On
Margins of
P5+1, US
Talked ISIL
With Iran, But
Not Military
Coordination
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, June
16 -- With
Iran nuclear
P5+1 talks now
taking place
in Vienna, the
question
arises how
ISIL's advance
in Iraq may
impact them.
On June 16 a
Senior State
Department
Official told
the press, "We
are open to
engaging the
Iranians, just
as we are
engaging other
regional
players on the
threat post by
ISIL in Iraq.
The issue did
come up
briefly with
Iran on the
margins of the
P5+1 in Vienna
today,
separate from
our trilateral
meeting. These
engagements
will not
include
military
coordination
or strategic
determinations
about Iraq’s
future over
the heads of
the Iraqi
people. We
will discuss
how ISIL
threatens many
countries in
the region,
including
Iran, and the
need to
support
inclusivity in
Iraq and
refrain from
pressing a
sectarian
agenda."
Earlier on
June 16 a US
Senior
Administration
Official told
reporters the
issue does not
give Iran more
leverage,
while talks
about Iraq may
occur "on the
margins," that
is separate
from the P5+1
process.
Asked of
timing, the US
official said
"we are all
focused on
July 20... we
can get this
done."
The official
said that
"World Cup
fever has
presented
itself here in
Vienna." Today
Iran plays
Nigeria, and
the US plays
Ghana (with
Vice President
Biden in
attendance).
Asked again
about Iraq,
the official
said that the
situation in
Ukraine hadn't
impacted the
P5+1 talks.
Inner City
Press wonders
if, with the
blocking in
the UN
Security
Council of
Russia's
proposed
statement on
the attack on
its embassy in
Kyiv, that
might change.
And as set
forth before,
how Francois
Hollande's and
Laurent
Fabius' open
lobbying for
BNP Paribas
and its
violation of
Iran sanctions
might have an
impact as
well.
Fabius
has said that
Iran wants
hundreds of
thousands of
centrifuges
and that
France is
drawing the
line there,
copying itself
from 2013.
But how
strange:
Francois
Hollande and
Fabius defend
BNP Paribas'
violation of
Iran
sanctions,
while loudly
playing
hardball.
Playing is the
operative
word.
With the July
20 deadline to
conclude the
Iran nuclear
talks looking
more
uncertain,
early on June
7 the US State
Department
announced that
“Deputy
Secretary of
State William
J. Burns and
Under
Secretary for
Political
Affairs Wendy
R. Sherman
will travel to
Geneva for
consultations
with Iranian
officials on
June 9-10.”
Beyond the two
days' relation
to the July 20
deadline, they
also come as
Iran sanctions
violations by
BNP Paribas
are being
actively
defended by
French
president
Francois
Hollande and
foreign
minister
Laurent
Fabius.
These
June 9-10 US -
Iran meetings
was called a
bilateral and
other US
attendees were
named,
including
Brooke
Anderson,
previously at
the US Mission
to the UN, and
Jake Sullivan,
who was with
Vice President
Biden at Petro
Poroshenko's
inaugural in
Kyiv on June
7.
Then
Iranian
bilaterals
with Russia
and China,
each
separately,
were
announced. The
question was
raised June 7
by Inner City
Press: what
about France
and the UK?
What about the
European
Union?
The EU
quickly
announced that
its Helga
Schmid will
also play a
role -- or
“join” -- in
Geneva. EU
spokesperson
Michael Mann
said, “The US
will hold a
bilateral with
the deputy
chief Iranian
negotiator in
Geneva next
week. EU
Political
Director Helga
Schmid will
join. Other
bilaterals
will follow in
the next
days.”
So
when is a
bilateral
meeting NOT a
bilateral?
Soon a
US Senior
Adminstration
Official on
background
responded to
questions: “As
we've said -
and as the EU
just noted -
these talks
are
intensifying.
The P5+1 and
the EU have
been in total
coordination
throughout
these talks,
including
regarding
bilateral
discussions.
As such, EU
Political
Director Helga
Schmid will
join in Geneva
as well.”
So
again: when is
a bilateral no
longer a
bilateral?
Will France
itself try to
participate,
with Jacques
Audibert's
replacement
Nicolas de
Riviere a/k/a
Flippy Nic?
How to compare
France's
hard-line
position on
Iran and
sanctions
violations now
that Francois
Hollande and
Laurent Fabuis
are actively
defending
sanctions
violations,
not only to
Sudan but also
Iran, by BNP
Paribas? A new
dynamic? Watch
this site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|