On
W.
Sahara, UN
Won't Explain
Rights
Mechanism Drop,
Nigeria Says
April 17
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, April
16 -- The
untransparent
annual UN cat
and mouse
process around
Western Sahara
in which the
same human
rights
monitoring
mechanism
mandate that
other UN
Peacekeeping
missions have
is briefly
proposed and
then now shot
down by
Permanent
Member of the
Security
Council France
has moved into
a ninth stage.
UN Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric
refused to
explain, when
Inner City
Press asked,
why Ban
dropped a rights
"mechanism"
from the
advance copy
of his report.
Dujarric
refused to say
with whom,
other than
Morocco's
King, Ban
spoke about
the matter between
April 10 and
April 15, when
a new draft
without
"mechanism" went
on the UN's
website. Video
here.
Moments later,
Inner City
Press asked
Ambassador Joy
Ogwu of Nigeria,
April's
Security
Council
president and
an African
Union member,
about the drop
of the word
"mechanism."
She said it
will be
discussed in
consultations
on April 17. Video here.
On April 10,
Inner City
Press published
what was
called the
advance copy
of Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
report on
Western
Sahara, saying
that the goal
is a human
rights
monitoring
MECHANISM, see here
at Paragraph
100.
Now, the revised
report is on
the UN's
website, with
the mechanism
dropped. Click
here, at
Paragraph 100.
Earlier on
April 17,
despite a slew
of questions
about Western
Sahara coming
in to French
Ambassador
Gerard Araud
as he held a
press
conference on
human rights,
he did not
answer those
questions nor
take any
question from
Inner City
Press. The
only critical
question Araud
took, perhaps
by mistake, he
replied to,
You are not a
journalist,
you are an
agent. Video here.
(Inner City Press
and the Free
UN Coalition
for Access
asked Dujarric
on April 16 if
this was
appropriate. Video here. He said accredited
correspondents
should be
treated with
respect, but
declined even
when Inner
City Press
noted that
French foreign
minister
Laurent Fabius
did the same
thing to say
he will convey
this "respect"
position to
the French
Mission, or
Araud's
replacement
Jacques
Audibert, click
here for that)
On April 15,
Araud called
on France 24
and a
Reuters
reporter
who quoted
Araud without
mentioning
that Javier
Barden
reported Araud
as calling
Morocco
France's
mistress.
(Araud talked
of suing, but
never did.)
Nor did
Reuters
mention that
the head of UN
Peacekeeping,
atop the
Western Sahara
mission
MINURSO, is
Herve Ladsous,
a long-time
French
diplomat
including at
the UN
during the
Rwanda
genocide of
1994.
So a human
rights
monitoring
mechanism is
out, at least
from Ban
Ki-moon
report.
Morocco's
King, after in
essence
threatening to
end the UN
mission if
human rights
monitoring
mechanism is
included, is
now reportedly
slated to
visit Dakhla,
as early as
tomorrow. Click
here.
And as the
pace picks up,
here
is another
letter going
in to Security
Council
members, this
time from
humanitarian
groups working
in Western
Sahara, here.
This comes
just after the
King announced
a new
Ambassador to
the UN,
replacing (and
some say
blaming)
Ambassador
Loulichki.
The new
Ambassador
will be Omar
Hilale,
most recently
a hardliner on
the human
rights issue
at the UN in
Geneva. This
comes as
France is
slated to
replace its
Ambassador
Gerard Araud
with Jacques
Audibert in
July. So for
both Araud and
Loulichki,
this month is
a last
campaign
against a
rights
monitoring
mechanism.
Araud was
slated to give
a press
conference on
April 15, ironically
on human
rights, on
topic on which
he convened a
closed door
meeting at 10
am on April
15, from which
even some UN
member states
were
banned.
Araud should
have been
expected to
address these
issues -- but
he and his
spokesman
Frederic Jung
did not take
any question
from Inner
City Press,
and Araud
attacked the
lone critical
question he
selected.
Inner City
Press and the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
on the morning
of April 11
put online the
first advance
copy of the
"Report of the
Secretary
General on the
situation
concerning
Western Sahara,"
to be issued
as a document
of the
Security
Council under
the symbol
S/2014/258, here.
On April 12,
the Moroccan
government
-- but not the
UN -- issued
a read out of
a call by the
King of
Morocco to UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
earlier in the
day on the
topic of "the
Moroccan
Sahara,"
emphasis
added:
Tetouan
- HM King
Mohammed VI
held on
Saturday a
phone
conversation
with UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-Moon, says
a release of
the Royal
office.
The
talks covered
latest
developments
and the
present
timetable
related to the
Moroccan
Sahara issue,
says the
release. On
this occasion,
HM the King
reiterated
Morocco's
constant
commitment and
constructive
cooperation to
reach a final
political
settlement to
this regional
dispute,
within
Moroccan
sovereignty.
HM The
King further
drew the UN
secretary
General's
attention to
the imperative
need to
preserve the
negotiations
parameters as
they were
defined by the
Security
Council,
safeguard the
presence
framework and
modalities of
the UN
involvement
and avoid
biased
approaches and
risky options,
the statement
goes on.
Any
straying from
this track
will be fatal
for the
ongoing
process and
holds dangers
for any UN
involvement in
the issue.
The
conversation
also covered
HM the King's
sustained
actions and
laudable
initiatives
for the
stability and
development of
the African
continent.
Inner City
Press and the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
asked the UN:
"The
Moroccan
government has
issued its own
read-out of
their King's
telephone call
to the
Secretary
General, this
is a request
for a UN
readout of the
SG's call, in
light of what
Inner City
Press asked at
the April 11
noon
briefing...
There are
other
questions
outstanding,
as you know,
and I have
others, but
asking this
after the
Moroccan
government's
readout, for
the UN's
read-out."
Without
providing any
UN read-out,
Ban's
spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric
replied, "I
can confirm
that the call
took place."
Inner City
Press and
FUNCA asked
Dujarric and
his deputy
Farhan Haq
more
pointedly:
"If
not the still
requested UN
read-out, will
you comment on
Morocco's
statement that
the "King
further drew
the UN
secretary
General's
attention to
the imperative
[to] risky
options... Any
straying from
this track
will be fatal
for the
ongoing
process and
holds dangers
for any UN
involvement in
the issue" --
since this
seems to be a
threat to try
to terminate
"UN
involvement"
in Western
Sahara if an
option such as
a human rights
monitoring
mechanism were
included in
MINURSO, do
you have any
comment? And,
can you state
which side
initiated the
call, and if
the advance
copy of the
Secretary
General's
report on
Western Sahara
which I asked
about at
Friday's noon
briefing was
discussed?"
Ban's
spokesman
Dujarric an
hour later
replied: "No
further
comment."
At noon on
April 11,
Inner City
Press asked
Dujarric who
has input into
Ban Ki-moon's
reports, for
example if not
only the first
but the final
"Ban" report
on Western
Sahara will
urge a human
rights
monitoring
mechanism.
Dujarric
refused to
explain the
process,
saying wait
until it's
over, it is
not final
until it is
final -- not a
good sign,
some say. Who
wrote the
first report?
Who is
changing it?
Who CAN change
it? Inner City
Press asked,
without
answer. Video
here,
and embedded
below. UN
transcript:
Inner
City Press: I
wanted to ask
about the
Secretary-General’s
position on
Western
Sahara.
There’s an
advanced copy
of the report,
the
Secretary-General’s
report that
was circulated
that would be
ultimately a
more formal
document, but
it seems to
say the goal
is a human
rights
monitoring
mechanism, and
now there are
reports that
that’s going
be changed.
The word
mechanism will
drop, can you
describe what
the process is
on reports
such as this
that are
ascribed to
the
Secretary-General.
Who has input
into them?
Once they are
sent around
are they
final, and if
they are not,
who has input
in this case
to change
them?
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric: All
Secretary-General’s
reports are
ultimately
signed off by
the
Secretary-General’s
Office. Any
relevant
department or
mission would
have input
into it but a
report is a
final report
once it’s
final. So I
would ask you
to wait a day
or two until
the report is
issued, and
then we can...
you know
nothing is
final until
it’s final.
Inner
City Press:
Because the
consultations
would be on
the 17th,
everything is
moving, this
is the month
to do it. So I
wanted to
know, since
there is a
document
that’s
ascribed to
the
Secretary-General
that says
monitoring
mechanisms, I
just wanted to
ask you, does
Secretary-General
Ban Ki-moon
favour human
rights
monitoring
mechanisms?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Again, once
the report is
out, and it’s
final, it
would be the
Secretary-General’s
report. Until
the report is
out, we are
not going to
comment on it.
And once it’s
out, it is the
Secretary-General’s
word, so
there’s really
nothing to add
That's called
stonewalling
in advance,
that there
will be
nothing to
add. On April
14, Dujarric
not only
refused Inner
City Press'
request for
further
information
about Ban's
call with the
King: he would
not explain
why a UN
read-out of
Ban's call
with the
acting
President of
Ukraine was
provided, but
not with
Morocco's
King.
In Paragraph
100 on Page 20
Ban's (first)
report says,
or said, that
the goal is "a
sustained,
independent
and impartial
human rights
monitoring
mechanism."
Amid changes,
a Western wire
-- which has engaged in
censorship at
the UN, here
-- quoted
French
Ambassador
Gerard Araud
that "France
formally
denies any
interference
with the UN
Secretariat."
This servile
wire did not
even mention
that it can be
done within
the UN
Secretariat,
where the
Department of
Peacekeeping
which runs
MINURSO is
headed by
Herve Ladsous,
a long time
French
diplomat. Nor
does it
mention Araud
being quoted
by Javier
Bardem that
Morocco is
France's
"mistress" -
if only to run
Araud's denial
and litigation
threat. We
will be
watching for
that.
As a
part of this
watchfulness,
Inner City
Press had published a letter just submitted to the President of
the Security
Council by
"a number of
Nordic
organisations,
from Denmark,
Finland,
Norway and
Sweden,"
urging the
inclusion of
human rights
monitoring in
MINURSO's
mandate.
Even
former UN
envoy on
Western Sahara
Peter van
Walson has
written to
French
president
Francois
Hollande
urging France
to stop
opposing human
rights
monitoring in
Western
Sahara.
Also
new this year
is the
discomfort
caused by
Spanish actor
Javier Bardem
asserting that
French
Ambassador
Gerard Araud
told him that
Morocco is
like France's
mistress.
French foreign
ministry
spokesperson
Romain Nadal
has reportedly
confirmed that
Araud met with
Bardem in
2011; Araud
has said he
would seek
permission to
sue Bardem. (There is
a pattern here.)
Now, Jacques
Audibert is
said slated to
take over for
Araud by July.
So
this will be
Araud's last
campaign
opposing human
rights
monitoring in
Western
Sahara.
Earlier on
April 10 Araud
spoke at the
Security
Council
stakeout about
Central
African
Republic but
when Inner
City Press
asked about
the Chadian
troops there,
charged by the
High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights with
killing 30
civilians,
Araud told
Inner City
Press to Ask
Chad's
Ambassador.
US
Ambassador
Samantha Power
moments later
answered Inner
City Press'
question about
the withdrawal
of Chad's
troops from
CAR, video
here.
The
April 10
advance copy
of the "Report
of the
Secretary
General on the
situation
concerning
Western
Sahara"
consists of
104 paragraphs
and a map.
To
begin with --
Inner City
Press will
have more than
one report on
this Report --
there is a
recognition of
"demostrations
aimed at
drawing
attention to
human rights
concerns,
socio-economic
issues and
political
demands,
including the
right to
self-determination.
These were
swiftly
dispersed by
Moroccan
security
forces. On
most such
occasions,
there were
credible
reports of
heavy-handedness
on the part of
security
forces as well
as violence,
such as
stone-throwing,
on the part of
the
demonstrators."
The
Report says
"of particular
note was a
demonstration
that took
place in
Laayoune on 5
May 2013...
Protesters
expressed
dissatisfaction
that Security
Council
resolution
2099 (2013)
did not
include
provisions to
include human
rights
monitoring in
MINURSO's
mandate."
Will
it be
different this
year? Watch
this site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|