UN Cyber
Crime Treaty Would Expand Guterres
Censorship Regime Now CPJ Gently on
Dangers
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Maxwell
Book
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Jan 19 – The Biden
Administration's record on
press freedom was the topic of
a report and Zoom press
conference by the Committee to
Protect Journalists held on
January 13, see below.
While CPJ's
answer that day about the
United Nations was deferential
to the UN Secretariat of
Antonio Guterres, on January
19 CPJ has rightly criticized
another part of the UN. From
CPJ. h/t Madeline Earp:
"Cybercrime is on
the global agenda as a United
Nations committee appointed to
develop a treaty on the topic
plans for its first meeting
amid pandemic-related delays.
“When there’s ambiguity, some
governments will take
advantage of that and try to
use it to clamp down on
speech,” Deborah Brown, senior
researcher for digital rights
at Human Rights Watch, told
CPJ. “It’s important to
look not just at what’s being
proposed at the global level,
but at how national
governments are interpreting
their own laws,” she told
CPJ. Cybercrime laws
criminalize topics like false
news in Nicaragua, Nigeria,
and Sudan, among other
countries. Journalists have
been arrested on cybercrime
charges in Iran for reporting
on the economy; in Pakistan
for investigative and
political commentary; and in
Benin, for alleged defamation.
[There have been] journalists
imprisoned under both Jordan’s
Cybercrime Law and Indonesia’s
Electronic Information and
Transactions Law in the
past. Nigeria’s
Cybercrimes Act criminalizes
using computers to transmit
information that could cause
annoyance or that the sender
knows to be false; Luka
Binniyat, a Nigerian
journalist was arrested under
the Cybercrimes Act in
November 2021 and continues to
be held in advance of a
February 3 court hearing."
Guterres recently re-upped
Nigeria's Amina J. Mohammed as
his Deputy SG; both refuse all
written questions from Inner
City Press, which they've
banned.
Amid
substantial praise of the
Biden administration in
contrast to its predecessor,
mild criticism was leveled
against the Administration's
position on Julian Assange and
performance in getting
journalists out of
Afghanistan.
Inner City
Press asked questions, in
writing and then by audio over
Zoom:
"Is the Biden
Administration committed to
press freedom at international
organizations? The question is
in context of his State
Department being yet to act on
the United Nations in New York
banning all journalists from
Taiwan, for example, and also
ousting and banning US-based
Inner City Press amid its
investigative reporting, with
no way to appeal or get back
in. The Department has been
asked but done nothing.
"See also...
recent UN Appeals Tribunal
full panel decision about the
UN's lifetime ban on Inner
City Press, saying it is up to
member states - like, the US /
Biden Administration?
Separately, what
do you think of DOJ's press
accessibility, given their
withholding of court exhibits
in the Jan 6 cases and the
recent Ghislaine Maxwell
trial?"
While not
directly answered by CPJ
Deputy Executive Director
Robert Mahoney during the press
conference - the report's
author Leonard Downie said the
issue of DOJ withholding court
exhibits in the US v.
Ghislaine Maxwell trial in
SDNY and the January 6 cases
in DDC had not been raised to
him by the journalists he
chose to speak with - later
CPJ provided these answers,
which are appreciated:
"With respect to
the question you raised about
Taiwan; We believe that
international bodies that
require accreditation should
ensure that journalists are
eligible for such
accreditation irrespective of
their country of origin or
that of their news outlet. For
bodies like the U.N.,
accreditation processes must
uphold their stated
commitments to press freedom
and take into account the need
for journalists from all over
the world to meaningfully
access and engage in
news-gathering activities.
With
regards to your question about
the Biden Administration's
committed to press freedom at
international organizations,
that question is best directed
at the Administration.
While the
UN can reasonably assert that
violating known guidelines
could result in the loss of
credentials, it was not as
transparent as it could have
been throughout its
investigation. We would
encourage the UN to implement
a more transparent
investigation process for
incidents involving accredited
press, both resident or
non-resident. Any formal
process adopted by the UN for
reviewing credentials should
provide an opportunity where
the journalist is able to
respond to any allegations
made against them."
On
this last, the next question
is what will CPJ, omnipresent
at the UN including meeting
directly with SG Antonio
Guterres and presumably
Guterres' media accreditation
(and blocking) chief Melissa
Fleming, actually do to make
the UN do this?
The UN has
provided no due process, no
appeals process, and has kept
Inner City Press banned since
July 3, 2018 based on
unspecified (and dubious)
violations, such as staking
out a UN budget committee
evening meeting as Inner City
Press had under Kofi Annan and
Ban Ki-moon. The only
difference? Antonio Guterres,
CPJ's apparently good friend.
The CPJ report is
‘Night and day’: The Biden
administration and the press,
by Leonard Downie Jr., here.
Would it come up, as
requested, at Biden's January
19 press conference? Watch
this site.
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a
month helps keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus material on our
Patreon page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|