New
DRC Army Rapes
of IDPs While
Ladsous
Stonewalls
Minova's 126
Rapes
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
January 19 --
While UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous has
stonewalled
about the 126
rapes in
Minova by the
Congolese Army,
which the UN
supports, new
rapes have
been committed
on a hill
outside the
Mugunga III
camp, a hill
controlled by
the Congolese
Army.
Ladsous
has
refused Press
questions
about the
Minova rapes
on November
27,
December
7 and December 18 -- when he had his spokesman seize the
UNTV
microphone so
the question
couldn't be
asked, video
here.
Ladsous has
not done a
stakeout
since.
On
January 19,
Inner City
Press asked
both Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Martin Nesirky
and top UN
humanitarian
Valerie
Amos about
these rapes,
and about how
Ladsous is
(not)
implementing
Ban's supposed
Human Rights
Due Diligence
Policy of not
working with
army units
which engage
in rape of
other abuse.
Amos
insisted that
the UN has a
zero tolerance
policy --
since Ladsous
has
been in
change, some
call it a
"zero
truthfulness"
policy
-- but she did
not provide
any of the
previously
promised
details about
Minova.
Here
is the UN's
transcription
of what Inner
City Press
asked Nesirky,
followed by
the MONUSCO
answer added
to the
transcript,
never
e-mailed to
Inner City
Press but
perhaps read
over the
squawk to
those sitting
in their
offices (or
waiting to be
spoon-fed
by Ladsous,
as in the
November 27
video here):
Inner
City Press:
...Between 3
December and 5
January, there
were numerous
rapes around
Muguna III
Camp. It’s
noted that
around that
camp
[inaudible]
took place, 27
of them in
just a single
day. There is
no
M23. In fact,
that hill is
controlled by
the Congolese
Army
soldiers. So,
related to
this Minova
question,
what’s the UN
response to
its partners,
at lease in
part,
controlling
the hill in
which 27 rapes
took place in
a day? What’s
the United
Nations
going to do
about this MSF
report? And I
wanted to ask,
back on
Minova, I
appreciated
what was sent
to me two days
ago. But it
didn’t address
this idea of
the UN human
rights due
diligence
policy. It
basically said
the Congolese
are
investigating
and 11
people have
been arrested.
I wanted to
know how many
of these 11
were for rape,
for 126 rapes.
And also, in
both of these
cases,
DPKO’s
[Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations]
stated policy
of not
working with
Army units
which have
committed
rape. How do
they
apply? In this
case of Minova
long after the
event took
place?
Spokesperson:
On the last
part, I don’t
have anything
to add. Simply
to say
that an
investigation
is under way
and therefore
we need to
wait to
find out what
the result of
that is. With
regard to the
report from
MSF, we are
obviously
aware of it
and we’ve
asked the
mission to
brief us on
that
particular
matter. But I
don’t have
anything at
the moment.
Should that
change, and I
would
anticipate
that it will,
then obviously
I will let you
know.
[The
Spokesperson
later said the
mission,
MONUSCO, had
advised that
it is
aware of the
reports. As
mandated, the
mission will
investigate
these
incidents.]
Again
this last was
added to the transcript,
never e-mailed
to Inner City
Press but
perhaps read
over the
squawk to
those sitting
in their
offices -- or
waiting to be
spoon-fed
by Ladsous, as
in the
November 27
video here.
We'll have
more on this.