On
North Korea
USUN Submits
Designation
Proposals to
UN Which Still
Bans Inner
City Press
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Video,
scoop,
CJR
UNITED NATIONS,
August 3 – Before the North
Korea - US summit, US
President Donald Trump on June
1 said, "you people are going
to have to travel because
you'll be in Singapore on June
12th." And on that day, after
a 38 minute tete a tete (with
interpreters) and wider
meetings and a lunch, Trump
held up the four point
document and after that took
questions, see below. On
June
22, the day the UN ousted
Inner City Press from a speech
by Secretary General Antonio
Guterres in contravention of
the Press' rights even under
the UN's rules (CJR here),
Inner City Press earlier in
the day asked UN spokesman
Farhan Haq, UN transcript here: Inner
City Press: it seems that
North and South Korea have
agreed to have at least
temporary family
reunifications sometime this
summer, maybe in August,
since you said the
Secretary-General is following
this process, what does he
think of that? Does it
have any implications for the
nuclear side of the
discussions?
Deputy Spokesman: Well,
we welcome all
confidence-building measures
that are taken between the
parties on the Korean
Peninsula and we certainly
hope that the issue of family
reunifications can move
forward. As you're
aware, this has been a concern
of many families for decades
and anything that helps ease
the sort of problems and pain
that they've faced from
separation is a welcome step."
The UN just watches - and
censors. On August 3, the US
Mission to the UN, silent on
this to day, issued this: "The
U.S. Mission to the United
Nations submitted a list of
designation proposals today to
the UN Security Council’s 1718
North Korea Sanctions
Committee as part of the U.S.
government’s regular sanctions
implementation activities.
This action coincided with
today’s Treasury Department
actions and is part of a
coordinated U.S. government
effort to continue to
implement existing sanctions,
both domestic and
multilateral, and cut off
North Korea’s illicit
financial activities. The
United States has been clear
that if the international
community wants to achieve the
final, fully verified
denuclearization of North
Korea, the best way to support
that process is to remain
vigilant in applying the
current sanctions to their
full extent." On July
3 the same rogue UN
Security officer Ronald E.
Dobbins and a partner roughed
up Inner City Press as it
covered Guterres' budget; on
July 5 and 6, Guterres UN has
banned Inner City Press five
days now and counting from
entering the UN pending a
"review" - of Dobbins'
brutality?
Fox News story
here,
GAP blogs I
and II.
Now
on August 2 on their way to
Malaysia a US State Department
Official travel with Mike
Pompeo answered questions
about North Korea, including:
" If he does meet with the
North Korea foreign minister,
would that be on Friday or
Saturday, do you think?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT
OFFICIAL: Thank you for
that question, Carol.
I’m not in a position to
confirm any additional
meetings of a bilateral nature
beyond those meetings with
Singapore, but I will simply
note what happens at these
annual gatherings is there are
at least 27 – I think this
year with guests of the chair
there are approximately 30 –
foreign ministers. That
provides a platform for a lot
of interaction – some sit-down
meetings, some side-bar
meetings, some pull-asides,
some chance encounters – to
address challenges in the
region or other
business. So I think
it’s safe to say the Secretary
will be seeing many of his
counterparts.
MODERATOR: We need to
wrap it up. A few more
questions.
QUESTION: You said last
Tuesday that the Secretary
will ask countries to continue
implementing sanctions against
North Korea, but what – can he
do more than just ask
implementing when there is a
sense that they are not
implementing them as – as they
were doing before the summit
and before this year?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT
OFFICIAL: Yeah, I think
when it comes to North Korea
and sanctions, it’s more than
an ask; it’s a reminder of
obligations. All of the
countries participating in
these multilateral meetings
are also members of the United
Nations and are obligated to
implement all UN Security
Council resolutions. And
we do have concerns about
North Korea bypassing some of
those sanctions, not adhering
to its own obligations, so the
Secretary will use these
opportunities to remind all of
that obligation to stick to
the sanctions as a means to
get to the ultimate objective,
the fully verified, finally
fully verified,
denuclearization of North
Korea.
QUESTION: But he already
addressed this problem at the
UN Security Council a few
weeks ago. What can he
do more than just reminding
them? I mean, is this
having some success in
implementation? Do you
see some changes or not yet?
SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT
OFFICIAL: Well, in very
general terms, we believe that
the sanctions and the
adherence to sanctions by
countries around the world is
a primary reason that North
Korea has entered into
dialogue, and those sanctions
need to stay in place until
the goals and objectives of
the sanctions are
achieved. That’s a very
important message, and it’s
not one that the Secretary
delivers lightly, I think he
delivers on a regular basis,
and we see a need to continue
doing so." We'll have more on
this - and, we hope, on the
question we were able to ask
the Dutch chair of the UN's
North Korea sanctions
committee Karel Von Oosterom,
who has been informed in
person at the Delegates'
Entrance gate and then in
writing: would travel ban
waivers be needed if North
Korea attends the UN's
September high level week? The
answer, from genial Dutch
spokesman Frits Kemperman who
knows of the UN's ouster of
Inner City Press, was that Kim
Jong Un is not on the travel
ban list. But how about the
rest of his possible
delegation? How will we get
this answer, while
banned? On June 28,
restricted Inner City Press
observed China's Permanent
Representative and one staffer
rushing, or trying to rush, in
to the Security Council
between 5:45 and 6 pm. But the
door was locked. Exclusive
Inner City Press Periscope
video here.
Later it was reported and
China and Russia had a
proposal to reduce UN
sanctions on North Korea.
We'll have more on this. On
June 13 Inner City Press asked
this month's President of the
UN Security Council Vassily
Nebenzia if his country,
Russia, thinks the Singapore
deal is essentially "freeze
for freeze." Nebenzia replied,
"There are elements of freeze
for freeze, that is clear."
Video here.
Inner City Press also asked
the chair of the UN Security
Council's 1718 Committee if
the blanket sanctions
exemptions were time bound and
are now over. Seems so -
Periscope video here, at end.
On June 12 Trump said the war
games will not be resumed in
North Korea complies, calling
them provocative and
expensive. A Japanese reporter
asked about abductions,
adding, when will Trump do
interview with Japanese TV?
Trump said abductions will be
worked on, it's not in the
document. Trump said that to
verify - the word not in the
document - there'll be a lot
of people there. There was no
mention of the UN or IAEA.
Hours later UN Secretary
General Antonio Guterres put
out a canned statement "reiterat[ing]
his readiness
to fully
support the
ongoing
process,"
below, after leaving problems
at the IAEA unaddressed,
taking few and onlyl
handpicked questions,
restricting the Press. On June
11 in New York with the UN
effectively marginalized, its
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres wanly offered,
"Relevant parts of the United
Nations system stand ready to
support this process. The
International Atomic Energy
Agency has a mandate to apply
safeguards on all nuclear
material in peaceful use,
including all material removed
from military programs." He
took three pre-picked
questions but has not answered
on the IAEA portion of the UN
system's cover up of sexual
harassment charges under his
watch. As Inner City Press has
exclusively
reported: "An abrupt
resignation at
the
International
Atomic Energy
Agency in
Vienna, of
Tero
Varjoranta, was by some like
Reuters linked to Trump's
pull out from
the Iran JCPOA
deal. Varjoranta
was linked to
the JCPOA
- but his
resignation,
multiple
whistleblowers
tell Inner
City Press,
was more tied to
a sexual harassment incident witnessed
by many staff. Inner
City Press'
sources,
understandably
afraid of
retaliation
in Guterres'
UN (which
continues to restrict Inner
City Press) now exclusively
provide Inner
City Press: it was a
retreat held
in October
2017 by one
division
within the
Department of
Safeguards, see below.
On May 23,
before the UN barred Inner
City Press
from the
premises from
7-7:55 pm then
had it escorted out,
Inner City
Press asked Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric, UN
transcript here." More
here.
With that entirely unaddress
and the Press that exclusively
reported and asked still
restricted by Guterres, the UN
put out this on June 12: "The
Secretary-General welcomes the
holding of the Summit between
the leaders of the Democratic
People’s Republic of Korea
(DPRK) and the United States
as an important
milestone in the advancement
of sustainable peace and the
complete and verifiable
denuclearization on the Korean
Peninsula. As the
Secretary-General noted in
letters to both leaders before
the Summit, the road ahead
requires cooperation,
compromise and a common
cause. Implementing
today’s and previous
agreements reached, in
accordance with relevant
Security Council resolutions,
will require patience and
support from the global
community. The
Secretary-General urges all
concerned parties to seize
this momentous opportunity and
reiterates his readiness to
fully support the ongoing
process." At the UN on June 5,
Inner City Press asked the
chair of the UN's North Korea
Sanctions Committee, Dutch
Ambassador Karel van Oosterom,
how many sanctions exemptions
have been given for the talks.
After not answering this
question the last few times
Inner City Press asked, on
June 5 he said, "One," a
blanket exemption. Inner City
Press followed up, asking if
and when North Korea will
provide information like the
names of those traveling:
before the 12th or after the
12? Van Oosterom, walking
away, said it's an open
exemption. UN video here.
What does this say about
sanctions? Trump on May 29 tweeted,
"Meetings are currently taking
place concerning Summit, and
more. Kim Young Chol, the Vice
Chairman of North Korea,
heading now to New York." On
May 30 just before 7 pm Kim
Yong Chol and security, as
well as at least one staffer
from the US Mission to the UN,
exited the Millennium Hilton
hotel on 44th Street across
from the UN and piled into a
series of black cars, pursued
by media. See 2 minutes and 20
seconds of Inner City Press'
Periscope feed, here.
They drove to 330 East 38th
Street, the Corinthian
Condominium where many war
crimes linked diplomats have
lived and the US leases a
condo for its deputy
ambassador; they dined for 1
hour and 26 minutes on
"American beef." On May 31
after a two and a half hour
meeting at the Corinthian,
Pompeo held a short press
conference at the Lotte Palace
Hotel at 2:15 pm. Inner City
Press arrived as required at
1:15 pm; there was a full
stand up by Fox then another
cut short by someone's ring
tone. Periscope video here.
Pompeo took four questions
(Bloomberg, WSJ, ABC and Fox)
and was upbeat but declined to
entirely confirm the June 12
talks are on. Why could he, if
another statement like those
on Bolton and Pence could get
it called off again? Looks
like it's a go. Will UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres (again out of town
until May 31, when he canceled
the press Q&A he had
scheduled) try to make himself
relevant? Seems not. On travel
ban exemptions, the
UN Security
Council
website as
Inner City
Press exclusively
reported is to
be run by the
"self
employed"
husband of the
chief of staff
of the
Department of
Political
Affairs. The
Dutch have a
role in this
website, DPA
whistleblowers
tell Inner
City Press.
We'll have
more on this.
Back
on May 24 Trump wrote to Kim
Jong Un, "based on the
tremendous anger and open
hostility displayed in your
most recent statement, I feel
it is inappropriate, at this
time, to have this
long-planned meeting."
Simultaneously, UN Secretary
General put out a statement -
praising North Korea for
destruction of an already
played out testing site. The
UN under Guterres remains out
of date, irrelevant and worse.
But on the morning of Saturday
May 26, Trump's spokesperson
Sarah Huckabee Sanders said,
"The White House pre-advance
team for Singapore will leave
as scheduled in order to
prepare should the summit take
place." And just before 9 pm
on May 26, in a White House
event marking the release of a
Utahan from Venezuela, Trump
said:
“We're doing
well on summit with
North Korea..
there's a lot of
good will... if we
can be successful in
de-nuclearization of
the Korean
peninsula. We're
looking at June 12
in Singapore, that
hasn't changed.”
But the UN remains
a place of untransparency. At 3
pm on May 24 Inner City Press
asked the Dutch chair of the
UN's 1718 DPRK sanctions
committee if the exemptions
granted will be rescinded. He
said he would answer later - but
was gone when the UN Spokesman's
Office announced the afternoon's
consultations were over. The
Committee's website lists
exempted correspondent banks but
not travel ban exemptions; the
UN Security Council website as
Inner City Press exclusively
reported is to be run by the
"self employed" husband of the
chief of staff of the Department
of Political Affairs. The Dutch
have a role in this website, DPA
whistleblowers tell Inner City
Press. Dutch Ambassador Karel
van Oosterom pointedly declined
to answer Inner City Press'
question(s) on May 30, here.
We'll have more on this. Watch
this site. Ealier in the day at
the UN Security Council
stakeout, the Dutch deputy
ambassador repeated that it
would be a bumpy road; Sweden's
ambassador said he had just seen
the news. The French Ambassador
Francois Delattre refused to
stop or answer any questions, as
has become more and more
routine. Trump on May 10 had tweeted
"The highly anticipated meeting
between Kim Jong Un and myself
will take place in Singapore on
June 12th." On May 22 North
Korea state media Minju
Joson laid
down this
line: "If
the U.S. and
the South
Korean
authorities
persist in the
confrontation
policy and war
moves against
the DPRK,
oblivious of
this fact,
they will be
held wholly
accountable
for all the
ensuing
consequences.
Dialogue and
saber rattling
can never go
together.”
So the odds now change daily,
and the UN remains marginal at
best. While North Korea said
it was inviting to witness its
destruction of nuclear testing
site at Punggye-ri from May 23
to 25 media from South Korea,
the United States, China,
Russia and the UK, it gave no
response to South Korea's
transmission of the names of
journalists. Hope springs
eternal: the South Korean
journalists nevertheless took
off for Beijing, intent in
re-transmitting their names.
From there a Unification
Ministry official said, "We
tried to convey the list
through the Panmunjom
communication channel at 9
a.m. today, but the North
declined to accept it."
The South Korean journalists
were left behind in Beijing by
the others, then themselves
left. Now this, from South
Korea's Unificatin Ministry: We
delivered a
list of eight
reporters from
two outlets to
the North
today, and the
North accepted
it." Watch
this site.
Marginal UN's Secretary
General Antonio Guterres,
refusing on the record, had a
lunch with his favored
correspondents on May 21, with
wine; nothing emerged and
Guterres was reportedly not
not asked about UN corruption,
the China Energy Fund
Committee bribery case, sexual
harassment cover ups at
UNAIDS, UNESCO and as is
relevant here the IAEA or his
continuing restriction on the
Press which reports on them.
Meanwhile Japanese media reach
out to Inner City Press about
its UN corruption exclusives,
while slowest and most right
wing Sankei Shimbun writes
derivativesly about Santa Fe,
Texas. Second tier. On US talk
show Fox News Sunday, South
Carolina Senator Lindsey
Graham said “If they don't
show up, it means diplomacy is
over. If they do show up and
try to play Trump, it means
military conflict is the other
way forward... One way or the
other it's going to be over by
2020.” On May 18, Inner City
Press asked the Chair of the
UN Security Council's 1718
DPRK (North Korea) sanctions
committee Karel van Oosterom
if his Committee has received
ay request for sanctions
exemptions or waivers for the
June 12 talks; he indicated
No: "the members of the
Committee have not received
such a request." Vine video here.
This was in a loud press
gaggle after the Committee met
with the UK's Ambassador to
Pyongyang, after a similar
meeting with Russia's
ambassador there. (The UN is
using a little known Russian
correspondent bank, which self
reportedly had the wrong
people negotiate the
arrangement, as Inner City
Press exclusively reported).
Those covering the meeting
nearly entirely worked for
Japanese media, see below.
Inner City Press previously
asked UN Secretary General
Antonio Guterres' spokesman
Stephane Dujarric if it would
play any role - no answer -
and on May 9 asked him if the
UN had played any role at all
in the release of the three
American hostages by North
Korea earlier in the day. No,
Dujarric said, before laughing
after a Press question about
hindered humanitarian aid and
calling Inner City Press
"self-centered." Video here.
On May 16, North Korea's first
vice minister for foreign
affairs Kim Kye Gwan issued a
statement further calling the
talks into question. Guterres,
holding a press encounter in
Brussels as he rarely does in
New York, said he hopes common
sense prevails. Inner City
Press asked his deputy
spokesman Farhan Haq, video here, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: does
he believe, it seems like the
snags are based on a couple of
things, one having to do with
this Max Thunder military
exercise, and that's the basis
on which North Korea said the
DPRK [Democratic People’s
Republic of Korea] cancelled
the meeting with South Korea
and more recently they focused
on some comments by the new
[United States] National
Security Advisor analogizing
North Korea to Libya.
So, I'm just wondering,
particularly as to the
military exercises, does he
think this is the right
time? Does he think
there should be some meeting
halfway or is he just hoping
that it works out?
Deputy Spokesman: We
believe that the parties
involved know what their
concerns are. And, like
the Secretary-General said, he
believes that common sense
will prevail. He does
regret that the inter-Korean
meeting was cancelled, but he
hopes the discussion will
resume." The UN under Guterres
is becoming ever more
marginal. On May 15,
Kim's state media KCNA cited
the joint US - South Korea
military exercised somewhat
absurdly called Max Thunder as
an “exercise targeting us,
which is being carried out
across South Korea, is a
flagrant challenge to the
Panmunjom Declaration and an
intentional military
provocation running counter to
the positive political
development on the Korean
Peninsula.The United States
will also have to undertake
careful deliberations about
the fate of the planned North
Korea-U.S. summit in light of
this provocative military
ruckus jointly conducted with
the South Korean authorities.”
At the UN Security Council
stakeout on the afternoon of
May 15, Sweden's Permanent
Representative Olof B. Skoog
said had yet to hear of this
development; the Dutch chair
of the Council's North Korea
1718 sanctions committee went
into the Council's meetings,
on Somalia and Abyei, without
stopping to spek with the
press. Back on May 12, KCNA
announced that North Korea's
"Nuclear Weapon Institute and
other concerned institutions
are taking technical measures
for dismantling the northern
nuclear test ground ... in
order to ensure transparency
of discontinuance of the
nuclear test." Media from five
countries - including the UK
but not Japan - were invited.
Japan's right wing Sankei
Shimbun, which routinely
misses North Korea news at the
UN in favor of problematic
fluff about Kanye West and its
reporter Mayu Uetsuka's
laundry and jogging in the
park, snarked that "The
dismantling of
the nuclear
test site may
just be
another
theatrical
performance to
the outside
world... It
seems that North Korea wants
foreign currency under the
premise of inviting foreign
media." But now an expert opines
that "only four media (two US
TV, one ROK TV, one ROK text)
100% confirmed going to North
Korea to observe demolition of
Pyungye-ri. Many media invited
have had invites rescinded
with no real reason given." So
does Sankei stand by its
statement this is all about
getting foreign currency?
Trump back on May 8 while
withdrawing from the Iran Deal
announced that Mike Pompeo was
on his way to North Korea and
would be there in an hour's
time. Trump said he was
hopeful the US hostages would
be released and that
withdrawal from the Iran Deal
would make America safer.
Meanwhile Kim Jong Un has
flown to the Chinese city of
Dalian and met Xi Jiping.
Along with a seaside walk, the
talk was of synchronized and
mutual steps with the US,
probably not what Trump wants
to hear. South Korea's Yonhap
and Chosun have both reported
the talks will take place in
Singapore in the June, most
probably the third week in
June. It is noted that Trump
often reverses course - it
could be earlier, in the DMZ
in Panmunjom, or even not at
all, depending on how the
meeting is pre-spun. Either
way, it seems the UN remains
on the sidelines, despite
intermittent claims of
relevance from UN Secretary
General Antonio Guterres and
his yet to be seen new head of
the Department of Political
Affairs. Inner City Press,
which previously shared a UN office
with Chosun Ilbo prior to
being evicted
for exposing the UN's bribery
by Ng Lap Seng and now Patrick
Ho, was told she'd start on
May 1. Also as the Trump - Kim
talks approach, the
constellation of those
opposing or seeking to
undercut them extends from
self-styled diplomatic experts
in Washington to decadent and
ill-informed pro-Abe Japanese
scribes in New York. The
former include politicians who
while first claiming diplomacy
was being killed now say it it
moving too fast. The latter
published, in Sankei Shimbun
alone, two separate stories
about the May 3 event at the
UN in which as Inner City
Press reported
amid other news a professor
from Tufts University said
Japan's colonial rule of Korea
was better than that of the
Kims. Of this, Sankei's Mayu
Uetsuka who was not even there
wrote that “Mr. Kaichiro
Iizuka (41), the eldest son of
Mr. Yaeko Taguchi (62) = Same
(22) =, said the mother was
one year old when she was
kidnapped, "I have no memory
of touching my mother ". While
attention is being paid to
nuclear and missile issues, he
said, 'Do not forget the
abduction issue that human
beings are being threatened,
human lives should not be
lighter than nuclear weapons
and missiles.'” Meanwhile the
same Uetsuka, unconcerned with
human lives other than her
own, bragged
about renting an apartment on
the Upper West Side there is
no washing machine in the
room. At first I was looking
for a property with "washing
machine" at the rental site,
but I could not find it in the
desired area in the budget.
New York has many old
buildings, so there are no
washing machines only about
30% of the property. Piping
around the water is not in
place, it is also difficult to
purchase and install a washing
machine yourself. There is a
laundry room in the building
and it will be shared with
neighbors. From friends, I
heard that there are some
Americans who are washing
shoes and they snatch, but
they will have to get used to
it. In the life of the United
States, insensitive dullness
which does not care a little
is trained. The room I live in
is also puzzled by the
appearance of the next
apartment from the window, but
it gradually ceased to matter.
Let's start a jog at Central
Park for a diet.” No, it's
time to be replaced, putting
out for old reports, throwing
away real information for a
self-promoting bartender
typist, on June 5 typing slews
of quotes about the new
President of the General
Assembly seemingly not to be
used: Kevin Pinner, claiming
he “named products, generated
slogans and ideas for
marketing campaigns” for
Chinavision. Oh
for the days
of Jun
Kurosawa, who
at least
pursued the
attempted
censorship of
Mr Tatsuya
Kato (and
Gaza). These
days Pinner sits elsewhere in
the UN, ordered to type
information that Sankei will
never publish. He shatterred a
plate on June 28, before he's
asked a single question in the
UN. Mayu Uetsuka
tried to promote
New York ads for Hitachi,
Panasonic, Shimizu
Corporation, and Daikin
Industries; now derivative on
Facebook and GDPR. She sat in
the back of the end of UNSC
presidency press conference
June 28, typically asking (and
knowing, it seems) nothing.
She was not present on May 17;
no question about Sankei's
dubious story about South
Korean ship to ship transfers
with DPRK ships was asked.
Tellingly, even after sitting
on the ground at the stakeout,
Sankei's Gaza articles were by
Mina Mina (or Mina Mitsui),
Takao Sato in Jerusalem and in
DC, Hiroyuki Kano still
running interviews which while
interesting are from April:
more than two months before.
To complain about media
critique? Neither was even
present at Guterres' North
Korea stakeout on June 11.
Now, without them asking any
questions at all, it seems
their docility is moving them
up the UN's servile pecking
order. Like the Sankei
"foreign pool" reports for
Abe's visit, and failure to
ask anything when called on
during an arms control press
call with Inner City Press
participating from outside the
UN gate, while the robot
mouthed an inane question in
the Press-less UN noon press
briefing, this is failure. We
will have more on all this.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|