On
India US Congratulates Modi
While UN Guterres Censors Press
and Refuses South Asia Questions
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR Letter
PFT Q&A
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, May 24 – The US
Secretary of State of Mike
Pompeo through spokesperson
Morgan Ortagus has today said,
"The United States offers its
congratulations to Narendra
Modi and his National
Democratic Alliance on their
decisive victory in India’s
national elections.
India’s elections are the
largest exercise in democracy
in human history and serve as
an inspiration to democracies
and individuals around the
world. We applaud the
Indian people for turning out
to vote in historic numbers
and the Government of India
for their exceptional
execution of this massive
undertaking. The United
States and India enjoy a
strong strategic partnership
that stands on a foundation of
shared values, extensive
people-to-people ties, and a
commitment to a secure and
prosperous Indo-Pacific
region. We look forward
to working with the newly
elected government on a range
of important issues, including
expanding economic and energy
ties, enhancing defense and
security cooperation,
countering the threat of
terrorism, and enhanced
collaboration in space.
We are confident that the
strong and upward trajectory
of our partnership will
continue."
Inner City Press
has India, Pakistan and other
South Asia questions for the
UN regime of Antonio Guterres
- but under his new
ghoulish system of
roughing up and banning the
Press, now 324 days, and
refusing to answer its written
questions,
the stonewalling face of the
UN is that of UN spokesman
Stephane Dujarric and
Pakistan's Daily Dawn's Masood
Haider, classic video here.
We'll have more on this. After
having covered
the UN since
2005 for Inner
City Press,
and pursued
stories of UN
under-performance
from Sri Lanka
to Darfur and
Haiti to Yemen
and Cameroon,
at 4 pm on
Friday 17
August 2018
I got a four
page letter
from Under
Secretary
General Alison
Smale,
formerly the
New York
Times' Berlin
bureau chief. We've put
the letter on
Scribd here,
Patreon
download here.
The
letter
informed me,
without a
single
opportunity to
be heard and
offer
rebuttal, that
“your
accreditation
is hereby
withdrawn
pursuant to
the
Guidelines.”
It cited what it
called three
previous
warnings. But
on further
inspection there is
no there,
there. And
Grand
Inquisitor Alison
Smale didn't
even
consider, or
acknowledge,
that Inner
City Press had
responded to
the
spurious
complaints --
from the
Morocco
mission to the
UN on 17 March
2017 and
from DPI Deputy
Maher Nasser,
who blocks
Inner City Press on Twitter,
on 20 October
2017.
Smale's
misuse of the
Morocco
complaint, if
not reversed,
would set a
precedent in that in
Guterres' UN
member states
which don't
like a particular
journalist can
file frivolous
complaints and
get the
journalist
banned. On 17
March
2017, after
engaging in
entirely legal live streaming
from the UN
Security
Council
stakeout,
Inner City
Press received
this: "From:
Marija D.
Rokuiziene
Date: Wed, Mar
22, 2017 at
12:59 PM
Subject: Re:
Turkish Lounge
To: Matthew
Lee, Inner
City Press
Cc: Hua Jiang
<jiang1 [at] un.org>,
Hak-Fan Lau
<lau [at] un.org>,
Tal Mekel
<mekel [at]un.org>
Dear Matthew,
It was
recently
brought to our
attention by
one UN Mission
that recording
was taking
place in a
restricted
area of the
second floor,
at the Turkish
Lounge near
the Security
Council.
You were
mentioned by
name in this
regard, and we
take the
opportunity of
this sensitive
occurrence to
remind you
that the
Turkish Lounge
is not part of
the stake out
area and is
off limits to
media unless
invited by the
delegation,
and that
filming and/or
recording of
private
conversations
is not
permitted.
Regards,
Marija
D.Rokuiziene
Media
Accreditation
and Liaison
Unit
United Nations
- S-248"
The
complaint was
entirely
false, as Inner
City Press
immediately
pointed out,
in writing:
"From: Matthew
R. Lee
Date: Wed, Mar
22, 2017 at
1:29 PM
Subject: Re:
Turkish Lounge
- formal
response and
requests,
please confirm
receipt
To: "Marija D.
Rokuiziene"
Cc: "matthew.
lee", Hua
Jiang,
Hak-Fan Lau,
Tal Mekel
For your
information,
on Friday
March 17 I was
in the press
area of the
UNSC stakeout,
after the 3 pm
meeting. I
took a
photograph of
the Polisario
delegation,
with
Christopher
Ross, going up
to the 38th
floor.
There were
diplomats I
recognized to
be from the
Moroccan
Mission
sitting in the
so-called
Turkish
Lounge. I did
not record any
conversation
or take any
photo of them
(although in
the past,
Moroccan
Ambassador
Omar Hilale
has invited me
to photograph
him and his
associate
there).
After I took
and tweeted
photograph of
Polisario and
UN official
Ross going up,
a Moroccan
diplomat /
associate
walked the UN
Security
officer at the
turnstile my
pass no longer
works on; the
officer came
over and told
me, seemingly
apologetically,
that the
diplomat can
said I
shouldn't take
photographs.
I said I
was within my
rights to take
photographs
from the
stakeout, but
I nevertheless
- in light of
DPI's / MALU's
previous
punative acts
with no due
process, and
ongoing
restrictions
after more
than 1 year -
left the UNSC
stakout.
I consider
this complaint
by Morocco to
be an attempt
to limit
coverage of
the Western
Sahara issue.
Given DPI's /
MALU's
previous
actions, if
any of this is
put in my /
Inner City
Press' history
or file with
MALU this must
be included
to.
This is a
formal request
to see my /
Inner City
Press' file.
And this is,
again, a
request to be
returned to
Inner City
Press' long
time shared
office S-303A,
and a
statement for
the record
that Akhbhar
al Yom and its
correspondent,
assigned
without
tranparency
303-A after
DPI's no due
process
eviction of
Inner City
Press, do not
meet the
stated rules
of three days
a day, have
asked no
questions, and
should be in
the bullpen
and Inner City
Press' office
and resident
correspondent
status
restored.
Please confirm
receipt and
provided the
requested
information /
file as well
as the list of
those waiting
for office
space, the
prioritization
the UN has
assigned and
the reasons
therefor.
Thank you.
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Esq., Inner
City Press
Past (and
future) Office
at UN: Room
S-303, UN HQ,
NY NY
10017."
(The list was
never
provided;
Inner City Press'
office was
given to an
Egyptian state
media whose
essentially
retired
correspondent, a
president of
UNCA in 1984,
rarely
come in and
has not asked
a question of
the UN in
a decade.) This
came as
Morocco
Ambassador Omar
Hillale has
used the Security
Council UNTV
microphone
to
berate Inner
City Press and
me for asking
too many
questions
about this country,
its occupation
of Western Sahara
and
mistreatment
of the
people of the
Rif. To allow
a bad faith
complaint to
be used by
Guterres'
Smale - in bad
faith - to
then ban the
journalist for
life is a new
low. It calls
into question
which state(s)
Smale and Guterres
have taken or
encouraged
complaints
from.
Cameroon?
France? Smale's
bad faith
letter ruling
must be
reversed.
The
latter is equally
bad in its way,
since a DPI
official
mis-using his
position as Nasser
did was the
subject of
Inner City Press
timely
request to
Smale that she
recuse herself
(which she
refused to do - she has
functioned,
after all, as
Antonio
Guterres
Global Censor).
After
receiving via DPI's Tal Mekel at
6 pm on Friday
20 October
2017 a letter
clearly
drafted by Nasser,
Inner City
Press immediately
published a story
about it. The
Free UN Coalition for
Access, an
actual press
freedom advocacy group which
DPI's Hua
Jiang had
threatened my
accreditation for
posting a sign
for on my then
office door,
put out a
press release
and flier. And
on Monday 23
March 17
before 11 am I
sent the
following to
DPI including
Smale (who has
never
responded to
one of my more
than a dozen
e-mails, while
openly
laughing and
socializing
with corporate
correspondents
who are her friends)
and to
Guterres and
his deputy
Amina J. Mohammed:
"From: Matthew
R. Lee
Date: Mon, Oct
23, 2017 at
10:18 AM
Subject:
Response to UN
to threat to
accreditation
of Inner City
Press, which
is
retaliatory,
vague and
contrary to
freedom of the
press
To: Tal Mekel
, SGCentral ,
amina.mohammed [at]
un.org,
alison.smale [at]
un.org
Cc: nasser [at] un.org,
funca, The Free UN
Coalition for
Access
Dear Mr.
Mekel, and
those UN
officials
copied below
(SG Guterres,
DSG Mohammed,
USG Smale,
etc) --
The UN threat
letter sent to
me after 5 pm
on Friday,
attached,
coming as it
does as Inner
City Press
pursues
stories not
only of UN
corruption
but, most
pressingly,
inaction amid
mass killings
in Cameroon
and elsewhere
is troubling.
It has the
obvious effect
of
discouraging
reporting. For
example, while
it flatly
states that I
“breached” a
rule during a
photo op on
the 38th
floor, it does
not say how,
or even what
day or which
photo op.
The effect is
to discourage
me from
covering any
of these photo
ops / meetings
on the 38th
floor, since I
have no way of
knowing when I
will be
charged with a
violation
under which
you “may”
review my
accreditation.
This vagueness
is contrary
to, for
example, the
US First
Amendment, but
also numerous
UN-claimed
principles of
freedom of the
press and due
process.
As to Mr
Nasser's
misuse of the
DPI / MALU
threat process
to try to win
an argument he
escalated on
Twitter on
October 19,
saying I
should be less
negative about
the UN when I
noted how many
clicks it
takes to find
sexual abuse
and
exploitation
information on
the new DPKO
site he
promoted -
before he
blocked me on
October 20 --
great outreach
there, now
communications
are broken off
-- the audio
linked to in
the article is
from the
stakeout area
by the
Secretariat
lobby
elevators. It
did not
violate even
this rule that
the DPI and
DSS
mis-negotiated,
not with the
press corps
but a subset
of the UN
Correspondents
Association,
whose members
by the way do
not obtain or
even seek
prior consent
for recording,
and membership
in which is
not and cannot
be required to
be a resident
correspondent.
But to Inner
City Press,
the UN writes
in fine
Kafka-esque
style: “we
would like to
remind you
that filming
and recording
on the 38th
floor are
limited to
official photo
opportunities,
and recording
conversations
of others in
the room is
not permitted.
It has been
brought to our
attention that
you breached
that rule
recently.
Please kindly
take note that
any further
violation of
the guidelines
and
established
journalistic
standards
could lead to
a review of
your
accreditation
status.” When
was the
breach? If a
UN official
says or does
something
embarrassing
during a photo
op, can the UN
review Inner
City Press'
accreditation?
Your letter
unless and
until
retracted
means that
publications
which even
link to audio
that one
participant in
which is
embarrassed of
can have their
accreditations
reviewed: for
example, if a
UN official
participating
in a meeting
on the 38th
floor recorded
it and, being
disgusted by
the UN's
actions or
inaction
leaked it to
the press, the
press could be
reviewed for
publishing
their audio
recorded
“without
consent.”
This is,
again,
obviously
contrary to,
for example,
the US First
Amendment, but
also numerous
UN-claimed
principles of
freedom of the
press and due
process.
The
outstanding
request, to
MALU, USG
Smale, SG
Guterres and
DSG Mohammed,
that Inner
City Press
resident
corresponent
access and
work space
S-303 which
was wrongful
taken without
hearing or
appeal 20
months ago as
I pursued the
Ng Lap Seng UN
bribery
scandal which
resulted this
summer in six
guilty
verdicts, is
below and
incorporated
herein by
reference and
I insist on a
response to my
two letters to
then-new USG
Smale in
September. I
was told there
is an
awareness of
the need to
show Inner
City Press the
“courtesy” of
a response,
but there has
still been
none, until
the October 20
accreditation
threat was the
response.
The UN should
care about,
and not seek
to hinder,
reporting on
for example
the killings
in Cameroon
and even UN
corruption.
Threats of
censorship are
not the way to
accomplish
this. Inner
City Press
should be
restored to
its resident
correspondent
accreditation
and shared
workspace
S-303, both of
which were
taken 20
months ago in
retaliation
for covering
UN corruption
in connection
with Ng Lap
Seng and, if
there is some
problem in
your view with
reporting and
broadcasting
what UN
officials say,
rules should
be proposed
that do not so
blatantly
violate the
very
principles of
freedom of the
press that the
UN preaches to
others. Inner
City Press is
more than
willing to
work in this
regard."
So where is
that, in Smale's hit
job lifetime
ban letter? To
simply recite
complaints,
by your own
deputy, while
ignored the
detailed
responses that
were filed at the
time shows bad
faith. Smale's
letter
must be
reversed - and
more. Watch
this site.
Inner
City Press had
informed
Smale, and
Secretary
General
Antonio
Guterres who
is ultimately
responsible
for this, that
Smale must
recuse
herself.
As
part of its
coverage of
the UN in the
past year I
have heard
from
whistleblowers
in Smale's
Department of
Public
Information
that she
diverted funds
intended for Swahili
programming to
her avowed
focused,
getting better
coverage for
Guterres
particularly
on social
media.
But
Smale did not
recuse
herself, and
Guterres who
refused my
polite question
to him on July
20 why this
censorship was
taking place
and why he had
been so silent
as Cameroon
killed
Anglophones in
the North-West
and South-West
regions of the
country, did
not make her
recuse. Nor
did he recuse
himself,
despite my
timely request
that the
President of
the General
Assembly, and
not the
obviously
conflicted
Guterres and
Smale, take
charge of any
review deemed
necessary.
What
is most
troubling
about the UN's
August 17
dis-accreditation
letter is how
vague it is,
and inaccurate
the few times
it gets
specific.
The UN
claims that on
3 July 2018 I
“attempted to
gain
unauthorized
access to a
locked area of
the UN.” But
as I reported
at the the
time, and my
Periscope video subsequently used by Fox
News and
The UK
Independent
shows, I was
in the UN's
much traveled
Vienna Cafe.
(Guterres'
Assistant
Secretary General
Christian Saunders,
whose involvement in a
UN procurement
scandal I
previously reported,
was also
there: he
oversaw the
assault and
the next day
told me he
doesn't like
my articles.)
On July 3
I was staking
out -- that
is, standing
outside of -
the UN Budget
Committee
meetings. In
fact, I had
been informed
of the
meetings by UN
personnel and
diplomats had
invited me
down in order
to tell me, as
a reported,
what was going
on.
Ironically
it
was with
Cameroon's
Ambassador
Tommo Monthe
that I had
just spoken
when UN
Lieutenant
Ronald E.
Dobbins and
another
officer who
had still been
identified by
the UN
approached me
from behind,
grabbed and
twisted my
arm, grabbed
and damaged my
laptop
computer and
tore my shirt.
I recoiled and
said, loudly,
“I am a
journalist,
covering a
meeting!” To
Smale, this is
incivility,
enough to be
permanently
banned from
the UN for.
Next,
at the top of
page 3 of the
letter, Smale
runs through a
litany of
supposed
violations
without
providing any
details, nor
acknowledging
that other
correspondents
more friendly
to Guterres
and her are
allowed to do
these things
routinely.
Smale
pillories my
“presence on
UN premises
outside
authorized
time periods
as stipulated
in the
Guidelines.”
But
those
Guidelines,
even as
selectively
quoted by
Smale at the
top of page 2
of her letter,
make clear
that I was
permitted past
7 pm to cover
an advised
meeting - such
as the July 3
UN Budget
Committee
meeting
considering a
$6.7 billion
expenditure of
public funds
or the June 22
event in the
UN General
Assembly lobby
featuring a
speech in
which Guterres
bragged about
fasting in
Mali.
On
June 22, not
mentioned in
Smale's August
17 letter but
alleged as a
“repeat
violation” by
Guterres'
deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq in
a July 5
article, the
same
Lieutenant
Dobbins and
four Emergency
Response Unit
officers he
summoned and
then told not
to give their
names, pushed
me out of the
UN even as
other non
resident
correspondents
were allowed
to remain in.
There is video, here.
Days
before that
first roughing
up of Inner
City Press by
UN Security
but clearly
green-lighted
from higher
up, Guterres'
lead spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric told
a person who
tried to speak
with him on my
behalf to get
the UN to stop
requiring me
to have a
minder or
escort as they
have since
February 2016
that things
would be
getting worse
for me. It seems
clear
Dujarric knew
about or had
already
ordered the
physical
targeting of
Inner City
Press any time
after 7 pm,
even if an
advised
meeting or
Guterres
speech was
taking place.
But a
telling
omission in
Smale's letter
is that as
recently as
June 26 dozens
of non
resident
correspondents
were allowed
to stay in the
UN past 7 pm
drinking with
Guterres on
the North
Lawn,
ghoulishly in
the name of
press freedom
with Smale.
The event was
not advised in
the UN Media
Alert, and I
know that UN
Security could
not have been
given a list
of approved
non resident
correspondents
since my
timely RSVP to
cover the
event which
had yet
another canned
Guterres
speech was
never
answered. I
was told by
the organizer
of that
pro-Guterres
event that the
RSVP was
ignored
because it was
open to all
correspondents.
Again, there
is video in my
contemporaneous coverage. Maybe this
is why Smale
and Guterres
- and Dujarric -
say livestreaming
is a problem
to be solved
with Security
violence and
banning.
Since
as
Smale says
there are
thousands of
those, many of
whom write few
articles and
ask fewer
questions,
there is no
way UN
Security had a
list of non
resident
correspondent
to NOT beat up
after 7 pm.
They just
decided / were
told to start
roughing up
critical Inner
City Press,
sometime
between June
22 until the
July 3 assault
which I
reported on
July 4 to the
NYPD and was
told, while a
report was
taken, that
the UN asserts
immunity.
(That's the
problem.)
Next
Smale asserts
I have been in
locations not
authorized by
the Guidelines
- without
giving a
single
example. This
does not
comply with
due process,
to put it
mildly. One
wonder how it took
the UN 45
days to write this
(except for
the desire
to slow-walk
things to
try to prevent
Inner City
Press from
covering
the UN General
Assembly in September).
Even at
censorship,
today's UN is
incompetent,
particularly
given the
public money
it requests
and spends
(that $6.7
billion
again).
It is
the “live
broadcasts” --
reporting and
commentary
subject to
protection
under the
First
Amendment of
the US
Constitution
and UN
Universal
Declaration of
Human Rights
Article 19 -
that Smale
next takes
issue with.
She cites,
again without
any example,
profanities
and derogatory
assertions.
But
Guterres'
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric
repeatedly
used
profanity,
specifically
the F-word, in
the briefing
room including
telling me,
“Matthew
that's a
stupid f*cking
question.”
Even more
dispositively
a former
president of
the UN
Correspondents
Association,
Giampaoli
Pioli who had
ordered me to
remove from
the Internet
an article
about him
arranging a UN
screening for
the Sri Lanka
Ambassador of
a film denying
his country's
war crimes
after having
had the
Ambassador as
his paying
tenant in one
of his many
Manhattan
apartment -
the reason I
quit UNCA -
once called me
an “assh*le”
at the UN
Security
Council
stakeout,
during an
advised
meeting.
It
happened at
the Security
Council
stakeout so it
was recorded, audio here.
But DPI did
nothing about
this profanity
and
“derogatory
assertion” by
the president
of UNCA,
become their
UN Censorship
Alliance. So
there is no
rule, less
enough of one
to ban me for
life.
There
is another
vague
reference to
refusing to
obey UN
Security
officers,
impossible to
respond to and
troubling in
light of the
video of Lt
Dobbins and
his colleague
pulling me,
and tearing my
shirt. Is one
not allowed to
say, “I am a
journalist?”
What would
Smale do?
What Smale
does NOT do is
public
financial
disclosure. As
Inner City
Press first reported,
and asked
Dujarric to
explain
without
getting any
answer, Smale
is not listed
in Guterres'
online roster
of public
financial
disclosures,
unlike for
example
official
Natalia
Gherman, who
was awarded
her UN post
after Smale.
Not
that Guterres
has a good
record on
transparency.
As Inner City
Press has
asked him
without
response,
Guterres has
yet to even
order a UN
audit of the
China Energy
Fund Committee
/ Patrick Ho -
President of
the General
Assembly Sam
Kutesa UN
bribery case
that Inner
City Press, alone
from
(then?) among
the UN press
corps, has
been covering
at the Federal
courthouse in
lower
Manhattan,
including with
the Smale, Dujarric
and Guterres
reviled Periscope
livestream.
Guterres
did not act on
Inner City
Press' 25 June
2018
letter to
alleging nepotism
in the handing
of the
management of
the Security
Council's
website to the
photographer
husband of the
chief of staff
of the
Department of
Political
Affairs, nor
on Inner City
Press now
ironic request
that he
provide
protect to the
Press being
target. It was
Guterres, it
turns out, who
was and is
behind the
targeting.
Most
Orwellian,
halfway
through page 3
Smale attempts
to use
questions I
have had to
ask at the UN
Delegates
Entrance since
she and
Guterres
banned me from
the UN
Security
Council
stakeout from
July 3 on. At
that new
stakeout, I
have
interviewed
among others
outgoing Human
Rights
Commissioner
Prince Zeid
(whose abuse
of
whistleblowers
I have also
reported) and
Permanent
Representatives
such as those
from
Kazakhstan and
even Burundi.
So which
unnamed member
states is
Smale claiming
have
complained to
her and
Guterres:
Cameroon? The
United
Kingdom?
France?
Morocco?
In
fact, one of
the three
specific (now
in retrospect
devious)
warning letter
Smale cites
involved the
Moroccan
delegation
falsely
claiming I
could not take
photographs or
record and
live-stream at
the UN
Security
Council
stakeout. But
the Guidelines
permit that.
The
DPI staff who
passed along
the Morocco
complaint were
orally
apologetic but
that's now for
naught. The
Kafkaesque
file was being
built. The
last of the
complaints is
the most
self-serving:
Smale's own
deputy Maher
Nasser, in an
abuse
of position
that I
complained to
Smale in
writing about
prior to her
“ruling,”
directed to a
letter to me
claiming I
could not
record him in
an approved
stakeout area.
It's that he
was
embarrassed by
what he said,
and he since
then has
blocked me on
Twitter,
another
strange
practice for a
UN official
but once that
Dujarric
himself has
engaged in.
Smale
claimed in a
July 19
response to
the DC-based
whistleblower
protection
group
Government
Accountability
Project that
Dujarric and
the four other
spokespeople
his office
would be
answering my
e-mailed
question in
respect to
what she
called my
“journalistic
endeavour.”
This was repeated
today to BuzzFeed's
Hayes Brown,
here.
But they
answer less
than 20% of
the questions
- one a day,
the easiest of
the five I ask
- and I am
being banned
from covering
the UN
Security
Council, whose
mishandling of
Yemen
and Myanmar,
and
non-handling
or worse of Cameroon
I have a right
to cover and
Inner City
Press'
audience have
a right to
follow online
including in
live-streams.
Most
pressingly,
Guterres and
Smale want to
block me from
covering
member states
in the UN
General
Assembly high
level week in
late
September, the
deadline for
accreditation
for which is
September. A
conflicted
Secretariat
has no right
to ban a
well-read
media from
covering this
diplomatic
dance of
nations. This
corruption and
censorship
must be
reversed, and
acted on,
before
September 5.
The
final sin
cited by Smale
is that when
Inner City
Press was
unjustly
evicted from
its long time
shared office,
for having
asserted a
right to cover
events in the
UN Press
Briefing Room
unless some
official paper
said it was
closed - and
nevertheless
leaving as
soon as
requested by a
UN Security
officer - it
did not move
its years of
files out fast
enough. In
fact, I was
advised at
that time that
UN DPI's and
the Office of
the Secretary
General's
lawless
crusade
against Inner
City Press
might still be
turned around;
from February
19 until April
16, 2016 I did
not enter or
“occupy” the
office, even
when I could
have. It was
the UN which
ultimately dumped my files out onto First
Avenue then,
as Guterres
and Smale have
now dumped me,
with conflicts
of interest
and without
due process.
Can
this
pseudo-legal
permanent
censorship
order stand? I
will do
everything in
my power that
the answer is
no, and that I
can return to
covering the
UN the same as
pro-Guterres
state media
from countries
like Morocco
and the Gulf,
and corporate
media which
only want easy
quotes and no
critique. If
freedom of the
press means
anything, this
will not
stand.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|