On
Africa Telecom, ITU Explains Somalia While Charging $100,000 for Access to Heads
of State
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
September 20 -- The International Telecommunications Union, a member of the UN
family, has scheduled a "Connect Africa" summit for Kigali, Rwanda at the end of
October. In the run-up, ITU secretary-general Hamadoun Toure took questions from
reporters at the UN on Wednesday, having handed out a map circling East Africa
from Somalia on south as "The Missing Link." Inner City Press asked about the
relative 'Net savvy of Somalis, despite the long lack of a central government.
Mr. Toure countered that business people there have to have four or five cell
phones, since there is not inter-connectivity.
The World
Bank's Mohsen Khalil also deployed that buzzword, inter-connected, along with
the inescapable "convergence." He pointed out that some of the most promising
ideas are in developing countries with no "legacy problems." More directly on
Somalia, he said that businesses rush in to sell telecom services in
post-conflict countries, because where there is instability, people "rely more
on phones."
Toure
spoke repeatedly of the profit motives, as an invisible hand. Toure emphasized
that he came to ITU from the private sector, and that "there is nothing wrong
with profit." Inner City Press asked about
ITU's website's solicitation of
$100,000 sponsorship commitments from private telecom firms, in exchange for
which they are promised that their CEO will appear on TV, logos can be used,
"guaranteed slot in high-level panel for CEO," and "access to bilateral meeting
rooms." In light of this last, Inner City Press asked if the ITU has any
standards to screen potential sponsors, beyond simply their willingness to pay
$100,000. Video here, from Minute 25:50.
Mr. Ban and Mr. Toure of the ITU:
part of UN or not?
Mr. Toure
said that their willingness to pay "shows their commitment." Many people want
access to the heads of state he said will be at the Summit; these have to be
screened in some way. So why not by money?
Except,
one wondered, that this is the UN family. Or is it? Perhaps the ITU,
which as Toure pointed out, existed before the UN, is free to sell its logo and
to monetize its perceived affiliation with the UN without even the few
safeguards in place, for example, in General Assembly
Resolution 92(I) of 1946 and in the "Guidelines on Cooperation between the
United Nations and the Business Community" issued by the Secretary-General on
July 17, 2000. Similar issues have been raised by the UN Development
Program's claim to be exempt from the UN's Ethics Office...
* * *
Click
here for a
Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army
(which had to be finalized without the UN's DPA having responded.)
Click
here
for an earlier
Reuters AlertNet
piece by this correspondent about the Somali National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's
$200,000 contribution from an undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here, and
some are available in the ProQuest service.
Copyright 2006-07 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com -
UN Office: S-453A,
UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile
(and weekends): 718-716-3540