OPCW
Announces €100000
Contribution
To Syria Work
From Norway
Running For
UNSC Seat Vs
Ireland and
Canada
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR Letter
PFT Q&A
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, January 23 –
Five hours before the UN
Security Council was set to
meet on chemical weapons in
Syria on January 8, from the
Hague the Organzsation
for the
Prohibition of
Chemical
Weapons issued
this: "On
24 November 2018, the
Organisation for the
Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons (OPCW) received
information pertaining to an
allegation of chemical weapons
use in Aleppo, Syrian Arab
Republic, and began monitoring
the situation. The
Director-General of the OPCW,
H.E. Mr Fernando Arias,
informed OPCW Member States of
the allegation and invited all
parties that may have
information to share it with
the OPCW Technical
Secretariat. In early
December, an advanced team was
deployed to Syria to collect
further information.
Since then, consultations with
the Syrian authorities have
been on-going. The OPCW
Fact-Finding Mission (FFM)
deployed in early January to
further establish facts
regarding the allegation. The
FFM continues to independently
collect and analyse
information and will report
its findings to States Parties
to the Chemical Weapons
Convention. All measures
continue to be taken to ensure
the safety and security of
OPCW experts and personnel
involved." Now on January 23,
OPCW has announced a
contribution by Norway, which
is running for a UN Security
Council seat against Ireland
and Canada (which have yet, it
seems, to have made similar
OPCW contributions). Inner
City Press, even roughed
up and still banned
from entering the UN by SG
Antonio Guterres now 203
days, is covering the
race, and Guterres' jobs move
plan, here.
Here's from the OPCW
announcement: "The
Director-General of the
Organisation for the
Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons (OPCW), H.E. Mr
Fernando Arias, met with the
State Secretary for Foreign
Affairs of the Kingdom of
Norway, H.E. Mr Audun
Halvorsen, during a visit to
OPCW Headquarters in The Hague
today. The
Director-General and the State
Secretary discussed progress
in the implementation of the
Chemical Weapons Convention
(CWC), as well as the June
2018 decision by the States
Parties to address the threat
from chemical weapons
use. With reference to
that decision, and in
accordance with the Programme
and Budget decision of the
OPCW for 2019, the State
Secretary announced a
voluntary contribution of
€100,000 from Norway to the
Trust Fund for Syria
Missions. He remarked:
“Norway has always been a
strong supporter of the work
of the OPCW to keep the world
free of chemical weapons. This
is now more important than
ever. This grant will
contribute to the
identification of the
perpetrators of chemical
weapons use in Syria, and,
hence, contribute to increased
security and diminishing human
suffering in Syria.” The
discussions further focused on
the implications of the recent
Fourth Review Conference for
OPCW’s future activities, and
the expansion of the
Organisation’s laboratory
capabilities through the
construction of a Centre for
Chemistry and
Technology. The
Director-General thanked the
State Secretary for Foreign
Affairs for the contribution
and expressed: “The work of
the OPCW is sustained by the
humanity’s desire to live in a
world free of chemical weapons
and underpinned by the support
of State Parties to the
Chemical Weapons Convention. I
want to express my thanks to
Norway for its long-standing
and staunch commitment to
verifiably eliminating
chemical weapons.'" When the
Presidency of the UN Security
Council was taken over by the
Dominican Republic on January
2 its José Singer held a press
conference to take questions.
But it was only from the media
NOT banned
by UN Secretary General
Antonio Guterres. And in the
mere seven questions taken
there was not one about
anything in Africa, which
makes up over 60% of the
Council's agenda. Nothing on
the expulsion of Guterres'
envoy Nicholas Haysom from Somalia.
Nothing on the
disenfranchisement of 1.2
million in the DR
Congo, where the UN has
(mis) spent billions of
dollars. Nothing on Cameroon,
or Burundi,
or Gabon
or Togo.
Nothing on the Dominican
Republic's neighbor Haiti.
It took a mere 22 minutes, the
shortest and most vacuous
ever, including Singer's
opening statement. The
set-aide first question was
not on Africa; there was a
question about the UN Charter
and a media invitation to
visit Gaza. Guterres, who had
roughed up and banned Inner
City Press as it inquired into
his failure in Cameroon, where
human lives were exchanged for
Budget Commitee favors, has
deployed his UN Global Censor
Alison Smale to try to ensure
that his failures and
conflicts of interest can't be
asked about. They are asked
about by Inner City Press in
writing, and not answered - no
answers from Spokesmen Farhan
Haq or Stephane Dujarric
today. But they cannot stop
reporting. An hour earlier -
in a ceremony which lasted
longer than the
correspondents' questions -
when the five new UN Security
Council members joined for two
year terms on January 2, the
foreign minister of the
Dominican Republic, Council
President for January, gave a
longish speech in Spanish
which while stressing Latin
American issued did not
mention next door Haiti.
There, the UN brought cholera
which killed at least 10,000
people; UN Secretary General
Antonio Guterres has not
raised or paid in restitution
any significant amount.
Whether this issue gets
address during January, or
even in the next two years,
remains to be seen. In the
ceremony, presided over by
outgoing member Kazakhstan,
the Permanent Representatives
of Germany, Indonesia, South
Africa and Belgium carried
their flags forward and
planted them, with Indonesia
and then South Africa waving
their flags. Inner City Press
covered this process in
previously, for example two
years ago with Bolivia, before
Guterres amid Inner City Press
questions about his failure on
Cameroon
and links with UN briber
China Energy Fund Committee
President had Inner City Press
roughed
up and banned
since. This should be
addressed - watch this
site. A month ago, when
Cote d'Ivoire Ambassador Kacou
Houadja Léon Adomu held a Press-less
press conference on December
3, he listed as Africa issues
to be address during the month
South Sudan, Central African
Republic, Guinea Bissau and
the Sahel. No one present
asked about Burundi much less
Cameroon, and Inner City Press
was unable, being banned
without hearing or appeal. Kacou
Houadja Léon
Adomu would
not answer on
North Korea
human rights
if his country
will sign the
draft letter
for a Council
meeting, nor
how it would
stand in any
procedural
vote. Many of
the questions
could have
been addressed
by just
looking at the
Program of
Work. Inner
City Press has
more questions
- watch this
site.
Troublingly, the UN allows in
Morocco state media, which got
a question from its
perspective. Inner City Press
still banned from the UN
without any due process or
appeal gets questions answered
by the International Monetary
Fund which it covers, on Yemen
and Sri
Lanka. At the IMF
briefing, spokesman Gerry Rice
was asked about US sanctions
on Venezuela gold sales. In
New York, Ambassador Ma
reiterated that China is
against all unilateral
sanctions. So what will the
Council be doing when the new
US sanctions on Iran kick in?
Watch this site - we continue
the UN as actively as anyone.
Last month Bolivia's
Ambassador Llorenti talked up
his upcoming field trip to DR
Congo, like the Security
Council visit he led to Haiti,
which Inner City Press went on
and reported from. But now
that Guterres for his own
reasons has had Inner City
Press roughed up and banned
since July 3, Llorenti's
Mission has yet to respond to
this, regarding (now) October
11: "find myself banned from
even entering the UN, since 3
July 2018 when I was
physically ousted while
staking out the Fifth
Committee meeting from the
Vienna Cafe area, at the
invitation of member states on
the Committee. I would like to
request that you / your
Mission ensure that I can
enter the UN to cover and
hopefully ask a question at
your Program of Work press
conference tomorrow, and after
that to cover / stakeout such
meetings at the October 11
consultations on Western
Sahara / MINURSO, which is
almost impossible to cover
without being in the building.
As you may know, there are
numerous Morocco state media
given office space and
resident correspondent status
by DPI under USG Alison Smale,
who has refused to answer a
single one of my 10 e-mails.
They will cover the Western
Sahara meeting, from their
perspective. I believe I have
a similar right to continue
this issue.
Responsible are Chef de
Cabinet Viotti (who was called
by the Reporters Committee on
Freedom of the Press) and/or
DSG Amina Mohammed. Or,
pending that, please have the
Mission bring me in to these
meetings. The only written
communication I have received
from the UN is this letter
from USG Smale, here."
We'll have more on this,
(well) before October
11. Back on September 4
when US Ambassador Nikki Haley
held a press conference about
her Security Council
residency, her second, of the
14 questions called on by the
US Mission to the UN not one
was about anything in Africa
or even about UN reform. This
happened as 60% of the UN's
work is in Africa, the UN is
caught up in sexual abuse and
harassment scandals and while
Inner City Press, which covers
UN abuse and has uncovered
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres' inaction in Cameroon
and the African business
links of his son Pedro
Guimarães e Melo De Oliveira
Guterres has been banned
from the UN for 63 days by
Guterres, prospectively to
miss access to the General
Assembly High Level week for
the first time in 11 years.
When Inner City
Press was roughed up while it
covered the UN Budget
Committee and a plan by
Guterres to move jobs
including from New York to
Mexico City, it was covered by
Fox News which one assumes the
US Mission reads. Inner City
Press did not reach out for
any assistance from the
Mission, holding to the
principle that the UN should
treat journalists fairly
without a state sponsor.
Nothing improved.
In fact, Guterres' British
head of Global Communications
Alison Smale issued a letter
banning Inner City Press,
dredging up old discredited
complaints from Morocco and
her bitter deputy. Still,
nothing from Haley or the US
Mission.
Finally on August
24, after Inner City Press
learned from a non-US source
of President Trump's plan for
a meeting about drugs on
September 24, Inner City Press
formally raised the matter to
Haley's spokesman, a holdover
from the Samantha Power days,
John Degory. He indicated he
heard what was said.
But
access was not arranged to
Haley's September 4 press
conference, at which after
Haley to her credit at least
raised South Sudan in her
opening remarks Degory tried
to give a question to among
others a retired travel agent
and a barely intelligible
resident correspondent from
Pakistan who beyond assisting
in Inner City Press' eviction
spent the past weekend tweeting
that tennis star Serena
Williams and her outfits are “pathetic.”
That's today's UN.
Now
there is a deadline to cover
the UN General Assembly and
Inner City Press has applied
and has writing an open letter
to Haley, below, and cc-ed her
and Degory on its polite
letter to Smale. Watch this
site. Sixty days after Inner
City Press was physically
ousted frm the UN and then
subject to a ongoing ban from
entry to cover the Security
Council or UN noon briefing,
Inner City Press sent a now
open letter to US Ambassador
Nikki Haley, here:
Dear Ambassador Haley:
On
this the first day of your UN
Security Council Presidency,
this concerns the censorship
of Press the UN has engaged in
since July 3.
I
was physically ousted that day
by UN Security while I
staked-out a meeting of the
Fifth (Budget) Committee as I
have for a decade. Right after
I spoke to Cameroon Ambassador
Tommo Monthe, chair of the
Fifth Committee, I was grabbed
by Lt Ronald E. Dobbins and
another officer, shirt torn,
laptop damaged, arm twisted.
This was covered in Fox News,
here,
as well as The (UK)
Independent.
On July 5 when I came
to cover the Security Council
meetings on Syria and Yemen, I
was banned from entering UN.
After a no due process review
by the Department of Public
Information's Alison Smale, my
accreditation was “withdrawn”
on August 17, seemingly for
life. The letter is online here,
downloadable with some of my
rebuttal (not heard by Smale
or DPI) here.
I have
raised this verbally to some
in your US Mission to the UN,
including eight days ago to
your spokesman John Degory,
followed up in writing with a
request to be admitted to your
September 4 Program of World
press conference. In your
first such press conference on
3 April 2017, I asked you
about peacekeepers' sexual
abuse and the continuing need
for the Freedom of Information
Act at the UN. Video here.
As
things stand, without any due
process, I am banned from your
press conference -- at which,
for the record, I would like
to ask you about the
Anglophone crisis in Cameroon
which I asked you about on 18
October 2017. Video here.
I am also banned from covering
the General Assembly High
Level week, the deadline for
accreditation for which is
September 5.
I
firmly believe I have a right
to cover this member states'
event, despite what I see as
bias and lawlessness by DPI
and the wider Secretariat. UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric in an
August 27 noon
briefing I was
banned from
attending cut
off a question
about my
ouster, video
here,
insisting that
to say this is
about freedom
of the press
would be
wrong. (Then
why is it in
the Press
Freedom
Tracker, here,
and the Columbia
Journalism
Review,
among others
for example in
the UK,
Japan,
Italy
and Cameroon?
Why this
5000+
signature
petition?) They
have gotten so petty as to get
UNICEF to block me from a book
event they had invited me to
on September 5. They similarly
got my blocked from a press
conference held outside of the
UN at the Pierre Hotel by the
UN World Intellectual Property
Organization, whose work on
North Korea's cyanide patents
I have also asked you about.
So I am
writing to you, asking for
your intervention at least on
the limited issues of not
being blocked from attending
your September 4 press
conference and relatedly DPI
relenting and not blocking me
from covering the GA High
Level Week, and allowing me to
apply and be accredited on
Sept 5 like thousands of other
correspondents, many state
media of government with
little respect for press
freedom.
Bigger picture, why has the UN
banned me for 60 days and
counting? I think it is
because, more than before,
they cannot or feel they do
not have to put up with
critical questions and
coverage.
Not to be
put too fine a point on it,
but this is NOT a new day at
the UN - or what is new about
it is the willingness to rough
up and journalist and ban its
media for life, with no due
process or appeal. This is not
consistent with the First
Amendment of the US
Constitution (which it is now
clear entirely stops east of
First Avenue) - nor with
Article 19 of the UN Universal
Declaration of Human Rights.
This is an
outrage at the UN that must be
addressed.
Matthew Russell
Lee, InnerCityPress.com
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2015 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|