After
Varsity Blues Guilty Verdicts on Gamal
Aziz & Wilson Appeal Argument at 1st
Circuit
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Podcast
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
FEDERAL COURT,
Nov 7 โ In the first of the
Varsity Blues college
admissions bribery cases to
come to trial, on September
14, 2021 in the U.S. District
Court for the District of
Massachusetts Bruce Isackson,
who pled guilty, was cross
examined. Inner City Press
live tweeted it here
(podcast here)
On October 8,
2021 both Gamal
Abdel Aziz
and John
Wilson were
found guilty by the jury after
some 10 hours of deliberation,
on conspiracy to commit fraud
and conspiracy to commit
bribery involving a school
that receives federal funds,
USC, and aiding and abetting
in fraud and bribery and
filing a false tax
return.
Gamal Abdelaziz was scheduled
to be sentenced in February.
On February
9, 2022, Gamal Aziz was
sentenced to a year and a day,
to allow for "good time"
sentencing reduction.
On November 7,
2022, his and Wilson's appeals
were heard in the First
Circuit Court of Appeals.
Inner City Press live tweeted
it here:
OK - now 1st
Circuit appeal in
#VarsityBlues college
admissions scandal case of
Gamal Abdelaziz and John
Wilson Counsel: There were no
referrals to Isackson, Lori
Laughlin, or Abdelaziz... But
when you invoke criminal
conspiracy law, everything
gets swept in.
Q: But couldn't
you client be charged with the
smaller conspiracy, as to his
own children?
A: But there's
good faith
Counsel: My
client was in Asia on a 12
hour time difference, we're
talking about a 30 second
conversation. Schools are
involved in side doors, back
doors - you can get away with
one weak manager, but not two.
They put Isackson on the stand
for more than a day...
Judge: It seemed
there was an emphasis on
secrecy, no? Counsel: I very
much disagree. Singer
explained, You shouldn't tell
the school that you're doing
it with me or they'll just ask
you (Wilson) for more money.
This was after Singer has
turned state's evidence
Judge Sandra
Lynch: If you move beyond text
to the Skilling narrowing, if
you are correct, the remedy is
acquittal, not just remand. So
please continue.
Counsel: They
have no case in all of US
history that support their
position- Judge: There's the
question of 666
Judge Lynch:
History is instructive, but
we're all into text. Let's
look at 1346 & the
narrowing construction
language from Skilling. One
could say that the 1346
language under Skilling is
meant to prevent only
pre-McNally type claims. Can't
find a case like this
Judge
Lynch: We could switch over to
Justice Scalia's concerns
about due process. Maybe
history plays into this, but I
tend to think that's a more
minor theme. What did Congress
intend here. I feel like we're
in the law school class
debating these issues [Yep]
Judge: What
if we were to send it back for
a new trial, and you then file
a motion on double jeopardy?
Counsel: I'm not
sure double jeopardy would
apply -- Judge Lynch: Stop. I
don't want you arguing against
your client. I'm going to
withdraw my question.
Now DOJ
lawyer says, The defendant
waived some of these
arguments. Consider the money
funnel --
Judge: The what?
DOJ: The
co-mingling of funds. They
routed it through KWF. Bruce
Isackson said he understood
the comingling could benefit
donors with thick tax returns
AUSA: These
defendants were involved in
editing their kids' essays to
match the sports they were
using -- Judge: Parents do
that all the time. AUSA: Not
about sports they haven't
played in two years.
Watch this site.
From October 6:
Jury Trial Day 19 as to Gamal
Abdelaziz, John Wilson held on
10/6/2021. Closing arguments
by the Government. Closing
arguments by Defendant
Abdelaziz. Closing arguments
by Defendant Wilson. Rebuttal
by Government. Jury Trial Day
20 to resume at 9:00 AM on
10/7/21 with the charge to the
Jury. (Attorneys present:
Kelly, Sharp, Sheketoff,
Maynard, Stearns, Kearney,
Wright, Frank, Tomback,
Papenhausen, Kendall.)
From September
14: Abdelaziz's lawyer shows
that Isackson never met his
client. Now playing audio
"that the prosecutor skipped
over yesterday, it starts on
page 65"
On tape, Ryan: Hi
mom, I'm just here with Rick
& Dad. "Maybe one of the
B's can become an A... And
he's got soccer."
Ryan: My favorite
was probably UCLA... What did
you like about it? Ryan: It's
a big community, they have
good sports there, it would be
fun to go to games. Bruce
Isackson: His sister goes
there, so everything's
comfortable. Ryan: I
went to USC with Audrey
Abdelaziz's
lawyer: He's not using his
threatening tone there, is he?
Bruce Isackson: He is not.
Rick (on audio) - If you could
be a practice player --
Abdelaziz's
lawyer: He wasn't sucking your
son into a crime, was he?
Bruce Isackson: I don't
understand Inner City Press
@innercitypress ยท 1h
Abdelaziz's lawyer: You enjoy
sports, don't you? Bruce
Isackson: I'm a fan.
Abdelaziz's
lawyer: And teams use practice
players, right? Bruce
Isackson: I suppose.
Audio Rick: If I call Jorge,
and he's a practice player,
it's his whole life, just
school and soccer
Abdelaziz's
lawyer: Did you use the word
'scheme' when you talked with
the agents?
Bruce Isackson: I
think so. Abdelaziz's lawyer:
Do you think that is reflected
in any of the notes? Return to
audio, transcript Page 70:
Ryan: UCLA is like in a better
location.
Abdelaziz's
lawyer: You don't know what a
man from Nevada was thinking,
do you? Bruce Isackson: A man
from Nevada? Abdelaziz's
lawyer: My client. You're not
a mind reader, are you? Bruce
Isackson: No, I am not.
Cross-examination
ends with Isackson
acknowledging his 37 month
guidelines sentence unless he
cooperates like this. AUSA
objected to "what the
government will do," but judge
overruled it.
On September 13, there was
Isackson's direct examinatoin
by the AUSA. Inner City Press
live tweeted, here:
Isackson
says he paid Rick Singer
$250,000 for his daughter
Audrew to get into USC as a
crew (rowing) recruit. All
that was required was a head
shot.
Now shown in
court: Dec 15, 2017 email from
Rick Singer to Audrey
Isackson, Bruce and Davina,
and "Steve Masera at
thekeyworldwide.com , "please
keep this hush hush til late
March."
Bruce Isackson
says Singer promised him a
"controlled environment" for
testing for Audrey. All he had
to show was that she needed
more time to process
questions.
AUSA: What would
happen there? Isackson: The
proctor would change the
score.
Bruce Isackson:
Audrey said she thought she'd
done well on her own. Then
Rick said, excuse me, She did
sh*t.
AUSA: What
score did she get on the ACT?
Bruce Isackson: A
31. We paid $100,000 to the
Key Worldwide Foundation, then
to Rick and the proctor.
AUSA: Did you
take a tax write off?
Isackson: Yes.
AUSA: Did you do
it again for your son?
Isackson: Yes.
We'd use the same process with
Rick.
AUSA: So your son
Ryan was going to get into USC
as a soccer player. Did he
play soccer?
Isackson: Yes.
AUSA: Did he play
at a level to be recruited to
USC?
Isackson. No. Not
even close.
AUSA: Did Rick
Singer claim to be a part
owner of the Sacramento Kings?
Isackson: He did.
AUSA: Did you
believe him?
Isackson: No....
The case is
US v. GAMAL ABDELAZIZ et
al., 19-10080-NMG (MAD)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|