On
#MeToo, Inner
City Press
Asks About Sidibé
Retaliation,
Guterres Spox
Says Up to
UNAIDS
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Photos
UNITED NATIONS,
March 15 –
UN Secretary
General
Antonio
Guterres says
he has a "zero
tolerance"
policy for
sexual
harassment,
and for
retaliation. But
when Inner
City Press
asked
Guterres' deputy
spokesman Farhan
Haq about
Michel
Sidibé's reported
threats of retaliatory
investigations
against those
making
and offering
support to sexual
harassment
complaints at
UNAIDS, Haq said
this is entire
a matter for
UNAIDS. When
Inner City
Press asked
about the UN
Secretariat's
own investigation
of
whistleblowers,
for the second
day in a row,
Haq again
defended it,
as somehow
benefiting
member states.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City
Press: I'm
sure you've
seen the
article in The
Guardian
quoting Michel
Sibidé [sic]
of UNAIDS
[Joint United
Nations
Programme
against
HIV/AIDS].
What I wanted
to ask you is,
he seems to be
attacking
those who came
forward in the
sexual
harassment
case against
Luiz
Loures.
He's attacked
them.
He's said that
Loures is a…
is… made a
courageous
decision.
And, of his
detractors, he
says, we know
these people
are taking
their golden
shan…
handshakes
from us here
and knowing
they have a
job and then
attacking
us. We
know all about
that. We
know every
single
thing.
Time will come
for
everything.
When I hear
anything about
abuse of our
assets, I ask
for an
investigation.
Maybe these
investigations
are going
on. And
so, many staff
and many
people in the…
in the
“#MeToo”
movement see
this as a
direct threat
against those
who came
forward.
And I wonder,
what does
António
Guterres… who
I'm… I… I
would assume
is a reader of
The Guardian,
what does he
think of these
comments?
Deputy
Spokesman:
We're aware of
this
article.
Obviously,
it's for
UNAIDS and
Mr.
Sidibé to
explain what
the comments
attributed to
him are.
Regarding what
the
responsibilities
are… of UN
officials are,
we've made it
very clear
that we want
to make sure
that all
accusations
are heard,
that anyone
who has
complaints
comes forward
and feel free
to come
forward and
that no one
denies that
them
right.
The
Secretary-General
has made that
clear, and
he's made that
clear to the
other
officials of
the UN system.
Inner
City Press:
On the issue
of
investigations,
given what you
said
yesterday, I
took the time
to digest
it. I've
also heard
from some
people that
were surprised
by it. I
want to just…
just… so… to
be
clear.
The U… you
said the UN
can absolutely
investigate
perceived
leaks because
it deals with
confidential
information,
if I take you
correctly.
I mean, you
said that it
can do that,
but you seem
to also claim
that no one is
retaliated
against.
So, the two
things I
wanted to know
is, when can
the UN
investigate?
Is it… does it
have to be
information
labelled
confidential?
Can it be… in
what cases
does it… and…
and if the
Anders Kompass
case or the
Miranda Brown
case or the
Emma Reilly
case, these
are all cases
of
retaliation.
So, can you
explain what
you were
saying
yesterday?
Deputy
Spokesman:
With the cases
you're
referring to,
these are
cases where
the system
itself
examined what
was
happening.
We do that in
compliance
with our rules
and our
procedures,
and we
certainly make
sure that all
the
whistle-blower
protections
are put in
place.
That is why we
look into
those
individual
cases.
What you were
talking about
was a general
question
of: Can
leaks be
investigated?
And with the
United
Nations, as
with any other
entity, you
have the right
to do that to
make sure that
the
confidentiality
of sensitive
documents is
protected.
Inner
City Press:
So, for
example, the
UN's request
to the 1718
Committee for
a waiver and
the use of a
correspondent
bank that was
leaked,
and I did
publish it,
can that be
investigated?
Is that
considered…
what's… does
it require the
showing of
harm to the UN
to investigate
it or…?
Deputy
Spokesman:
Those are
ultimately the
judgments that
are made by
relevant
officials.
It's clear, as
with any
number of
institutions,
whether State
institutions
or private
institutions,
that documents
leak
out.
But, it's also
clear that,
for the
diplomatic
work of the UN
to continue,
Member States
have to feel
secure in the
confidentiality
of many of
those
communications.
And so that is
a judgment
that
individual
managers will
have to make.
Inner
City Press:
So, is it
Member State
information… I
just… this is
the last… is
it… is it
information…?
Deputy
Spokesman:
Like I said
it's a
decision that
managers would
have to make
in terms of
what they feel
is important
and sensitive. Inner
City Press: Can
you see why
with… with the
UNAIDS guy's
comment about
"I can
investigate my
enemies", why
the two put
together, an
unfettered or
unclear
ability to
investigate
any leak,
combined with
threats from
UN officials
to investigate
any opponents,
might be
problematic?
Deputy
Spokesman:
There is no
effort and,
certainly,
there is no
encouragement
to any sort of
effort to
pursue people
who are making
complaints.
Those are
something…
that's
something
that's
entitled
within the
system.
And, as you
know, there
are a series
of protections
throughout the
system for
people who
make
complaints
about issues
at the
workplace,
whether sexual
harassment or
otherwise.
Again, I'm
just stressing
the basic
point of
principle that
the UN does
have the
right, just as
a point of
principle, to
protect the
confidentiality
of its
communications." We'll
have more on
this. Guterres
through
his spokesman
Stephane Dujarric
he
has tried to
answer Press
questions
about
complainants
by declaring
that sexual
harassment
is not involved,
for example at
UNFPA in
India, below.
That
is contradicted
by the
complainant. Now the UN
refugee agency
UNHCR which
Guterres ran
for ten years
before
his 14 month as far as UNSG is
identified
as having
numerous
sexual abuse
complaints: "one
substantiated
case of abuse
in 2016, for
which a member
of staff had
been
dismissed. It
had 19
complaints of
sexual
exploitation
or abuse in
2017, of which
six are still
being
assessed. One
alleged victim
was 17.
Details of two
other cases
involving
under-18s are
unknown. Ms
Jolie declined
to comment but
a source close
to the actress
said she will
find the
allegations
‘upsetting’
and
‘inexcusable’
and has raised
the matter
with the
agency."
Will Guterres
answer for
these? He's
put in charge
of his task
force Jan
Beagle who was
the deputy at
UNAIDS amid
systemic
sexual harassment
there. On February
28 Inner City
Press asked Dujarric
for Beagle to
answer
questions.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City
Press: I
just would
like to
request that…
that maybe Jan
Beagle, if
she's chairing
this thing,
have a press
conference.
And I'm…
particularly,
since she was
at UNAIDS
[Joint United
Nations
Programme on
HIV/AIDS] in
the very time
frame where
the head of
the… of the
world… you
know, YWCA
says that it
was basically
Animal House
or that's…
that's the
kind of
phrases that…
she used… she
said it was
systemic, not
just a matter
that she was a
victim, that
there were a
number of
victims.
It just seems
kind of in…
it's
incongruous
that one
person would
say that…? Spokesman:
I think… yeah,
I think UNAIDS
would dispute
that
assessment. Inner
City Press:
Sure, but
maybe she can
do a press
conference? Spokesman:
Maybe." It's
yet to happen
or even be
scheduled.
More
than a month
after it was
loudly
announced that
Frank La Rue
was suspended
and relieved
of his job
and being
investigated
for harassment at
UNESCO, whistleblowers
there exclusively
tell Inner
City Press
that not
only is La Rue
still getting
paid - the
intention is
to continue paying
him until he
retires, and
then never
release any
finding
against him.
"This is to
discourage
whistleblowers
from coming
forward in the
future," one
told Inner
City Press.
And now, the
day after
Inner City
Press asked Guterres'
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric again
about Luiz
Loures and his
murky
exoneration at
UNAID, Loures
says he will
not extend his
contract.
Guterres, some
say to try to
distract or
distance
himself from
the scandals,
held a photo op with
"his" Women Leaders,
at which Inner
City Press
was one of
only two media
present. Alamy
photos here.
Then it had nowhere to
edit, thanks
to ongoing
restrictions
and censorship
by Guterres' Woman
Leader Alison
Smale. On
February 23,
Inner City
Press asked
Dujarric about
Loures,
whistleblower
Emma Reilly ad
his
misstatement that
UNFPA in
India was
not going to
use immunity.
Video here.
Transcript
here: Inner
City Press:
The UNFPA
[United
Nations
Population
Fund] thing,
I'm only
asking about
this because…
because of
what your
answer was,
that they were
not citing
immunity in
India. A
criminal
complaint has
been now
filed, so I
wanted to
know, given
that, is the
UN going to
seek to… to
now use its
immunity to…
to… as a
response to
that? Spokesman:
All… all these
cases will
need to be
studied and a
decision will
be made." Yeah
- a decision
to cover up.
On February 20,
Inner City
Press asked
Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric if
the UN system
would waive
immunity in
India where
the head of
the UN Population
Fund UNFPA is
accused of #MeToo-style
sexual
harassment.
Dujarric
repeatedly claimed
that the UN is
not citing
immunity,
video here.
But this is
contradicted
by what UNFPA
filed with
India's
foreign
minister, here.
So the UN is
lying about
its defenses
to sexual
harassment,
right in its
own UN Press
Briefing Room
from which it
had Inner City
Press removed
for
covering UN corruption.
Today's
UN is corrupt. On
February 21 at
noon Dujarric
admitted what
he'd said was
false - but he
never emailed
this to Inner
City Press,
allowing the
false
information to
continue. Now
the
complainant
has filed in
criminal
court, quoting
Dujarric.
Inner City
Press asked
about this - as
the only
questioner at
the day's noon
briefing, also
the only one
Dujarric
evicted and
restricts. Today's UN
is corrupt. Dujarric
on February 21 told
Inner City
Press,
transcript here: "I'm
not going to
go into the
details of the
case.
What is
important and,
I think, to
remember this
case does not
involve
allegations of
sexual abuse,
sexual
harassment.
It is for a
different…
it's a
different
issue, so it
does not
involve the
issues that we
discussed
yesterday. Inner
City Press: That's
not what the
complainant
says. Spokesman:
I'm saying… I
will… and I
will leave it
at that."
Well,
here's
her interview
in India: Q 1.
When did you
first meet
Diego
Palacios? How
did it all
start? A1: I
had joined
UNFPA's Bihar
office in
February,
2017. Diego
came to Bihar
in March and
that is how
the sequence
of events
unfolded. From
day one, his
behaviour
towards me was
inappropriate.
He made
unwanted
sexual
advances which
were,
ofcourse,
uncomfortable
for me. In
fact, the kind
of
conversations
between us
were also very
uncomfortable.
Describing the
kind of
treatment he
gave me, is
inexplicable.
However, I
never
succumbed to
any pressure
or demands. Q2.
What followed
when you
showed
restraint in
accepting any
of his alleged
sexual
advances? A1: When
I didn't give
into any of
his demands,
he continued
to create
pressure on me
over a period
of time by
various means.
He stopped the
funding
abruptly in
December 2017
, then
suddenly a
zero value
contract came
in, following
which he
terminated the
contract."
This is what
Antonio
Guterres
through his
spokesman
claims is not
about sexual
harassment.
On
February 26,
Inner City
Press asked
Dujarric,
UN transcript here:
Inner City
Press: on this
same issue of
UN
transparency
on sexual
harassment
claims, I
wanted to ask
you again
about this
UNFPA [United
Nations
Population
Fund] India
case, not just
the statement
that they
weren't going
to use
immunity and
then they are
using it, but
you'd said
last week…
you'd said:
"what's
important, I
think, to
remember is
this case does
not involve
allegations of
sexual
abuse".
And, as you
may have seen,
Ms. Prashanti
Tiwari has
given an
interview in
India saying
very much that
she has
suffered
unwelcomed
sexual
advances by
Diego
Palacios.
That's her
allegation.
I guess I'm
just saying,
is it the UN's
right… did
they
misunderstand
to… to
characterise a
claimant's
claim as not
involving
sexual
harassment
when it
obviously
does? Spokesman:
I think all
these claims
need to be
investigated,
and I think
you should…
you should
contact UNFPA
or UNFPA India
for further
details,
because I
don't have the
granularity on
this. Inner
City Press:
I know, but I
guess I'm just
wondering,
because people
there have
asked, then
why did you
say from this
podium that it
wasn't about
sexual
harassment? Spokesman:
I think I've
said what I've
had to say. Inner
City Press: Then
I wanted to
ask you about
UNAIDS [Joint
United Nations
Programme on
HIV/AIDS] and…
and the cases
there of… of
Malayah
Harper, the
head of the
YWCA of… a
well-respected…
absolutely.
So, they've
asked for an
independent,
i.e., non-UN,
independent
investigation
of the claims
that… not just
the most
recent one,
but she claims
that when she
was there she
suffered
it. So,
what I'm
wondering is,
I've heard all
the things
that you're
saying and
maybe the… the
response is
evolving, but,
given this
call, is there
a… is there
a…? Inner
City Press: I've
seen the
article.
I think, you
know, there…
there are
mechanisms in
place for
people to come
forward,
internal
mechanisms,
external
mechanisms,
and I think
they should be
used to the…
to the
fullest.
We feel that
claims need to
be
investigated.
People should
feel free and
safe to come
forward and,
if they need
to lodge
complaints,
that they do
lodge
complaints."
And here's
what Guterres
sent to staff:
"Subject:
Message from
the
Secretary-General
to staff on
sexual
harassment in
the workplace: As
part of my
commitment to
encourage and
enable staff
to call out
sexual
harassment in
the workplace,
and to support
victims and
witnesses, I
am pleased to
announce the
launch of a
“Speak up”
helpline. The
helpline is a
24-hour
resource for
UN Secretariat
personnel to
speak
confidentially
with an
impartial and
trained
individual who
can provide
information on
protection,
support and
reporting
mechanisms.
Going live
tomorrow, the
helpline will
complement
existing
reporting
mechanisms.
The goal is to
attend to the
needs of
personnel, and
to empower
them to make
informed
decisions on
action, if
they choose.
More details,
including the
phone number,
will be
provided by
the Office of
Human
Resources. To
improve and
centralize our
response
capacity, the
Investigations
Division of
the Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services will,
with immediate
effect, take
responsibility
for
investigating
all complaints
of sexual
harassment,
and implement
a streamlined,
fast-tracked
procedure to
receive,
process and
address
complaints. A
specialized
team focusing
on the
investigation
of sexual
harassment is
being created,
and additional
investigators
are under
recruitment.
Particular
attention will
be given to
increasing the
number of
female
investigators. I
reiterate my
commitment to
zero tolerance
of sexual
harassment,
and underline
that
harassment of
any type is
antithetical
to the
principles for
which we stand
as an
Organization.
As members of
a
standard-setting
institution,
we must all be
committed to
fostering an
inclusive
environment in
which every
person is
valued and
respected. A
harmonious,
safe and civil
workplace is a
key to
delivering on
our mandates
for the people
we serve. António
Guterres, Secretary-General."
Many staff are
calling the
response lame.
February
19 Periscope video here,
the UN transcript
here and
below. Haq
said he would
check with
UNFPA - but
the written
answer he came
back with was not
given to Inner
City Press or
even
read out at
the February
20 briefing,
until Inner
City Press
asked Haq's
boss Stephane
Dujarric about
it, video here,
UN transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: in
India, a
consultant of
UNFPA [United
Nations
Population
Fund],
Prashanti
Tiwari, has
asked that
immunity be
waived as to
Diego
Palacios, who
she accuses of
sexual
harassment.
Given
statements
that… and I
was trying to
figure out
yesterday
whether this
"we don't cite
immunity"
statement by
the UN only
applies to
peacekeeper
sexual abuse
or to sexual
harassment
alleged in
this context?
Is immunity
going to be
waived in this
case?
And if not,
why not? Spokesman:
I will… hold
on a
second.
Let me
see. I
need better
glasses.
I have… I
don't have the
details of the
case with me,
but what I can
tell you is
that sexual
abuse is a
crime, and
immunity is
not there to
protect people
who commit
crimes.
And immunity…
so it's not
even a
question that
needs to be
asked.
It does not
apply to
crimes. Inner
City Press:
So if this
person sues a
UN official in
court? Spokesman:
I don't… I'm
not going to
talk to you
about the
specifics of a
case that I
don't have
that much
detail about,
unless
somebody
provides… Inner
City Press:
But, I thought
immunity
exists unless
you waive it,
unless the UN
chooses to
waive it. Spokesman:
No, immun…
most… the vast
majority of UN
staff have
functional
immunity.
If you commit
a crime… to
cover what
they do for
work. If
you commit a
crime, that
is, by
definition,
not part of
your
function.
UNFPA tells us
that they're
aware of some
claims by a
former
employee of
one of the
Fund's
contractors,
an NGO
[non-governmental
organization]
in Bihar,
India.
The person is
not, and has
never been,
employed by
UNFPA.
Unless her
claims…
nevertheless,
her claims
will, like any
others, be
looked into
according to
UNFPA policies
and
procedures. Inner
City Press:
Right, but
that doesn't
answer the
immunity
question. Spokesman:
I think I've
answered it to
the best of my
ability.
So, it does
not… if you
have
functional
immunity and
you commit a
crime, it is
clearly not
part of your
function, so
the issue of
immunity does
not arise." Then
why does Ms.
Tiwari have to
ask her
country's
foreign
minister?
From
the UN's
February 19
transcript:
Inner City
Press: I'd
wanted to ask
you about
UNFPA (United
Nations
Population
Fund) and
India.
There's a
complaint to
the Foreign
Minister of
the country by
a contractor,
Prashanti
Tiwari, that
the head of
UNFPA in
India, Diego
Palacios,
sexually
harassed
her. And
they've asked
the UN
system,
or they've
asked India to
ask the UN to
waive immunity
so that she
can pursue
these "Me
Too"‑related
charges.
The
not asserting
of immunity, I'm
not sure what
it applied
to.
What's the
UN's system
response to a
case like
this? Spokesman:
Well, we'll
need to check
with our UNFPA
colleagues." Hours
later,
nothing.
Meanwhile
Inner City
Press hears
that UN staff in Vienna have
sexual harassment
issues to
raise when
Austrian
Foreign
Minister Karin
Kneissl
has lunch with
the Directors
General of
CTBTO, IAEA,
UNIDO, UNOV
and UNOOSA on
February 20. We aim to
have more on
this.
On February 6,
Inner City
Press asked
Guterres'
deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq how
it was that
UNAIDS deputy
Luiz Loures
was "cleared"
of harassment
charges, "how
was the
decision made
within
UNAIDS?" Haq
said, "it was
immediately
referred to
the Office of
Internal
Oversight of
the World
Health
Organization."
UN
transcript here. Video
here.
[The
Guardian says
"OIOS," as in
the UN
Secretariat's
OIOS - which
is it?]. Inner
City Press
then
specifically
asked, "does
the director
of UNAIDS,
Michel Sidibé,
then make a
final
determination?"
Haq said, "It
has to follow
the
recommendations
by the
investigators,
in other
words, by the
World Health
Organization
investigators."
That does not
appear to be
the case:
Sibide, a
witness in the
case, is said
to have made
the decision, after
staff
members were
pressured. On
February 16,
Inner City
Press asked Haq's
boss Stephane
Dujarric, video here
(second
half after
Lubbers), UN
transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: I'm
sure you've
seen The
Guardian
article in
continued
reporting on
the UNAIDS
[Joint United
Nations
Programme
against
HIV/AIDS]
clearing of
Mr. [Luiz]
Loures beyond…
beyond the
role of the
executive
director.
They've said
that staff
members… many
of them have
said they were
virtually
ordered to
write letters
of support for
Mr. Loures,
which seems to
be pretty much
almost the
definition of…
of… of
cover-up Spokesman:
Look, I think
these are
allegations.
I would
encourage you
to speak to
UNAIDS.
They are… you
know, and they
will speak for
themselves in
this case and
answer what
is… what are
really just
allegations.
The
investigation
was
done. It
was done under
the authority
of the World
Health
Organization’s
Office of
Independent…
of
Investigative
Services, so
questions
regarding that
should go to
UNAIDS and the
World Health
Organization. Inner
City Press:
And can you
say anything
more about
this March
meeting that
the head of
UN-Women team
said that the
Secretary-General
was going to
convene, I
guess, on the
sidelines of
an upcoming
conference, an
all-agency
meeting about
sexual
harassment? Spokesman:
"Not at this
point." So,
when? On
February 13,
Inner City
Press asked
Haq's boss
Stephane
Dujarric, video
here,
UN transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: I
wanted to ask
you again
about this
UNAIDS [Joint
United Nations
Programme on
HIV/AIDS]/Luiz
Loures case,
because,
yesterday, it
emerged or
Code Blue
stated — and
I'd like you
to confirm or
deny that the
claimant in
that case
wrote to the
Secretary-General
in the midst
of it to say…
you know,
alleging that
Mr.
[Michel]Sidibé
had a conflict
of interest,
had actually
offered to
mediate an
apology by Mr.
Loures to the
claimant to
resolve the
whole thing,
which makes
his ultimate
decision-making
or appointing
of the
decision maker
problematic
from their
view.
Given the
importance of
this issue…
given what the
Secretary-General
said at the
stakeout about
zero
tolerance… did
he receive the
letter from
the
claimant?
Why didn't
he…?
Okay.
First
question. Spokesman:
I don't know
if he received
the letter
from the
claimant.
This process
was handled by
UNAIDS.
UNAIDS is an
agency which,
for these
types of
issues, deals
through the
World Health
Organization's
Office of
Internal
Oversight.
As you know,
UNAIDS is a
joint project
bringing
together
various parts
of the UN
system.
UNAIDS
management had
no role in the
investigation,
and the
Executive
Director
specifically
had no role in
the issuance
of the
independent
IOS [Office of
Internal
Oversight]
report or in
the
decision-making
process in
this
case.
The complaint
was handled by
the rules and
regulations
that are in
place and that
govern UNAIDS. Inner
City Press:
Well, two
things.
Number one,
they say that
he appointed
his Deputy
Executive
Director, ad
interim, Mr.
Joel
Rehnstrom, to
be the
decision maker
and that this
individual
relied on Mr.
Sidibé to
either get or
not get the
final
job. So,
they don't
think that
that's really
a
recusal.
And I guess my
other question
is, maybe you
can say it in
retrospect.
Given how
important this
issue has
become, given
what his
stakeout said,
if it's a UN
system and a
claimant
writes to the
Secretary-General
and says, I
believe the
process is
broken out
here, does he…
did he
acknowledge… I
think I
[inaudible]
find
out. Can
you find out? Spokesman:
As I said,
let's find out
what the… you
know, if we've
received the
letter.
As… as we
said, our
colleagues at
UNAIDS have
told us
specifically
that the
Executive
Director had
no role to
play in the
issuance of
the report or
in the
decision-making
or the
process.
And I don't
particularly
agree with
Code Blue's
logic. Inner
City Press:
One last thing
in terms of
the claimant
letter,
because it
seems like
it's… that's a
yes-or-no
question, but
I've heard
complaints
from others
who've tried
on a variety
of issues to…
to… to reach
and at least
feel that they
reached the
Secretary-General.
And I know
that, under
Ban Ki-moon,
there was such
a process, and
letters were
acknowledged.
How would you
say, from this
podium, to… to
people, for
example, a
claimant like
this, how are
they supposed
to know that
their… their…
their pleas
weren’t lost
in the mail? Spokesman:
I would hope
that every
letter is
answered or at
least
acknowledged.
I will check
on the
specific
letter. Inner
City Press: That
doesn't seem
to be the case
currently. Spokesman:
I mean,
you're… it's
asymmetrical
warfare
here.
You're talking
to me about
letters that I
don't… I have
no knowledge
of. Let
me find out if
that specific
letter was
acknowledged." Two days
later,
nothing. So
Inner City
Press asked
Dujarric again on
February 15,
UN transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: did you
ever find out
if the… if the
letter from
the claimant
in UNAIDS
[Joint United
Nations
Programme
against
HIV/AIDS] was,
in fact,
received by
the 38th
Floor? Spokesman:
Yes, the
letter has
been received
by the
Secretary-General.
Obviously, as
we've said
here, issues
of harassment
are taken
seriously.
The
Secretary-General,
as you know,
has taken a
number of
steps to
ensure that
there is a
strength in
capacity to
prevent and
respond to
allegations of
sexual
harassment and
to support and
protect
victims.
In terms of
the letter, I
can confirm
we've received
it. As
you know, it's
the policy of
the UN, as
provided by
the General
Assembly
resolutions
concerning the
Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services
(OIOS) and by
staff
regulations,
to maintain
confidentiality
and not to
publicly
discuss
individual
cases or
complaints of,
or
investigations
into,
misconduct.
Therefore,
we're not in a
position to
comment
further on the
details of the
case, but, as
I said, the
letter has
been
received." And
then what? The
same day,
Guterres
offered unmitigated
praise of Ruud
Lubbers, who
left the UN
for sexual harassment .
We'll have
more on this. Code
Blue recounts,
"The
claimant
stated that
while the
formal
investigation
was underway,
Mr. Sidibé
approached her
to say that
Luiz Loures
would like to
apologize and
to suggest
that he
himself would
facilitate a
meeting
between
accuser and
accused, thus
putting the
whole issue to
rest. Appalled
and offended
by Mr.
Sidibé's
attempt to
informally
resolve the
case and halt
the
investigation,
the claimant
refused and
reported Mr.
Sidibé's
interference
to IOS. When
brought in for
questioning by
IOS, Mr.
Sidibé denied
that Luiz
Loures
confessed to
him, and he
told
conflicting
stories about
why he had
broached the
meeting idea
with the
claimant.
First Mr.
Sidibé told
IOS that Luiz
Loures
suggested he
intercede with
the claimant.
“He [Loures]
told me
clearly that
it will be
better if we
could really
make sure that
three of us,
we could meet
to clarify
these issues,
and not make
it a big
problems
[sic],” Mr.
Sidibé said.
Then, in a
subsequent
interview with
IOS, Mr.
Sidibé said he
decided to
approach the
claimant
without Luiz
Loures’
knowledge. The
press release
continues:
“The UNAIDS
Executive
Director
recused
himself from
the final
decision-making
role in the
case to avoid
any perception
of a conflict
of interest.
Instead, the
UNAIDS
Executive
Director
delegated
authority over
the case to
the Deputy
Executive
Director for
Management,
a.i.,” Joel
Rehnstrom. It
hardly counts
as a recusal
for Mr. Sidibé
to delegate
his duties to
a subordinate
who, at the
time, was not
only his
personally
selected
interim Deputy
Executive
Director for
Management but
was also a
candidate for
official
appointment to
the position.
Further, Mr.
Rehnstrom was
a close
colleague of
Luiz Loures. We
fail to see
why this case
was not
removed from
the purview of
UNAIDS
altogether. As
you know, Mr.
Secretary-General,
the claimant
wrote to you
directly,
asking that
you assume the
responsibility
for making the
final decision
in the
case.
The press
release says
that IOS
concluded the
investigation,
determined
that the
allegations
against Luiz
Loures were
“unsubstantiated,”
and
recommended
that the case
be closed.
Upon receipt
of the
investigation
report, Mr.
Rehnstrom
“requested the
Chair of the
standing
Global
Advisory
Committee on
Harassment to
constitute a
panel to
review the
report and to
make
recommendations
to him.” The
press release
does not
mention that
all three
members of the
Global
Advisory
Committee are
UNAIDS
employees in a
chain of
command that
ultimately
reports to the
Executive
Director of
UNAIDS, Mr.
Sidibé. The
IOS
conclusions
are damning.
IOS "found it
perplexing"
that Mr.
Sidibé stated
he did not
seek Luiz
Loures’
agreement for
broaching the
meeting idea
prior to
making that
suggestion to
the claimant. IOS
"found it
perplexing"
that Mr.
Sidibé
approached the
claimant to
suggest a
meeting given
that he "was
aware at the
time that the
matter was
under official
investigation
by IOS, having
referred it to
IOS himself in
November
2016."
In addition,
IOS "found it
perplexing"
that Luiz
Loures didn't
ask Mr. Sidibé
what Mr.
Sidibé had
discussed with
the claimant,
"especially
given that Dr.
Loures had
been
interviewed as
a subject of
allegations of
sexual
harassment and
sexual assault
approximately
one month
earlier." IOS
said the
statements by
both Mr.
Sidibé and
Luiz Loures
contained
“inconsistencies
and
anomalies.” The
UNAIDS press
release
concludes by
stating that
the Global
Advisory
Committee
"fully
concurred with
the findings
and
recommendations
of the
independent
investigation
and
recommended"
to Mr.
Rehnstrom
"that he close
the case." He
did so. We
have been
reluctant to
use the phrase
"cover-up" in
relation to
the Luiz
Loures case.
But it is
becoming
harder to
avoid the
conclusion
that the
Executive
Director of
UNAIDS knew
the truth
about Luiz
Loures’
shocking
behavior
toward a
female
subordinate.
We are
beginning to
believe that
Mr. Sidibé did
everything in
his power to
protect his
friend and
colleague from
the
consequences
of his
actions. The
UN internal
"justice"
system, we
have long
argued, is
dysfunctional
and
biased."
How then could
Guterres says
he was
declaring
"zero
tolerance" at
his stakeout
with
pre-picked
questions on
February 2?
Inner City
Press first reported
about this UN
buck-passing
on sexual
harassment in
2008 (before
UN's
retaliatory eviction),
here:
"the
International
Computing
Center,
administered
by the World
Health
Organization
which has also
refused
questions.
This ICC, it
turns out,
does not
defend those
who work for
it. One ICC
technician,
faced with
sexual
harassment by
a high UN
official, was
told by the UN
in New York
that nothing
could be done,
to reach over
the Atlantic
to the
ICC.
There, the
answer was
that the ICC
does not
process, or
apparently
favor, such
complaints."
We'll have
more on this.
On February 7, Inner City
Press asked Guterres' deputy
spokesman Haq, video here,
UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: I'd asked
you yesterday about this
clearing of [Deputy Executive
Director, Programme] Luiz
Loures in UNAIDS (Joint United
Nations Programme on
HIV/AIDS), and you'd said that
the… essentially, the decision
was made by, I think you said,
OIOS of the World Health
Organization. Spokesman:
It's not called OIOS.
It's the Internal Oversight
body of the World Health
Organization. Inner City
Press: Okay. It's being
alleged and it's by Code Blue
and as reported in the
Guardian that, in fact, the
decision… while… they don't
say… they call it Internal
Oversight Services, the UN's
investigation team. Then
they say that the report is
reviewed by a three-person
panel within the agency.
The panel then presents
recommendations to the
agency's Executive
Director. And they say
that Mr. [Michel] Sibidé
[sic], although chall… once
challenged by investigators,
appointed a subordinate but
still called himself the final
decision maker and that he was
also a witness in the case,
i.e., he was interviewed by
the investigators apparently
seeking to exonerate Mr.
Loures and then was the final
decision maker. So,
given what the
Secretary-General said about
zero tolerance, it seems like
it's important to get a clear
answer whether Mr. Sibidé or
his designee made the final
decision to clear Mr. Loures.
Spokesman: Well, you'd
need to get the details from
UNAIDS. As far as I'm
aware, Mr. Sidibé, not
“Sibidé”, Mr. Sidibé had
recused himself from the
process, but any further
details, you need to get from
UNAIDS. Inner City Press: It's
reported publicly that he
still maintained his position
as the final decision maker
and that he appointed the
person who would make the
decision, which is not really
what recusal is about.
Spokesman: Again, you'd
need to get the details from
UNAIDS about how the process
was conducted. Inner City
Press: Is the
Secretary-General comfortable…
given today's Guardian report
about essentially a cover-up
of sexual harassment at
UNAIDS, is he comfortable with
this as the way the UN system
deals with such allegations?
Spokesman: I wouldn't
agree with your
characterization of it as a
cover-up. They went through an
investigative process." What
process? UN Secretary General
Antonio Guterres says he has a
"zero tolerance" policy for
sexual harassment. But his
chief of "Global
Communications" Alison
Smale argued that all UN
staff including victims should
"speak with one voice" which
several staff told Inner City
Press they took to mean, Don't
make the UN look bad. Inner
City Press asked Guterres'
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
about it, despite getting cut
off (Vine here),
UN transcript here
and below, longer tweeted
video here.
Then on January 24, after
publishing the UN's troubling
finding of "mitigating
circumstances" for abuse and
payments to abuses, Inner City
Press asked Dujarric, UN
transcript here:
Inner City Press: The question
has to do with not about
policy the… the rights of
staff to speak but about the
UN's actual action on… on
cases of harassment.
There's a… there's this
document that's circulated to
staff about disciplinary
actions taken, and I… I saw it
yesterday, and I was pretty
surprised, because under the
rubric of abuse of authority,
harassment and discrimination,
it says, for example, a staff
member performed a sexual act
at the workplace in the
presence of… of
employees. Mitigating
factors included the staff
member's long service in
mission settings. And in
most… in many of these cases,
people are… are… even if
they're relieved from service,
they're paid
compensation. So, I
wanted to know, number one, is
there… have… have… the things
that are being said now, how
seriously the
Secretary-General takes… takes
such allegations, these were
from 2017, and so it seems
like there are cases of…
there's another case if you
want to… harassed an
individual… Spokesman: I
can't comment on the specific
cases you mentioned… Inner
City Press: Right. It's
not a leak. This is an
official disciplinary
document. Spokesman: I'm
not saying… I'm not going to
comment on specific cases,
because I don't have the
information in front of
me. There are
administrative rules and
procedures and an internal
justice system here, and we
are an organization of
rules. Those rules are
followed. What is
important is that everyone
understands that there is an
environment in which they
should feel comfortable and
empowered to come forward and
report cases of harassment or
abuse of power without any
fear of retribution.
That's the Secretary-General's
focus, to ensure that people
feel free to come up. We
are fully aware, like any
other organization, that these
issues are probably
underreported, because people
do not feel comfortable in
coming forward. Inner City
Press: But in… beyond
just coming forward, it seems
important what the UN actually
does. So there are
unwanted advances… mitigating
circumstances, payola to the
person… Spokesman: The
case… you know, there… you're
using. You're throwing
around terms. I mean,
obviously each case is looked
at. I'm not going to go
into the details of each
case." But it's not
hypothetical. From the UN's
transcript: Inner City
Press: I heard there was
a call about speaking with one
voice on sexual harassment at
the UN this morning. And
I wanted to… I guess I wanted
to ask you, because some staff
members have had a question,
this idea of speaking with one
voice, does it in any way
contradict the idea that staff
are free without speaking with
the same voice as the rest of
the UN, or is UN management to
speak to the press, is
there…Spokesman: There's
no… it's just to ensure… I
think it's important from a
communications standpoint that
all our colleagues are fully
aware of the current state of
play of rules and
regulations. I think
you're con… I don't know the
English word, but you're
mixing up the two. I'll
come… I'll come back to you."
This while a UN compendium on
the discipline it meted out
from 1 July 2016 to 30 June
2017, obtained by Inner City
Press and put online here,
cites "mitigating
circumstances"
including "long
service in
mission
settings"
for
harassment, abuse and public
sex, and provides those
accused with compensation From
the UN document: "A staff
member sexually harassed an
individual, who had worked for
an entity external to the
Organization and then joined a
United Nations agency, by
making unwanted advances,
sending improper messages of a
sexual nature and continuing
to attempt to contact the
individual. There were
mitigating circumstances.
Disposition: separation from
service, with compensation in
lieu of notice and with
termination indemnity.... A
staff member repeatedly and
inappropriately touched the
body of another staff member
who was working in a
subordinate position in the
office of the former.
Disposition: a fine of one
month’s net base salary and
separation from service, with
compensation in lieu of notice
and without termination
indemnity. A staff member
performed a sexual act at the
workplace in the presence of
employees of a contractor, and
in a second instance,
performed a sexual act in
public view. Mitigating
factors included the staff
member’s long service in
mission settings. Disposition:
separation from service, with
compensation in lieu of notice
and with termination
indemnity." This (mis) use of
mitigating factors hearkens
back to the just-previous head
of UN Peacekeeping, the fifth
of six Frenchmen in a row atop
DPKO, saying that peacekeepers
committed sexual abuse due to
a lack of "R&R," which
most in the UN(CA) press corps
ignored. On January 12
Guterres' spokesman Stephane
Dujarric had no comment at all
when Inner City Press asked
about the widely reported
sexual harassment allegations
against the deputy chief of
UNESCO, Frank La Rue. When
Inner City Press asked a
second time on January 17,
Dujarric said La Rue is no
longer in his position. But
what are the UN's policies,
now in light of the Guardian's
report and UN official Jan
Beagle's letter to the editor
about it? Inner City Press is
informed that on January 23
there was a UN wide conference
call on which two
contradictory positions were
expressed: let staff talk
freely to the media, or in the
alternative, "speak with one
voice," meaning control. Could
this be Guterres' "Global
Communications" strategy, a
continuation of censorship? On
January 22, Inner City Press
asked UN Spokesman Stephane
Dujarric, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: as I'm sure
you know, Jan Beagle has
written to The Guardian about
the series about sexual
harassment. And, among
other things, she said,
unequivocally, the UN staff
are free to speak… free to
speak to the media, which, if
true, is a great thing.
I just wanted to ask you
about, there's a UN rule that
says that for statements or
announcements to the press,
permission is required, and
I'm aware of a number of
cases, but, for example, the
case of Emma Reilly in the UN
system at the Office of the
[United Nations] High
Commissioner for Human Rights
(OHCHR), she was explicitly
told that she could not speak
to the press. And I know
that because that was
explained to me and… so… so
can you just… what I want to
do, rather than…? Can
you make clear… if, in fact
you're announcing that staff
can speak freely and will not
be retaliated against, this
would be the time.
Spokesman: I
understand. Okay.
There are media guidelines in
which staff members are told
they can speak to the press in
their areas of
responsibility.
Obviously, I think it's clear
that they should tell… they
should do it in concert with
their supervisors. There
need to be some
coherence. But, I think
the larger point is, if a
staff member feels they have
been wronged, they have not…
they have exhausted every
avenue, they feel they live in
a climate of fear, the press
remains an outlet. Inner City
Press: I understand, as
whistle-blowers, there's all
kinds of rules of what… you
have to exhaust your ability
inside the system before you
speak, but that's not what Jan
Beagle told The
Guardian. She said staff
aren't… aren't prohibited at
all, and I want to read you
something that… that Emma
Reilly… this was quoted to
her. “As a conduct
provision, within the UN
system, it would not be proper
for international civil
servants to air personal
grievances or criticize their
organizations in
public.” And, obviously,
the type of harassment we're
talking about…
Spokesman: As I said,
there are media guidelines,
and, obviously as… I'll repeat
what I've said. If
people feel they've exhausted
every avenue and they need to
“blow the whistle” on a
situation, the press remains
an outlet. Inner City
Press: Right, but if
they get retaliated against,
can they hold up the letter
and…? Spokesman: We do
not want to have… We are
working, I think, with great
effort in ensuring that we
create an atmosphere in which
staff members are… feel they
can speak up to their
supervisors, to other outlets,
and report on harassment or
retaliation. That is our
focus. Yes, sir. " Back
on January 18, Inner City
Press asked Dujarric, UN
transcript here:
Inner City Press: the article
just came out, but it
describes some policies that I
think you could address.
One policy that it mentions is
that some UN agencies have a
six-month statute of
limitations on
complaints. Is that
something the
Secretary-General is
interested in changing, and
another… Spokesman: I
don't know which UN agencies
the article is referring
to. What is clear is
that the Secretary-General
wants to see, across the
board, in parts of the UN over
which he has no direct-line
authority — as you know, some
specialized agencies and
others, he has no direct
authority — but through the
Chief Executives Board, he
wants a harmonization and he
wants effective policies to be
put in place to ensure that
people feel free and
comfortable coming forward.
Inner City Press: How about
comfortable speaking?
One of the… one of… the
article says that… that… that
those interviewed spoke on
condition of anonymity, quote,
partly because they are
precluded from talking
publicly by UN rules governing
staff. Can you say from
this podium that UN staff are
free to speak to the press
about abuse they suffer within
the UN from superiors?
Spokesman: No one is
putting a gag order. I
don't… but you know,
obviously, those quotes are
anonymous quotes. I
can't address them. But
the whole point is to create
an atmosphere in which people
who have suffered harassment
or who are… feel comfortable
to come forward and speak and
comfortable enough without any
fear of retaliation, which
would be unacceptable. Inner
City Press: And the one last
thing, it talks about OIOS
[Office of Internal Oversight
Services] and… and
interviewing the wrong people
and bungling
investigations. And I
just wondered, since… I think
since Ms. [Heidi] Mendoza took
over, I haven't seen her have
a press conference, and I'm
just wondering if… on this
issue, if this issue is
important enough in order to
understand how investigations
are done. Spokesman:
Look, we will have people come
forward to talk about
investigations. I can't
speak for OIOS, but I know…
you know, I know as for… they
have been investigating these
cases, I think, 15 reports in
2016 and about 17… 18 in
2017." So he had those
numbers, if-Pressed. Inner
City Press asked, if UNESCO's
investigation finds the
allegations, including that
the victim had a mental
breakdown, are well founded,
should La Rue remain a UN
official? Periscope
video here.
Dujarric
had no comment. Here's
video of La Rue answering
Inner City Press' questions in
October 2016, saying he wants
"transparency in UN bodies."
Having heard nothing back from
Dujarric, despite sending him
a link about the La Rue case,
on January 17 Inner City Press
again asked Dujarric about it,
UN transcript here:
Inner
City Press: I'd
asked you, it was last week
about this Frank La Rue
complaint or case at UNESCO,
and so what is the position, I
understand that he's entitled
to due process…
Spokesman: "No, I think
you may… you may have seen
that UNESCO announced that he
was relieved of his… of his
post. Whether it's
administrative leave, I don't
know what the exact term is,
but he's no longer in that… in
that function. UNESCO
has its own investigative
mechanisms, which are fully…
fully under way. And
whether it's UNESCO or the
Secretariat, there's obviously
zero tolerance for… for sexual
harassment, and the case will
be… will be investigated."
We'll have more on that - and
this: throughout 2016 New
Zealand documentary maker
Gaylene Preston and her crew
staked out the UN Security
Council along with Inner City
Press, awaiting the results of
the straw polls to elected Ban
Ki-moon's sucessor as UN
Secretary General. Preston's
focus was Helen Clark, the
former New Zealand prime
minister then in her second
term as Administrator of the
UN Development Program.
Preston would ask Inner City
Press after each poll, What
about Helen Clark's chances?
Suffice it to say Clark never
caught fire as a candidate.
Inner City Press told Preston,
as did many other interviewees
in her documentary “My Year
with Helen,” that it might be
sexism. But it might be power
too - including Samantha
Power, the US Ambassador who
spoke publicly about gender
equality and then in secret
cast a ballot Discouraging
Helen Clark, and praised
Antonio Guterres for his
energy (yet to be seen).
Samantha Power's hypocrisy is
called out in Preston's film,
in which New Zealand's
Ambassador complains that
fully four members of the
Council claimed to be the
single “No Opinion” vote that
Clark received. There was a
private screening of My Year
With Helen on December 4 at
NYU's King Juan Carlos Center,
attended by a range of UN
staff, a New Zealand designer
of a website for the country's
proposal new flag, and Ban
Ki-moon's archivist, among
others. After the screening
there was a short Q&A
session. Inner City Press used
that to point out that
Guterres has yet to criticize
any of the Permanent Five
members of the Council who did
not block him as the US,
France and China blocked
Clark, with Russia casting a
“No Opinion.” And that
Guterres picked a male from
among France's three
candidates to head UN
Peacekeeping which they own,
and accepted males from the UK
and Russia for “their” top
positions. Then over New
Zealand wine the talk turned
to the new corruption at the
UN, which is extensive, and
the upcoming dubious Wall
Street fundraiser of the UN
Correspondents Association,
for which some in attendance
had been shaken down, as one
put it, for $1200. The
UN needed and needs to be
shaken up, and hasn't been.
But the film is good, and
should be screened not in the
UN Censorship Alliance but
directly in the UN Security
Council, on the roll-down
movie screen on which failed
envoys like Ismail Ould Cheikh
Ahmed are projected. “My Year
With Helen” is well worth
seeing.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|