From
DRC, Now 22
Rapes in
Minova,
MONUSCO
Looted,
Ladsous
Storyteller?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
November 29 --
Under the $1.4
billion watch
of the UN
Peacekeeping
mission
MONUSCO, at
least 22 women
were recently
raped in
Minova,
presumably by
the Congolese
Army, which
MONUSCO
supports.
When
UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous
emerged from a
closed door
briefing of
the Security
Council on
November 27,
Inner City
Press asked
him, What
about Minova?
Beyond the
rapes, there
are reports of
renewed
fighting
between the
M23 mutineers
and the FARDC.
But Ladsous
refused
to answer,
searching for
any other
questioner
and then
taking favored
correspondents
with him into
the hallway.
On
November 29,
Inner City
Press asked
MONUSCO's
Deputy
Moustapha
Soumare about
Minova, now
that the UN's
own rape count
has risen from
21 to 22. Video
here, from
Minute 7:22.
Soumare
acknowledged
the presence
then in Minova
of FARDC
troops
"retreating
from Sake." He
said, "that
has happened
during the
time the FADRC
was retreating
from Sake."
Soumare
claimed that
MONUSCO was
partially
displaced to
Sake due to
the "looting
of our
warehouse and
offices." He
said, "MONUSCO
was displaced
into the Sake
area... there
has been some
looting of our
warehouses and
our offices."
Video
here, from
Minute 8:06.
Inner
City Press had
asked Ladsous
about this
too: protests
of and threats
to UN premises
and personnel
he is
responsible
for in DRC.
Ladsous
refused
to answer;
later his
spokespeople
provided a
vague
purported
response that
did not
specify any of
the damages to
MONUSCO
premises, much
less the now
acknowledged
looting of
warehouse and
offices. And by
whom
was this
looting?
UN
Peacekeeping
doesn't like
to answer,
which makes
their supposed
Human
Rights Due
Diligence
Policy
meaningless.
They say they
won't work
with army
units which
commit abuses,
then
repeatedly
refuse for
example to
state which
FARDC units
were in
Minova, when
the rapes
occurred.
This
is what one of
Ladsous'
spokespeople
sent Inner
City Press
about DRC on
the evening of
November 28,
and Inner City
Press'
immediate
response:
"Answers
to
your
questions: On
MINOVA, FARDC
and Due
Diligence
Policy. We are
aware of
reports of
human rights
violations and
abuses
allegedly
committed by
FARDC troops.
The mission is
monitoring the
situation,
following up
on the
allegations
and will
report through
appropriate
processes.
"On
the potential
use of UAV:
DPKO assets
and resources
are used in
line with
Security
Council
mandates,
force
requirements
and
guidelines. If
and when we
were to use
new tools on
trial basis in
DRC or
elsewhere, the
usual
procedures and
consultations
with
legislative
bodies will be
respected."
Inner
City Press
immediately
replied, to
three of
Ladsous'
spokespeople
and two of Ban
Ki-moon's,
with no
response
received as of
19 hours
later:
"Thanks,
but
the answers on
Minova and Human
Rights Due
Diligence
Policy and
on drones
do not answer
the questions
I asked. On
Minova, (a)
which FARDC
units were
present in
Minova when
the 21 rapes
took place?
(b) What was
MONUSCO's
presence in
Minova during
this time? (c)
What and where
are the
"appropriate
processes"
through which
DPKO will
report? Are
any of them
public, so
that
compliance
with the Human
Rights Due
Diligence
Policy can be
assessed?
"For
USG Ladsous to
refuse to
answer in any
way the
question of
Minova,
fighting there
and what
MONUSCO did
and will do,
is
problematic.
On drones, my
question was
and is clear:
do
DPKO and its
USG believe
that approval
-- not just
'consultation'
-- by the
General
Assembly or
its committee
is required
before any use
of drones?"
Now
the Italian
Mission to the
UN has sent
out an
invitation,
including to
Inner City
Press, to an
event where
Ladsous and
others will
speak and
presumably
take questions
on "telling
the
peacekeeping
story better."
This
follows an absurd
MONUSCO press
release
bragging of "MONUSCO's
remarkable
efforts in
assisting the
FARDC fight
the M23 rebels."
In Minova?
It's
not just about
telling a
story - it's
about the job
being done,
including
protection of
civilians and
transparency
in purported
Human Rights
Due Diligence
Policy -- and
about
answering
questions
about it.
Watch this
site.