Your support
means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on
our Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron. MRL
on Patreon
UNITED
NATIONS, May 3 --
The Trump - Kim
talks, primed by
Mike Pompeo's visit
to Pyongyang, have
had their location
sweepstakes narrowed
down, excluding the
US. While some
including CBS report
Singapore is in the
running, after that
report Prime
Minister Lee Hsien
Loong said, "We've
had no formal
invitations,
requests from the
parties." On
the afternoon of May
3 in the UN in a
Japan sponsored
event about human
rights in North
Korea, Sung Yoon Lee
of Tufts University
made a point of
saying that Japan's
colonialism in Korea
was better than what
the Kims have done.
Fine, but why
compare? Conference
Room 6 was full -
although
increasingly
irrelevant pro-Abe
media Sankei Shimbun
was not in it, too
busy "reading" Kanye
West - and many of
the speeches,
punctuated by
applause, were
directed at urging
Trump not to be
fooled by Kim Jong
Un. Australia spoke
about Human Rights
Council term, as
earlier in the day
did Austria, on the
UN's hypocritial
World Press Freedom
Day. This is today's
UN. Earlier on May 3
it was reportd that
North Korea has
moved its three
American hostages to
a hotel in
preparation of
releasing them;
Trump's lawyer and
former New York City
Mayor Rudy Giuliani
has said the release
will be today, May
3. We'll see. On the
other hand on May 2
the North Korea /
DPRK mission to the
UN issued a press
release trashing the
US for having, in
the closed door
April 30 Security
Council 1718
sanctions committee
meeting, brought up
North Korean
hacking. Inner City
Press has put it on
Scribed, here.
The tone runs
counter to what's
been coming out of
Pyongyang. But it is
all in evolution.
Trump has suggested
the DMZ, and South
Korea's President
Moon called UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres to
ask the UN to play a
role in North
Korea's promised
shut down of its
nuclear testing
location at
Punggye-ri. Inner
City Press on May 1
asked Guterres'
spokesman which of
the two versions
from Seoul was
correct, that
Guterres said Yes or
that he passed the
buck to the UN
Security Council.
Rather than answer,
the Spokesman said
there would be a UN
read-out soon From
the UN transcript:
Inner City Press: on
this report that…
that President Moon
[Jae-in] of South
Korea called António
Guterres, what can
you say about it, in
one report, it said
that… that he'd said
that, yes, I'll do
it, and another
report it said he'd
said it's up to the
Security Council,
but I want to.
Which is it?
Deputy
Spokesman: We
actually expect to
have a readout… I
was hoping to have
it when I got in,
but it's not ready
yet. But,
hopefully, you'll
have it shortly."
Five hours later,
still nothing. Then
after 6 pm, this:
"The
Secretary-General
spoke with H.E. Mr.
Moon Jae-in,
President of the
Republic of Korea,
on 30 April. The
Secretary-General
congratulated the
President on the
success of the
Summit between the
Republic of Korea
(ROK) and the
Democratic People’s
Republic of Korea
(DPRK). The
President sought the
support of the
United Nations to
verify the imminent
closure of the
DPRK’s nuclear test
site, as announced
by the DPRK Chairman
Kim-Jung-un. The
President also asked
the support of the
United Nations for
the implementation
of the DPRK-ROK
agreement to
transform the
demilitarized zone
into a peace zone,
as provided for in
the Panmunjom
Declaration for
Peace, Prosperity
and Unification of
the Korean
Peninsula. The
Secretary-General
reiterated the full
support of the
United Nations to
furthering the
inter-Korean
dialogue and in this
regard pledged that
the United Nations
stands ready to
discuss possible
forms of support."
So no answer on the
role of the UN
Security Council.
Inner City Press on
April 30 went to
stake out the 10 am
meeting of the UN
Security Council's
1718 DPRK Sanctions
committee. But even
as of 10:15 it had
not started - some
Council members had
not bothered to show
up. A UN Secretariat
staffer made
repeated cell phone
calls. Finally the
meeting began,
including hearing on
humanitarian issues
from the UN
Development Program,
which pending a
proposed power shift
to the UN Deputy
Secretary General
coordinates UN
efforts in-country.
It was UNDP which
pushed for the
exemption of
sanctions for
Russia's Sputnik
Bank on which Inner
City Press
exclusively reported
earlier this year.
But the delayed
April 30 meeting
didn't break up
until 12:30, when
Inner City Press was
at the UN noon
briefing asking
about, among other
countries, Syria, Haiti
and Cameroon.
Rushing down to the
basement, the
Committee Chair was
saying that all
efforts are made to
enable the transfer
of liquidity, using
exemptions, and
noting the
exemptions given so
all participants
could attend last
week's DPRK - ROK
talks. Second half
of stakeout here,
on Periscope.
Reference was made
to the Global Fund
suspending malaria
work in North Korea.
We'll have more on
this - and this:
In the face of
North Korea sanctions, the UN
in December 2017 used the
sanctioned Foreign Trade Bank
and Russia's Sputnik Bank to
release EUR 3,974,920.62 into
the country, documents
obtained by Inner City Press
and exclusively published on
February 21 show. On February
21, Inner City Press asked the
Dutch chair of the UN Security
Council's 1718 Sanctions
committee about the exemption.
He refused to comment, saying
the issue did not come up in
the meeting he had just
exited. Videohere.
But a letter
from Sputnik Bank stated that
"unauthorized person (I.V.
Tonkih) led negotiations
with Korean party on interbank
correspondent relationship."
Photoshere,
more documents in PDF now
published on Patreon,here. On February 22,
Inner City Press asked UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres' spokesman Stephane
Dujarric about how Sputnik
Bank, given its admission, was
selected, and then additional
questions in writing, below -
which Dujarric would not
answer or confirm. Videohere.
Beyond
the Committee
member(s) delayed
arrival on April 30
some Japanese media
at the UN weren't
present either, for
example the notably
anti-talks
(and increasingly
incompetent) Sankei
Shimbun. Nor was
Sankei Shimbun
present at the May 1
UN noon briefing
where Inner City
Press asked about
Moon's call to
Guterres. After the
Moon - Kim talks
with hand shaking
and two-step across
the DMZ, on April 28
the White House
issued read outs of
calls with Abe of
Japan and Moon of
South Korea:
"President Donald J.
Trump spoke today
with President Moon
Jae-in of the
Republic of Korea to
discuss the April 27
meeting between
President Moon and
North Korean leader
Kim Jong Un.
President Trump
thanked President
Moon for the close
coordination between
the Republic of
Korea and the United
States in the
lead-up to his
meeting, and
committed to remain
in close contact in
the coming
weeks. The two
leaders agreed that
the unprecedented
pressure applied by
the United States,
the Republic of
Korea, and the
international
community through
the global Maximum
Pressure Campaign
has led to this
significant
moment.
President Trump and
President Moon
emphasized that a
peaceful and
prosperous future
for North Korea is
contingent upon its
complete,
verifiable, and
irreversible
denuclearization."
And, "President
Donald J. Trump
spoke today with
Prime Minister
Shinzo Abe of
Japan. The
leaders affirmed
their commitment to
achieving the
permanent and
verifiable
denuclearization of
North Korea and to
continuing their
close coordination
in advance of talks
between the United
States and North
Korea. They
also reiterated the
need for North Korea
to abandon all
weapons of mass
destruction and
ballistic missile
programs.
Finally, President
Trump noted that he
will urge North
Korea to promptly
resolve its
abductions of
Japanese citizens."
Japan continues on
this issue, but
we'll see its place
in a Trump - Kim
meeting. Inner
City Press on the
morning of April 27
witnessed the North
Korean Ambassador
coming down the
steps from the UN's
Delegates' Entrance
to its 1B basement,
where in Conference
Room 3 Guterres was
to meet with the
Group of 77 and
China on his stalled
reforms. Meanwhile
the parents of US
student Otto
Warmbier have filed
suit against North
Korea, care of Ri
Yong Ho, for
punitive damages in
the killing of their
son. Lawsuit on
Scribd, here.
On April 26, Pompeo
was confirmed as US
Secretary of State
by the Senate,
57-42. (From the
State Department:
"Supreme Court
Justice Samuel Alito
swore in Secretary
of State Mike Pompeo
in the West
Conference Room of
the Supreme Court at
2:00 pm, April 26,
2018." Reportedly,
after Brussels he's
headed to
Jerusalem.)
President Trump,
before the vote,
told Fox &
Friends that "We're
doing very well with
North Korea. We'll
see how it all comes
out. We
have three or
four dates.
That includes
five
locations.
That will be
narrowed down...
Mike Pompeo did go
there. He wasn't
supposed to meet
with Kim Jong Un,
but he did. He, you
know, they arranged
actually while he
was there to say
hello. We have
incredible pictures
of the two talking
and meeting which
I'd love to release
if we can." On April
25 some details of
Friday's Kim - Moon
talks emerged.
"There are three
items on the agenda
for Friday:
denuclearization,
creating a peace
regime, and
improving
inter-Korean ties.
Moon will propose
the opening of an
inter-Korean liaison
office and
establishing a joint
committee to promote
political, military
and economic
exchanges, the
left-leaning
Hankyoreh reported.
But on
denuclearization,
the most difficult
issue and the one of
most interest to the
United States, the
discussion will be
carried out by the
two leaders
directly, the
right-wing Chosun
Ilbo reported."
Meanwhile self
described right wing
Sankei Shimbun has
no information,
literally fallen
asleep at the
UN. As
the UN Security
Council headed for a retreat
in Sweden, it was accompanied
by UN Secretary General and,
Inner City Press first
reported, UN Disarmament chief
Izumi
Nakamitsu. On the 38th
floor the word was that her
agenda is "OPCW" - that is,
Douma. And North Korea? No
other media was up on the 38th
floor for this, other than
Inner City Press. Inner City
Press ran into Nakamitsu after
she had a meeting preparing
for the retreat with Guterres
and his Political
(some say,
Cameroon)
adviser
Khassim
Diagne. The UN
Secretariat has
yet to release
a list of the
officials
it is bringing
to the
retreat, so this
report is a
scoop-lette.
Sweden's
Deputy
Ambassador
Carl Skau's
joke the
previous day
about making
the Council
members sit
silent and
listen to
music, perhaps
Bach as Dag
Hammarskjold
famously did,
came up. But
what music? At an April
18 press conference Inner City
Press asked what seemed an
obvious journalistic question:
who's paying? Video here.
On the
morning of April 18,
Trump tweeted:
"Mike Pompeo met
with Kim Jong Un in
North Korea last
week. Meeting went
very smoothly and a
good relationship
was formed. Details
of Summit are being
worked out now.
Denuclearization
will be a great
thing for World, but
also for North
Korea!" So at noon
on April 18, Inner
City Press asked UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric about
Pompeo's trip, which
the UN spokesman
said he had no proof
actually occurred.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City Press: it
has, since your last
briefing, emerged
that current CIA
head, nominee to
State Department
Secretary of State
Mike Pompeo,
travelled to
Pyongyang and met
directly with Kim
Jong-un. I'm
wondering, I mean,
you've had
statements on other
breakthroughs.
This… what do you
think of this
one? And also,
the President,
Donald Trump, said
that there [are]
five locations being
considered for the
talks. None
are in the US.
Maybe you will or
maybe you
won't. Would
the UN be willing to
offer, for example,
its premises in
Geneva as a location
for the upcoming
talks? Pompeo
first.
Spokesman: The
United Nations is
ready to support
this effort in
whatever way we
can. I've seen
the reports, and
we've read with
interest the
different articles
that say Mr. Pompeo
was in
Pyongyang. I
have no way of
confirming it.
In general, the
Secretary-General is
very supportive of
all of the
diplomatic
initiatives that are
currently under way.
Inner City
Press: Are you
saying that you
doubt that he was
there? I mean,
the President said
he went there.
Spokesman: No,
I'm not saying I
doubt it; I'm saying
I have no… it's not
for me to… I have no
official
comment. I've
seen the press
reports." He said,
"I have no way of
confirming it." All
politics, including
journalistic
politics of course,
are local. Take for
example the
self-described
pro-Abe Japanese
newspaper Sankei
Shimbun, which
missed the
Washington news as
it misses and
bungles the news at
the UN, having
switched
to a scribe
named Kevin
Pinner who
brags online
of his time as
a copywriter
in Shenzhen
for
"Chinavasion
Wholesale Ltd,
I named
products,
generated
slogans."
Slogans
indeed. Now
Pinner is
uselessly
typing up
quotes
on Palestine that
are not used,
talking about
his boss and
then falling
asleep in the
bullpen, sidling
up to state media
using "Sonkei... the
right wing smallest
of the major
Japanese papers" as
a calling card,
gushing a pedigree
of Chinese media
(great) and Swiss
magazines - the
state media had not
heard of Sankei. On
April 27 he was not
even at the UN noon
briefing where the
PGA meeting with the
Korean Ambassador
was announced. On
April 18 at a
stakeout on Syria
covered by Inner
City Press, present
were other Japanese
media but not
Sankei. Its Mayu
Uetsuka now
"covered" Stormy
Daniels, with cookie
cutter comparisons
of the US and France
and swipes at
evangelicals, absurdly
under the rubric
"Reading the United
States." And why not
Canada, with
superficial
coverage of a
mere "motion"
about
the South
China Sea?
Meanwhile
they
missed even
the story of
the US
Committee on
Human Rights
in North
Korea, see
Inner City
Press'
coverage here.
This
reading will
continue. Uutsuka,
an embarrassment
even to her
predecessor Jun
Kurosawa and, in
Paris Mina Mitsui
actually covering
Syria, previously
"reported" on MLK
events in Memphis,
while using UK-based
corporate wire
coverage of the
issues impacting its
own readership.
We'll have more on
this - and on this:
as UN Secretary
General Antonio
Guterres took off
for his six day trip
to China, Inner City
Press which has
pursued the UN
bribery scandals of
Ng Lap Seng and now
the China Energy
Fund Committee asked
Guterres' spokesman
Stephane Dujarric on
April 6 if Guterres
will address any of
these issues during
his five days in the
country. Dujarric
was dismissive, and
ended the briefing.
Video here.
UN
transcript
here and
below.
Guterres spoke at
the Boao Forum on
Asia, with no
mention of bribe
paying, much less
the growing but
censored #MeToo /
#RiceBunny sexual
harassment movement
in China - nor
China's recent gifts
to Kim Jong Un in
seemingly open
violation of UN
sanctions. Gushing
with him at Boao one
of Guterres' UN
system officials,
Francis Gurry, under
whom the UN World
Intellectual
Property
Organization helped
North Korea with
cyanide patents
without even
notifying the UN's
DPRK Sanctions
Committee. Gurry,
identified as a
senior Australian
diplomat, "told
The Australian
Financial Review on
the sidelines of the
Boao Forum... he
would remain at the
helm of the WIPO
until his second
term expires in
2020, despite
efforts last year to
oust him." So much
for accountability,
including for
retaliation against
staff, in Guterres'
UN - where the
investigative Press
gets retaliated
against, daily.
Guterres quotes at
the Forum in Hainan:
"last May when I had
the honour to attend
the Belt and Road
Forum with President
Xi Jinping... By
connecting peoples
and markets in Asia,
Europe and Africa,
including in Latin
America..." In
Africa, through CEFC
China Energy at the
UN to UN PGA Kutesa,
this included bribes
for oil and banks in
Uganda. In the Czech
Republic, which
chairs ECOSOC at
Guterres' UN, this
included buying
sports teams and
media, banks and
even brewers - and
China Energy Fund
Committee is still
in "special
consultative status"
with ECOSOC, even
after the indictment
and jailing of this
"NGO's" Patrick Ho.
The UN has gotten
even more corrupt,
and censorious,
under Guterres. From
the UN's April 6
transcript, when
Guterres' spokesman
Dujarric was also
dismissive of
restrictions on the
Press in UN
headquarters: Inner
City Press: I wanted
to ask about the…
the trip to China by
the
Secretary-General.
You know, as you
know there's…
there's one being
concluded and one
still active UN
bribery cases
pending in the
Southern District of
New York. Most
recently…
Spokesman: I
don't agree with
your
characterization.
Inner
City Press:
They're both about
bribing the
PGA. I guess
you can say the PGA
is not really the
UN, but…
Spokesman: Go
ahead. Go
ahead.
Inner City
Press:
Okay. So my
question is since
there seems to be a
pattern of… in two
cases, one was Ng
Lap Seng,
South-South News,
who Vivian Wang has
now pleaded
guilty. The
other is the China
Energy Fund
Committee, which
remains in
consultative status
with ECOSOC
[Economic and Social
Council]. Is
this an issue that
the
Secretary-General,
in visiting the home
base of both
operations, and both
are alleged to be
Government
connected?
Spokesman: The
United Nations has
cooperated with the
Southern District
here in New York in
whatever way we can
in any and all
investigations.
The legal process
here has played
itself out and is
playing itself out,
and as for the
accreditation of the
ECOSOC
accreditation, as
I've told you
numerous times, it's
a member state
issue…". And then
Dujarric ran off the
podium. We'll have
more on this. The UN
has been targeting
not only Inner City
Press for
censorship, but also
its sources, for
retaliation.
It was
reported and quoted
here:
"Looks like UN is
making efforts to ID
people who send
stuff to media:
'Identified a
computer used to
print an email that
was later leaked to
Inner City Press, by
correlating an URL
on the top of the
leaked document with
Webmail & DHCP
logs.' Are they
punishing
whistleblowers?"
Well,
yes. And the
investigative Press.
On
March 14, Inner City
Press asked UN
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres'
deputy spokesman
Farhan Haq about the
above-quoted and he
said, since the UN
has confidential
information it can
and does investigate
leaks and leakers.
Video here.
But isn't that, in
leaks to Inner City
Press ranging from
Burundi to Cameroon
to cover ups to
North Korea, going
after
whistleblowers? Haq
dodged, and Inner
City Press asked if
a person who leaked
the memo to Kofi
Annan about
impending genocide
in Rwanda would be
investigated.
Apparently yes - but
Haq again claimed
that there is no
retaliation. What
about Anders
Kompass, fired after
releasing a document
bout French
peacekeepers' rapes
in Central African
Republic? Or Miranda
Brown? Or Emma
Reilly? On March 15,
after asking Haq
about threats of
retaliation made at
and by UNAIDS, Inner
City Press asked
what type of leak
the UN investigates,
and for whom. Haq
said any kind the UN
wants, and
ostensibly for
member states. Video
here.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City Press: On
the issue of
investigations,
given what you said
yesterday, I took
the time to digest
it. I've also
heard from some
people that were
surprised by
it. I want to
just be clear. You
said the UN can
absolutely
investigate
perceived leaks
because it deals
with confidential
information, if I
take you
correctly. I
mean, you said that
it can do that, but
you seem to also
claim that no one is
retaliated
against. So,
the two things I
wanted to know is,
when can the UN
investigate?
Is it… does it have
to be information
labelled
confidential?
Can it be… in what
cases does it… and…
and if the Anders
Kompass case or the
Miranda Brown case
or the Emma Reilly
case, these are all
cases of
retaliation.
So, can you explain
what you were saying
yesterday?
Deputy
Spokesman:
With the cases
you're referring to,
these are cases
where the system
itself examined what
was happening.
We do that in
compliance with our
rules and our
procedures, and we
certainly make sure
that all the
whistle-blower
protections are put
in place. That
is why we look into
those individual
cases. What
you were talking
about was a general
question of:
Can leaks be
investigated?
And with the United
Nations, as with any
other entity, you
have the right to do
that to make sure
that the
confidentiality of
sensitive documents
is protected.
Inner
City Press:
So, for example, the
UN's request to the
1718 Committee for a
waiver and the use
of a correspondent
bank that was
leaked, and I did publish
it, can that be
investigated?
Is that considered…
what's… does it
require the showing
of harm to the UN to
investigate it or…?
Deputy
Spokesman:
Those are ultimately
the judgments that
are made by relevant
officials.
It's clear, as with
any number of
institutions,
whether State
institutions or
private
institutions, that
documents leak
out. But, it's
also clear that, for
the diplomatic work
of the UN to
continue, Member
States have to feel
secure in the
confidentiality of
many of those
communications.
And so that is a
judgment that
individual managers
will have to make.
Inner
City Press:So,
is it Member State
information?
Deputy
Spokesman:
Like I said it's a
decision that
managers would have
to make in terms of
what they feel is
important and
sensitive.
Inner City Press:
Can you see why with
the UNAIDS
guy's comment
about "I can
investigate my
enemies", why the
two put together, an
unfettered or
unclear ability to
investigate any
leak, combined with
threats from UN
officials to
investigate any
opponents, might be
problematic?
Deputy
Spokesman:
There is no effort
and, certainly,
there is no
encouragement to any
sort of effort to
pursue people who
are making
complaints.
Those are something…
that's something
that's entitled
within the
system. And,
as you know, there
are a series of
protections
throughout the
system for people
who make complaints
about issues at the
workplace, whether
sexual harassment or
otherwise.
Again, I'm just
stressing the basic
point of principle
that the UN does
have the right, just
as a point of
principle, to
protect the
confidentiality of
its communications."
We'll have more on
this. Here's how the
UN transcribed
it: Inner City
Press: it's been
said here by OHRM
[Office of Human
Resources
Management], which
did a press
conference that UN —
and you just said
it, in fact — that
UN staff are free to
speak. So, I
wanted to ask you,
this is a quote of a
document obtained by
the journalist
Lauren Wolfe, who's
recently written
about “#MeToo” at
the UN. And
the document, it's a
UN document, says:
"Identified a
computer… a computer
used to print an
email that was later
leaked to Inner City
Press by correlating
an URL at the top…
URL at the top of
the leaked document
with web mail and
DHCP logs," which is
Dynamic Host
Configuration
Protocol.
Basically, it
reflects that UN —
and I believe it's
OIOS [Office of
Internal Oversight
Services] — is
conducting
electronic
investigations to
determine which UN
staff member leaked
documents showing UN
wrongdoing, they
believe. And
so, how does this
square with the idea
that people are free
to blow the whistle
and that the UN
wants wrongdoing and
malfeasance to be
confronted in any
way possible?
And is it
appropriate to… to
identify
whistle-blowers that
communicate with
investigative
journalists?
Is that appropriate?
Deputy
Spokesman: No,
whistle-blowers
should be
protected. At
the same time, as
you know, there's a
huge amount of
confidential
information in the
United Nations,
information that
needs to be handled
with great
sensitivity.
And it is
appropriate for
different offices to
monitor how those…
that information is
handled.
Inner
City Press: I just
wanted to ask one…
just… because it
seems like there's…
there could be a
conflict between
saying that
whistle-blowers are
free to speak, but
we're free to
investigate them
because we're an
organization that
has confidential
information.
So, I'm asking about
this specific… and I
believe you can
answer on this one…
Deputy
Spokesman:
Every institution,
including all
Governments, are
free to conduct leak
investigations, and
they do so. We
try to make sure…
and there are, as
you know, different
offices and
different avenues
for protection for
whistle-blowers.
There's a
whistle-blower
protection policy,
and that has to be
enforced.
Inner City Press:
So, if somebody
leaked — for
example, I'm going
to go back so it's
not a hypothetical,
an actual document —
the Rwanda memo that
went to Kofi Annan
that said weapons
are being stored and
a genocide is about
to happen, somebody
leaked it to the
press, would the UN…
would it be
appropriate for the
UN to investigate
who blew the whistle
on human rights
violations, which is
the case in this…?
Deputy
Spokesman: As
you know, there have
been many different
types of sensitive
documents over the
history of the UN
that have, in fact,
leaked to the press
and no one has faced
any consequences for
that, precisely
because it was in
the public
interest. At
the same time, a lot
of business of the
UN simply could not
be conducted, the
sensitive diplomatic
work we're supposed
to do could not
happen if there was
the presumption that
all documents would
leak.
The decay or need
for reform at the UN
Department of Public
Information was
shown again on March
12, when DPI's UN
Photo called Arancha
Gonzalez of the ITC
the UN National
Security Adviser, here.
This came the
business day after
March 9, when DPI's
now flagship UN News
mis-named the UN's
scandal plagued
peacekeeping mission
in the Central
African Republic
“MONUSCO” instead of
its actual name
MINUSCA. Photo here;
DPI also mistakenly
called Najat Rochdi
a "High
Commissioner." That
came on the same day
that DPI chief
Alison Smale was
criticized, both
fairly and unfairly,
in a General
Assembly meeting
held in the
Trusteeship Council.
Inner City Press,
covering the meeting
but only with the
escort or minder
that Smale's DPI
requires of it but
not more than a
hundred less
prolific, less
critical and seldom
present
correspondents, put
questions after
Smale's holdover
adviser Hua Jiang
sped out of the
meeting to a critic,
then politely to
Smale herself. She
acknowledged little
action to date on
the criticisms, at
least one of which
should have been
directed to the
Department of
General Assembly and
Conference
Management. But all
bureaucratic
niceties aside, how
can a former New
York Times editor
have presided
without explanation
or response over a
system of press
accreditation with
no rules, with
blatant targeted
restrictions, for
more the six months?
In October Smale
said she
acknowledged the
need for the
“courtesy” of a
response to the
Press' petitions -
which has yet to
come - and on March
9 seemed to indicate
an acknowledgment of
the need for rules.
But where are they?
After the reiterated
exchange, Inner City
Press demurred for
days. On March 12 it
reiterated the
request for rules,
to Smale, Guterres
and his chief of
staff, and Deputy
Amina J. Mohammed:
"Dear USG Smale, SG
Guterres, DSG
Mohammed & CdC
Ribeiro: I am
writing to formalize
my oral request to
USG Smale on March
9. Specifically,
that Inner City
Press be given an
opportunity to be
heard on why, after
now more than two
years of restricted
access to the UN for
having pursued the
Ng Lap Seng UN
bribery story into
the UN Press
Briefing Room, it
should be restored
to its long time
office and resident
correspondent
status. Beyond my
particular case - on
which Special
Rapporteur David A.
Kaye wrote to DPI
about the lack of
due process, here.
There is as I
mentioned again to
USG Smale on March 9
the need for UN
rules not only on
how a journalist
gets due process
before any eviction,
but also for how a
once-evicted
journalist can
pursue
reinstatement. I
have been told I am
not even on any
list, as
correspondents who
ask less and produce
less than I do about
the UN have come
after I was evicted,
and been made
resident
correspondents. I
have covered, among
other stories, Cameroon,
DPRK,
Sri
Lanka, Yemen,
Sudan, the new (Nov
2017) UN bribery
case of Patrick Ho
and CEFC
China Energy and the
issues raised by a
UN Security
Inspector openly praising
a controversial GA
speech (the Iran
bomb fuse cartoon
speech), in both
2016 and this month
- and for this last
story, I'm told I
face further
complaints or
restrictions.
Similarly lawlessly,
as I live-streamed
on Periscope a
recent SG photo op
with Egypt's new
Ambassador I was
suddenly told
by UN Security
that I could not
record audio, even
as UNTV recorded
audio. This is
Kafka-esque and must
end, this month
which marks the 25th
month. I will be
trying to cover the
UNSC and CSW, with
the absurdly
required DPI minder
or escort. A meeting
on this should be
held this week by
USG Smale or one of
you." 24 hours,
nothing. We will
continue on this.
The deadline is now.
Watch this site.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for