At
UN
on Syria, Some
Europeans
Disagree on
ICC, on Ban's
Assad Readout
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 19 --
The day after
the US and
four European
nations
announced
they'll put
forward a
resolution on
Syria, the
question
persisted of
whether a
referral to
the
International
Criminal Court
will be
included.
France has
said the ICC
referral
should be
made.
When
Inner City
Press asked
Germany's
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
Miguel Berger
about the
resolution, he
said the four
European and
the US are
already at
work.
Inner
City Press
asked if an
ICC referral
would be
included in
the draft.
Berger said
that is being
discussed,
along
with eying the
upcoming Human
Rights Council
session on
August 22.
Berger
added that
given events
on the ground,
it would be
"very
difficult for
Russia" to
oppose a
resolution on
Syria.
Inner
City Press
asked a
representative
of India,
which holds
the presidency
of the
Council for
August, about
a possible ICC
referral. The
response was
negative,
including
because "there
is no escape
clause" -
because even
Article 16
deferral has
yet to be
used.
A European
representative,
from a country
not currently
on the
Security
Council,
also expressed
to Inner City
Press
skepticism
about an ICC
referral.
But
the problems
may run
deeper. A
representative
of a
veto-wielding
Council member
said that even
a sanctions
resolution
would be
problematic.
"We
just passed
the PRST," the
representative
said,
referring to
the
Presidential
Statement
adopted August
3. "The
Council can't
just keep
making
demands."
EU4 on Syria,
plus DiCarlo
of US, ICC in
reso not shown
The
Secretary
General thinks
it should be
investigated,
Haq said for
the second
time. Does he
not have a
television?
Inner
City Press
asked if what
Ban's
Department of
Political
Affairs (DPA)
chief Lynn
Pascoe told
the Council --
that Assad
"implied"
operations
were over --
was different
from Ban's
read out. Haq
said that
Pascoe
and DPA were
responsible
for the read
out.
Other
Ban
Administration
sources say
they disagreed
with the
inclusion in
Ban's
read out of
what Assad
said. But they
were
apparently
overruled.
Watch this
site.
* * *
As
Syria
Claims
Military
Operations Are
Over, UK
Shifts Read
Out of UN's
Assad Call,
Won't Dictate
to Ban on
Microphone
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 18 --
After the UN
Security
Council's
session on
Syria, UK
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
Philip Parham
confirmed that
a draft
resolution is
in the works,
as Inner City
Press reported
half way
through the
meeting.
Parham would
not say if a
referral to
the
International
Criminal Court
would be
included.
French
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
Briens called
it a "resolution
de sanctions,"
not mentioning
the ICC. The
German and
Portuguese
DRPs, both
speaking in
English, added
their two
centimes
d'Euros. Then,
unlike after
the last
Council
session on
Syria, the US
joined in with
the EU4, as
DPR Rosemary
DiCarlo cited
the statements
of President
Obama and
Hillary
Clinton.
Inner
City Press
asked the
group what
they thought
of Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
telephone call
with Bashar al
Assad, which
recited that
"President
Assad said
that the
military and
police
operations had
stopped," and
if Ban should
name an envoy.
Parham
said he
wouldn't
"dictate
to [Ban] from
the
microphone"
-- and
so, a secret demarche
meeting? --
that Ban's
political
chief Lynn
Pascoe, in
closed
consultation,
had said "President
Assad
implied that
these things
had stopped.
But, in answer
to your second
question, no
we don’t think
they have
stopped."
Minutes
later, Inner
City Press
asked Syrian
Permanent
Representative
Bashar
Ja'afari about
the call, and
the quote. He
said, "it's a
fact of the
ground," the
operations
have ceased.
The TV at the
stakeout was
not on, but a
perusal of
BBC, CNN and
Al Jazeera
would show
different.
Ja'afari
answered a
question in
Arabic and
referred,
seemingly in
scorn, to
YouTube.
DiCarlo and
Hardeep Singh
Puri on August
10
Inner
City Press
also asked
Ja'afari if
the UN
humanitarian
mission which
OCHA chief
Valerie Amos
said would be
there "this
weekend" could
go all over
the country.
Ja'afari said
they will be
in Damascus on
Saturday, but
did not answer
on access.
Ja'afari
claimed that
High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights Navi
Pillay had not
recommended
ICC referral,
only said to
the Council,
you "may" do
it. Pillay
spoke at the
stakeout, but
took only two
questions,
walking away
as the Press
asked, Can you
describe where
you got this
information?
Footnote:
Pillay
said nothing
about her
Southern
Kordofan
report, which
airbrushed out
inaction by
Egyptian UN
peacekeepers.
Will she
answer the
question
around
Friday's
Council
session on
Sudan and
Libya? We'll
see.
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here
for a Reuters
AlertNet
piece by this correspondent about Uganda's
Lord's Resistance Army. Click here
for an earlier Reuters
AlertNet piece about the Somali
National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's
$200,000 contribution from an undefined trust
fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017 USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2001 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -