UN
Libya
Lovefest
Ignores
Tortured
Africans, NATO
Killings in
Majer
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March 7, updated
-- Amid
something of a
Libya TNC
lovefest at
and by
the UN,
discordant
notes of
fragmentation
and torture of
black
Africans
seemed swept
under the
carpet. UN
envoy Ian
Martin began
the
Security
Council open
meeting by
lavishing
praise on
Prime Minister
El-Keib.
During
the meeting a
letter
described as
"coordinated"
from the
Libyans was
circulated,
asking for a
12 month
renewal of the
UN
mission.
Russia is said
to want a
shorter time:
six months.
But Ian Martin
might have
become too
close to those
in power in
Libya.
Back
on February
26, Inner City
Press asked
the
spokesperson
for Martin and
the UN
Support
Mission in
Libya:
What
have
UNSMIL and Ian
Martin done
about the
abuse of
Tawergians
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuCJcaQRIuA&feature=youtu.be
Has
Mr.
Martin seen
this video?
What is his
comment? What
is the status
in Tawergha?
They
are
caged,
handcuffed
with green
flags pushed
their mouths;
the end
of the short
clip is
particularly
troubling. My
question is
both what
UNSMIL /
Martin think
of it and what
they have done
or will do
about
it, such as
identifying
those involved
or expecting /
ensuring that
Libyan
authorities
take some
action.
After
a couple
days, the
UNSMIL
spokesperson
replied:
Subject:
Press
Q re Tawergha
and public
video of
abuse: has Ian
Martin seen
it? What have
he and UNSMIL
done?
To:
Matthew.Lee
[at]
innercitypress.com
Here
we
go:
The
plight of
Tawergha and
human rights
abuses against
them as well
as
against other
detainees are
of high
concern to the
United Nations
and
have
repeatedly
been referred
to in the
SRSG's
briefings and
in
public
reporting/statements.
The United
Nations
Support
Mission in
Libya (UNSMIL)
has called on
the Interim
Government to
investgate
allegations of
mistreatment
of the
Tawergans and
to ensure
better
security for
them.
Meanwhile, the
UN has been
providing
humanitarian
assistance to
alleviate
their current
living
conditions,
and is also
working with
the Libyan
authorities to
find a
permanent
solution to
their
displacement
and to ensure
the improved
protection of
their
human rights.
Spokesperson/Senior
Advisor
on Public
Information
and
Communication
United Nations
Support
Mission in
Libya (UNSMIL)
Tripoli -
Libya
But
again: did
Martin take
the time to
see the video?
Was anything
done about it?
Update:
after the
meeting,
unlike many of
the SRSGs, Ian
Martin did not
take any
questions at
the stakeout.
Inner City
Press asked
him to answer
one question.
"No," he said,
"It's Prime
Minister
El-Keib's
day."
Inner City
Press asked,
have you seen
the Tawergha
video? But Ian
Martin walked
away.
Later at the
stakeout, the
UK's Mark
Lyall Grant
said that
issues of
detentions and
torture were
discussed in
consultations.
But there
remains this
part of the
question: is Ian
Martin doing
enough? Or is
he too close
to the
government?
Likewise,
the UN
International
Commission of
Inquiry
reported on
March 2
that in a
single
incident "in
the town of
Majer on 8
August 2011...
the
Commission
found NATO
bombs killed
34 civilians
and injured
38. After
the initial
airstrike
killed 16, a
group of
rescuers
arrived and
were
hit by a
subsequent
attack,
killing 18."
The
report was put
online on the
website of the
UN Human
Rights
Commission,
and NATO
chief
Rasmussen was
asked and
answered about
it on March 5.
Later
that day,
Inner City
Pres asked
Ban's deputy
spokesman
Eduardo del
Buey about the
report, how it
related to
Ban's earlier
statements on
NATO and
international
humanitarian
law.
"It
only came
on out
Friday," del
Buey replied,
"give us
time." How
much time? Two
more days have
passed. Note:
it is
paragraph 87
of
the Report,
which is
online here.
Then
after Prime
Minister
El-Keib spokes
to the
Security
Council,
Russia brought
up
the ICI
report. US
Ambassador
Rice replied
that NATO
complied with
all laws; she
was echoed by
German
Permanent
Representative
Wittig
and French
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
Martin Briens.
But
what about the
18 rescuers
killed?
Another
Western member
of the Council
told Inner
City Press,
"I'm sure
there will be
a follow up by
NATO."
Vitaly Churkin
came out and
told the
Press, they
keep being
coquettish and
answering the
wrong
question. The
question is,
were there
civilian
casualties in
Libya? We will
keep pushing.
When the
Security
Council open
meeting was
over, Inner
City Press
asked Prime
Minister
El-Keib which
countries he
was referring
to as not
protecting
Libyans'
investments.
He replied,
some in
Africa, they
nationalize
the
investments.
Inner City
Press asked
him to name a
country.
Zambia, he
said.
Later a major
African
country came
to Zambia's
defense,
telling Inner
City Press
that El-Keib's
comment were
unfair, "There
is an asset
freeze, you
can't just
accuse
Zambia."
At the
stakeout,
Inner City
Press asked UK
Ambassador
Mark Lyall
Grant about
the issue. He
said the the
chairman of
the Council's
Libya
Sanctions
Committee,
Ambassador
Cabral of
Portugal,
spoke in
consultations,
but that the
feeling is
that the
Committee says
"yes" to every
request from
the
government.
After that,
another
Council member
said El-Kebi
should not
have just
named
Zambia.
We hope to get
Zambia's
response.
One
wonders if Ban
Ki-moon raised
the issue
during his
recent visit
to Zambia,
after which
Ban visited
Angola but did
not meet with
the
opposition.
Ah, democracy
-- no African
spring?
From
the UK Mission
transcript:
Inner
City Press:
I’ve heard the
idea of a 12
month
[mandate], is
there
unanimity
around that
and also was
there any
discussion of
this issue of
African
Libyans that
were being
detained,
locked up,
there’s a
video
circulating of
people with
flags in their
mouth and
being told to
salute the new
government, I
just wonder do
you think
UNSMIL is
doing enough
on that? I
just tried to
ask Mr Martin
and didn’t get
an answer.
What’s the
Council’s
stance on the
treatment of
people
perceived to
be Qadhafi
supporters in
Libya?
Lyall Grant:
"On the first
issue, there
was certainly
one Member
State that
raised the
question of
whether it
should be a
six-month or a
12-month
mandate
renewal. Mr
Martin said
that he
thought it
should be a
12-month
renewal and
referred to a
letter from
the Prime
Minister to
the
Secretary-General
and members of
the Security
Council in
which he
specifically
requests the
12-month
renewal. So
certainly our
view, the
British
government’s
view, is that
it should be a
12-month
renewal.
"The question
of detentions
was certainly
raised.
There are
concerns about
the
detentions,
particularly
by some of the
militias which
are not
properly under
central
government
control yet,
and that is an
issue of
concern to the
Council, and a
number of
Members raised
that issue.
And Mr Martin
said that
UNSMIL was
certainly
working on
that issue."
Inner
City Press: Mr
el-Keib the
Prime Minister
said that some
African
countries are
not respecting
or returning
Libyan
investments.
Another member
afterwards
said maybe
these are
subject to
freeze, and
the Council
should do
something. Was
there
discussion
about what to
do with the
still frozen
assets?
Lyall Grant:
"There was
some
discussion of
that, about
what the Prime
Minister had
said and what
it meant, and
we had a
briefing from
the Ambassador
of Portugal
who chairs the
Sanctions
Committee, and
he made the
point that he
felt that
UNSMIL and Mr
Martin were in
a very good
position to
advise on
lifting any
remaining
sanctions on
assets, but
the Council as
a whole didn’t
feel there was
a problem, in
that when the
Libyan
Government
requested a
lifting of
asset
sanctions, in
all cases the
Sanctions
Committee had
responded
promptly. So
it seemed to
be a view that
there wasn’t a
major problem
that needed to
be fixed."
Footnote:
As
El-Keib spoke
across First
Avenue at the
International
Peace
Institute, UN
official slash
IPI chief
Terje
Roed-Larsen
told El-Keib,
"everyone in
this room
thinks you are
a hero."
Of course,
Roed-Larsen's
IPI made the
invitations in
such a way to
bring that
about.
Roed-Larsen
has refused to
answer
Inner City
Press'
questions
about his
"non-UN UN
trip" to
Bahrain, nor
other
questions
about double
service and
possible
conflicts of
interest.