Nigerians
Are Paying to
Rebuild UN
House,
Critique
UNanswered
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, March
26 -- Nearly
two weeks
after Inner
City Press
asked
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
Office of the
Spokesperson
about complaints
in Nigeria
about people
there paying
for rebuilding
the UN House
after it was
bombed, there
had still been
no answer.
So
Inner City
Press asked
again on March
25, and today
an answer
arrived.
This was the
questions
asked by Inner
City Press at
8 am on March
13:
-On
Nigeria, what
is the UN
Secretary
General's or
Secretariat's
response to
the the
Nigerian group
WON saying the
UN should
refund the $30
million given
it by the
Nigerian
government for
reconstruction
of its
building that
was bombed by
Boko Haram? To
help you
answer:
Emmanuel
Ogebe
of WON said:
“We are asking
that the UN
should refund
the N 4billion
because we
believe that
an
international
organization
of that class
should have
the resources
to fix the
building. The
fact of the
matter is that
Nigeria should
not foot the
bill of an
international
organization
funded by all
countries of
the world and
then, poor
people who
have nothing
will loose
their houses,
churches and
the Nigerian
government
will not
provide for
them. It is
only
obligatory
that Nigeria
pays its dues,
and we have
even gone far
to provide
peace keeping
troops. We
have paid our
dues even with
the lives of
some officers,
and now we
have an
atrocity like
this, instead
of the UN to
take care of
the building
and allow us
have resources
to take care
of
ourselves...
We ask the UN
Secretary
General to
refund the $30
million into a
Victim
Compensation
Fund that
would assist
victims of the
insurgent.”
This
is not (yet?)
litigation:
what is the UN
Secretariat's
response?
This
question was
not answered;
then on March
25 the UN
announced that
Deputy
Secretary
General Jan Eliasson
would be in
Nigeria. So
Inner City
Press asked:
Inner
City Press: I
wanted to ask
you a question
that I had
asked a couple
weeks ago, in
writing, which
is that at
least one NGO
(non-governmental
organization)
there, they
claim that the
rebuilding
of the Nigeria
House after
the Boko Haram
attack was
paid entirely
by
the
Government,
$30 million.
And they’re
saying this is
unfair and
is not how
it’s done
elsewhere,
like, for
example, this
building
here is not
all paid by
the US. So
they were
saying that
this money
should be
refunded to
Nigerians
because there
are many
actual victims
of Boko Haram
who are not
receiving any
compensation
from the
Government.
So, I wanted
to know: is
that the case?
How was the
reconstruction
of the
building
funded, and
what would be
the response
of the UN
system to a
Nigerian NGO
saying that
it’s not being
done
fairly?
Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq:
Well, first of
all, I don’t
know whether
that’s a fact,
so first we’ll
have to check
what the
funding is,
and we’ll try
to get back to
you on that.
Twenty
two hours
later, with
Eliasson in
Nigeria, the
following was
provided:
Subject:
Your
question on
the UN House
in Nigeria
From: UN
Spokesperson -
Do Not Reply
[at] un.org
Date: Wed, Mar
26, 2014 at
10:41 AM
To:
Matthew.Lee
[at]
innercitypress.com
The
UN House in
Abuja was
built by the
Federal
Government and
donated to
the United
Nations
System.
After
the 26 August
2011 attack on
the UN House,
the Federal
Government
pledged to
reconstruct
the building.
The
Federal
Government, in
fulfilment of
its pledge,
started phase
one of
the
rehabilitation,
which is about
60% complete.
Whether
that answers
the critique,
we'll let
readers decide.
Still
unanswered,
among other
questions, is
this one:
-While
still
requesting
response with
regard to Mr.
Roed-Larsen,
Mr. Joseph V.
Reed et al,
here is a more
systematic
question:
Has
the SG yet
prepared the
guidelines
required by
Resolution
67/255?
Following the
GA's decision
on $1/year
contracts in
April 2013,
how many
individuals
currently have
$1/year
contracts, and
who are they?
To
assist your
answer:
A/RES/67/255, 73rd
plenary
meeting 12
April 2013 e,
excerpt
...63.
Stresses that
one-dollar-a-year
contracts
should be
granted only
under
exceptional
circumstances
and be limited
to high-level
appointments,
and requests
the
Secretary-General
to prepare
guidelines
regarding the
use of these
contracts,
along the same
lines of those
established
for
when-actually-employed
appointments,
and to report
thereon, in
the context of
his next
overview
report, to the
General
Assembly at
the main part
of its
sixty-ninth
session;
We
are still
waiting. A
flier the Free UN Coalition for Access posted on
this topic, on
the "non-UNCA"
bulletin board
it advocated
for, was torn
down on March
7. FUNCA put
it back up.
But of the two
different
FUNCA fliers
up, now one of
the two has
been removed.
It is a new
era, requiring
a new
approach.
Two years ago
Dujarric was
re-introduced
to UN
journalist as
the chief of
the News &
Media
Division, in a
reception in
what the UN
called "UNCA
Square." And
then the
censorship
attempts
began.
A
journalist for
Iranian TV,
found to have
a rubber gun
which was a
prop in an
independent
film he was
working on, had his UN
accreditation
revoked,
permanently.
Dujarric was
in charge of
Media
Accreditation,
and Inner City
Press asked
him for a
justification
of this "one
strike and
you're out
policy." No
answer was
ever provided
by Dujarric.
Also
in his Media
Accreditation
role, Dujarric
chastised
Inner City
Press for
daring to go
stand outside
and try to
cover a
meeting of
Ban's Senior
Advisory Group
on
Peacekeeping
Operations,
which included
controversial
Sri Lankan
military
figure
Shavendra
Silva. After
the Sri Lankan
government
directed a
complaint
letter to the
aforementioned
UNCA, Inner
City Press was
told
it could not
cover the
meetings.
Inner
City Press,
then on the
board of UNCA,
was not
notified when
the
organization's
then president
agreed to
screen a Sri
Lankan
government
film denying
war crimes.
After it
published an
article noting
that the UNCA
president had
in the past
rented one of
his apartments
to Palitha
Kohona, Sri
Lanka's
Permanent
Representative
to the UN,
demands were
made that
Inner City
Press remove
the article
from the
Internet.
UNCA
took to
sending copies
of
correspondence
to Dujarric,
about articles
Inner City
Press had
written about
officials and
diplomats of
Dujarric's
native France.
Finally, UNCA
first vice
president
Louis
Charbonneau of
Reuters sent a
complaint
against Inner
City Press to
Dujarric,
calling it
"for the
record."
More
recently,
Charbonneau
has gotten one
of his
complaints to
Dujarric
banned from
Google's
Search, using
a filing
under the
Digital
Millennium
Copyright Act
-- straight up
censorship.
What does
Dujarric say?
In
fact, Dujarric
solicited
complaints
against Inner
City Press
from other big-media
UNCA
board
members,
through a
private,
including
through non-UN
email address.
Freedom
of Information
Act responses
show that UNCA
board members
met with "the
UN" to
request that
Inner City
Press be
thrown out.
Once Inner
City Press
published some
of these,
Dujarric on
June 29, 2012
asked to meet
Inner City
Press.
Dujarric
told
Inner City
Press not to
refer to Ban
Ki-moon as
"Wan Ki-moon"
and not to
refer to Herve
Ladsous,
the fourth
Frenchman in a
row atop UN
Peacekeeping,
as The Drone
despite
Ladsous
proposing the
UN's first use
of drones and
refusing to
answer Press
questions
about it.
This and a
specious
criticism for
having signed
Nobel Peace
Prize Winner
Tawakul Karman
of Yemen into
the UN,
where she
dared speak on
the UN
microphone
after a
Security
Council
meeting on
Yemen, were
linked by
Dujarric to
re-accreditation
he controlled.
Criticism of
stories,
coverage and
even tweets is
fine -- but
when done by
an official in
charge of
accreditation,
and even tied
to
accreditation,
we call it
what it is:
censorship.
Disgusted,
Inner
City Press and
another long
time
correspondent
from Brazil
founded the Free UN Coalition for Access as an
alternative to
the insider
UNCA, which
did not for
example offer
any defense to
the cameraman
thrown out for
the rubber
gun. (Reuters'
Charbonneau,
in fact, wrote
a story
playing up the
Iranian
angle.)
But
Dujarric
became the
interlocutor
for FUNCA. He
said only UNCA
was needed.
After
convening a
meeting
between FUNCA
and UNCA, at
which Inner
City Press openly said
"this is on
the record"
and UNCA
president
Pamela Falk of
CBS said,
"He's going to
write about
this,"
Dujarric sent
Inner City
Press a letter
which claimed the meeting was off the record and said
FUNCA was not
a DPI
interlocutor
for reform.
There
have been no
reforms since,
quite the
opposite.
Dujarric, who
earlier
refused a New
York Civil
Liberties
Union request
that the UN
provide due
process to
journalists,
continued the
Kafka-esque
atmosphere in
March 2013
when Reuters
and Agence
France-Presse
filed stealth
complaints
leading
with how Inner
City Press
asked a
question to Herve
Ladsous.
When
Dujarric's
Accreditation
Unit led a
raid on Inner
City Press'
office, photos
from which
quickly
appeared on
BuzzFeed,
Dujarric
denied any
role in giving
out the
photos. But
the published
photos are
identical to
the ones his
unit took that
day.
Since the
letter with
the false "off
the record"
claim, the
raid and
photos and
attempt to
censor tweets,
there has been
very little
contact
(though there
was an attempt
to essentially
ban FUNCA,
another
limitation on
freedom of
association,
speech and
press). FUNCA
has continued,
working with
UN-focused
journalists
not only in
New York but
as far afield
as Somaliland
and Colombia.
Now
Stephane
Dujarric is
the
spokesperson.
Can he use
this position
to pursue the
censorship
he's sought
for the past
two years?
FUNCA opposes
it, and says
these
questions must
be answered.
Watch this
site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|