As
Pillay Says
60,000 Dead in
Syria, Qs of
Benetech &
US State
Department
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
January 2, updated
below
-- That too
many people
have been
killed in
Syria
is without a
doubt. But how
many? The day
after New
Years the UN
Office of the
High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights said
the figure has
reached
60,000. A
sample major
UK newspaper
said these
were "UN
figures."
Not
so fast. The
number is from
an outside
contractor
chosen and
presumably
paid by the
OHCHR,
Benetech,
which says
that it used
figures
collected from
seven
different
sources, some
of dubious
objectivity,
and none of
them "UN"
sources.
Various
Inner
City Press
readers had
questions
about the
figures, then
about
Benetech. A
Security
Council member
asked Inner
City Press, of
the figures,
"how do they
know, with no
presence in
the field?"
Inner
City Press
went to Benetech's
website, there
finding
that of eight
listed
funders, one
is the
National
Endowment for
Democracy and
another the US
State
Department.
So
Inner City
Press wrote to
Navi Pillay's
spokesman
Rupert
Colville,
who in
the past has
often been
quick and
helpful with
some answers,
initally about
the Democratic
Republic of
Congo. Inner
City Press
asked:
"Quick
questions on
deadline:
first, please
confirm that
the new
Syria study
was
commissioned
by OHCHR from
Benetech, and
that it is
this
Benetech: http://benetech.org/human_rights/strategic_partners.shtml
"Then,
the real
question(s):
please
describe when
and how it was
decided to
commission
this study,
how much was
paid, and how
the selection
/
procurement
process
settled on
Benetech. And
please comment
on the
idea that
choosing a
firm which
lists the US
State
Department and
the
National
Endowment for
Democracy
among its
eight funders
might call
into question
its
impartiality
or
objectivity."
The
questions were
sent before 11
am New York
time, but four
hours later,
no response
from the
OHCHR. It
would seem
that the
questions
should
be answered.
In
this case, Benetech
used data from
": 1) the
Violations
Documentation
Centre,
the
documentation
arm of the
Local
Coordination
Committees; 2)
the Syrian
Network for
Human Rights,
3) the Syrian
Revolution
General
Council
which was
combined with
the
SNHR; 4)
the Syria
Shuhada
Website, 5)
the March 15
Group; 6) the
Syrian
Observatory
for Human
Rights, and 7)
the Syrian
government."
No, these are
not now "UN
figures."
Back in
September,
UNICEF
announced 1600
dead in one
week in Syria.
But when Inner
City Press inquired,
OCHA disavowed
the figures,
which were
only from
media
accounts. They
are laundered
to become "UN
figures."
Footnotes:
from
before
Christmas,
Inner City
Press is still
waiting for an
answer to
this: "will
OHCHR play any
role in, or
does it have
any comment on
or guidance
for, the (now
third) review
of UN action
and inaction
in Sri Lanka
in 2009, now
chaired by DSG
Eliasson and
to
be completed
in the 2d
quarter of
2013?"
The
UN system
would never
stand behind
-- in fact it
covered
up --
casualty
figures in Sri
Lanka. It
would have
been good to
do
enumeration
then, when the
UN had people
on the ground.
If that's a
lesson learnt,
good. But it
should be done
transparently.
How was
Benetech
selected and
how much were
they paid?
Inner
City Press
also let
Colville and
the OHCHR
know, "still
NO
information
from DPKO on
which FARDC
units were in
Minova during
the
126 rapes in
late November,
nor even which
FARDC units
MONUSCO works
with or
supports.
Growing doubts
about this 'Human
Rights Due
Diligence
Policy'" -- a
UN system
policy in
which the
OHCHR
ostensibly
plays a major
role.
The stonewalling
of DPKO chief
Herve
Ladsous
should not be
allowed to be
the whole UN's
position - or
will
it be? Watch
this site.
Update
of 6:30 pm
-- receiving
no answers
from OHCHR
after seven
hours, Inner
City Press
asked Benetech
in San
Francisco
similar
questions. The
questions have
been referred,
seemingly to
Atlanta, area
code 404.
Meanwhile in
Washington, US
spokesperson
Victoria
Nuland said,
"we’ve seen
this report by
UN Rights
Commissioner
Navi Pillay."
But the report
is BY
Benetech, a
fundee of the
State
Department.
All we're
saying is that
the questions
should be
answered.
Watch this
site.