On Iran Pompeo Calls French
FM While SG Guterres Set to Support
Colonialism While Banning Press
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
UN GATE, Jan 12 –
On
Iraq, yet
another
country in
which the UN
system of Antonio
Guterres is
corrupt (see
below UNESCO
exclusive from
Inner City
Press which
Guterres bans
from the UN
now for the 549th
day), Guterres on
November
28
had
a
canned
statement
through
equally
corrupt Stephane
Dujarric:
"The
Secretary-General
urges all
actors
to refrain
from violence
and to engage
in peaceful
and meaningful
dialogue for
the benefit of
Iraq and the
Iraqi people."
On
January 12,
this
from US State
Department
Spokesperson
Morgan
Ortagus:
"Secretary
Michael R.
Pompeo spoke
today with
French
Minister of
Foreign
Affairs
Jean-Yves Le
Drian to
discuss U.S.
and French
efforts in
Iraq and
continued
cooperation in
countering
Iran’s malign
activities in
the
region.
The two
reiterated the
purpose and
resolve of the
Coalition’s
military
presence in
Iraq to fight
ISIS."
Meanwhile,
UNSG
Guterres is
wasting public
money on a
junket in his
real home
Lisbon,
"justified" by a
French dinner
on January
13 supporting
French
colonialism in
five
countries - not
including
Cameroon, the
ultimate
example
of the bloody
fruits of
French
colonialism.
We'll have
more on this.
was the
"Statement
of H.E. Dr.
Mohammad Javad
Zarif Minister
for Foreign
Affairs of the
Islamic
Republic of
Iran (to be
delivered, on
his behalf, by
H.E.
Ambassador
Majid Takht
Ravanchi
Permanent
Representative
of the Islamic
Republic of
Iran to the
United
Nations)
Before the
United Nations
Security
Council On
“Upholding the
United Nations
Charter to
Maintain
International
Peace and
Security” New
York, 9
January 2020
*
In the Name of
God, the Most
Compassionate,
the Most
Merciful
Mr. President,
I am here
today to
deliver a
statement on
behalf of H.E.
Minister Zarif
whose visa was
denied by the
U.S. in
contravention
of the
Headquarters
Agreement. “We
are meeting
today to
discuss a
momentous
imperative we
are all
confronted
with. The
world is at a
crossroads:
with the end
of monopolies
on power, one
unhinged
regime is
frantically
clamoring to
turn back
time. This has
meant more
damaging
American
unilateralism
in defiance of
international
norms and law:
most recently
a dastardly
targeted
assassination
of the heroes
who were the
nightmare of
groups such as
ISIS. But
since the
regime’s
inauguration,
more and more
threats and
attacks
against the
people of Iran
and other
sovereign
nations in
utter
disregard of
the Charter.
It now even
seeks to
emulate the
war crimes of
DAESH,
menacing the
cultural
heritage of
the
millennia-old
civilization
of Iran. Our
January 8th
action against
an air base in
Iraq from
which the
cowardly armed
attack against
Martyr
Soleimani was
launched, was
a measured and
proportionate
response to a
terrorist
attack, in the
exercise of
our inherent
right to
self-defense
in accordance
with Article
51 of the
Charter. This
rogue US
regime has
withdrawn from
several
landmark
accords,
including the
Paris
Agreement, the
INF Treaty,
and not least,
the Joint
Comprehensive
Plan of
Action. That,
in an open
affront to
this very
Council, has
involved
unprecedented
and unlawful
US punishment
of anyone who
attempts to
comply with
Resolution
2231, which
unequivocally
endorses the
JCPOA. It has
also adopted
mob tactics to
expand or gain
market share
in the face of
the increasing
diversification
of the sources
of power. In
the case of my
own country,
US economic
terrorism has
involved the
strangulation
of access of
ordinary
Iranians to
food and
medicine as
well as use of
illegal
unilateral
sanctions to
give American
oil a foothold
in Asia. No
one is spared
from this
malign
behavior, as
evidenced by
how the US
approaches
global trade –
including its
targeting of
European
infrastructure
to force the
entry of its
own natural
gas. The
question
amidst this
rogue behavior
is how to
protect the UN
Charter. For
if other
states become
“passive
unilateralists”;
if they
succumb to
unilateralism
in their
bilateral
relationships
or compromise
Charter
principles for
the sake of
short-term
gains or the
avoidance of
immediate
harm, they
inadvertently
encourage the
lawless
unilateralist
to bully them.
To protect
multilateralism,
we must never
appease
unilateralist
regimes. We
need political
will as well
as an
instrument
that will
safeguard the
values,
principles and
multilateralism
enshrined in
the Charter.
Such an
instrument
should include
- Renewed
commitment to
the Charter,
particularly
non-intervention
in internal or
external
affairs and
prohibition of
the threat or
use of force,
- Rejection of
all coercive
unilateral
measures
including
sanctions as
unlawful,
entailing
international
responsibility,
including
financial
responsibility
to compensate
damages
imposed on the
target and
third
countries, -
Assigning
international
criminal
responsibility
for
obstructing in
any way, shape
or form
humanitarian
trade, -
Prohibition on
depriving
individuals
from their
liberties and
extradition
upon judicial
requests made
on the basis
of or related
to unilateral
coercive
measures -
including
sanctions.
Iran is
dedicated to
multilateralism
and committed
to the Charter
and its
principles.
Our commitment
to the JCPOA
as well as our
most recent
inclusive
initiative to
promote peace
and security
in the Persian
Gulf region
(Hormuz Peace
Endeavor, or
‘HOPE’) prove
our strategic
approach. With
the engagement
of other
littoral
States of the
Persian Gulf,
the objectives
of HOPE can be
realized. In
this endeavor,
we welcome the
assistance of
the United
Nations—including
by acting as
an umbrella.”
Thank you for
your time."
On
Jan 7,
after
protests and
incursions at
and inside the
US Embassy
in Baghdad
and then the drone
strike(s),
while
the UN not only
issued no read
out, but
refused each
and every one of
Inner City Press' nine
written
questions,
entirely
corrupt,
from
Iran's Mission
to the UN,
forwarded by a
number of recipients,
an invitation
to sign their
condolence
book for
Soleimani: "In
the name of
God, the most
Compassionate,
the most
Merciful
8 January
2020
Excellency,
Upon
instructions
from my
Government and
pursuant to my
letters dated
3 and 7
January 2020
regarding the
terrorist
attack
perpetrated by
the armed
forces of the
United States
of America
against Martyr
Major General
Qasem
Soleimani in
Iraq, I would
like to inform
you that on 8
January 2020,
in the early
morning hours
of Tehran
time, in
exercising our
inherent right
to
self-defense
in accordance
with Article
51 of the
United Nations
Charter, the
armed forces
of the Islamic
Republic of
Iran took and
concluded a
measured and
proportionate
military
response
targeting an
American air
base in Iraq
from which the
cowardly armed
attack against
Martyr
Soleimani was
launched. The
operation was
precise and
targeted
military
objectives
thus leaving
no collateral
damage to
civilians and
civilian
assets in the
area. As
a responsible
member of the
United
Nations, the
Islamic
Republic of
Iran is
committed to
the purposes
and principles
enshrined in
the United
Nations
Charter,
recalls its
dedication to
the
maintenance of
international
peace and
security and
stresses that
it does not
seek
escalation or
war.
Seriously
warning about
any further
military
adventurism
against it,
Iran declares
that it is
determined to
continue to,
vigorously and
in accordance
with
applicable
international
law, defend
its people,
sovereignty
and
territorial
integrity
against any
aggression.
I should also
avail myself
of this
opportunity to
reiterate the
full respect
of the Islamic
Republic of
Iran for the
independence,
sovereignty,
unity and
territorial
integrity of
the Republic
of Iraq.
I should be
grateful if
you would have
the present
letter
circulated as
a document of
the Security
Council.
Please accept,
Excellency,
the assurances
of my highest consideration.
Majid Takht
Ravanchi
Permanent
Representative
H.E Mr.
Antonio
Guterres
Secretary-General."
Inner
City Press,
though banned
by Guterres
from any entry
of the UN due to
its reporting
on his
corruption,
will have more
on this. Inner
City Press
asked, along
with nine
other
questions, in
the morning.
No answer at
all from the corrupt
UN, Stephane
Dujarric and
Melissa
Fleming.
Following
the exclusive report
by Inner City
Press of May
26, the wind
of panic in
the Cabinet of
Azoulay is
blowing across
UNESCO.
In February
2018, only few
months after
the election
of the French
Director
General Audrey
Azoulay,
UNESCO
launched the
“Revive the
Spirit of
Mosul”
initiative ostensibly
to participate
in the
reconstruction
of this city,
after years of
war and
destruction.
This seemingly
noble
initiative was
in fact
a cover
up operation
of reinforcing French
influence in
Iraq in order
to secure
markets and
work for
French
companies. Inner
City Press, before
being roughed
up and
banned by Antonio
Guterres, can
trace this
all the way
back to
France's abstention
for BNP Paribas on
Iraq Oil for
Food.
UNESCO
was used and
abused since
then in the
realization of
that pragmatic
end. All
donations
received from
Governments
around the
world are
accurately
planned to be
channeled in
due course to
corporations
close to the
French
administration.
How did that
happen? This
is how.
Immediately
after the
launch of the
initiative, a
special team
was
established
within UNESCO
led by the
Director of
the Cabinet of
Azoulay,
Nicolas
Kassianides,
well know by
now for his
illegal
housing grants
exposed by
Inner City
Press.
Members
of this
restricted
team are only
fully loyal
people to
Azoulay such
as the
Assistant
Director General
for Culture
Erneso Otone
Ramirez, one
of his senior
Directors,
Lazare
Eloundou
Assomo and the
member of the
Cabinet of
Azoulay,
exposed by Inner
City Press
as the
forgetting her
passport while
traveling on
official
missions,
Sunna
Altnoder.
As a
next step, the
Director of
the UNESCO
office in
Baghdad,
Louise
Haxthausen,
was removed
straight away,
since she was
considered by
Kassianides
too close to
the government
of Iraq after
her several
years of
experience in
the country,
and too
independent in
her dealing
with issues
that
progressively
became
sensitive for
French
national
interests. She
was replaced
by a Director
well know for
his submissive
behavior in
any
circumstance,
the Italian
Paolo
Fontani.
At some
point earlier
this year, the
Iraqi
government
expressed
dissatisfaction
that UNESCO is
focusing on
the
reconstruction
of one city
only. The
response from
Azoulay was
rib-tickling;
in a meeting
with the
highest
authorities of
Iraq, she
simply
countered
their line of
reasoning by
pointing out
that UNESCO
must first do
the
“re-looking of
Mosul”.
The people
present in the
room are still
telling the
story over
lunches and
dinners when
time for jokes
arrives
together with
coffee and
cognac.
Why focusing
on Mosul is
having a plain
and simple
rationalization.
Most of the
millions
received by
UNESCO are for
projects to be
implemented in
that
particular
city.
Actually,
there are no
prospects for
business
elsewhere at
this stage.
Thus, in
corrupted
UNESCO, the
dirt keeps on
oozing this
time in the
context of
Iraq.
Furthermore,
the French DG
Audrey Azoulay
supported and
supervised
personally the
organization
of a concert
with her
French
partners and
friends in Chateau
de Chambord.
Unfortunately
for her, it
did not
attract any
media
attention
outside
Paris.
According to a
member of the
Cabinet of
Azoulay, the
transactions
of UNESCO in
Mosul are
among the most
well-kept
secrets in the
House. The
Cabinet member
even considers
that a number
of parallel
dealings are
most probably
piloted by
some
specialized
French
services.
For
instance, why
would the
Director of
Cabinet
Nicolas
Kassianides go
on mission to
Iraq next
week? Since
when is a
UNESCO
Director of
Cabinet
allowed to
deal with
tasks which
fall normally
under the
responsibilities
of the
Director
General, or of
her Assistant
Director
generals for
culture or for
external
relations.
Nicolas
Kassianides
proves to be
an expert in
shady deals
and this is
why he is the
one designated
by Azoulay to
meet next week
in Baghdad the
Iraqi
Ministers of
Culture, of
Education and
for Foreign
Affairs, as
well as the
Prime
Minister’s
Chief of Staff
who has
nothing to do
with UNESCO
matters. All
those meetings
are clearly DG
or Assistant
DGs level.
Obviously, if
the Director
of Cabinet was
from another
country but
France, it
would have
been
unconceivable
to go on such
high-level
official
mission. This
French
oriented
management
style is
changing the
nature of the
organization,
but strangely
enough, UNESCO
member states
remain silent
on that
blatant
usurpation of
power by one
country.
“Kassianides
is clearly
taking
instructions
elsewhere”,
said our
source in the
Cabinet. “As a
former staff
of Quai
d’Orsay, and
being fully
aware that his
days in UNESCO
are counted,
he must keep
good relations
with his
former
administration
in order to
get a good
position there
after
successfully
defending the
French
national
interest under
the cover of
multilateral
UN
work”.
The state of
affairs in the
Cabinet has
been left to
deteriorate
progressively
and as long as
member states
remain silent,
the reputation
of UNESCO will
remain
severely
affected. The
governing
bodies of
UNESCO must
remember that
it involves at
present a
number of
different
scandals with
regard to
Azoulay’s
administration
and a whole
series of
kickbacks and
schemes that
really make
problems for
the overall
credibility of
the
organization.
Still banned
Inner City
Press
will have more
on that.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past (and
future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|