By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 3 --
Nine days
after Missouri
police officer
was not
indicted for
killing Michael
Brown in
Ferguson, in
New York City
on December 3
a Staten
Island grand
jury declined
to return any
indictment for
the killing
of Eric Garner,
which was caught
on video,
here.
New York
Congresspeople
spoke out
immediately,
with Bronx
Rep. Jose
Serrano say
that Garner's
death "was not
an accident,
it was
homicide," for
all to see.
Brooklyn
Representative
Nydia
Velazquez
linked the
Garner
non-indictment
to 12-year old
Tamir Rice
being killed
in Cleveland.
Representative
Hakeem
Jeffries
recalled
peaceful
protests after
the killing,
in The Bronx,
of Amadou
Diallo.
Later Mayor
Bill De Blasio
spoke but
unlike the
Congresspeople
took no
questions, as
his
Commissioner
for
International
Affairs Penny
Abeywardena
recently came
to the UN without
openly taking
questions,
either, here.
The
UN in Geneva
for days refused
to release to
US-based media
without paid
correspondents
in Switzerland
the UN
Committee on
Torture's
concluding
remarks on the
US.
When they went
online on
November 28,
on police
brutality they
discussed
Chicago but
not Ferguson,
Missouri, from
which the
family and
supporters of
Michael Brown,
killed by
police officer
Darren Wilson,
even traveled
to Geneva. The
report as
belatedly put
online
says:
Excessive
use of force
and police
brutality
26.
The Committee
is concerned
about numerous
reports of
police
brutality and
excessive use
of force by
law
enforcement
officials, in
particular
against
persons
belonging to
certain racial
and ethnic
groups,
immigrants and
LGBTI
individuals,
racial
profiling by
police and
immigration
offices and
growing
militarization
of policing
activities.
The Committee
is
particularly
concerned at
the reported
current police
violence in
Chicago,
especially
against
African-American
and Latino
young people
who are
allegedly
being
consistently
profiled,
harassed and
subjected to
excessive
force by
Chicago Police
Department
(CPD)
officers. It
also expresses
its deep
concern at the
frequent and
recurrent
police
shootings or
fatal pursuits
of unarmed
black
individuals.
In this
regard, the
Committee
notes the
alleged
difficulties
to hold police
officers and
their
employers
accountable
for abuses.
While noting
the
information
provided by
the delegation
that over
the past five
years 20
investigations
were opened
into
allegations of
systematic
police
department
violations,
and over 330
police
officers were
criminally
prosecuted,
the
Committee
regrets the
lack of
statistical
data available
on allegations
of police
brutality and
the lack of
information on
the result of
the
investigations
undertaken in
respect of
those
allegations.
With regard to
the acts of
torture
committed by
CPD Commander
Jon Burge
and others
under his
command
between 1972
and 1991, the
Committee
notes the
information
provided by
the State
party that a
federal rights
investigation
did not
develop
sufficient
evidence to
prove beyond a
reasonable
doubt that
prosecutable
constitutional
violations
occurred,
However, it
remains
concerned
that, despite
the fact that
Jon Burge
was convicted
for perjury
and
obstruction of
justice, no
Chicago police
officer has
been
convicted for
these acts of
torture for
reasons
including the
statute of
limitations
expiring.
While noting
that several
victims were
ultimately
exonerated of
the underlying
crimes, the
vast majority
of those
tortured –most
of them
African
Americans–,
have received
no
compensation
for the
extensive
injuries
suffered
(arts. 11, 12,
13, 14 and
16).
The State
party should:
(a) Ensure
that all
instances of
police
brutality and
excessive use
of force by
law
enforcement
officers are
investigated
promptly,
effectively
and
impartially by
an
independent
mechanism with
no
institutional
or
hierarchical
connection
between the
investigators
and the
alleged
perpetrators;
(b) Prosecute
persons
suspected of
torture or
ill-treatment
and, if found
guilty, ensure
that they are
punished in
accordance
with the
gravity of
their acts;
(c) Provide
effective
remedies and
rehabilitation
to the
victims;
(d) Provide
redress for
CPD torture
survivors by
supporting the
passage of
the Ordinance
entitled
Reparations
for the
Chicago Police
Torture
Survivors.
The
words
Ferguson,
Missouri and
Brown appear
nowhere in the
report. In a
Geneva press
conference
which was not
on UN webcast
or even the
Treaty Bodies
website, one
UNCAT member
was quoted by
CNN. So it
goes with the
UN. We'll have
more on this.
The day after
St. Louis
Country
prosecutor Bob
McCulloch
blandly read
out a
justification
of the
non-indictment
of Police
Officer Darren
Wilson for
killing Mike
Brown in
Ferguson,
Missouri, on
November 25 in
New York a
protest march
came
by the United
Nations,
taking over
First Avenue
with
non-violent
chants of
"Hands up,
don't shoot!"
The UN locked
its gates, and
New York City
sent Corrections
Department
busses to
park in front
of the UN
compound.
Inner City
Press joined
the march,
headed to
Times Square,
video
here and
see below.
On November 28
at the UN in
Geneva reports
including one
on Torture and
police
brutality in
the United
States will be
released. On
November 24
the UN said it
was
restricting
embargoed
copies of this
report to its
"UNOG-based
press corps" -
that is, media
that can
afford to have
a
correspondent
in
Switzerland.
How many of
the media that
have
consistently
covered the
murder of Mike
Brown can
afford that?
Inner City
Press on
behalf of the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
immediately
challenged
this
restricted
distribution.
First
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman in
New York, and
now the UN in
Geneva have
refused to
lift the
restriction,
without
substantive
explanation.
On November
27, Inner City
Press and FUNCA asked:
"Now
on the eve of
the press
conference,
reiterating
the request
below, that
embargoed
copies not be
needlessly
restricted
only to
"UNOG-based"
press -
there is as
much or more
interest by
US-based media
in the report
on US torture
and police
brutality as
by media based
in
Geneva.
But US-based
media that
have reporters
based in UNOG
are larger,
more corporate
media. So that
particular
embargoed
report should
be released to
all UN system
accredited
media, not
only those
with reporters
based at UNOG.
The Free
UN Coalition
for Access
says that
should go the
other way, too
-- embargoed
UN reports
should not be
restricted to
NY / UNHQ
based media
either."
On November
27, the UN in
Geneva via Liz
Throssell
Media Officer
for the UN
Treaty Bodies,
replied:
"Dear
Matthew, The
six-hour time
difference is
very much in
your favour,
and unlike the
journalists
here you will
have an entire
working day to
report on the
Committee
against
Torture's
"Concluding
Observations"
on the eight
countries they
have been
reviewing this
session. These
will be posted
online at
around 8:00
a.m. New York
Time -- you
will be able
to find
whichever ones
that interest
you by
scrolling down
through the
countries
listed here."
But
this is not
responsive. As
Inner City
Press and
FUNCA have
replied, "the
request is
that you not
arbitrarily
limit
embargoed
copies only to
“UNOG-based
journalists.”
They will be
able to
publish
stories at the
embargo time,
while despite
your message,
others will
not."
Why limited
pre-distribution
of this report
to the media
which can
afford to have
a
Switzerland-based
correspondent?
What is wrong
with the UN?
Click here for
Inner City
Press and
FUNCA's
coverage of
the opaque
race to head
the UN
Department of
Public
Information, here.
The UN must do
better.
Back on
November 25 in
Times
Square, amid
the neon glitz,
there were
chants of "we
do this for
Mike Brown"
and
light-up signs
for Justice.
Seventh Avenue
was shut down,
peacefully.
"All Lives
Matter" -- video here. But where is it
headed?
Back on
November 24,
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric if
the UN or
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon have
any comment
(not this
evening) and
about
limitations on
the
distribution
of the UN's
report on US
torture and
police
brutality.
Mike Brown's
parents went
to Geneva to
testify at the
UN review of
the US' record
on torture and
police
brutality. The
results of the
review are due
on November
28, but will
only be given
in advance to
media
accredited at
the UN in
Geneva, UNOG.
As noted, the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
opposes that
limitation on
non-corporate
media, and
requested
comment on the
non-indictment
from UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric.
Inner City
Press asked:
"This
is a request
for comment on
the
non-indictment
for the
killing of
Michael Brown
in Ferguson,
Missouri.
Separately but
relatedly,
this is
request on
behalf of the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
that the
planned
restriction of
the embargoed
release of the
UN's review of
the US' record
on torture and
police
brutality to
media at UN
Geneva. Media
accredited
here at the UN
Headquarters
should have
the same
rights, unless
the UN is
choosing to
favor
corporate /
multinational
media. The
request for
comment should
be responded
to asap; the
request for
equal
treatment on
embargoed copy
should be
addressed
before
November 27,
given the
November 28
public
release."
Dujarric to
his credit
replied
quickly; he
declined
comment for
the evening,
and argued:
"Dear
Matthew,
On your first
question, I
will not have
a comment this
evening.
On your
second, this
is the purview
of my
colleagues in
Geneva. To
your point
about
corporate
media, I think
you misjudge
the press
corps in
Geneva which
is as diverse
as the press
corps in NY.
In fact, there
are probably
more
freelancers in
Geneva than in
New York."
Inner City
Press, for
FUNCA, has
clarified:
"The
point is,
there is as
much or more
interest by
US-based media
in the report
on US torture
and police
brutality as
by media based
in Geneva. But
US-based media
that have
reporters
based in UNOG
are larger,
more corporate
media. So that
particular
embargoed
report should
be released to
all UN system
accredited
media, not
only those
with reporters
based at UNOG.
(FUNCA says
that should go
the other way,
too --
embargoed UN
reports should
not be
restricted to
NY / UNHQ
based media
either.) Will
appreciate a
decision on
this asap,
given the
November 28
release and,
for example,
tonight's Mike
Brown killing
non-indictment,
on which
comment is
still sought."
Dujarric did
not responded
to that, but
on November 25
he said " for
the
Secretary-General,
his thoughts
right now are
with Michael
Brown's family
and with the
Ferguson
community.
I think he
appeals to all
of those in
Ferguson and
throughout the
United States
who felt
disappointment
at the grand
jury's
decision to
make their
voices heard
peacefully and
to refrain
from any
violence.
He also calls
on the US
authorities,
on law
enforcement
authorities,
whether at the
federal, state
or at the
local level,
to protect the
rights of
people to
demonstrate
peacefully and
to express
their opinions
peacefully.
And he echoes
the appeals
made by
Michael
Brown's
parents to
turn this
difficult time
into a
positive
moment for
change."
FUNCA has
spoken up to
Turkish media,
for example,
on an attack
on Turkish
media in
Ferguson. Back
on August
13,
Inner City
Press asked
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
the killing
and crackdown.
Video
here.
Dujarric began
by saying that
Ban and the UN
have "no
particular
comment," then
added that "as
in all cases,
the right to
demonstrate
peacefully
needs to be
respected, and
investigations
need to be
conducted."
Okay, then.
There have
been reports
mentioned the
financial
institutions
in the area,
including
nationwide
lenders Bank
of America,
US
Bank and
Fifth Third.
Inner
City Press and
Fair Finance
Watch reviewed
the
demographics
of mortgage
lending by
these three in
the area in
the most
recent year
for which data
is publicly
available,
2012.
In the St.
Louis
Metropolitan
Statistical
Area in 2012,
Bank of
America denied
the
conventional
home purchase
mortgage
applications
of African
Americans 1.81
times more
frequently
then those of
whites.
Fair
Finance Watch
has previously
objected
to US Bank's
stealth branch
closings,
including in
Chicago, here
and here. The
US Community
Reinvestment
Act requires
banks to lend
fairly in all
of their
communities,
but is not
sufficiently
enforced, FFW
has shown.
For US
Bank, the
disparities
was 1.6 to 1;
for Fifth
Third
Mortgage, that
company's
lender, it was
a whopping
4.95 to 1:
African
American
applicants
were denied
4.95 times
more
frequently
than whites,
worse that the
aggregate (all
lenders).
Troublingly,
for all
lenders
Latinos were
denied 3.1
times more
frequently
than than
whites. So
where is the
US headed? And
why has the UN
had nothing to
say so far?
Watch this
site.