Early
on June 21,
based on
questions the
UN has left
unanswered to
many
requesters,
the new Free
UN Coalition
for Access asked
the UN's
“Greening the
Blue,”
which had been
bragging about
carbon
reduction,
“Can you / UN
estimate Ban
Ki-moon's
entourage's
travel
emissions?”
Greening
the
Blue uses
social media,
but which not
answer this
question from
FUNCA's
Twitter
account, here.
So at the June
21 UN noon
briefing,
FUNCA
co-founder
Inner City
Press asked:
Inner
City Press:
there is
something
called
Greening the
Blue, I have
tried to ask
them directly
and haven’t
received a
response,
whether the
UN’s Office of
the
Secretary-General
estimates the
carbon
footprint, the
carbon
effects, of
his travel,
which
obviously is
quite
necessary, but
can you
disclose what
that the
quantity is
and whether it
is in any way
offset?
Deputy
Spokesperson
Eduardo Del
Buey: Well,
we’ll try and
get that
information
for you,
Matthew.
Six
hours later,
as the UN made
other demands
on Inner City
Press and
FUNCA (the
very sign of
which the UN
and its
partners have
tried to ban),
the following
was emitted
by the UN as a
note to all
correspondents:
In
response to a
question about
efforts to
offset carbon
footprint at
the United
Nations, the
Spokesperson
for the
Secretary-General
has the
following to
say:
We do
not have
specific
estimate of
the
Secretary-General’s
travel, but we
do estimate
regularly the
United Nations
staff’s total
carbon
footprint as
well as the
share of air
travel.
According to
the most
recent
Greening the
Blue report,
launched on 19
June 2013, the
total
emissions of
8,185 staff
members at the
United Nations
Headquarters
estimate
63,059 tonnes
(CO2eq), of
which 48 per
cent is caused
by air travel.
On the
question of
Ban's travel
impact, the UN
did not have
or provide an
answer. But on
the question
of air travel,
ironically,
the same week
Ban's
Department of
Public
Information
was tweeting
about its
multimedia
partnership
with the
airline Royal
Air Maroc,
see
here with
model plane.
The
response –
which did not
provide the
basic
requested
information
about Ban's
travel and is
online
in full here
– added in a
different
font, as if an
additional
argument, that
“[r]ecent
renovations to
the UN
Secretariat
building in
New York were
designed to
reduce energy
consumption by
50%.”
In the
new offices,
at least for
the press,
lights go on
automatically
even if one
does not want
them.
Meanwhile DPI
has devoted a
lot of energy
to trying to
order Inner
City Press to
take a simple
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
sign off
the door to
its office,
while allowing
the old
UN
Correspondents
Association to
have two
prominent
signs, a big
meeting room,
a separate
office and
even a locked
UNCA pantry in
which it
stores its
wine glasses.
Likewise,
the UN
Censorship
Alliance
announced
limitations of
use of the
UN
Security
Council
stakeout as
media
workspace,
which is how
new media
coverage of
the Council is
possible,
conversing
with diplomats
going in and
out while
writing a
series of
short pieces
about a range
of topics. The
US takes over
the Security
Council
presidency on
July 1. What
will they do
about it?
Watch
this site.