Asma
Jahangir Had
Place in Sri
Lanka Probe
&
Criticized
Attempts to
Silence By UN,
Annan Here
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
February 12 -- In
the hours
following the
death of Asma
Jahangir,
tributes and
memorials have
been published
but some
aspects of her
interactions
with and at
the UN have
not been
touched -
including many
hours later
still when
Secretary
Antonio
Guterres
issued a
statement,
and the next
day when Kofi
Annan did,
below. In
2014
Jahangir was
named, by
then-leaving
UN Human
Rights
Commissioner
Navi Pillay,
to a panel on
war crimes in
Sri Lanka,
here along
with attempts
within the UN
to cover up
the crimes and
the housing of
Sri Lanka's
figure Palitha
Kohona:
With
Navi Pillay slated to leave as UN High
Commissioner on Human Rights on August 31,
on June 25 she made an announcement about
the HRC Panel on Sri Lanka...Some in the
UN even tried to censor
Sri Lanka coverage, here. Here's
from Pillay announcement:
"Three
distinguished experts have agreed to
advise and support the team set up to
conduct a comprehensive investigation of
alleged human rights violations in Sri
Lanka, as mandated by the Human Rights
Council in March:
Ms Asma Jahangir, former President of
Pakistan’s Supreme Court Bar Association
and of the Human Rights Commission of
Pakistan, previous holder of several
Human Rights Council mandates and member
of a recent fact-finding body into
Israeli settlements."
It was about a past financial
relationship between Kohona and
the president of the UN
Correspondents Association, who
then agreed to an UNCA screening
of a Rajapaksa government movie
denying war crimes that UNCA
tried to censor.
Jahangir
opposed these
things. As
Inner City
Press
reported,
Jahangir was
in the running
to succeed
Pillay - but
Prince Zeid of
Jordan, now
himself to
leave, was
handed the
post. Who will
follow Zeid?
(Jahangir had
also been in
the running in
2012 for the
UN's Children
and Armed
Conflict post,
here).
Kofi
Annan, Chair
of The Elders,
said, “Asma
Jahangir’s
tenacity,
clarity of
vision and
unbending
principles
helped win
countless
victories in
the struggle
against
authoritarianism.
She spoke
truth to
power, and
power was
forced to
listen. In
this sad time,
I hope her
family can
take some
consolation
that Asma’s
legacy will
live on to
inspire future
generations of
lawyers,
feminists and
human rights
activists the
world over.”
Antonio
Guterres
issued this,
through his (and
Annan's and Ban
Ki-moon's)
spokesman
Stephane Dujarric:
"We have lost
a human rights
giant. News of
the death of
Asma Jahangir
today is
echoing within
her native
Pakistan and
across the
world. She was
a tireless
advocate for
inalienable
rights of all
people and for
equality –
whether in her
capacity as a
Pakistani
lawyer in the
domestic
justice
system, as a
global civil
society
activist, or
as a Special
Rapporteur. Asma
was brilliant,
deeply
principled,
courageous and
kind. I convey
my heartfelt
condolences to
Asma’s family,
friends and
colleagues,
including in
the United
Nations and
civil society
within which
she was such a
leader. Asma
will not be
forgotten." In
October 2017
Inner City
Press asked
Jahangir about
a stand-off
between
representatives
of Syria and
Saudi Arabia
during her
presentation
on Iran to the
UN's Third
Committee.
Alamy photo here.
She called
it
“disappointing,”
see here along
with account
of censorship
in the UN, in
the midst of
this
chronology: During
the UN Third
(Human Rights)
Committee's
presentation
on Iran by
Special
Rapporteur
Asma Jahangir
on October 25,
Saudi Arabia
complained
that Syria was
talking about
it, and not
Iran. When the
chair of the
committee
asked Syria to
"focus" on
Iran, the
Syrian
representative
began to
contest if
Saudi Arabia
had
appropriately
made a point
of order.
Things grew
heated and
soon the
Syrian
representative
had his
microphone cut
off - leading
him,
predictable,
to speak
louder - and
face a threat
that UN
security would
be called.
Finally the
meeting was
suspended for
ten minutes.
Inner City
Press, which
due to UN
censorship had
to get a UN
minder to
reach the
meeting it was
covering on
the second
floor, could
due to the
same
restrictions
not get down
to the Third
Committee
right away.
When it did, this Periscope
video from the
photo booth
shows the
scene. On
October 26,
Inner City
Press asked
Asma Jahangir
what she
thought of
what happened.
She said she
was
"disappointed,"
that the UN is
a "house of
diplomacy."
Well, the UN
is willing to
physically
remove the
investigative
Press and
throw its
files out onto
First Avenue,
here. When UN
Special
Rapporteur
David A. Kaye
held a short
press
conference at
the UN on
October 25, he
called for the
UN to
institute an
access to
information
policy. Inner
City Press
asked him to
specify what
the UN
Secretariat of
Antonio
Guterres can
and should do
on its own,
without
waiting for or
blaming the
General
Assembly.
Inner City
Press also
asked him
about the UN
new October 20 threat to
review its
accreditation,
including for
ill-defined
violations on
an unspecified
date on the
UN's 38th
floor. Video here.
Rest in peace. As North
Korea says it can't pay its
2018 UN dues because of
sanctions on its banks, there
are 14 other UN member states
at least two years behind in
their dues payments, according
to Secretary General Antonio's
letter less than a month ago.
While four of these countries
got exemptions from losing
their voting power in the
General Assembly, ten were
stripped of their votes,
including oil-rich UN Security
Council member Equatorial
Guinea. The other countries
listed as denied votes for
failure to pay are Libya, also
under UN sanctions; Venezuela,
Suriname, Grenada, Dominica,
Dominican Republic, Marshall
Islands, Central African
Republic and Yemen, being
bombed by Saudi Arabia. The
four that got exemption and
can still vote are Sao
Tome and
Principe, Comoros,
Somalia and
Guinea-Bissau,
the latter two
also on the
agenda of the
UN Security
Council.
While the Democratic Republic
of Korea, North Korea's official
name, last year paid its UN
dues as a "swap," for this
year's $180,000 it has told
the UN that sanctions are
prohibiting the transfer and
asks that the UN take action.
Vice Minister Pak
Myong Guk
wrote to UN
Department of
Management
chief Jan
Beagle, in a
letter
obtained by
Inner City
Press and
available in
full here
on Patreon,
that "Last
year we paid our contribution
to the UN in the form of swap
with the operation expenses of
the UN agencies in the DPRK,
purely out of its position to
honor its obligation as a UN
member state, but it is an
abnormal method which cannot
be applied continuously in
view of our state law and
regulations. I would like to
kindly request the UN
Secretariat to take measures,
in
conformity with its mission
with impartiality and
independence as lifeline, to
secure promptly the bank
transaction channel through
which the regular payment of
the DPRK’s contribution is
made possible." We'll have
more on this. Back on January
17 when the UN's Committee on
Relations with the Host
Country met, the
representative of the
Democratic People's Republic
of Korea read a three-page
statement condemning the US
for issuing his Mission to the
UN's tax-exempt card in the
name "North Korea" and not
Democratic People's Republic
of Korea. He said, "We
presumed it would be only a
kind of technical mistake by
the U.S. side, and returned
the card back to the U.S.
mission, while requesting them
to correct that serious
mistake." The statement, which
Inner City Press has
exclusively obtained
immediately after the meeting
(photos here,
full PDF of letter via
Patreon, here)
continued that the U.S.
mission replied, "It seems to
be a glitch in our database,
we'll reach out to our office
in DC." That was on December
13, the statement said,
continuing: "on 14th December
there was an explanation from
the U.S. mission informing
that, quoted as 'Our DC office
has indicated that all country
/ mission names on OFM
credentials for Democratic
People's Republic of Korea
indicate North Korea which is
the conventional short
abbreviation. The short name
for the Democratic People's
Republic of Korea is North
Korea, so the tax card will
remain the same." The
statement concluded by
condemning "such reckless
political hostile policy" and
demanded an apology. Watch
this site. Throughout 2016 New
Zealand documentary maker
Gaylene Preston and her crew
staked out the UN Security
Council along with Inner City
Press, awaiting the results of
the straw polls to elected Ban
Ki-moon's sucessor as UN
Secretary General. Preston's
focus was Helen Clark, the
former New Zealand prime
minister then in her second
term as Administrator of the
UN Development Program.
Preston would ask Inner City
Press after each poll, What
about Helen Clark's chances?
Suffice it to say Clark never
caught fire as a candidate.
Inner City Press told Preston,
as did many other interviewees
in her documentary “My Year
with Helen,” that it might be
sexism. But it might be power
too - including Samantha
Power, the US Ambassador who
spoke publicly about gender
equality and then in secret
cast a ballot Discouraging
Helen Clark, and praised
Antonio Guterres for his
energy (yet to be seen).
Samantha Power's hypocrisy is
called out in Preston's film,
in which New Zealand's
Ambassador complains that
fully four members of the
Council claimed to be the
single “No Opinion” vote that
Clark received. There was a
private screening of My Year
With Helen on December 4 at
NYU's King Juan Carlos Center,
attended by a range of UN
staff, a New Zealand designer
of a website for the country's
proposal new flag, and Ban
Ki-moon's archivist, among
others. After the screening
there was a short Q&A
session. Inner City Press used
that to point out that
Guterres has yet to criticize
any of the Permanent Five
members of the Council who did
not block him as the US,
France and China blocked
Clark, with Russia casting a
“No Opinion.” And that
Guterres picked a male from
among France's three
candidates to head UN
Peacekeeping which they own,
and accepted males from the UK
and Russia for “their” top
positions. Then over New
Zealand wine the talk turned
to the new corruption at the
UN, which is extensive, and
the upcoming dubious Wall
Street fundraiser of the UN
Correspondents Association,
for which some in attendance
had been shaken down, as one
put it, for $1200. The
UN needed and needs to be
shaken up, and hasn't been.
But the film is good, and
should be screened not in the
UN Censorship Alliance but
directly in the UN Security
Council, on the roll-down
movie screen on which failed
envoys like Ismail Ould Cheikh
Ahmed are projected. “My Year
With Helen” is well worth
seeing.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|