At UN, New
OIOS Chief
Mendoza
Worked on
Corrupt
Peacekeeping
Payments
By
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Exclusive
series
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 5
-- The UN
Office of
Internal
Oversight Services,
used under
previous chief
Carman
Lapointe to go
after the
whistleblower
on
peacekeepers'
Central
African
Republic rapes
Anders
Kompass, whom
UN
Peacekeeping
boss Herve
Ladsous tried
to fire,
stands to
receive new
leadership.
On
October 5 the
UN announced
that Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
“following
consultations
with Chairs of
Regional
Groups,
informed the
General
Assembly of
his intention
to appoint
Heidi Mendoza
of the
Philippines as
the new
Under-Secretary-General
for Internal
Oversight
Services for a
five-year
non-renewable
term. Ms.
Mendoza is
currently
Commissioner
of the
Commission of
Audit of the
Philippines
(since 2011).”
What the UN
announcement
did NOT say is
that Heidi
Mendoza
already has
experience
with
corruption
involving
Ladsous' UN
Peacekeeping.
As reported
by the
Philippine
Star on
February 23,
2011
“During
the hearing,
DFA Assistant
Secretary
confirmed a
report in The
STAR on
Tuesday that
the UN has
denied making
a $5-million
reimbursement
to the Armed
Forces of the
Philippines in
January 2001
as alleged by
former
government
auditor Heidi
Mendoza.”
The
Star also
reported that
“In a House
justice
committee
hearing
Tuesday also
on the plea
bargaining
agreement,
another
whistleblower,
former state
auditor Heidi
Mendoza said
she had been
pressured by
her superiors
to go slow on
her
investigation
of Garcia. She
said even the
million dollar
reimbursements
from the
United Nations
for Filipino
troops in
peacekeeping
missions
didn’t escape
the attention
of corrupt
officials.”
How Mendoza
will deal with
the continuing
corruption
involving
Ladsous, and
with his and
others' cover
up of sexual
abuse
(including
Ladsous
linking rapes
to “R&R")
remains to be
seen. Watch
this site.previous
chief Carman
Lapointe to go
after the
whistleblower
on
peacekeepers'
Central
African
Republic rapes
Anders
Kompass, whom
UN
Peacekeeping
boss Herve
Ladsous tried
to fire,
stands to
receive new
leadership.
On
October 5 the
UN announced
that Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
“following
consultations
with Chairs of
Regional
Groups,
informed the
General
Assembly of
his intention
to appoint
Heidi Mendoza
of the
Philippines as
the new
Under-Secretary-General
for Internal
Oversight
Services for a
five-year
non-renewable
term. Ms.
Mendoza is
currently
Commissioner
of the
Commission of
Audit of the
Philippines
(since 2011).”
What
the UN
announced did
NOT say is
that Heidi
Mendoza
already has
experience
with
corruption
involving
Ladsous' UN
Peacekeeping.
As reported
the Philippine
Star on
February 23,
2011
“During the
hearing, DFA
Assistant
Secretary
confirmed a
report in The
STAR on
Tuesday that
the UN has
denied making
a $5-million
reimbursement
to the Armed
Forces of the
Philippines in
January 2001
as alleged by
former
government
auditor Heidi
Mendoza.”
The Star also
reported that
“In a House
justice
committee
hearing
Tuesday also
on the plea
bargaining
agreement,
another
whistleblower,
former state
auditor Heidi
Mendoza said
she had been
pressured by
her superiors
to go slow on
her
investigation
of Garcia. She
said even the
million dollar
reimbursements
from the
United Nations
for Filipino
troops in
peacekeeping
missions
didn’t escape
the attention
of corrupt
officials.”
How
Mendoza will
deal with the
continuing
corruption
involving
Ladsous, and
with his and
others' cover
up of sexual
abuse
(including
Ladsous
linking rapes
to “R&R,”
here) remains
to be seen.
Watch this
site.
French
soldiers in
the Central
African
Republic
allegedly
sexually
abused
children, as
exposed in a
UN Office of
the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights and
UNICEF report
given to the
French
government by
longtime OHCHR
staffer Anders
Kompass.
Kompass
was urged to
resign --
according to a
first UN
Dispute
Tribunal
ruling
reinstating
him, by French
head of UN
Peacekeeping
Herve Ladsous,
who has since
tersely denied
it -- and
Miranda Brown
who worked
with him did
in fact have
her UN service
ended, see
below.
In typical UN
fashion,
subsequent
coverage even
of Kompass has
omitted any
reference to
Ladsous, who
doles out
answers only
to scribes who
don't
criticize him.
Ignoring
Ladsous, focus
shifts to the
UN Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services,
whose Carman
Lapointe is to
leave on
September 13
-- according
to sources,
after one
final junket,
to Manila from
September 8 to
11.
On
August 27, the
UN is throwing
a farewell
reception for
Lapointe:
From:
Byung-Kun
Min/NY/UNO
Date:
08/25/2015
02:07PM
Subject:
Reminder:
Invitation to
a farewell
reception for
Ms. Carman
Lapointe at
4.00 PM on
Thursday 27
August 2015
Dear
Colleagues,
For your kind
attention,
please.
Best
regards,
Min.
.......................................................
Min, Byung-Kun
Chief of OUSG,
OIOS
David
Kanja---14/08/2015
06:21:39
PM---Dear
Colleagues,
From: David
Kanja/NY/UNO
Date:
14/08/2015
06:21 PM
Subject:
Invitation to
a farewell
reception for
Ms. Carman
Lapointe at
4.00 PM on
Thursday 27
August 2015
[Ban
Ki-moon, we
note, has
another
appointed at
4:10 pm.]
Inner
City Press has
heard, asked
and reported
that Lapointe,
days before
leaving the
UN, is set to
travel all the
way to Manila
for a
conference or
junket, among
with her
special
assistant
Byun-kun Min,
and her
Assistant
Secretary
General David
Kanja (the
organizers of
the farewell.)
Why
would a UN
official go to
such a
conference
days before
leaving the
organization?
As
noted,
Lapointe is to
leave the UN
two days
later, on
September 13.
Here is the
question Inner
City Press has
submitted to
Ban Ki-moon's
spokesperson's
office:
"Please
state who from
OIOS will be
attending this
in Manila:
'"about 50
United Nations
(UN) agencies,
multilateral
financial
institutions,
and
inter-governmental
organizations
in a forum to
discuss topics
of common
interests to
the internal
auditing
profession.
The RIAS 2015
will be held
at the Asian
Development
Bank in Manila
on 8 to 11
September
2015.'
"and if any
beyond IAD
Director
Eleanor Burns,
please state
the rationale
including for
the UN /
public
expenditure."
We'll
have more on
this.
Inner City
Press while
repeatedly
asking the UN
about its
ostensibly
independent
panel
predicted the
UN will try to
point to the
departure of
officials at
or over their
departure
dates (Human
Rights deputy
Flavia
Pansieri,
OIOS' Carman
Lapointe and
Ethics Officer
Dubinsky) as a
way not to act
on, for
example,
Ladsous who
was appointed
by and is
protected by
France, whose
soldiers were
the alleged
rapists in
this case.
On July 22 the
UN
Spokesperson's
office said
Pansieri had
"resigned,"
citing health
reasons. Inner
City Press
immediately
asked for
confirmation
she had been
at - over -
the expiration
of her
contract
anyway. The
spokesperson
wouldn't
confirm this,
nor answer
Inner City
Press if
Pansieri has
or will speak
with the
(ostensibly)
independent
panel.
Now on July 24
OHCHR protests
-- too much,
some say --
that
Pansieri's
resignation
got linked to
the CAR
scandal it
does not wish
to surround
Zeid and, it
seems,
Ladsous.
Before
Pansieri told
her family and
friends about
resigning,
Zeid emailed
staff, then
was surprised
it was leaked.
The
explanation
must be
compared to
what the UNDT
was told.
Here's the
July 24 OHCHR
briefing
notes, with
Inner City
Press [annotations]:
"On
Wednesday,
after she had
informed the
High
Commissioner
that she had
reluctantly –
because of her
health
situation –
decided she
could not
continue to
fulfill her
very demanding
functions, he
sent a message
to all staff
relaying her
decision and
expressing his
own regret and
wishes for her
speedy
recovery. He
also noted
that she had
requested that
this news
remain
internal
initially,
until she had
herself
informed her
friends and
former
colleagues of
her decision."
[ICP:
it seems
foreseeable
that such an
email would be
leaked - isn't
that exactly
what Kompass
is being
charged with?]
"Regrettably
that wish was
not honoured
and within a
few hours the
news was
spreading with
the added
insinuation
that the
reason for her
resignation
was linked to
the ongoing
investigations
into the
handling of
the alleged
sexual abuse
of children by
French troops
in CAR.
"Since every
single article
published
about her
resignation
has made that
link, and
either said or
strongly
implied that
the reasons
relating to
her personal
health were
simply an
excuse, she
has authorized
me to give a
little more
information
about her
health,
something
which – as
would be the
case with most
of us – she
would have
preferred to
remain
private.
"Flavia
Pansieri has
had three
separate
serious
medical
conditions
since the
beginning of
this year, and
has twice been
admitted as an
emergency case
to hospital,
first of all
in January and
then again in
early July,
when she
underwent an
emergency
operation for
a detached
retina. She is
currently
recuperating
from that
operation, but
it is still
not clear if
she will
regain her
vision in the
affected eye.
"Pansieri, who
– as the High
Commissioner
put it in his
note to the
staff – had
nobly agreed
to come out of
retirement to
work for
almost three
years at
OHCHR, has
reasonably
enough decided
to finally
prioritize her
health and
family. She
also
recognizes
that in her
current state
of health, she
cannot
guarantee that
she will
regain the
energy and
stamina
required for
the very
demanding job
of Deputy High
Commissioner.
She has
however said
she is still
available to
carry out the
functions, as
best she can,
until a
replacement is
appointed.
The High
Commissioner
stressed how
grateful he is
'for her
continuous
commitment to
this Office
and the
extraordinary
dedication she
has shown
while
fulfilling her
very onerous
workload,
often going
beyond the
call of
duty.'"
[ICP:
Is this
"beyond the
call of duty"
a reference to
Zeid's charge,
to the UNDT,
that Pansieri
met
inappropriately
with Swedish
diplomats?]
"He
also deeply
regrets the
way his
message to
staff was
leaked
prematurely,
and the manner
in which her
genuinely
serious health
situation was
treated with
such
disrespect."
Is this a
critique of
media
coverage? Or
again of
staff?
Inner City
Press has
already asked
if Ladsous --
who used Ban
Ki-moon's
guards to
expel Inner
City Press
from an "open"
meeting -- has
spoken with
the panel; no
answer. We'll
have more on
this.
On July 10,
Judge Thomas
Laker of the
UNDT denied a
request by
Kompass to
suspend the
Office of
Internal
Oversight
investigation
of him,
including a
requested July
13 interview,
at least
sending the
10-weeks work
of the Panel
Ban Ki-moon
has named.
(Laker'
decision, here,
at Paragraph 8
does say that
"the High
Commissioner
had requested
his
resignation,
adding
that
the
Under-Secretary-General
for
the
Department
of
Peacekeeping
Operations had
made such
request.")
On
July 7, Inner
City Press
asked UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
France's
one-year delay
in now sending
magistrates to
CAR, and how
this related
to the UN on
rapes in
Darfur saying
that such
delay
undermines
justice and
accountability.
Video
here. From
the UN's
transcript:
Inner
City Press:
the French
judges are
sending two
magistrates to
Bangui to
belatedly
speak with the
child alleged
victims of the
Sangaris force
there.
They're now
saying that,
as far back as
August of last
year, the
French Defense
Ministry
investigators
went.
This is now a
year later
that they're
sending these
investigators.
Given what the
UN has said
about the
difficulty of
investigating,
for example,
the Thabit
rapes in
Darfur after
less than a
year, what
does the UN
think about
this
gap? It
wasn't that
the French
didn't
know.
The French
sent somebody
in August of
last year and
did
nothing.
What's
different
now? And
is the UN
going to help
with this new…
Spokesman:
Obviously, we
will cooperate
in every way
we can with
the ongoing
investigation.
I'm not going
to comment on
what gaps
there may be
within the
French
investigation.
I don't know
what has been
happening in
the
meantime.
I think we're
just basing
ourselves on
press
reports.
So I'm not
going to
comment on
that.
Inner City
Press: I
only say
because the UN
has said so
much about
the…
Spokesman:
No, no,
I…
[cross talk] I
stand by what
I said.
What I'm
saying to you
is I don't
know… we are
not privy to
all the
details of
what may be
going on in
the French
investigation.
So I'm not
going to
comment on
that.
This seems to
be the UN's
policy. And
what has the
panel done so
far?
Inner
City Press
reported on
some of the
documents and
went to
Ladsous' rare
press
conference on
May 29
(International
Day of UN
Peacekeepers)
in order to
ask some
questions. Video here.
But
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric,
choosing who
could ask
questions,
refused to
call on Inner
City Press,
even for
Ladsous to
say, as he did
under
Dujarric's
predecessor
Martin
Nesirky, "I
don't respond
to you,
Mister."
So
Inner City
Press
objected, on
behalf of the
new Free UN
Coalition for
Access (the
old UNCA has
become part of
the problem)
and asked
questions, video here, transcript
here.
The
documents also
call into
serious
question the
claims of
"independence"
from the
office of Ban
Ki-moon of the
Office of
Internal
Oversight
Services and
the UN Ethics
Office.
Consider this:
OIOS head
Carman
Lapointe, writing
to James
Finness (still
in charge of
the
"investigation"
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric
continues to
use as an
excuse to not
answer
question),
noted that at
the UN staff
retreat in
March "I
received an
urgent email
from the CdC
[Ban's Chef de
Cabinet Susana
Malcorra] to
meet with
Zeid, Flavia
and Joan."
So OIOS
is not
independent -
it can to
told, by Ban's
chief of
staff, to meet
with
collaborate
with the
Ethics Office
as well as
OHCHR's Zeid
and Pansieri.
Inner
City Press
previously
reported on
and asked
Dujarric about
OIOS' flawed
process and a
high profile
recusal, see
below.
As
noted, Inner
City Press
reported on
some of the
documents and
went to
Ladsous' rare
press
conference on
May 29
(International
Day of UN
Peacekeepers)
in order to
ask some
questions.
But
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric,
choosing who
could ask
questions,
refused to
call on Inner
City Press,
even for
Ladsous to
say, as he did
under
Dujarric's
predecessor
Martin
Nesirky, "I
don't respond
to you,
Mister."
So why did
Nesirky allow
Press
questions to
Ladsous, and
Dujarric
didn't?
Dujarric set
the first
question aside
for "UNCA" --
but called on
an individual
who was not
elected to
their board,
who lost the
election; her
question was a
vague softball
offering
Ladsous a
chance to
comment on
Central
African
Republic. He
said, it was
one nation,
not under blue
helmet.
But
Ladsous'
MINUSCA
mission knew
of the sexual
abuse since at
latest August
5, 2014. Inner
City Press
said, "Follow
up on CAR?"
Dujarric
called on
Reuters, which
previously
wrote to him
trying to get
Inner City
Press thrown
out of the UN
(then filed to
get his leaked
complaint
blocked or
Banned from
Google's
Search, here.)
Reuters did
not even aske
about the CAR
sexual abuse.
What
emerged is
that both
Ladsous --
and,
troublingly,
Ban Ki-moon --
were formally
informed of
the sexual
abuse of
children in
CAR "in the
spring."
What date? And
what did they
do?
Dujarric said,
"last
question;" as
Ladsous left
the room Inner
City Press
asked Ladsous
about him
speaking about
the
whistleblower
Kompass with
OHCHR's Zeid,
also a subject
of the new
documents --
no answer.
Inner
City Press
objected to
Dujarric, who
has fielded or
dodged a dozen
Inner City
Press
questions
about the CAR
rapes and
Ladsous' role,
not even being
allowed to ask
a question.
Dujarric said,
"Noted." Video
here.
And
what? Again,
Dujarric's
predecessor
Nesirky, and
his deputy Del
Buey, allowed
Inner City
Press to put
questions to
Ladsous. What
if the
difference?
We'll have
more on this.
On July 30,
2014,
Ambassador
Nicolas
Niemtchinow,
Permanent
Representative
of France to
the UN in
Geneva wrote
to
Kompass that
action was
being taken.
But then,
nothing.
On
August 5, 2014
the Human
Rights Officer
in CAR of
OHCHR wrote to
Renner Onana
of the
already-then
UN mission
MINUSCA;
DPKO's SRSG
Babacar Gaye
was
referenced.
So when did
Gaye or
MINUSCA tell
DPKO chief
Ladsous?
Tellingly,
even the UN's
cover up was
delayed by
High
Commissioner
Prince Zeid
thinking he
heard of
French troops'
sexual abuse
in MINUSMA
(Mali) and not
MINUSCA (CAR).
Zeid
asked his
predecessor
Navi Pillay if
she met with
French
representatives
about rapes in
Mali -- the
answer was no
-- then much
later asked
her if she'd
met with the
French about
CAR (the
answer was
yes.)
It was
Zeid's Deputy
Flavia
Pansieri who
conveyed
Ladsous'
directive to
Kompass to
resign. Zeid
in his
statement
makes much of
Pansieri
meeting with a
Swedish
diplomat in
the street, in
casual
clothes, after
Sweden raised
l'affaire
Kompass at a
dinner in
honor of Ban
Ki-moon's
Deputy Jan
Eliasson. THe
UN's move now
seems to be to
try to lay all
blame on
Pansieri,
whose term was
expiring
anyway. We'll
have more on
this.
"On 12 March
2015 meeting
with the
Deputy High
Commissioner I
was informed
that the High
Commissioner
requested my
resignation
for the way I
dealt with the
reports of
paedophilia in
the Central
African
Republic. I
was told that
the High
Commissioner
had been asked
for my
resignation by
Mr. Ladsous,
Under
Secretary-General
for the
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations in
New York,
during a visit
of the High
Commissioner
to New York."
Absent from
the UN Fifth
(Budget)
Committee's
May 18 meeting
was not only
embattled
Peacekeeping
chief
Ladsous,, but
also OIOS'
Carman
Lapointe.
In
her stead for
OIOS was
Michael
Stefanovic,
who told the
Fifth
Committee that
he has recused
himself from
the
investigation
and has
written to
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon as to
why.
This is highly
irregular. If
the recusal
was made on a
personal
connection
between
Stefanovic and
the
whistleblower
Anders
Kompass,
Stefanovic
would have
recused
himself from
the earlier
investigation
- but he
didn't. If it
were such a
recusal, he
would have
written to
Lapointe, and
not to the
S-G.
For now we add
this -- if
OIOS Director
Stefanovic has
a conflict of
interest, how
can the UN be
asking others
to rely on an
OIOS
investigation?
Inner City
Press has
asked a
Permanent
Member of the
Security
Council -- not
France -- if
an OIOS
investigation
would be
sufficient,
and has been
told "No."
Now
we have this,
from the Fifth
Committee's
May 20
meeting:
Lapointe,
summoned to
the meeting
via her
Byun-kun Min,
was asked
-When
did OIOS/ID
start the
investigation
into Anders
Kompass?
-Why
did Mr.
Stefanovic
recuse himself
from the
Kompass
investigation?
-In
view of Mr.
Stefanovic
recusing
himself, did
Ms. Lapointe
see any
impediments
for the scope
of the
investigation,
especially as
it appeared to
implicate an
ASG or USG in
misconduct?
Note - this is
a reference to
UN
Peacekeeping
USG Ladsous.
Multiple
sources tell
Inner City
Press Lapointe
replied that
Stefanovic
told only the
Secretary
General, not
her, that he
recused
himself, and
that the
Deputy
Director of
OIOS in Vienna
is now
"overseeing"
the
investigation.
So
those now on
the case are
James Finniss,
Kanja and
Margaret
Gichanga --
who has been
asking to
interview WIPO
whistleblower
Miranda Brown,
who worked
alongside
Kompass for a
time. We'll
have more on
this. It is a
new low for
the UN.
Back
on May 18,
Inner City
Press, staking
out the Budget
Committee
meeting, spoke
with Ban's
chief of staff
Susana
Malcorra when
she left the
meeting. Here
is a
transcript,
followed by an
exclusive
summary of
what happened
inside the
closed
meeting.
Inner
City Press:
How did it go
in there? Are
their
questions
answered?
CdC
Malcorra: Well
I hope, yes.
Some of them
still have
questions that
will be
answered by my
colleague. I
think I’ve
made a point
of what it is
that we’re
discussing
here. This
investigation
is a UN
investigation.
It was led by
the UN in the
field when
they had
allegations
handed to
them. It was
the human
rights cell in
the mission
that led this
investigation.
It looks like
we were
absent, but it
was us...
And
this
investigation
could, at
least prima
facie, there
were places
clear enough
to further
investigate by
the member
state. And as
such, the
information
was provided
to a member
state. On a
separate
front, is how
the
information is
provided. And
we cannot
accept the
irresponsibility
of the names
of the
victims, the
witnesses and
the
investigators
shared with
the member
states ...
it’s
inacceptable.
It may look
like a
bureaucratic
approach. It’s
not a
bureaucratic
approach...
Inner
City Press:
What about not
telling
Central
African
Republic
authorities?
CdC
Malcora: They
are discussing
that now.
After the
meeting ended,
and Inner City
Press spoke
with numerous
attendees - a
common refrain
was that the
UN leadership
is "in denial"
- we have
pieced
together this
summary of the
meeting, and
the totally
insufficient
answer on UN
Peacekeeping
chief Ladsous'
role, a lack
of recognition
of his UNAMID
mission's
previous cover
up of rapes in
Tabit in
Darfur, which
the US and UK
and other say
they care
about, and
lack of follow
up on
whistleblowers.
Attendees'
summary of Ban
Ki-moon chief
of staff
Malcorra:
"Malcorra
said she had
no idea the
session would
go into the
specifics of
CAR, she
thought it was
to touch upon
general Sexual
Abuse and
Exploitation
policy
(several
attendees were
dubious and
angry about
this
approach.)
Malcorra said
that in the
case of
misconduct by
UN staff the
procedures
were in place.
In this case,
even when it
was not UN
peacekeepers
the human
rights cell in
Bangui was
there and they
were the ones
that initiated
the
investigation.
It is thanks
to the UN that
allegations
were
substantiated
and it was
enough to
decide to
proceed with a
further
investigation.
The wrongdoing
of the UN
staffer Anders
Kompass was to
have shared
the
information
without it
being redacted
putting the
victims,
witnesses and
investigators
lives in
danger. She
repeated many
times this was
a serious
breach and
that she
disagreed with
anyone that
didn’t view
this conduct
wrong.
According to
Malcorra the
UN
investigation
lasted three
months which
allowed them
to
substantiate
the
allegations.
When that
finding was
final it went
to the two
lines of
command: The
head of
mission in CAR
and the
OHCHR.
But, several
asked, why
didn't either
of these tell
the CAR
authorities?
Malcorra
said she would
have preferred
this case
hadn't
surfaced in
the media and
that it is
regrettable
member states
have had to
learn matters
from the
press. But
that, Malcorra
said, member
states have to
be aware that
the press
manipulates
everything.
Several states
talked about
the UN image
and
credibility to
which Malcorra
said she was
very sad with
those comments
because if not
for the UN
these troops
could have
gotten away
with these
disturbing
acts. She also
said this was
a clear case
of damned if
you do damned
if you don’t.
But what about
the cover up?
What about
Ladsous?
Malcorra said
that “no other
element had
been taken
into account”
for Kompass'
firing. But
member states
were aware of
Paragraph 9 of
the UN Dispute
Tribunal
ruling
reinstating
Kompass. As
noted, one
Permanent
Representatives
(and several
other
diplomats)
told Inner
City Press
that Ladsous
should resign.
Tellingly, the
sources say,
Malcorra
claimed didn’t
recall any
UNAMID coverup
allegations.
Tabit?
Malcorra
didn’t even
address the
Otis report on
whistleblowers
- which Inner
City Press has
been asking
Ban's
spokesman
about,
repeatedly --
but assured
member states
that due
protections
are in place
and that an
adequate
policy exists.
Malcorra said
she looks
forward to
working
further on the
UN convention
in paragraph
57 of the SG
report on SEA
and agrees
that there are
systemic
flaws, and
therefore
there will be
a review of
all the
processes.
According to
sources in the
meeting --
Inner City
Press asked
and was told
to inquiry
with member
states --
the
Legal Counsel
and head of
OLA qualified
as excellent
the
cooperation
with the
French
Authorities
and that the
lifting of
immunity so
far hasn’t
been necessary
because at
this stage its
very general
requests of
information
that the UN
promptly has
given to the
French
authorities.
For the sake
of efficiency
hasn’t gone
through the
lifting of
immunity
process but if
a trial or
judge becomes
involved they
will do it
quickly at a
later stage.
Several member
states were
dubious. The
EU, Inner City
ress is
informed, said
“accountability
starts at the
top.”
Malcorra
left
unanswered why
the host
state, the
CAR, was not
involved. She
is said to
have ignored
the specific
question on
the status of
the OIOS
investigation.
She ignored
the complaints
about
under-reporting
saying that
the trend of
decrease was
very clear and
that the USG
of DFS would
go into
details (what
he did,
genially, was
repeat the
Secretary
General's
report).
An impartial
investigation
was called
for, from both
sides of the
Atlantic and
elsewhere.
There was a
refrain
afterward:
Ladsous should
resign."
A well-placed
African
Permanent
Representative
before the
meeting told
Inner City
Press before
the meeting
that Ladsous
should resign.
But with him
conveniently
absent, would
others be left
holding the
bag, trying to
explain why
he, Ladsous,
appears in the
UN Dispute
Tribunal
ruling as
urging that
the
whistleblower
resign?
Back on May 8,
Inner City
Press asked US
Ambassador
Samantha Power
about both
issues - the
UN's failure
to tell the
CAR
authorities,
and Ladsous'
"surprising"
role, as High
Commissioner
Zeid put it
earlier in the
day. Video
here and
embedded
below. Then
Inner City
Press asked
the UN
Spokesman,
Stephane
Dujarric,
about the
contradiction;
for the first
time, he gave
a timeline.
Here
is the video
of Inner City
Press
questions to
US Ambassador
Power:
It is an
answer that
may move
things
forward.
Ladsous, it
should be
noted, just
this week
snubbed a Joe
Biden-linked
Hemispheric
peacekeeping
conference in
Uruguay,
wasting an
$8,000 first
class plane
ticket and
angering many
troop
contributing
countries. He
refuses to
answer Press
question, for
example on
rapes in
Minova, DRC
and Tabit in
Darfur.
As noted, on
May 8, High
Commissioner
Zeid held a
press
conference,
and twice
refused to
comment on why
Ladsous was
said to have
pressured to
fire or
suspend the
whistleblower.
Inner City
Press has
covered
Ladsous' role
from the
beginning, and
highlighted
his appearance
in Paragraph 9
of the UN
Dispute
Tribunal
ruling
reinstating
Kompass. On
May 7, Ladsous
told Inner
City Press, "I
deny that" -
then refused
to take
questions.
Zeid
was asked, and
first time
said he should
first give his
view of the
pressure to
the
investigator,
not the media.
The
second time,
he said he was
surprised to
read it -- his
Office did not
contest that
part of the
ruling,
effectively
admitting it
-- and that
the head of UN
Peacekeeping
should not
have been
intervening
about a non-UN
force. Video here.
Neither
he nor the
questioners in
the room in
Geneva said
the obvious:
Ladsous is a
longtime
French
diplomat; it
is not rocket
science to
read Paragraph
9 as him
(inappropriately)
still working
for "his"
country.
Zeid
said other
things we'll
report later;
he alluded to
the need for a
Commission of
Inquiry. Some
ask, will
Ladsous quit
before then?
Or after?
Early on May
8, UN system
staff
complained to
Inner City
Press that UN
High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights Prince
Zeid of
Jordan, in a
closed staff
meeting on May
8, tried to
downplay the
scandal, going
so far as to
blame imams in
Bangui for not
playing their
role.
But it was
OHCHR which
didn't even
give the
report of the
rape of CAR
children to
CAR
authorities,
only to the
French.
In places,
Zeid appeared
to try to use
his record ten
years ago on
sexual abuse
to shift the
blame to
imams.
Inner City
Press has
shown a
failure by his
Office to act
on past
leaking, to
Morocco. We'll
have more on
this.
On May 7,
Inner City
Press asked
more questions
about this -
including to
Herve Ladsous
himself.
After a long
closed-door
consultation
meeting of the
Security
Council,
Ladsous
emerged. Inner
City Press
asked him,
based on
Paragraph 9 of
the UNDT
ruling, Why
did you ask
Kompass to
resign?"