On Palestine, ICP Asks
Mansour of
Al-Aqsa,
OPCW's Veolio
Despite OPT
Work
By
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Investigative
3d Look
UNITED
NATIONS, March
5 --
When the State
of Palestine's
Riyad Mansour
held a stakeout
at the UN on
March 5 with
representatives
of the
Organization
of the Islamic
Conference
(OIC), Non-Aligned
Movement and
Arab League,
his topic was
the Al-Aqsa
mosque.
Inner City
Press asked
Mansour if
recent events
there impacted
the described
agreement by
Palestine with
US Secretary
of State John
Kerry not to
go to the
International
Criminal court
-- and about
the selection
by the Organization
for the
Prevention of
Chemical
Weapons of a
company,
Veolia, which
does business
in the Occupied
Palestine
Territory,
as Inner City
Press first
reported three
weeks ago.
Mansour said
that the
commitment to
Kerry was not
implicated,
these moves
were by the
OIC, NAM, Arab
Group et al.
(Egypt's
Permanent
Representative
reiterated
this).
On the OPCW's
choice of Veolia,
Mansour said
while he still
needed to
study the
matter, the European
Union has
taken
decisions not
to deal with
companies
profiting from
the illegal
settlements in
the Occupied Palestinian
Territories.
So what of the
EU -- and OIC
and NAM --
votes on the
OPCW board?
To dispose of
Syria's
chemical
weapons, 14
companies
submitted bids
to the
Organization
for the
Prevention of
Chemical
Weapons. On
February 14
the OPCW told
the press
there were two
winners:
Ekokem
OY AB
(Finland)
Veolia
Environmental
Services
Technical
Solutions, LLC
(U.S.A.)
Veolia, it
turns out,
stands accused
of illegal
operations in
the occupied
Palestinian
territories,
including
waste disposal
in the
illegally
occupied
Jordan valley,
North of the
Yafit
settlement;
waste water
treatment in
the illegal
Israeli
settlement of
Modi’in Illit;
bus service to
illegal
settlements
and Jerusalem
Light Rail /
tramway. h/t
In April 2010
the UN Human
Rights Council
declared the
tramway and
its operations
to be illegal
(A/HRC/RES/13/7
of 14 April
2010).
So how did the
OPCW select
Veolia? There
is a one page
press release
sent to the
media, "reported"
(or merely
repeated,
without any of
the above) by
Reuters
and others,
not mentioning
that France,
where Veolia
is actually
headquartered
at the parent
level, has
contributed no
money at all
to the OPCW or
UN trust funds
on destroying
Syria's
chemical
weapons.
On
transparency
back on
February 6,
after OPCW-UN
mission chief
Sigrid Kaag
briefed the UN
Security
Council about
Syria chemical
weapons, Inner
City Press
asked her
about her
Mission's
trust funds, as it
did back on
January 8.
Inner City
Press noted
that the
Organization
for the
Prevention of
Chemical
Weapons put
online a
January 24
press release
about Canada
donated 10
million CAD,
but that it
had no link to
any over-all
chart.
Kaag said, "I
knew you'd ask
that," and
said it should
go online
soon. Video here and embedded
below.
After 6 pm,
Inner City
Press ran an
update with
the chart,
which shows
for example
that to the UN
Trust Fund,
Japan has
pledged $9
million -- but
has as of yet
provided no
money.
In terms of
cash, Kaag's
native
Netherlands
has provided
more (barely)
that the
United
States:
$2,062,500
versus $2
million from
the US.
The
OPCW Trust
Fund for Syria
is denominated
in Euros. The
European Union
is the largest
donor, and
several EU
members have
also
contributed in
their own name
- but not
France.
A separate
OPCW Syria
Trust Fund for
the
Destruction of
Chemical
Weapons has
more in unpaid
pledges then
monies
actually paid.
Among those
yet to come
through are
once again
Japan, the
aforementioned
Canada, the
EU, Australia,
India, Italy
and South
Korea.
There is the
maritime
component (see
chart)
and then this:
In
addition to
their
contribution
to the OPCW
trust fund for
the
Destruction of
Chemical
Weapons,
Canada
contributed
another CAD 5
million
(almost US$
4.7 million)
for the
destruction
operations on
board the
vessel MV Cape
Ray. Italy has
indicated that
the port of
Gioia Tauro
will be made
available for
transloading
of priority
chemicals from
the cargo
vessels onto
the MV Cape
Ray. Germany
has indicated
it will
dispose of
approximately
370 tons of
effluent
generated
through the
hydrolysis of
the priority
chemicals. The
United Kingdom
has indicated
that it will
destroy two
binary
chemical
weapon
components at
a commercial
facility.
And so the
only Permanent
Five member of
the Security
Council not to
contribute...
is France.
On delay, US
Ambassador
Samantha Power
was asked of
Russian
Ambassador
Vitaly Churkin
saying that
the US ship to
destroy the
weapons was
not even in
the
Mediterranean
yet. She said
she would "set
the record
straight" that
this had
nothing to do
with Syria's
delay, and
that the ship
would be there
soon. (It did
arrive).
Only two
questions were
allowed to
Ambassador
Power, from Al
Jazeera then
from Al Hurra,
on whose
Broadcasting
Board of
Governors US
Secretary of
State John
Kerry sits.
The Veolia /
OPT question
will have to
be answered,
by the OPCW
and one hopes
by the US and
other OPCW
members.
(Outgoing UN
spokesperson
Martin Nesirky
has told Inner
City Press,
"Ask the OPCW.")
Watch this
site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2013 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|