UN
Human Rights Office Lurches
From Corrupt Recruitment To
Collusion With Guterres
Censorship
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR PFT NY
Post
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, June 14 – The UN Office
of the High Commissioner for
Human Rights, which retaliated
against Anders Kompass,
Miranda Brown, Emma Reilly and
others and did nothing about
Antonio Guterres having Inner
City Press roughed up and
banned now 346 days, is also
corrupt when it comes to
recruitment and hiring.
Whistleblowers there, citing
Kompass and the previous
Commissioner, unacted on by
his successor, have sent Inner
City Press this:
"the
non-transparent, fraudulent
and unfair manner in which job
opening 74117 (current Middle
East and North Africa Chief/
Geneva) was first advertised,
processed and then filled. But
prior to that, we thought it
wise to confront this issue by
drawing your attention to the
rather expeditious and
doubtful career progression
that the current incumbent of
the aforementioned position,
Mr. Mohammad Ali Anlsur
(former Jordanian Diplomat
with no Human rights
experience at all), has
enjoyed ever since he joined
this Office. Not only he was
miraculously and abruptly
scrambled from a P3 position
to sensitive P5 positions in a
matter of months, all
recruitment processes and
temporary assignments that
relate to him were tarnished
with irregularities and
serious breaches to existing
rules and procedures
Mr. Anlsur was
brought to OHCHR in September
2014 by HC Zeid (He used to
work with him in New York) to
officially serve as his
Special Assistant and as a
focal point for the Middle
East and North Africa region
within the Executive Office
(EO). He replaced the then P3
MENA focal point, Ms. F. J.,
who was forced out of the EO
"to make space" for Mr.
Anlsur. This abrupt movement
of staff within the EO was
justified by the then DHC (in
an all staff message dated
September 2014) on the need
for the new HC to have an
Arabic Speaker that would
accompany him in bilateral
meetings with interlocutors
from the MENA region!. But
soon after, Mr. Anlsur was
surprisingly assigned to serve
as Senior Legal Policy Adviser
at the P5 level (temporary
replacing Ms. C. A). This
position gave him the
privilege to overlook and
advise* on the way the Office
(mis)managed the case of
Anders Kompass, which had and
continues to have negative
impacts on the whole UN
system. In
addition, and under the direct
instructions of the Zeid
himself Mr. Alsnur has been
appointed as the "mini king
for the MENA region",
disrupting the good
functioning of files, deciding
on priorities and disregarding
and isolating other senior
officials that were already
working on the Middle East.
Most of the decisions taken
thereon on the MENA region
were one sided, arbitrary and
to the least subjective. Those
who dared expressing concerns
or simple views on best venues
to address the many challenges
that the region was faced with
would be forced out of their
positions either by laterally
moving them from one duty
station to another (musical
chairs between Head of offices
in Qatar, Beirut, Tunisia,
Yemen, Jordan and Mauritania)
or simply isolated after being
subject to smearing campaigns
and or investigations based on
fake assumptions. There are
numerous cases, but we will
only refer you to the cases of
Mr. Freij Fenniche (who was
Chief of MENA and forced into
retirement) and Elobaid
Elobaid (moved out of Qatar at
a sensitive time when Alnsur
only priority for the region
was to build partnership with
the Qataris.... During
the same period, Elobaid was
faced with at least one
investigation by OIOS as
outlined in this
UN court decision.
Anders
Kompass, the Head of the
Division (he normally
supervises the work of the
MENA Section) was faced with
two cases the first of Western
Sahara and the second on CAR.
Time has proved that Alnsur
has instigated at least the
CAR case against Anders
Kompass.
Back to the "enthronement" of
Mr, Alnsur! In April 2015, her
was selected on a fixed-term
P4 position within the
Executive Office (job opening
37481). It is unclear whether
he was sitting on a temporary
P3/ P4 at the time of this
selection, but in any
circumstances this recruitment
process remains questionable
and constituted a first
exceptional measure to
accommodate Mr. Anlsur's
ascension in OHCHR. This
includes, among other things,
narrowing the Terms of
References (ToRs) as to
perfectly fit his
profile/previous work
experience, upgrading the
functions of the MENA focal
point at the Executive Office
from a P3 to a P4 etc.
Surprisingly enough, the same
post was downgraded to a P3
the moment Mr. Anlsur was
selected/ confirmed at his
current P5 position in FOTCD.
Members of the Panel (as we
will see it later on) were
over dominantly from the
Executive Office, which is
extremely rare in OHCHR
recruitment
processes.
Less than six months later (in
November 2015), Mr. Anlsur was
mysteriously and surprisingly
catapulted to the MENA Section
to first serve as Officer in
Charge (after forcing Anders
Kompass out of the Division
and the then Chief and his
Deputy Chief of the MENA
Section out) and then
temporary Chief of Section at
the P5 level, after yet
another loose recruitment
process. This raises serious
concerns as to the fairness
and transparency of that
process. In addition, some of
the candidates to the
aforementioned positons were
directly threatened while
other potential candidates
were "invited" not to
apply... Not only his
sudden move to FOTCD was done
with a complete disdain to
existing rules and procedures,
but only within months after
his exceptional appointment at
a P4 level. It is of utmost
importance to highlight that
the then vacant temporary P5
at the MENA Section was only
advertised on a GTA after Mr.
Anlsur would have spent
exactly one year (in October
2016) on his initial
assignment as the Section's
Office in Chard. In other
terms, Mr. Anlsur was given a
golden opportunity to somehow
meet the "lateral move"
requirements under
ST/AI/2016/1, further paving
his way towards the fixed-term
P5 at the MENA Section. In the
private sector such a
reprehensible act is called
"insider trading". In the UN
and/or broader public sector,
it has different names:
abuse of authority/power,
fraud or simply
corruption.
Accordingly, and
as initially mentioned the
whole recruitment process of
job opening 74117 (Chief of
MENA Section) was done in
violation of basic UN rules
and procedures, including the
then staff selection and
managed mobility system
(ST/AI/2016/1) and this is
why:
First, the ToRs of this job
opening were again drafted in
a way that perfectly fitted
the profile of Mr. Anlsur,
whereby key requirements for
these kind of sensitive P5
positions such as prior
experience in the UN (field
& HQs) were simply removed
from the initial Job Opening
(JO). Managerial skills were
not required but only
desirable whereas knowledge of
French and other important
pre-existing requirements were
also simply dismissed.
Surprisingly, the same ToRs
rather required prior
"Experience of institutional
legal matters related to
managing legal processes of
international organizations".
Probably a wink to Mr.
Anlsur's previous work
experience at the Legal
Department in the Jordanian
Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Furthermore, one of the
screening questions expressly
required whether candidates
have "experience in human
rights monitoring, analysis
and reporting". Mr. Anslur
simply cheated by responding
with a yes, although he never
had any substantive human
rights
monitoring/analysis/reporting
experience in his entire
career. Neither before joining
OHCHR, nor while working for
OHCHR. The then hiring manager
and the Ohchr Human Resources
have both failed in checking
this information. In addition,
another amazing aspect of this
recruitment is the
non-transparent manner in
which the ToRs were drafted
and processed, including
through the exclusion of
relevant and experienced staff
members (in the field of
recruitment) from within the
FOTCD Director's Office. Any
attempt to oppose the
recruitment process was
vehemently
suppressed.
Second, it was
further surprising to see job
opening 74117 taken out of
POLNET in yet another attempt
to control its outcomes.This
is probably the first and only
time when OHCHR has requested
a vacancy to be moved out of
Polnet. Looking backward on
this case, we do not see any
apparent and valid
justification for doing so for
the post could have been
easily advertised through
POLNET semi-annual staffing
exercise. In fact, it should
be clearly and loudly stated
that when Mr. Anlsur joined
the MENA as O.i.C he did so
without any form of
recruitment. He then served as
O.i.C for the MENA Section
(while maintaining his P4
position at the EO) for almost
a year without OHCHR feeling
the urgency to issuing a GTA.
Adding insult to injury, the
Hiring Manager then opted not
to administer a written exam
and to directly conduct
competency based interviews.
The choice of the interview
panel, composed among others
of FOTCD Director a.i
and the HC’s Chief of staff,
is rather very rare and raises
serious concerns as to the
fairness of the
process.
Third, and most
importantly, it is regrettable
to also note that at the time
of his application to job
opening 74117, Mr Anlsur did
not meet the eligibility
requirement under Article 6.9
of ST/AI/2016/1 which provides
that "Candidates shall be
required to have at least one
geographical move, which may
have taken place at any level
in the Professional and higher
categories within the United
Nations system, to be eligible
to be considered for a
position at the P-5, D-1 and
D-2 levels, except as provided
for in section 25.2 below". It
goes without saying that Mr.
Anlsur has no geographical
move** "within the UN system".
Furthermore, he did not meet
the exceptional measures as
defined in Section 25 of
ST/AI/2016/1. In fact, Article
25.2 foresees some
transitional measures for
eligibility screening of
candidates until 31 December
2020. It indeed provides that
"For staff members who joined
the Organization on or before
30 April 2014, the eligibility
requirement to be considered
for promotion to the P-5, D-1
and D-2 levels may include two
lateral moves, in lieu of the
geographical move required in
section 6.10 above, which may
have taken place at any level
in the Professional category,
and shall be subject to the
following
provisions:
(a)
[...]
(b) Staff recruited at the P-4
level shall become eligible
for consideration for a
position at the P-5 level
after one lateral move at the
P-4 level. Staff recruited at
the P-5 level shall become
eligible for consideration for
a position at the D-1 level
after one lateral move at the
P-5 level. Staff recruited at
the D-1 level shall become
eligible for consideration for
a position at the D-2 level
after one lateral move at the
D-1
level".
The provisions of Article 25.2
do not apply to Mr. Anlsur as
he only joined OHCHR in
September 2014 (on a "express
of interest basis" and was
first selected on a P4
position in April 2015) and
shall therefore be subjected
to the geographical move
requirement as defined in
Article 6.9. In addition, the
requirements under Article
25.2 (b) do not apply to his
case either. Article 25.2 (b)
clearly states that "staff
recruited at the P4 level
shall become eligible for
consideration for a position
at the P5 level after one
lateral move at the P4 level".
According to ST/AI/2016/1 a
lateral move is defined as:
"Service of a staff member in
two different positions at the
same grade level, performing
the functions of the position
selected for a continuous
period of at least one year".
It is obvious from our initial
introduction that Mr. Anlsur
does not meet the lateral
move's definition as he spent
less than a year (8-9 months
to be precise) at his P4
position in the Executive
Office (let alone his
temporary assignment as Senior
Legal Officer). In addition,
in the MENA Section he did not
serve at the "P4 level" as he
was appointed as O.i.C and
then Chief of Section at a P 5
level. During his initial
assignment as O.i.C MENA
(November 2015- October 2016)
he did maintain his position
at the EO and, technically he
was not "laterally moved" to
FOTCD, at least not before his
temporary selection as the
Head of MENA in October 2016
at the P5 level. He was
selected on his current P5
position in April/May 2017...
Many have been
prevented from competing for
P5 and D1 positions given the
Office strict adherence to the
geographical/lateral moves
requirements as per
ST/AI/2016/1. We further
regret that the previous HC
and other Senior managers have
failed to uphold respect for
basic UN rules and procedures,
including principles of
integrity, transparency,
non-discrimination between
staff members, non-selectivity
and equal opportunities in the
filling of vacant positions,
in the field and HQ alike.
Proximity to the HC or any
other Senior Officials shall
not be used to simply
undermine basic rules and
procedures and/or as a fast
track for promotion. In his
last statement to the HRC of
18 June 2018, Zeid left no
doubt about his biaised
preference to Alnsur when
stressing towards the end of
his intervention: “And finally
to my brother Mohammad Ali
al-Nsour, who accompanied me
from New York, via Amman, and
has been with me every step of
the way, and will always
remain a very special friend-
thank
you”...
Accordingly, we would like to
use this platform to once
again call upon our
senior leaderships, the new
High Commissioner and the
Secretary General, to
take some urgent and immediate
measures to ensure that all
future recruitments are
conducted in full transparency
and in compliance with the
Secretary-General’s bulletin
ST/SGB/2016/2 and which was
designed to ensure the
selection of "staff on the
basis of merit, demonstrated
competencies and prior
performance, through a
competitive process in which
the paramount consideration is
the necessity of securing the
highest standards of
efficiency, competence and
integrity". We also would like
to call upon them to
thoroughly investigate the
aforementioned claims and
allegations with a view to
ensuring accountability. In
the meantime, we further urge
them to take immediate
managerial and corrective
measures in line with relevant
Secretary-General's
bulletins. * In a now
online note dated 29 March
2015, Anders Kompass has
clearly stated that: "on 19
March 2015, I was told by a
Colleague that Mr. Mohammad
Ali Alnsour, Special Assistant
to the High Commissioner, had
contacted by phone the Human
Rights Officer who had
investigated the case asking
her to formally request an
internal investigation on the
case. I was told that the HRO
had refused to do so".
Other online documebts clearly
point out to the fact that the
whole Anders scandal was
instigated by Anlsur. "
With UN High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights
Michelle
Bachelet
and her Deputy Andrew Gilmour
set to speak in the UN on
human rights day on December
10, Inner City Press responded
to an invitation and was told,
"Thank you for registering to
attend the Human Rights Day
event at the United Nations on
Monday 10 December. On Monday,
please come to the UN
Visitors’ Gate on First Avenue
opposite 45th street starting
at 2pm, at which time entry
passes will be distributed."
Then, past six
p.m. on Friday, December 7
this from Bachelet's and
Gilmour's Office of the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights: "Dear
Matthew, We
have received
notification
from UN
Security that
your name was
flagged as
"BARRED" on
the list we
submitted for
passes for
Monday's event
(3pm, ECOSOC
Chamber). We
will therefore
not have a
pass for you
and are unable
to facilitate
entry.
Thank you for
your interest
and best
regards,
OHCHR New York
Office."
Inner City Press
immediately wrote back,
to the sender
and
Bachelet and
her assistant, to
Andrew Gilmour
and to the
moderator of
the event, "Particularly
since you are the UN Office of the
High Commissioner for *Human
Rights,* did you not ask why a
journalist who asks the Secretary
General and his spokesmen about
the killings in Cameroon,
Burundi, UN
corruption, UN peacekeepers'
sexual abuse of civilians,
and Sri
Lanka, is “BARRED” from
attending your human rights event
- without any hearing or appeal? I
will appreciate your Office's
answer to this." We'll
have more on this.
Bachelet
gave a speech on
October 15 in the UN's Third
Committee, she emphasized a
prioritization of social and
economic rights and said one
of the officials of her office
is "on mission in
Silicon Valley" in the
US. There are questions
about this - but Inner City
Press which has covered human
rights and the UN for more
than a decade was for the
first time banned from access
a High Commissioner's speech.
This has been raised repeated
to Bachelet since she took
office but she has so far done
nothing, not even responded.
Meanwhile on October 12
Cameroon, from whose Paul Biya
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres took a golden statue
and favors in the Fifth
(Budget) Committee and remains
silent on the slaughter of
Anglophones, was elected to a
seat on the UN Human Rights
Council. This system is
failing - but if Bachelet
cannot even answer on Guterres
maintaining a secret banned
list including not only Inner
City Press but also "political
activists," then the UN has
hit a new low.
Inner City Press was never
given a hearing by Smale
before her August 17 letter
with withdrew Inner City Press
media accreditation. Nothing
in it said anything about a
ban from entering the UN as a
person, a tourist, or in
another other way. But this is
what happened, without any
recourse. Pure Kafka-esque
censorship, by a former New
York Times Berlin bureau chief
to hinder coverage of the
corruption of the former
Portuguese prime minster
Antonio Guterres, see
September 23 New York Post
here. What next? Watch
this site.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office, past & future?: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now UNder
Guterres: UN Delegates
Entrance Gate
and mail: Dag H.
Center
Box 20047, NY NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2018 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|