Asma
Jahangir's
Place in Sri
Lanka Probe
Recalled, She
Criticized
Attempts to
Silence In
& By the
UN, RIP
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
February 11 --
In the hours
following the
death of Asma
Jahangir,
tributes and
memorials have
been published
but some
aspects of her
interactions
with and at
the UN have
not been
touched. In
2014 she was
named, by
then-leaving
UN Human
Rights
Commissioner
Navi Pillay,
to a panel on
war crimes in
Sri Lanka,
here along
with attempts
within the UN
to cover up
the crimes and
the housing of
Sri Lanka's
figure Palitha
Kohona:
With
Navi Pillay slated to leave as UN High
Commissioner on Human Rights on August 31,
on June 25 she made an announcement about
the HRC Panel on Sri Lanka...Some in the
UN even tried to censor
Sri Lanka coverage, here. Here's
from Pillay announcement:
"Three
distinguished experts have agreed to
advise and support the team set up to
conduct a comprehensive investigation of
alleged human rights violations in Sri
Lanka, as mandated by the Human Rights
Council in March:
Ms Asma Jahangir, former President of
Pakistan’s Supreme Court Bar Association
and of the Human Rights Commission of
Pakistan, previous holder of several
Human Rights Council mandates and member
of a recent fact-finding body into
Israeli settlements."
It was about a past financial
relationship between Kohona and
the president of the UN
Correspondents Association, who
then agreed to an UNCA screening
of a Rajapaksa government movie
denying war crimes that UNCA
tried to censor.
Jahangir
opposed these
things. As
Inner City
Press
reported,
Jahangir was
in the running
to succeed
Pillay - but
Prince Zeid of
Jordan, now
himself to
leave, was
handed the
post. Who will
follow Zeid?
(Jahangir had
also been in
the running in
2012 for the
UN's Children
and Armed
Conflict post,
here).
In October
2017 Inner
City Press
asked Jahangir
about a
stand-off
between
representatives
of Syria and
Saudi Arabia
during her
presentation
on Iran to the
UN's Third
Committee.
Alamy photo here.
She called
it
“disappointing,”
see here along
with account
of censorship
in the UN, in
the midst of
this
chronology: During
the UN Third
(Human Rights)
Committee's
presentation
on Iran by
Special
Rapporteur
Asma Jahangir
on October 25,
Saudi Arabia
complained
that Syria was
talking about
it, and not
Iran. When the
chair of the
committee
asked Syria to
"focus" on
Iran, the
Syrian
representative
began to
contest if
Saudi Arabia
had
appropriately
made a point
of order.
Things grew
heated and
soon the
Syrian
representative
had his
microphone cut
off - leading
him,
predictable,
to speak
louder - and
face a threat
that UN
security would
be called.
Finally the
meeting was
suspended for
ten minutes.
Inner City
Press, which
due to UN
censorship had
to get a UN
minder to
reach the
meeting it was
covering on
the second
floor, could
due to the
same
restrictions
not get down
to the Third
Committee
right away.
When it did, this Periscope
video from the
photo booth
shows the
scene. On
October 26,
Inner City
Press asked
Asma Jahangir
what she
thought of
what happened.
She said she
was
"disappointed,"
that the UN is
a "house of
diplomacy."
Well, the UN
is willing to
physically
remove the
investigative
Press and
throw its
files out onto
First Avenue,
here. When UN
Special
Rapporteur
David A. Kaye
held a short
press
conference at
the UN on
October 25, he
called for the
UN to
institute an
access to
information
policy. Inner
City Press
asked him to
specify what
the UN
Secretariat of
Antonio
Guterres can
and should do
on its own,
without
waiting for or
blaming the
General
Assembly.
Inner City
Press also
asked him
about the UN
new October 20 threat to
review its
accreditation,
including for
ill-defined
violations on
an unspecified
date on the
UN's 38th
floor. Video here.
Rest in peace. While
at least four
countries have
issued travel
warnings in
the wake of
Bangladesh's
arrest and
crackdown on
the resulting
protests, the
UN on February
8 hid from the
issue, and
from the need
to better vet
the security
forces the UN
is accepting
from
Bangladesh in
light of the
crackdown.
Inner City
Press asked,
video here,
UN transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: on
Bangladesh.
I mean, you
had said… the
arrest took
place some
time ago, and
various
countries have
put out
already travel
warnings, so
I'm wondering,
at a minimum…
the UN with
its country
team there,
have they
taken note of
what's taking
place in the
street? Deputy
Spokesman:
I've told you
what I've got
on that for
now. Inner
City Press:
given that
there's live
fire, you say…
very recently,
DPKO
[Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations]
put out a
statement
thanking
Bangladesh for
its
peacekeepers,
and I'm sure
they've done
great work,
but there have
been repeated
issues of
abuses by the
security
forces, or
seeming
abuses,
killing of
civilians, use
of live fire
on
protesters.
Can you
describe what
vetting goes
on, and… and
the recent
spate of… of
these thank
you, messages
put out by
DPKO, are they
in any
relation to…
to… to the
vetting
process that's
going on or
issues that
have arisen in
various
delegations,
contingents of
peacekeepers?
Deputy
Spokesman
Farhan
Haq: All
peacekeepers
are vetted to
make sure that
they have not
engaged in any
practices that
involve the
violation of
human
rights.
And we go
through that
on a
country-by-country
basis. Inner
City Press:
And so have
there been any
Bangladesh
peacekeepers
blocked in the
last five
years, given
the events in
the country in
which units by
name have
taken place in
crackdowns on
their own
civilians?
Deputy
Spokesman:
We raise all
concerns with
any particular
members of
incoming
peacekeeping
troops with
the
troop-contributing
country to
make sure that
no one is
deployed who
does not meet
our
standards."
What standards
are those? In
other news,
with Maldives'
President
declaring a
state of
emergency, on
February 5
Inner City
Press
asked the
spokesman for
UN Secretary
General
Antonio
Guterres
Stephane
Dujarric about
it at noon on
February 5,
before the US
then spoke,
below.
Under Guterres
and his
outgoing head
of Political
Affairs
Jeffrey
Feltman, both
headed to Korea,
it took the UN
a full 18
hours to come
out with two
paragraphs on
February 6,
below. On
February 8, UN
Assistant
Secretary
General for
Political
Affairs
Miroslav Jenca
was to brief
the UN
Security
Council about
the Maldives
under "Any
Other
Business." But
Jenca did not
speak to the
Press on the
way in or out
of the
Council. Past
2 pm when
Kuwait's
Ambassador,
the President
of the
Security
Council for
February, gave
a summary of
the day's
meetings,
Maldives
wasn't on it.
Inner City
Press asked,
loudly, but no
answer; later
it was
explained that
since AOB
topics are not
listed in the
UN Journal,
the President
feels he
cannot speak
to it. It
would be up to
the
Secretariat.
But under
Antonio
Guterres, the
UN Secretariat
says and
disclosed less
and less. If a
briefing on a
crackdown
happens but no
one was speak
about it, does
it make a
sound? Some
ask, why is
Guterres not
sending some
sort of envoy
or mediator?
It can't be
that he feels
he needs total
consent: he
sent Nigeria's
former
president
Obasanjo to
Kenya, where
both sides
said they
never met with
him. So why
the different
approach to
the Maldives?
We'll have
more on this.
The UN's
statement from
earlier on
February 6:
"The
Secretary-General
is seriously
concerned
about the
unfolding
situation in
the Maldives,
in particular
the
declaration of
a state of
emergency and
the entry of
security
forces into
the Supreme
Court
premises. The
Secretary-General
urges the
Government of
the Maldives
to uphold the
constitution
and rule of
law, lift the
state of
emergency as
soon as
possible, and
take all
measures to
ensure the
safety and
security of
the people in
the country,
including
members of the
judiciary."
From the UN transcript:
Inner City
Press: it
seems like
President
Abdulla Yameen
[Abdul Gayoom]
has not
complied with
releasing the
opponents.
In fact, he's
issued a state
of
emergency.
I'm wondering,
is there… is
DPI… is DPA
(Department of
Political
Affairs)
actually
involved, or
is it just… is
it issuing
statements
from New York,
or is it
trying to
speak with him
and engage
and…?
Spokesman:
I think we're
very concerned
with the
ongoing
developments
in the
Maldives,
including what
we've seen in
the last 24
hours.
We're
following it
very
closely.
And I would…
you know, the
Secretary-General
would, again,
call on the
Government to
respect the
court ruling
and for
restraint to
be
exercised.
And we… I do
expect a more
formal
statement on
this shortly."
A the UN,
shortly means
18 hours.
How far will
today's UN go
to placate
some
countries,
while ignoring
others and restricting
the Press? On
January 26 UN
"global
communications"
chief Alison
Smale flew to
Charleston,
South Carolina
for a photo op
and UNTV video
with China's
Xiamen
Airlines for
having
painting the
UN's "SDGs"
logo on the
side of an
airplane. This
without having
answered Press
questions
about her
Department of
Public
Information's
malfeasance
with resources
allocated by
the General
Assembly for Kiswahili
and about the
lack under her
"leadership"
of any content
neutral UN
media access
rules.
Afterward,
when Inner
City Press
asked for the
mp4 video
of her South
Carolina
junket - Inner
City Press is
informed that
the plane she
celebrated
could not in
fact fly - it
was told to
"Ask UN
Webcast,"
which is under
Smale. They
were asked -
and have not
given the
video. Nor has
Smale offered
any response
to a detailed
petition
two weeks ago,
while
re-tweeting
her former
employer the
NYT and
current boss
Antonio
Guterres. But
who is making
who look bad?
And how can a
former NYT
editor have no
content
neutral media
access rules,
and no
answers? As
she restricts
Inner City Press from its
UN reporting on
Cameroon,
Myanmar,
Kenya,
Yemen
and elsewhere?
We'll
have more on
this. While
any country
would try to
get the UN to
promote its
airline, if
the UN would
do it, Smale
is the UN
official who
responsible
for Inner City
Press being
restricted and
evicted as it
reports on the
UN bribery
scandal of
Patrick Ho and
China Energy
Fund
Committee.
Smale hasn't
even deigned
to answer
petitions in
this regard,
in September
(she said she
recognized the
need for the
"courtesy" of
a response,
never given)
and in
January --
too busy
flying to
South Carolina
to promote an
airline:
Today's
UN of Antonio Guterres, who
just met
with ICC indictee Omar al
Bashir, and his Deputy Amina
J. Mohammed who has refused
Press questions
on her rosewood signatures
and now the refoulement of 47
people to Cameroon from "her"
Nigeria, has become a place of
corruption and censorship. On
January 30 as Inner City Press
sought to complete its
reporting for the day on
Guterres' Bashir meeting and
Mohammed's Cameroon no-answer,
it had a problem. It was
invited to the month's UN
Security Council president's
end of presidency reception,
6:30 to 8:30 - but with its
accreditation reduced by
censorship, it could not get
back into the UN after 7 pm,
to the already delayed UN
video. It ran to at least
enter the reception - but the
elevator led to a jammed
packed third floor, diplomats
lined up to shake the outgoing
UNSC president's hand. Inner
City Press turn to turn tail
back to the UN, passing on its
way favored, pro-UN
correspondents under no such
restriction. Periscope here.
Inner City Press has written
about this to the head of the
UN Department of Public
Information Alison
Smale, in Sepember
2017 - no answer but a new threat - and this
month, when Smale's DPI
it handing out full access
passes to no-show state media.
No answer at all: pure
censorship, for corruption.
Smale's DPI diverted funds
allocated for Kiswahili,
her staff say, now saying they
are targeted for retaliation.
This is today's UN. Amid UN
bribery scandals, failures in
countries from Cameroon to
Yemen and declining
transparency, today's UN does
not even pretend to have
content neutral rules about
which media get full access
and which are confined to
minders or escorts to cover
the General Assembly.
Inner City Press,
which while it pursue the
story of Macau-based
businessman Ng Lap Seng's
bribery of President of the
General Assembly John Ashe was
evicted by the UN Department
of Public Information from its
office, is STILL confined to
minders as it pursues the new
UN bribery scandal, of Patrick
Ho and Cheikh Gadio
allegedly bribing President of
the General Assembly Sam
Kutesa, and Chad's Idriss
Deby, for CEFC China Energy.
Last week Inner
City Press asked UN DPI where
it is on the list to be
restored to (its) office, and
regain full office - and was
told it is not even on the
list, there is no public list,
the UN can exclude,
permanently, whomever it
wants. This is censorship.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2018 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|