SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Dec 17 -- Maxwell's defense began
the third Friday of the trial pushing to
keep their case open until Monday. They said
they had a witness who would fly in from
London, from the Nag's Head Pub no less, to
testify about Ghislaine's ownership (versus
residence) of a property there during the
charged conspiracy.
Judge
Nathan, who had canceled three trial days
for her nomination hearing in DC, said to
just stipulate to it. On another witness,
Kelly, she asked why the defense had waited
until so late to bring up the idea of the
Marshals bringing her in. She said she had a
rule: if a side did not have its next
witness ready, they had to rest.
Readers
online asked Kurt what it meant, to rest.
Were Maxwell's lawyers lazy?
It
didn't seem so. Kurt stopped and explained
about the close of evidence, and the
government's right to put on a rebuttal
case. Then came the day's first witness, a
former Palm Beach law enforcement officer
named Jason Richards. He read from the notes
he took, with Maxwell's lawyers emphasizing
to the jury things he had not written down.
They did the same with the second and last
officer, Amanda Young.
Then
came the defense's big witness, girlfriend
of Jeffrey and wife of another hedge funder,
Eva Andersson Dubin. Former doctor, mother
of three, now with Alzheimer's, it seemed.
She mentioned another former girlfriend of
Jeffrey's, a Francis or Frances Jardine, and
authenticated some of the still sealed
flight logs.
Now
came what the defense thought was the
kill-shot. "Mrs Dubin," she was asked, "Did
you ever engage in group sex with Jane?"
"No,"
Eva Andersson said. But then under cross
examination she acknowledged that she has
memory problems now, can't remember what
happened last month. Next!
Next
was another rosy picture of Epstein's
Madison Avenue business, from Michelle
Healy. But she was asked, Are you the only
Michelle in the world?
I
hope not, she answered, drawing the first
laugh of the day from the jury. Would it be
enough?
At
the lunch break Kurt went out into Foley
Square. For December it was a warm day, and
he took off his jacket with its
breaking-down zipper to live stream. He got
dumping and a hot and sour soup on Henry
Street because the line in Tasty Dumpling on
Mulberry was too long. Here the two together
were only four dollars, rather than the five
on Mulberry. But the soup was not as hot, in
either way.
Kurt
raced back it but at first it seemed for
nothing. The lawyers were buzzing around
getting stipulations signed. Bobbi Sternheim
leaned over Maxwell in her purple sweater.
The moment of truth was coming.
Judge
Nathan came in and before the jury entered
asked, Ms Maxwell, have you considered your
decision whether or not to testify?
Rather
than a simple yes or no, or formal line
through counsel, Maxwell said, clearly
prepared, Your Honor, the government has not
proved its case beyond a reasonable, so
there is no need for me to testify.
Much
was made of this, Kurt even making of it a
headline. But it was only for that, for
media. The jury never heard it. Would it be
Maxwell's last public words?
Judge
Nathan brought the jury in and they heard
the stipulations, ranging from Annie
Farmer's boots to Mike Wallace's birthday.
Then she told them to come on Monday at 9 am
and be prepared to stay to 6. They wanted to
get through the closing arguments and
rebuttal, and the legal charge that would be
hammered out tomorrow, Saturday (the jury
didn't hear this last).
Judge
Nathan said she would finish her draft of
the jury charge by six. But would it go into
the docket? Kurt stayed waiting at the PACER
terminal, using the time to tweet out a
photo of YouTube's email to him denying even
on appeal monetization of last Saturday's
Maxwell song.
Some
responses bashed Big Tech censors. Another
said, Learn how to screenshot. A third said,
don't give up your day job for music. Kurt
wasn't planning to.
#MaximumMaxwell.
And so it
continued. Click
here
for Patreon and more
(2d).
Note:
On October 29,
2021 and again on November 12
Ghislaine
Maxwell and
the US
Attorney's
Office for the
Southern
District of
New York filed
a flurry of
motions in
limine,
heavily
redacted; the
Government
argued that
trial exhibits
are not public
and will be
withheld.
Inner City
Press opposed
and opposes
the continued
secrecy.
Inner City Press
will cover the trial, and all
the comes before and after it;
#CourtCaseCast and song I,
Song
2, Song
3, fifth song
and now Nov
27 song
The underlying
case is US v. Maxwell,
20-cr-330 (Nathan).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material including Maximum
Maxwell, and other Maximum, on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room, 500 Pearl Street, NY NY
10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Author's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for