As
Syria
Claims
Military
Operations Are
Over, UK
Shifts Read
Out of UN's
Assad Call,
Won't Dictate
to Ban on
Microphone
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 18 --
After the UN
Security
Council's
session on
Syria, UK
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
Philip Parham
confirmed that
a draft
resolution is
in the works,
as Inner City
Press reported
half way
through the
meeting.
Parham would
not say if a
referral to
the
International
Criminal Court
would be
included.
French
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
Briens called
it a "resolution
de sanctions,"
not mentioning
the ICC. The
German and
Portuguese
DRPs, both
speaking in
English, added
their two
centimes
d'Euros. Then,
unlike after
the last
Council
session on
Syria, the US
joined in with
the EU4, as
DPR Rosemary
DiCarlo cited
the statements
of President
Obama and
Hillary
Clinton.
Inner
City Press
asked the
group what
they thought
of Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
telephone call
with Bashar al
Assad, which
recited that
"President
Assad said
that the
military and
police
operations had
stopped," and
if Ban should
name an envoy.
Parham
said he
wouldn't
"dictate
to [Ban] from
the
microphone"
-- and
so, a secret demarche
meeting? --
that Ban's
political
chief Lynn
Pascoe, in
closed
consultation,
had said "President
Assad
implied that
these things
had stopped.
But, in answer
to your second
question, no
we don’t think
they have
stopped."
Minutes
later, Inner
City Press
asked Syrian
Permanent
Representative
Bashar
Ja'afari about
the call, and
the quote. He
said, "it's a
fact of the
ground," the
operations
have ceased.
The TV at the
stakeout was
not on, but a
perusal of
BBC, CNN and
Al Jazeera
would show
different.
Ja'afari
answered a
question in
Arabic and
referred,
seemingly in
scorn, to
YouTube.
DiCarlo and
Hardeep Singh
Puri on August
10
Inner
City Press
also asked
Ja'afari if
the UN
humanitarian
mission which
OCHA chief
Valerie Amos
said would be
there "this
weekend" could
go all over
the country.
Ja'afari said
they will be
in Damascus on
Saturday, but
did not answer
on access.
Ja'afari
claimed that
High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights Navi
Pillay had not
recommended
ICC referral,
only said to
the Council,
you "may" do
it. Pillay
spoke at the
stakeout, but
took only two
questions,
walking away
as the Press
asked, Can you
describe where
you got this
information?
Footnote:
Pillay
said nothing
about her
Southern
Kordofan
report, which
airbrushed out
inaction by
Egyptian UN
peacekeepers.
Will she
answer the
question
around
Friday's
Council
session on
Sudan and
Libya? We'll
see.
UK's
transcript
of DPR Parham
at stakeout,
August 18,
2011:
Inner
City
Press: "Ban
Ki-moon last
night issued a
readout of a
call
he had with
Bashar al
Assad? One of
the quotes was
that President
Assad said
that the
military
operations had
stopped. And
what the
SG’s role in
all this,
should he
appoint an
envoy as he
did on
Libya? What do
you think of
the readout of
that call, and
should he
now take a
different
approach after
today’s
meeting and
report?"
DPR
Parham:
“Well on your
first point,
the briefing
that we had
from
Lynn Pascoe
just now on
the phone call
was that the
Secretary
General
had expressed
alarm at the
widespread
human rights
violations and
the
use of force,
and made clear
that the
military
operations and
mass
arrests should
cease, and
that in
response to
that,
President
Assad
implied that
these things
had stopped.
But, in answer
to your second
question, no
we don’t think
they have
stopped. All
the evidence
is
to the
contrary and
that’s what we
heard in the
briefing just
now. So what
should the
Secretary-General
be doing? I
wouldn’t want
to
dictate to him
from the
microphone at
all. But he is
clearly saying
the right
things to
President
Assad and
delivering
those strong
messages which
we hope that
Assad will
hear. And we
can consider,
and he can
consider in
due course,
whether a
Special Envoy
would be a
good
additional
tool in that
process.”
From
transcript
of White House
call on Syria,
August 18,
2011:
Inner
City
Press: You
said that the
U.S. had led
in the
Security
Council. I'm
in front of it
right now, and
at least to
the eye, it
was mostly the
European floor
members that
sort of took
the lead. Is
that going to
change? And
also, what do
you make of
criticism that
sanctioning
the Syrian
cell phone
company might
actually make
it harder for
protestors to
communicate
and spread
information
about abuses
there?
SENIOR
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICIAL: I'll
take the first
one, and then
turn to my
colleague. In
terms of the
Security
Council, we
led along with
our European
allies. I
think those of
you who have
followed that
know that the
United States
and our
European
allies
supported a
strong
resolution
against the
Syrian regime.
We were able
to bring the
council to a
unified
presidential
statement of
condemnation
against Syria
-- which, by
the way, sent
a very strong
message that
Syria couldn't
necessarily
look to some
of its -- some
of those who
had protected
it in the
council in the
past, but
rather those
members of the
council joined
us in
condemnation.
So
I
think that was
an instance of
the United
States working
with our
European
allies through
the council to
get a strong
outcome. And
we'll continue
to pursue
avenues
through the
U.N. and other
places to
amplify the
condemnation
of the Syrian
regime.
I
think it also
speaks,
frankly --
that message
of
condemnation
from the
Security
Council -- to
the shrinking
support for
Syria in the
international
community.
Frankly,
they've
principally
been able to
look only to
Iran as a
patron and
supporter of
their
crackdown
efforts within
in their own
country. And
the choices of
support that
they seek in
the
international
community are
closing off.
But I'll turn
to my
colleague to
talk about the
sanction
question.
SENIOR
ADMINISTRATION
OFFICIAL: With
respect to the
sanctions
applied to
Syriatel, that
is a company
that is
controlled by
Rami Makhluf,
who is
probably the
most
significant
corrupt crony
and supporter
of the regime,
who has used
his preferred
position with
the Syrian
government and
the Syrian
economy to
siphon off
enormous
wealth from
the Syrian
people. The
sanctions on
Syriatel,
because
they're
controlled by
Makhluf, we do
not think will
result in the
loss of
communication
ability among
the people of
Syria.
We
will
also be taking
steps in the
next few days
to issue a
general
license
pertaining to
communication
services in
Syria that
will also
serve to
facilitate
communication
among the
Syrian people.
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here
for a Reuters
AlertNet
piece by this correspondent about Uganda's
Lord's Resistance Army. Click here
for an earlier Reuters
AlertNet piece about the Somali
National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's
$200,000 contribution from an undefined trust
fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017 USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2001 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -