Ladsous
Now Admits Minova
Rapes,
But Won't Say
by Whom, If
Works With
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 7 --
The UN claims
to have a
Human Rights
Due Diligence
Policy under
which it will
not work with
or support
military units
or personnel
who engage in
abuses like
rape.
But Department
of
Peacekeeping
Operations
chief Herve
Ladsous four
times on
Friday refused
to answer a
simple
question:
which
Congolese Army
units were in
Minova during
the 70+ rapes,
and what's
being done to
ensure the UN
does not work
with them?
See
video
here, and
below, at
Minute 0:22,
0:40, 1:34 and
1:49.
But he would
not answer the
key UN
question: what
meaning does
the supposed
Human Rights
Due Diligence
Policy,
announced by
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, have?
Afterward
a
range of
diplomats from
Security
Council
members and
Troops
Contributing
Countries told
Inner City
Press Ladsous'
stonewalling
and choosing
friendly
questioners is
making them
look
bad. One
used the old
saw, "A fish
rots from the
head."
Ladsous
refused to
answer Inner
City Press'
question about
Silva. Yes, a
fish rots from
the head.
Previously
on November
30, the
military
adviser of a a
major TCC told
Inner City
Press Ladsous
is the worst
DPKO chief
"ever," much
worse than his
predecessor
Alain Le Roy.
Le
Roy was the
third
Frenchman in a
row to head
DPKO, but at
least he was
vetted.
Ladsous as it
turned out was
rejected as a
candidate by
previous
Secretary
General Kofi
Annan, a
senior Annan
aide has
described to
Inner City
Press.
And this time,
he was a last
minute,
no-check fill
in for Jerome
Bonnafont, who
bragged in
India that he
had the post.
Clearly, this
is no way to
choose senior
UN officials.
But this UN is
so out of
control, it
seems, no one
can stop it.
On
December 7,
while refusing
four times the
Press question
on the rapes
at Minova and
his
Department's
role and
follow up,
Ladsous and
his spokesman
directed the
UN microphone
to other
questioners --
two of whom
retreated to
the hallway
with Ladsous
on November
27, video
here --
and took
questions not
about the
Congo.
Ladsous
was asked
about Northern
Mali, on which
while in Paris
he said
nothing could
be done under
September
2013. When
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Martin Nesirky
on whose
behalf Ladsous
was speaking,
since the
Security
Council has
not decided
that, and some
members think
that too slow.
Inner City
Press asked if
there was a
transcript.
But none has
been provided.
Ladsous also
took a
question about
Syria --
anything but
the Congo and
his failure
and cover up
there, it
seemed -- and
repeated the
answer in
French and
English,
without
including what he
said in Paris
about
Salafists.
And he was not
asked. This is
how this UN
works, or
doesn't.
At
Friday's noon
briefing,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's deputy
spokesman
Eduardo Del
Buey questions
about the
supposed Human
Rights Due
Diligence
Policy (that
he counldn't
answer without
DPKO, which
has not been
answering
these
questions),
and if Ladsous
would
evenhandedly
take
questions,
including on
Minova.
"Mr
Ladsous
manages his
own stakeout,"
Del Buey
replied. But
isn't there
some absolute
minimum that
is expected of
a UN official,
given how much
they get paid,
taxfree?
The
briefing
itself saw
TCCs disagree
with some
others on the
mandate of
MONUSCO.
Ladsous is in
no position to
show
leadership,
and isn't,
sources say.
And so
civilians
suffer, under
this UN. Watch
this site.