On
Ukraine,
IMF Announces
Deal As Gas
Prices Rise
50%, Press Qs
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March 27 -- It
was 4:25 am in
New York and
Washington
when the International
Monetary Fund
announced its
preliminary
agreement for
a $14 - $18
billion loan
program with
Ukraine.
Twelve hours
before, Inner
City Press
asked a number
of IMF
spokespeople
to confirm or
comment on
reports that
the Ukrainian
"increase the
price of
natural gas
for household
consumers by
an average of
50%" is
attributable
to the IMF.
Receipt
of the
question was
acknowledged;
perhaps it
will be
answered at
the IMF's 9:30
am briefing,
embargoed
until 10:30 am
(when the UN
General
Assembly will
be considering
a resolution
on Ukraine).
Later on March
27 the US
Congress is
expected to
act on a $1
billion loan
guarantee to
Ukraine, but
not on the IMF
changes the
Obama
administration
requested.
Obama Press
Secretary Jay
Carney issued
a statement
welcoming the
IMF
preliminary
deal,
concluding
that "We also
remain
committed to
providing the
IMF with the
resources it
needs – in
partnership
with Congress
– to provide
strong support
to countries
like Ukraine
as well as
reinforcing
the Fund’s
governance to
reflect the
global
economy."
Rice
genially said
several times
that the
question
couldn't or
wouldn't be
answered while
the IMF
mission is “in
the field” in
Ukraine. He
initially gave
the same
answer to
Inner City
Press'
question that
had nothing to
do with
Ukraine: is it
true, as
Russia
reportedly
argued at the
most recent
G-20 meeting,
that quota
reform could
be
accomplished
without US
approval,
under some set
of rule
changes?
Rice
during the
briefing
repeated this
could not be
answered while
the mission is
in Ukraine.
Later it was
conveyed that
the reform is
not possible
without US
approval. The
answer is
appreciated: a
benefit of
asking in
person. But
Inner City
Press (and the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access)
hope to make
the online
asking of
questions work
better from
now on.
We'll see.
In
another
non-Ukraine
question,
Inner City
Press asked
Rice about a
book published
earlier this
week in
Hungary,
that the
then-economy
minister in
2011 told
Goldman Sachs
that the
government
would be going
to the IMF for
a program.
Since much
currency
trading
ensued, Inner
City Press
asked if the
IMF has any
rules limiting
its government
interlocutors
from trading
on or sharing
insider
information.Video
here, from
Minute 31:12.
Rice
said there are
confidential
provisions.
But are those
only for the
contents of
communication
and not the
existence of
communications
or
negotiations?
We'll see.