At the UN, Russia Joins Opponents of Indigenous
Rights, Ban Ki-moon MIA
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN
UNITED NATIONS, July 18 -- Those opposing
a
declaration of indigenous people's rights
include Russia, it emerged Wednesday at the UN. The chairperson of the
Indigenous People's Caucus, Les Malezer, told reporters that at a meeting two
weeks ago about the
twice-stalled
rights declaration, Russia asked that the indigenous be removed from the room,
and then argued for changes to the draft.
Malezer also named Russia as
the one country that now says there should be no vote on the draft during the
current General Assembly session, ending September 17. Video
here.
While some in the African Group argue
that there are no indigenous people in their countries, in Russia there are, for
example, those in Chukotka, Yakutia and Chukchi. In 1992, the Russian government
called for the rapid development and passage of a law on "clan, obshchina
and family lands" for aboriginal groups (Ob uporyadochenii 1992). Eight
months later, the Sakha Republic adopted a statute on "nomadic clan and
clan-tribal obshchinas" edict (O kochevoy 1992).
So why now the opposition to a
declaration of indigenous rights? Observer say it comes down to natural
resources. Others now pressing for re-drafting of the declaration, which already
passed the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, include Canada, Australia, New
Zealand, Suriname, Guyana, Colombia and at least some members of the African
Group. South Africa, for one, voted for the draft in Geneva. Could it vote
against the same document in New York? That remains to be seen.
Indigenous at the UN in May 2007 (Ban Ki-moon
not shown)
Inner City Press asked Malezer if Ban Ki-moon
has been helpful in pushing for enactment of a UN rights declaration for the
indigenous. The previous Secretary-General was, Malezer answered,
diplomatically in the house of diplomacy. That is, Ban was missing-in-action
(MIA).
Mr. Ban
did not attend the opening of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. While
his staff claimed it was because he was not invited, those in the UNPFII scoffed
at that, and said he'd been invited. Then again, now Mr. Ban has angered the
African Group, too. Click
here for that.
So perhaps it evens out...
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service.
Copyright 2006-07 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540