Distracted
by
DSK & Hacking, IMF Ignores Sudan & Afghan Banks
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
June 23 -- With the International
Monetary Fund refusing to
answer or even acknowledge questions about its consideration of
programs from Afghanistan through Belarus
to South Sudan, set for
independence on July 9, it seems the arrest and resignation of
Dominique Strauss Kahn, the two candidate race to replace him and a
recent hacking scandal have distracted the IMF.
When
the IMF on
Thursday morning held its first press briefing in two weeks, the
questions largely related to the race between Christine Lagarde of
France and Agustin Carstens of Mexico to replace DSK. Two questions,
one online and the other in-person, concerned the IMF getting hacked.
Deputy spokesman David Hawley said that “files were copied,” but
deferred other answers.
Inner
City Press
submitted as it has in the past four questions by the IMF's online
briefing center. In the past at least some questions have been
answered, about Sudan and less frequently Sri Lanka.
But
in his post-DSK
era, these June 23 questions were entirely ignored:
With
South
Sudan set to declare independence on July 9, what is the status
of the IMF's consideration of South Sudan, including in light of
Sudanese president Omar al Bashir's threat to cut off the pipelines
that takes South Sudan's oil to market?
Afghan
authorities
have complained about negotiations with IMF. On
Afghanistan, can you state the status of and explain IMF's
requirement that shareholders not have any management role in Afghan
banks, given that this is allowed in the US, for example?
In
terms
of the IMF's research budget, some have questioned whether the
IMF at times censors the conclusions of research. Is that true, and
if so how does the IMF respond to the criticism?
In
Belarus,
will the new arrests of protesters in the last days have any
impact on the IMF's consideration of Belarus' request for an IMF
program?
Nor
in the half
hour between Hawley saying “there are no more questions” -- which
wasn't true -- and the expiration of the embargo were any of the four
questions answered. Previously the IMF has been asked about gift
filings by its top officials, and hasn't answered. Oh, transparency.
* * *
Amid
Lagarde
&
DSK Scandals, IMF Won't Answer on Belarus or Jamaica
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
June
9 -- Without a managing director, without transparency
and seemingly without regard to human rights, the International
Monetary Fund is negotiating with Belarus about a loan larger than
the $3 billion the Russians lent, conditioned on privatization to
Russian firms.
During
the
IMF's
bi-weekly briefing on June 9, Inner City Press submitted this
question:
“On
Belarus, what is the IMF's thinking after Russia cut electrical
supply this week, after crackdown on online protests and long
sentences to political opponents, and what does the IMF say that to
require privatization would be serving Russian buyers of Belarus
assets?”
IMF
spokesperson
Caroline Atkinson, facing in-person questions about Dominique Strauss
Kahn, took three online questions -- about Pakistan, Argentina and
Latvia -- but not this Inner City Press question about Belarus (nor
another one, about Jamaica).
After
not
acknowledging
the timely submitted questions during the briefing,
afterward Inner City Press received this email from the IMF about
Belarus:
Subject:
Your
question
on Belarus
From: [ ] @imf.org
Date: Thu, Jun 9,
2011 at 10:43 AM
To: Matthew.Lee [at] innercitypress.com
Matthew,
With
regard
to your question today on Belarus. As you probably know,
a previously scheduled IMF mission is currently in Minsk (the dates
are June 1-13) to conduct post-program monitoring. The standing
policy has been that we don’t comment on specific country matters
while missions are in the field and discussions are in progress. We
will update the press on the mission’s outcome when it concludes.
The
purpose
of
this mission is to discuss policies that would restore
economic stability and put the economy on the path of strong and
sustainable growth. The mission will use the opportunity to exchange
views with the authorities on possible next steps in response to
their request for the Fund-supported program.
Regards,
[
]
IMF Press Office
It's
been
reported
that IMF Head of the mission Chris Jarvis has met Deputy
Prime Minister Sergey Rumas. Inner City Press replied with a request
to be informed of any IMF press conference call about any
announcement with Belarus, but the IMF press person who had replied
was listed as out of the office.
DSK and Ms. Atkinson: "bad stuff found" not shown
On
Jamaica, the
IMF asked for more specifics, to which Inner City Press replied:
Jamaican
Finance
Secretary
Wesley Hughes met with the IMF, now returns to
Jamaica for talks with trade unions, in connection with which
Minister of State in the Ministry of Finance and the Public Service,
Senator Arthur Williams, has spoken of the “Government’s
inability to pay the $20 billion owed this year, and has proposed an
extended payment period, to protect the gains made in the economy and
to preserve its agreement with the IMF.”
So
1)
does
the IMF dispute that the Jamaican gov't can't pay, must
extend the payment period “to preserve its agreement with the IMF”?
Separately,
2)
what
did the IMF tell Finance Secretary Hughes about this?
After
not
taking
this question during the briefing, then asking two rounds of counter
questions about it, the IMF finally replied:
Subject:
RE:
FW:
Question Received (6/9/2011 10:10:02 AM)
From: [ ]
@imf.org
Date: Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 1:14 PM
To: matthew.lee [at]
innercitypress.com
Matthew,
We
are
not going to make any comment on ongoing negotiations between
the administration and the unions. I would refer your questions to
the Jamaican authorities.
The
government’s
commitments
related to the program are outlined in the
documents of the second and third reviews of the stand-by
arrangement, which you can consult online in the Jamaica page [of the
IMF].
So,
after not
acknowledging the timely submitted questions during the briefing, and
even asking questions about the questions, the IMF declined to answer
either of them. Some transparency. The IMF did not even respond to repeatedly
emailed questions about its policies on gifts. To be
continued.
* * *
IMF
Claims
Didn't
“Find
Bad Stuff” on Ethics, No Answers
on LP, Severance
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
May
26
-- With Dominique Strauss Kahn now under townhouse
arrest in Tribeca in New York, the International
Monetary Fund on
Thursday held its first open and online press briefing since DSK's
arrest for sexual assault.
IMF
spokesperson
Caroline Atkinson began blithely about DSK's interim replacement John
Lipsky's travel.
When she
opened up for questions -- with only three
exceptions on Greece and Portugal, only from those in the briefing
room in Washington -- she was asked directly, did you check the IMF's
files before saying you were “not aware” of other complaints
against DSK?
“I am not a
lawyer,” Ms. Atkinson said, adding that it would somehow be
inappropriate for the IMF to make disclosure of previous formal
complaints against Strauss Kahn, since he is now on trial.
Likewise,
she
declined
to
answer a question about the ability to withhold the
reported $250,000 severance payment to Strauss Kahn.
The
IMF
spokesperson was reduced to saying that the (American) ethics adviser
at the Fund hadn't “found any bad stuff.”
In
the past week,
Inner City Press has submitted factual questions to the IMF that the
IMF has not answered, such as on May 20:
--In
today's
UN
noon
press briefing I was told to “ask the IMF” about
Dominique Strauss Kahn's UN Laissez Passer. If holding the LP is
based on being an IMF official or staffer, given Mr. Strauss Kahn's
resignation, why hasn't the LP been retrieved? What policies does the
IMF have for the LPs of persons who resign or are terminated?
--what
policies
does
the
IMF have regarding the pensions and end-of-service
payments to individuals charged with, or convicted of, felonies
including those involving moral turpitude, such as sexual assault?
Has Mr. Strauss Kahn receive any payment since his resignation, or
does his resignation trigger one?
--
on
my
outstanding
question about disclosures to the IMF under the
IMF's cited policy on gifts, I have asked about Mr. Strauss Kahn and
Mr. Lipksy but am now expanding the request to cover the ten top IMF
officials.
Other
reporters
in
the
room on Thursday complained about not having their questions
answered, and about Executive Board members saying they'd been told
to refer all question, regardless of topic, back to the IMF Media
Department (which does not answer).
Inner
City
Press
iterated
the above questions, and a pressing one on Sudan, during the
IMF's briefing on Thursday. But it seems the IMF is trying to hide
from straight forward questions.
Update:
after
publication
of
the above, an answer was received on Sudan,
nothing on the DSK questions:
Matthew:
For
your
question
on Sudan, you can attribute this to an IMF
spokesperson. We deplore the violence and hope for a speedy end to
the fighting. As you know, South Sudan has applied for membership,
and that process is ongoing. A mission is on the ground now in Juba
to discuss the membership process with the authorities.
* * *
IMF
Promotes
Bank
Mergers,
Says
Bigger
is
Better,
Politics
&
Portugal Dodged
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
WASHINGTON
DC,
April
15
--
The
International
Monetary
Fund is unabashedly
promoting the takeover of small banks by large ones, claiming that
its own work in “Emerging Europe” since the financial meltdown
shows that communities are better served by large banks, even if
based far away or in other countries.
IMF
European
Department Director Antonio Borges told reporters on Friday that
Belgium was smart to have pushed Fortis to being acquired by BNP
Paribas. He urged more such mergers.
Inner
City
Press
asked
Borges
if
the
IMF
proposed
any safeguards at all, given that
concerns exist that when a local bank is acquired by one based far
away, there will be less reinvestment and accountability.
Borges,
while
calling
this
an
“interesting
question,”
bragged
that
the IMF
organized a coordinated effort to get large banks to treat
communities, particularly in Emerging Europe, fairly, and that this
had worked. See IMF
transcript, below.
Borges, invisible hand and safeguards on mergers not shown
Inner
City
Press
began
to
ask
about
attempts
to
encourage or require reinvestment, for
example in the UK -- but moderator Simonetta Nardin said there was no
time for follow up questions.
Meanwhile,
Borges
took
but
refused
to
answer
two
questions
about Portugal, citing an
IMF policy against officials working on their own countries, and also
claiming that the IMF does not get involved in politics. What --
encouraging bank mergers is not political? Watch this site.
From the IMF's
transcript:
Inner
City
Press:
you
seem
to
be
saying
that bank mergers—small banks
being bought by big ones sort of unqualifiedly may be a good thing.
In some countries people think that local banks are more accountable,
that if you move the assets to a faraway headquarters that there's
less responsive. What do you say to that critique and is that
something that the IMF takes any account of?
MR.
BORGES:
you
ask
a
very
interesting
question,
because this is a
problem we were faced with over the last few years. In many of the
countries of emerging Europe, you find banks that actually are owned
by other banks elsewhere and there were concerns that, as there might
be problems in the domestic countries of those banks that assets
would be pulled out from emerging Europe and they might suffer. And
the Fund, the IMF, invested quite a bit of effort to organize a
coordinated effort on the part of all these banks to behave in the
best possible interests of those economies, and I must say this was
quite successful, because as a result, these countries are now
recovering very well and their banks are operating well. So, if
anything, the experience of emerging Europe demonstrates that having
large, solid banks operate in your country may be an important source
of stability if things are properly managed.
Click
for Mar 1, '11
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption
Click
here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate
on
Sri
Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A,
UN,
NY
10017
USA
Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner
City
Press
are
listed
here,
and
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner
City
Press,
Inc.
To
request
reprint
or
other
permission,
e-contact
Editorial
[at]
innercitypress.com
-
|