UNITED
NATIONS, July
15 -- A day
after the Iran
Deal was
announced in
Vienna by the
EU's Federica
Mogherini then
Iran's Javad
Zarif, a draft
resolution was
circulated in
the UN
Security
Council, with
paragraphs on
sanctions
snap-back and
other
provisions.
Inner City
Press is
putting the
draft,
obtained from
multiple
sources,
online here.
Operative Paragraphs
11, 12
and 15
bear
particular
interest,
with their
purported
automaticity.
Iran
Deal Draft
UNSC
Resolution as
Uploaded by
Inner City
Press by Matthew
Russell Lee
On July 14 the
US White House
held a
background
press call,
"embargoed
until
conclusion."
This meant, no
tweets. But on
the call,
after Reuters
asked a
softball about
Obama's
involvement,
several Senior
Administration
Officials
gushed about
Obama's calls
to Vienna,
updates from
Susan Rice,
concern for
Israel's
security.
It was said
Obama will not
only call
Netanyahu but
also of course
the King of
Saudi Arabia.
(It seemed
clear that the
civilian
casualties
from the
Saudi's
US-supported
airstrikes on
Yemen would
not come up.)
Earlier on
July 14, Ban
Ki-moon chimed
in nearly
immediately to
welcome the
deal. This
stood in
contrast to
his 60 hour
silence after
his own faux
Yemen Deal
failed amid
airstrikes.
Success has
many wannabe
parents;
UNsuccessful
many fewer.
Obama
from
Washington at
7 am said he
will veto any
legislation
slowing this
down; The
Elders chaired
by Kofi Annan
spoke quickly
against any
“ideological
preconceptions
[or] narrow
political
interests.”
Journalists
camped out
under the
Evita-like
balcony of the
Coburg Hotel
for more than
two weeks
gushed about
UN Security
Council action
"in days," as
France's
Fabius put it.
France is the
Council's
pen-holder on
Burundi,
another
UNsuccess.
The Security
Council was
set to meet
later on July
14, about the
DR Congo, in
which FDLR
forces were
said headed to
Burundi. Inner
City Press
headed to the
Council. Watch
this site
Back on
November 24,
2014, hours
after the Iran
talks in
Vienna ended
by a further
extension,
Inner City
Press at the
UN's November
24 noon
briefing asked
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric if
Ban had any
comment.
"Let me get
back to you,"
Dujarric said.
Others asked,
what does that
mean?
Forty minutes
later,
Dujarric's
office sent
this out:
"In
response to
questions
about the
extension of
talks
concerning
Iran’s nuclear
programme, the
Spokesman has
the following
to say:
"The
Secretary-General
is encouraged
by the
determination
and commitment
by the P5+1
and the
Islamic
Republic of
Iran to
overcome their
remaining
differences
and to achieve
a
comprehensive
agreement. He
calls upon the
parties in the
months ahead
to sustain the
positive
momentum and
to build upon
the progress
they have
made. He hopes
that all sides
continue to
implement
their agreed
commitments
with a spirit
of mutual
trust and in
good faith."
Dujarric even
made a comment
when Inner
City Press
asked about
Chuck Hagel
resigning: Ban
enjoyed his
time with
Hagel. Note:
and disinvited
Iran from the
Montreux talks
on Syria.
In
Vienna the
press
conference by
John Kerry was
delayed by
Obama's
farewell to
Chuck Hagel.
(Covering
that event,
CNN's Wolf
Blitzer said
let's see if a
reporter
shouts a
question. But
the applause
was too loud:
no question on
the P5+1
talks, or
anything
else.)
Minutes later
in a tent in
Vienna, Kerry
was asked
about Hagel
being
micro-managed
by the White
House in of
the two
American press
questions he
took. After
that he
insisted, give
the foreign
press a
change. To an
Iranian
question, he
called himself
both candid
and fair.
As the Iran
P5+1 talks
continued on
the eve of the
current
deadline, who
was bragging
about having
predicted
their failure?
Western wire
service
Reuters,
crowing that
"Other media
now coming
around to
@reuters
consistent
reporting on
how final Iran
atomic deal
unlikely."
While
false
exclusives
have
proliferated
at Reuters
under Stephen
J. Adler,
there a
second,
separate trend
at work here.
On another UN
sanctions
regime,
Somalia and
Eritrea, even
when former
Reuters
reporter
turned
sanctions
monitor Dinesh
Mahtani was
forced to
resign for
having championed
a new leader
for the
country he was
supposed to
monitor, Reuters
entirely
omitted his
removal
from its
claimed
exclusives on
the sanctions
report.
Some of this
goes beyond a
desire, compensated
by editor
Adler, to
claim
exclusives
even where not
merited
(including by
adopted a policy
of not
crediting
others'
exclusives).
At the UN,
Reuters has
gone so far as
to try
to censor and
remove from
Google's
Search as
"copyrighted"
copies of
Reuters
complaints
against other
media filed
with the UN, click here
for that.
At
what point
does this
become more
(or less) that
journalism?
What about
"other media
now coming
around to
@reuters
consistent"
refusal to
credit smaller
media,
attempts to
get them
kicked out,
then censoring
the Internet?
We'll have
more on this.
Back on
October 27
when the UN's
special
rapporteur on
human rights
in Iran Ahmed
Shaheed held a
press
conference at
the UN, Inner
City Press
asked him for
an update on
what he had
said about the
effect of
sanctions and
banning of
Iran from the
SWIFT payments
system which
Inner City
Press asked
him about one
year and three
days earlier,
2013 here
from
Minute 12:29.
On
October 24,
2013, Shaheed
had
acknowledged
that the
banning of
Iran from the
SWIFT payments
system had had
an impact. On
October 27,
2014, Shaheed
said he
believes Iran
is still
banned from
SWIFT, but he
had no update.
Instead he
said that
humanitarian
exemptions to
sanctions are
having
successes. 2014 video here.
But
banning from
SWIFT or
"de-SWIFT-ing"
is not a
targeted
sanction at
all, and he
did not
mention any
exemptions to
it.
Overall, Inner
City Press
asked Shaheed
what impact he
thought "the
nuclear issue"
and the P5 + 1
talks have on
human rights
in Iran.
Shaheed said
he doesn't
like linkage,
but added that
when there's
focus on the
nuclear issue,
it takes away
from the focus
on human
rights.
Last
year Inner
City Press
obtained and
exclusively
published an
internal OHCHR
plan to take
over the "rule
of law"
functions of
the rest of
the UN system,
and the
staffing of
the Special
Representatives
on Children
and Armed
Conflict,
Sexual
Violence and
Conflict, R2P
and the
Prevention of
Genocide.What
has happened
on that? Are
rapporteurs,
like sanctions
monitors,
still not
given any
training or
orientation by
the UN?
Footnote:
on October 27,
the UN
Correspondents
Association
which so often
demands the
first question
be set-aside
for it didn't
even send
anyone to
Shaheed's
press
conference.
One attendee
said, it's
defUNCA-ed, as
in defunct, or
de-UNCA-ed,
like
de-SWIFT-ed.
The new Free
UN Coalition
for Access,
present, did
not try to
brand the
press
conference,
because there
was no need.
Watch this
site.