At UN,
Guterres on
Good Offices,
Luksic to ICP
on Budget,
Bokova Silent
on Ashe
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, April
12 -- How
should the
next UN
Secretary
General be
selected, to
improve the
Organization?
On April 12,
when Irina
Bokova of UNESCO
came to answer
media questions,
to many it was
bland, perhaps
as selected.
Inner City
Press, which
had been told
by President
of the General
Assembly
Mogens
Lykketoft to
ask the
candidates
about finances
and
corruption,
did -- it
asked Bokova
what she
thinks of the
John Ashe
case, see
below. She did
not answer.
By contrast,
when Inner
City Press
similarly
asked Igor
Luksic if he
will disclose
the budget for
his campaign,
from the
Montenegro
government and
otherwise, he
made a point
saying yes, if
he's going to
speak about
transparency
he has to
practice it.
The third and
last candidate
of the day,
Antonio
Guterres, said
in his opening
statement, as
fast
transcribed by
InnerCityPro.com:
First
of all, allow
me a few
remarks. Why
am I here? I
believe I’m a
privileged
man. God has
given me a
wide range of
opportunities,
creating a
need for
public
service. After
being a
student
volunteer in
the slums of
Lisbon, I had
the chance to
serve the most
vulnerable as
commissioner
for refugees.
That’s why I
am a candidate
for the SG.
And that
brings me to
the need for
prevention. TV
cameras are
not there when
a crisis is
avoided. But I
believe
prevention
must be the
priority of
everything we
do. And that
demands a huge
cultural
change.
The root
causes of
conflict
become
increasingly
interlinked,
and that’s why
we need to
understand the
global trends
in today’s
world, find
strategies and
policies to
act in line
with the UN’s
pillars. It is
here that
historic
agreements on
the SDGs and
climate change
have created a
unique
opportunity,
and it falls
to the SG to
mobilize the
whole system
to support the
states, which
are the
leaders of
this process.
At the same
time, the
reform of the
UN development
system.
The
balance
between the
bodies of the
UN system
should not be
changed, but
we have to
promote
convergence.
And no one
better to do
so. To take
climate change
and achieve
the SDGs is
also a
preventive
tool.
If
the
international
is failing,
it’s in
safeguarding
against
terrorism.
That’s why we
need a surge
in diplomacy.
Leadership is
failing. As
power
relations
become less
clear,
leadership is
more complex,
and that’s
where I see a
role for the
good offices
of the SG,
working as a
facilitator, a
catalyst, an
ambassador for
peace. And the
review of
peacekeeping,
women, peace
and security
also creates a
unique
opportunity to
create an
effective
peace
architecture,
what can be
called the
peace
continuum
which has
support for
capacity and
strengthening
institutions.
It is the best
foundation for
human rights
to be
protected and
enjoyed, and
for member
state
It is the role
of the SG to
mainstream
human rights,
through the
rights up
front
initiative.
And the SG
must lead by
example on
ethical
standards.
Human rithgs,
civil and
political,
economic,
social and
political
rights must be
promoted as a
common value,
in an unbiased
way, without
linking it to
any other
objectives.
The UN must be
at the
foreforont on
gender
equality, and
that was not
always the
case. We must
more from
perceiving
women and
girls as a
subject of
protection, to
fully
empowering
women and
girls. Gender
mainstreaming
across all
programs.
If elected, I
will present a
road map for
parity at all
levels with
clear bench
marks and time
frames. The
SGmust respect
parity in the
appointments
of the SG. A
shift is
necessary in
the selection
of special
representatives.
We have been
moving
backwards in
recent times.
On
coordination
and reform. We
need a less
process
oriented and
more delivery
oriented
coordination.
To have
collective
responsibility,
we need global
accountability,
accountability
of each
organization
to its
country, a
culture of
evaluation,
independent
and real-time
with
transparency.
Our rules are
too
cumbersome. We
need simplify
with a win-win
reform
strategy.
We live in
dangerous
times. We need
to promote
peace and
exercise
collective
responsibility
to eradicate
terrorism in
all its forms.
Our universal
values must
confront
radicalization,
intolerance.
We must be
proud of our
diversity."
Earlier,
Lykketoft took
a half-dozen
questions
before kicking
off the
informal
dialogues,
starting with
Montenegro's
foreign
minister Igor
Luksic, Inner
City Press
asked him if
questions
about UN
rapes, and the
John Ashe case
audit, will be
asked.
Lykketoft
replied that
the "John
Ashe" were
already being
dealt with, or
were fixed.
Inner City
Press pointed
out the Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services audit
of the
Secretariat,
how the
Department of
Public
Information
allowed a
corrupt event
in the General
Assembly
lobby, and a
corrupt
organization
to play a role
in the UN's
event on
slavery, as
well as
associating
with another
corrupt
organization
through
"Friends of
the UN." Video
here.
Lykketoft then
said, these
questions
could come up.
We'll be here.
On
April 11,
Inner City
Press asked
the
spokesperson
for President
of the General
Assembly
Mogens
Lykketoft if
Lykketoft will
ensure that
financial
disclosure
questions are
or can be
asked, and who
chose the
“civil
society”
questions. The
affable
spokesperson
told Inner
City Press to
ask Lykketoft,
and that the
list would be
provided after
the briefing.
Video
here.
But it
was not. Even
who chose the
people who
chose the
question was
unclear: some
in the UN who
work with
civil society,
presumably
meaning from
the Department
of Public
Information
which we must
note is the
most
criticized UN
department in
the so-called
John Ashe case
audit the full
text of which
Inner City
Press exclusively
put online on
April 6, here.
DPI has
shown a
willingness to
retaliate, so
we are
reporting this
as
diplomatically
as possible:
once a
spokesperson
has said on
camera that a
list will be
given, it
probably
should be.
At
minimum, the
excuse for not
providing it
should not be,
it would be
misunderstood.
Isn't it the
job of the UN
Department of
Public
Information to
provide and if
necessary
explain
information,
rather than
withhold it?
That said,
Inner City
Press will be
covering the
"informal
dialogues."
First up on
April 12 is
Montenegro's
foreign
minister Igor
Luksic. Beyond
some bank
bailout
controversies,
the fact that
Montenegro has
participated
in
peacekeeping
in Somalia and
Afghanistan,
with the UN in
Liberia and,
it was
debated, with
the European
Union in the
Central
African
Republic gives
rise to
questions.
What would
Luksic do
about the
scandal of
rapes in UN
peacekeeping,
in the Central
African
Republic and
elsewhere?
Merely
mouthing "zero
tolerance" is
clearly not
enough. What
does Luksic
think of a
current head
of UN
Peacekeeping
who links the
rapes to
"R&R"? Video here. To the
critical Press
being
physically ousted
from, then
restricted
within, the UN?
Relatedly,
what would he
do, in light
of the John
Ashe case and
audit,
to ensure that
the UN is no
longer for
sale? Watch
this site.
At the end of
the April 11
noon briefing
Inner City
Press was told
that the list
of who chose
the civil
society
questions will
be put online
on April 12,
after the
“interviews”
of candidates
has already
begun. We'll
be there - or
as close to
there as DPI
allows. Watch
this site.
(Inner
City Press
also asked
Lykketoft's
spokesperson
if, in fact,
DPI has at
least
belatedly
complied with
the John Ashe
audit's
Recommendation
5. The
spokesperson
said he will
check. We're
waiting.)
On April 8,
Inner City
Press asked
the spokesman
for outgoing
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon what
are the rules
governing
current UN
system
officials
running for
NextSG, in
terms of their
use of UN
time,
resources and
staff. From
the UN
transcript:
Inner City
Press: I
wanted to know
what the UN's
rules are
given that
there are now
two candidates
that are
currently
employed by
the UN system,
Irina Bokova
of UNESCO
[United
Nations
Educational,
Scientific and
Cultural
Organization],
Helen Clark of
UNDP [United
Nations
Development
Programme].
I wanted to
know, what
rules apply as
to how they
devote their
time, how
resources of
the agencies
and of other
staff in the
agencies are
devoted to
helping their
campaign.
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Obviously, for
UNESCO, that
is something
for the UNESCO
governing body
to
decide.
As far as
UNDP,
obviously, we
would expect
that and our
understanding
is that this
will have no
impact on her…
on Ms. Clark's
leadership of
UNDP and that,
obviously,
that no staff
resources
would be used
for that.
Inner City
Press:
No, and I
mean, I… I
guess I mean
it with all
due respect,
but
inevitably,
she's going to
be spending
time devoted
to this.
So, the
question is,
like, how much
time should
she…?
It's an
obvious…
Spokesman:
No, no, I'm
saying it's a…
I'm not
debating the
obviousness of
the
question.
That's what I
have to say at
this point.
On April 4,
New Zealand
announced for
Helen Clark.
But nowhere in
it did New
Zealand's
announcemeone
find financial
disclosure,
nor a vision
statement.
And with Clark's
UNDP embroiled
in the the
corruption
scandal
unveiled by
the indictment
of John Ashe,
none of the
correspondents
NZUN invited
for the launch
even asked
about that.
And while
anyone with a
passing
knowledge of
UNDP knows
Clark has a
problem with
staff
relations, to
put it mildly,
no one asked
about that
either.