UNITED NATIONS
GATE, August 23 – Two key
elements of press freedom are
not banning access as the UN
has done to Inner City Press
for 51 days now and being
transparent, another UN
failing. Today we consider not
only the shocking censorship
regime at the UN of Alison
Smale, until a year ago the
New York Times' bureau chief
in Berlin, but the equally
shocking failure of the NYT's
three UN correspondents to
cover or even respond on
Smale's lifetime ban imposed
on an investigative
journalist.
On August 17, Smale
after a 45 day "review" that
did not include a single
interview with Inner City
Press issues a lifetime ban on
its entry into the UN. It was
noted not only in BuzzFeed
and The
Hill, but in the largely
anti-Trump Press Freedom
Tracker, here.
But from the New York Times,
nothing. Inner City Press
submitted material to the NYT
editorial pages and James
Bennet - no response. Inner
City Press emailed the NYT's
three UN correspondents, Rick
Gladstone, rickg [at]
nytimes.com, Somini Sengupta
sengupta [at]nytimes.com, and
the newer but no more
responsive Michael schwirtz
[at] nytimes.com - and days
later, nothing, to this: "I'm
requesting that you / the NYT
report on this: the UN's
ex-NYT Alison Smale as USG of
DPI on Friday imposing a
lifetime ban on me, with no
due process, no appeal.
The letter is attached. My
rebuttal(s) so far are online
at
http://www.innercitypress.com/unguterres4smalebansicpmoroccoscam081818.html
The reasons given are bogus -
the warning letters, one the
product of a complaint from
the Mission of Morocco whose
policy on Western Sahara I
often question, the other a
complaint from a DPI official
who didn't like an article I
wrote. How can I be banned
from the UN for this? Most
pressingly, how can Smale and
SG Guterres block me from
covering next month's General
Assembly high level week,
which I've covered for 12
years? The deadline to
accredit is September 5.
If I have to, I will cover it
from the street (a practice
Smale called derogatory, but
see "On Cameroon Inner City
Press Video Guterres' Smale
Calls Derogatory for Lifetime
Ban Remonetized by
YouTube.") I do not
believe the UN should, or
legitimately can, target,
rough up, suspend and now ban
for life a critical
journalist. I am requesting
that you cover this, or work
so another NYT reporter does.
It is UN (and beyond) story.
Since the NYT reported Inner
City Press' entry into the UN,
it would seem it would cover
its being roughed up,
suspended and now banned for
life, on such bogus grounds,
particularly at this time and
given The Times' advocacy for
press freedom and access
elsewhere." And days later -
nothing. We'll have more on
this. Tellingly, while one
might expect the UN Department
of Public Information to be
more public than other of
Security General Antonio
Guterres' departments, the
chief of DPI Alison Smale is
not even on the public
disclosure list as of August
16, 2018. What could explain
it? Since DPI has all day and
a bent to propagandize, one
can imagine the excuse being
that Smale was only awarded
the position on 9
August 2017, after, say
the USG of Counter Terrorism
who is listed: he was named in
June 2017. But the excuse
breaks down: making public
disclosure, here,
of a property in Moldova, is
Natalia Gherman who was only
awarded her UNRCCA position on
15
September 2017, more
than a month after Smale. So
why isn't Smale in the public
financial disclosure list?
Isn't this particularly
inappropriate for a former
Berlin bureau chief of the New
York Times, which calls for
such disclosures by public
official like Smale is, but
doesn't act like? We'll have
more on this, and on other
disclosures: some don't even
fill out the Assets section,
only Outside Activities, for
example. Why have Guterres and
Smale, and their non-responsive
spokesman Stephane Dujarric,
banned Inner City Press from
the UN and the noon briefing
for 44 days now? Watch this
site. The New York Times on
Wednesday evening put online
its faux
humble contribution to the 100
editorials called for the
Boston Globe, saying Trump's -
studiously not named -
"attacks on the press are
particularly threatening to
journalists in nations with a
less secure rule of law and to
smaller publications in the
United States." The irony, now
raised to the Times' James
Bennet and others, is that
their former colleague and
bureau chief Alison Smale is,
at the UN, engaged in an
attack on a smaller
investigative Inner City
Press. After it was roughed up
by UN Security on
June 22 and July
3 while covering a
speech by her new boss UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres and his budget,
Smale
despite the conflict of
interest about Inner City
Press' coverage of her internal
Town Hall meeting and
whistleblowers say diversion
of Swahili
funds saw fit to ban Inner
City Press from the UN for 43
days and counting now. She has
put herself in charge of a
"review" of Inner City Press
involving anonymous complaints
Inner City Press has not been
shown. (That Smale's
significant other, Russian
pianist Sergei Dreznen told
Inner City Press it should change
and wear a suit or face her
wrath is another matter.)
Smale's UN Department of
Public Information has told
those who have asked,
including for example even the
Kazakhstan Mission to the UN
as well as the Government
Accountability Project and the
Reporters Committee for
Freedom of the Press that her
review and ruling will be
issued soon - with no due
process for Inner City Press,
whose reporting has been
injured for more than six
weeks, on its beats from UN
corruption to Yemen
and Cameroon.
This is the Times' legacy in
press freedom? Tellingly,
despite the New York Times
previously covering Inner City
Press at the UN, for example
gushingly in 2007
and as a character study in 2016
(with quotes from Guterres'
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
which have typically turned
out to be false), this violent
ouster and ban by ex-NYT Smale
has garnered not a single word
in the ostensibly pro free
press Times, whose
correspondents have been
written to and are aware,
despite coverage in The Independent
(UK), the Columbia
Journalism Review, Fox,
POLITICO
and even a note in CNN.
We'll have more on this.
Inner City Press on July 5 was
told at the UN gate that it
was banned from entering any
UN premises, the day after it
filed a criminal complaint
against UN Security Lieutenant
Ronald Dobbins and another for
physically removing
it from covering the July 3
meeting about the UN's $6.7
billion peacekeeping budget,
as witnessed and essentially
cheered on by Secretary
General Antonio Guterres'
Assistant SG Christian
Saunders, tearing its
reporter's shirt, painfully
and intentionally twisting his
arm and slamming shut and
damaging his laptop. Video here. Columbia Journalism Review
here.
On August 11,
amid a now 41 day ongoing
“review” of Inner City Press
that has shifted from the
initial charge of being in the
building too long on July 3
covering the Budget Committee
meeting to undefined
“harassment” of unnamed off
the record correspondents, the
murky role of Alison Smale, a
former bureau chief of the New
York Times which speaks so
much of attacks on the press
from Washington, in attacking
the Press at the UN is coming
into focus.
Smale never responded to a
single one of Inner City Press
e-mails since September 2017,
even as she openly cavorted
with retired corporate media,
even on camera. Contrary to
the wider NYT's purported
celebration of aggressive
investigative press, Smale has
attacked the most
investigative and, perhaps,
aggressive of UN press. She
retweets little but the NYT;
she has said her focus is
making Guterres look better.
Why has she not recused
herself from "reviewing" the
critical Press? There has
already been filed a detailed
misconducted complaint
filed with the Secretary
General, and she has
apparently given up on trying
to respond to the second,
detailed request for answers
from the Government
Accountability Project. Has
Smale become, tongue firmly in
cheek, akin to Aung San Suu
Kyi, previously vaguely
associated with freedom once,
with the power to act, the
totalitarian or merely elitist
impulse becomes clear? While
the NYT publisher finger
waggles, what of Smale's
elitist censoring, featuring a
Kafkaesque star chamber in
which the allegations of
unnamed corporate and state
media are taken as true, with
no opportunity to be heard?
Smale has among other things
been blocking Press coverage
not only of UN corruption but
of the slaugher in Cameroon,
for 41 days and counting.
We'll have more on this.
Guterres'
spokesman Farhan Haq has told
Fox
News: “there have been a
number of allegations from
fellow journalists that Lee
has harassed them over the
years. 'A lot of journalists
have not just been harassed
but threatened by him and
that’s a problem,' Haq said.”
That
last line is extraordinary.
Without identifying a single
one of these "lot of
journalists," Haq declares
their anonymous allegations to
be true: "HAVE not just been
harassed but threatened me
him." This stands in contrast
to the UN not accepting - in
the case
of Alison Smale and Stephane
Dujarric, trying to not even
acknowledge receiving - Inner
City Press' written, on the
record allegations complete
with exhibits. It's called
favoritism, and censorship.
This same
Farhan Haq recently answered
one of Inner City Press'
written questions, about why
Guterres had taken no action
on its documented exclusive
May 24 report
for which it received threats
(and subsequent letter
to Guterres and Smale) that
through presumptive nepotism,
management of the UN Security
Council's website had been
given to John
van Rosendaal,
the
photographer husband of Kyoko
Shiotani, the
chief of staff of Guterres'
Under Secretary General for
Political Affairs Rosemary
DiCarlo, previously US Deputy
Ambassador to the UN under
Susan Rice and Samantha Power.
Haq responded,
"If there are
allegations of misconduct they
should be taken to the
internal oversight offices and
mechanisms. Unfounded
allegations do not constitute
a formal complaint." So how
does Haq for the UN now deem
anonymous allegations against
Inner City Press not only as
formal complaints, and as
true?
This is Kafkaesque. Inner City
Press quit the UN
Correspondents Association
after finding it to be
corrupt. Its president after
having rented one of his
Manhattan apartments to
Palitha Kohona, who as Sri
Lanka's Ambassador to
the UN accused of a role in
the White Flag Killings,
unilaterally granted Kohona's
request to him to screen a Sri
Lanka government war crimes
denial film as an UNCA event,
in the Dag Hammarskjold
Library auditorium. This was
done without approval of or
even notice to all Executive
Committee members of which
Inner City Press was one. When
Inner City Press reported on
it, not only the UNCA
president but only Committee
members from Reuters, AFP and
other outlets demanded that it
take the article offline.
Inner City Press offered the
UNCA president as much space
on Inner City Press as he'd
want to reply, but he and UNCA
wanted censorship, then as
now.
After Inner City Press quit
UNCA, and faced counterfeit
troll Twitter accounts
and anonymous (but leaked)
complaints to Guterres' now
lead spokesman Stephane
Dujarric from Lou Charbonneau
of Reuters (now Human Rights
Watch) here
and censored from Google with
the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act here
and Voice of America, here as
obtained under the Freedom of
Information Act, it has not
spoken to these individuals
since.
Whatever claimed harassment or
threatens they are claiming to
or for the UN is not based on
any actual interaction, only
Inner City Press' articles
and, it seems, equally First
Amendment protected Periscope
broadcasts, even one that was
inadvertent and deleted but
ghoulishly monitored and
captured by or for the UN.
(More on this soon).
The simple
point: it is illegitimate to
rough up a journalist for
covering a Budget Committee
meeting then ban him from his
beat pending a review of the
incident - then invent new
charges, with unnamed accusers
and not opportunity to respond
with an eye toward continuing
the ban. So what's next? Watch
this site.
On August
3, Guterres' deputy spokesman
Farhan Haq replied to
the Reporters Committee for
Freedom of the Press a week
after RCFP called the
vacationing Guterres' chief of
staff Maria Luiza Viotti to
express concern at the ban and
to offer to facilitate the
restoration of Inner City
Press' access (that call was
returned by lead spokesman
Stephane Dujarric, also now on
vacation). Haq on August 3
said that the UN's "review" is
nearly done, and he promised
that Inner City Press will get
notice of the results in the
"coming days," with a
reference to a "summary of the
findings."
On August
8, with still no results
announced and Inner City Press
still not contacted to be
heard since July 10, Haq was
asked, from the UN transcript:
"Q: Farhan, can you confirm
receipt of a formal complaint
that has been submitted to the
Secretary-General by Inner
City Press on prohibited
conduct? Did you… have
you received…?
Deputy Spokesman: I
believe that has been received
and is being reviewed.
Question: What action
will be taken into… in regards
to that? And will that
hold up a decision that has
been ongoing on the status of
Inner City Press?
Deputy Spokesman: I
don’t believe it will hold up
any decision. I think,
once a decision is made, we
will convey it to Matthew, and
then I will let you guys
know."
But know
about what? For this
investigation, Inner City
Press in the 31 days has been
contacted only once, for a
Kafkaesque "interview" by two
UN Security officers in a
windowless room in the
basement of the UNITAR
building across from the UN.
The officers refused to write
down even Inner City Press
assertion that Dobbins has
animus, given an investigative
piece Inner City Press had
published using documents
leaked to it showing
irregularities in promotions
in UN Security, including but
not limited to Dobbins'.
Since then,
Dujarric who had initially
said Inner City Press'
reporter would be talking to
various parts of the UN system
shifted down to saying the
investigation is only by the
Department of Public
Information. That means no
investigation of or
accountability for UN Security
roughing up Inner City Press.
It also involved a Department
whose leadership Inner City
Press has questioned for its
lack of content neutral
accreditation and access rules
essentially investigating
itself, without even the
pretense of due process for
Inner City Press which has not
been contacted.
Who
is conducting the review? DPI
chief Alison Smale, who has
ignored Inner City Press'
emails and 5000+ signature
petition since she took office
11 months ago, is on vacation.
The Officer in Charge is Hua
Jiang, who work for the UN in
Sudan where Orwellian
investigations are the rule;
Ms. Jiang refused to answer
Inner City Press' questions,
What am I being investigated
for? Ms Jiang also
previously threatened Inner
City Press' accreditation if
it did not take down a sign
for the alternative Free UN
Coalition for Access off the
door of the office she and DPI
evicted Inner City Press from
in 2016, awarding it to an
Egyptian state media whose
essentially retired
correspondent rarely comes
into the UN and hasn't asked
the UN a question in a decade.
(But no investigation of
that.)
What could DPI be
investigating? Haq said Inner
City Press was charged with
two offenses, being in the UN
on June 22 and July 3. But why
was Inner City Press in the
General Assembly Lobby on June
22 at 7:15 pm? There was an
event listed in the UN Media
Alert at beginning at 6 pm.
But Antonio Guterres did not
arrive until 6:45 pm for this
speech. The Access Guidelines
say non resident
correspondents can remain in
past 7 for an advised meeting
and one hour after. So Dobbins
had no right to push Inner
City Press out on June 22. But
he did, and Guterres and DPI's
Alison Smale and the others
Inner City Press wrote to on
June 25 did nothing about it.
Why did
Dobbins and his unnamed
colleague use force, before
talking, on July 3?
Why was
Inner City Press in the
building at 10 pm on July 3?
There was a meeting of the UN
Budget Committee, advised to
Inner City Press, exactly the
type of meeting has covered
for ten years including the
last two as a non resident
correspondent (reduced to that
status for pursuing the Ng Lap
Seng / John Ashe UN bribery
scandal into the UN Press
Briefing Room). In fact, Inner
City Press many times been
thanked for its coverage of
such budget meeting, not only
from around the world but by
UN staff and diplomats in the
New York area. "It's the only
way if know if we'll have to
come in for vote in the
General Assembly," one said.
DPI only puts the meetings in
the Media Alert if there is a
vote - contrary to its policy
of listing UN Security Council
consultation even if there is
no vote -and there is no way
to know, at 10 pm, if
agreement will be reached at 2
am and a vote taken
thereafter. These are things
DPI should have asked Inner
City Press about, if it has
any thought of rendering
another censorship decision.
These are the ground Haq and
Dujarric listed, later adding
vague civility, with Dujarric
misreprentating the number of
times and location Inner City
Press dropped the "F-bomb"
(once, in the soundproof focus
booth). Dujarric has dropped
multiple F-bombs in the
Briefing Room. And UNCA
President Giampaoli Pioli at
the UN Security Council
stakeout loudly called Inner
City Press an "as*hole." DPI
was told of it, with audio here,
and did nothing. Just as DPI's
MALU told Inner City Press it
could livestream Periscope
video on the third and fourth
floors, and all of the second
floor except through the
turnstiles, without an escort
or minders. And as to 7 pm,
other non resident
correspondents routinely stay
past that hour not even
working like Inner City
Press but, as for example on
June 26, drinking with
Guterres. So it would be
illegitimate to act on Inner
City Press' "incivility,"
particularly without having
given it any opportunity to be
heard, in 31 days, on this or
anything else they might
pretextually come up with.
We'll have more on this. Watch
this site.
While the UN in the past ten
years has become increasingly
resistant to the critical
Press, it has been under
Guterres that the UN's
response has been physical
violence and outright banning.
Earlier this year Guterres'
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
started complaining about
Inner City Press' coverage of
Guterres, including for
example its entirely legal
Periscope live-stream from the
sidewalk across Sutton Place
from the UN mansion Guterres
lives in, which showed that on
the day Guterres told the
world to turn off all lights
for an hour for the
environment, his were all
ablaze.
Trying to defuse Guterres
administration retaliation,
Inner City Press had an
intermediary, whom we'll leave
unnamed, convey to Dujarric on
June 20 that Inner City Press
had voluntarily suspended all
broadcasts from near the UN
mansion, for a month.
Dujarric, who only the day
before had given a private
press conference in the UN
Press Briefing Room to a three
person crew from Al
Jazeera (which
complained when Inner City
Press on Periscope called it a
sleazefest), told the
intermediary it was too late,
"I wish you had been involved
a while ago." There's worse
waiting, Dujarric told the
intermediary on June 20. Worse
waiting to happen: not allowed
in.
On June 22
UN Lieutenant Ronald E.
Dobbins, with his own motive
having been mentioned in Inner
City Press' expose of
irregularities in promotions
in UN Security, arbitrarily
singled out Inner City Press
and made it leave the UN at
7:15 pm in the middle of an
event, in the UN Media Alert,
which featured a Guterres
speech. Inner City Press
live-streamed as it was pushed
through the GA lobby, and did
say “This is corrupt.” (That
cannot be a violation of the
UN's / UNCA's vague injunction
to civility, in the midst of
an impermissible ouster
mid-coverage.)
On
June 25 Inner City Press wrote
to Guterres, the chief of
staff and Deputy SG and DPI's
Alison Smale, saying that Lt
Dobbins had improperly ousted
it and had a personal animus.
Inner City Press sent this and
more to the UN's Office of
Internal Oversight Service,
recently further discredited
in a UN Dispute Tribunal
decision we're soon to write
about.
But
Guterres offered no
protection. In fact, his
spokesman Dujarric and deputy
Farhan Haq refused to answer
any questions about the
improper June 22 ouster, with
Haq on July 3 saying it has
been an appropriate
enforcement of rules (which,
in fact, allow non resident
correspondents to stay in the
UN past 7 pm if there is a
meeting, and for an hour after
the meeting).
On July 3
as Inner City Press covered
just such a meeting, of the
Budget Committee, Dobbins and
other approached and initiated
violence. Inner City Press did
not, as they perhaps hoped,
respond with any physical
resistance. But even saying “I
am a journalist, this is
corrupt” is now characterized
an incivility to justify
banning Inner City Press.
Things got worse, indeed. And
now we know Dujarric and
Guterres are responsible, and
both, now on vacation, should
leave the UN. On
July 30 Guterres'
sleazy basis
for roughing
up and banning
Inner City
Press for 27
days and
counting was reported
in the Columbia
Journalist
Review: Guterres'
spokesman Stephane
Dujarric has
gone
further, in an article
published July
30 by the
Columbia
Journalism
Review. Dujarric - who
Inner City
Press
directed to
the CJR
reporter to -
is quoted
that " Lee
Periscoped
while
shouting, 'Fuck
you!'
repeatedly.
(Lee says he
was
complaining
that Dujarrac
had given the
Al Jazeera
crew a private
interview, and
excluded him.)
'He
creates an
atmosphere of
incivility
within our
working
environment,'
Dujarrac says."
This is
a lie. (We
noted that
Dujarric himself has
repeatedly dropped
the F-bomb on
Inner City
Press, telling
it it
asked a "fucking
stupid
question" and, while
throwing it
out of the
UN Press
Briefing Room,
saying
"Matthew it's
fucking Friday
night, I'm so
fucking tired,
I want to go
home, just
leave," Vine here.)
Inner City
Press on June 19
when Dujarric
gave a "private
briefing" to Al
Jazeera about
Nikki Haley
and Mike
Pompeo
announcing the
US pull out
from the UN
Human Right
Council said
in the hall
that is was a
"sleazefest."
After closing
the door of
the focus booth
it has been
confined to work in
for two years
by
Dujarric, and long
after the Al
Jazeera trio
including
James Bays and
Whitney Hurst
were done,
said on
Periscope, F-You. Periscope
video - still
online
during this 27
day "investigation" -
here.
So
Dujarric is a
censor,
justifying the
beating up and
banning of a
journalist for
something he
broadcast in
a soundproof
booth to his
audience.
But
Dujarric
(and it seems Guterres'
and Smale's) roles
go beyond
justifying the roughing
up of the
Press. It seems
clear that the
green light
was given.
Consider this,
formally
submitted to a
UN Special
Rapporteur:
Dujarric told
CJR that on
June 19 Inner
City Press
supposedly
repeatedly
said f*ck you
to an Al
Jazeera crew (as
noted, they
must have
heard and
seized on it
only by
listening to
my Periscope
stream archive
afterward) --
1) on June 20,
Inner City
Press
was told by UN
Media
Accreditation
there were
concerns about
“intimidating”
Al Jazeera's
three-person
crew with its
phone;
2)
troublingly,
on June 20
Dujarric told
a person
trying to be Inner
City Press'
intermediary
that things
were “going to
get worse” for
me. So far Inner
City Press has
reported
once, on July
20, about that, here;
3) on June 22,
UN Security
Lieutenant
Ronald Dobbins
and four
others who
refused to
give their
names stopped
me at 7:15 pm
while Inner
City Press was
covering a
speech by SG
Antonio
Guterres and
pushed it
out of the
building,
leaving other
non resident
correspondents
inside.
Inner City
Press now
surmises that
Dujarric, or
higher, gave
an order after
June 19 to
(physically)
target it.
4) on June 25
Inner City
Press wrote
to Guterres,
his chief of
staff, his
deputy Amina J
Mohammed and
USG Alison
Smale
informing them
Lt Dobbins,
with animus,
had pushed it
out of the UN
during an SG
speech, and
implicitly
requesting the
vaunted
'protection of
journalist.'
They did...
nothing.
5) on July 5
Dobbins and
other officer
got even more
violent,
grabbing Inner
City Press'
reporter's
arm and
twisting it,
tearing his
shirt and
damaging his
computer while
Inner City Press
covered the UN
Budget
Committee
meeting in the
same way it has
for ten years,
including the
last two as a
non resident
correspondent
(downgraded in
connection
with Inner
City Press'
coverage of
the Ng Lap
Seng / John
Ashe UN
bribery
scandal in
which Ng is
now in jail).
On July 5 when
Inner
City Press came
to work -
after
reporting the
assault to the
NYPD - it was
told it was banned
from entering
the UN and has
been since.
Inner City
Press now
believes that
Dujarric /
Guterres /
Smale put out
orders to have its
reporter
physically
targeted,
despite the
rules saying he
can stay after
7 pm if there
is a meeting
(true both
times). Maybe
they hoped
Inner City Press
would react in
a way they
could easily
use to ban it.
All he
did was say
loudly “I am a
journalist” -
but they still
banned Inner
City Press.
But they took
a chance
the officers
would more
seriously
injure the
Inner City
Press reporter.
It was beyond
censorship,
beyond
reckless - it
must be
reported and
acted on. (It
has been
reported, by
Alex Newman, on July 31, here:
the "UN
spokesman had
vowed to make
things worse
for him after
watching a
video Lee
made. 'I
get roughed
up, banned, no
due process,
no end in
sight.'") Inner
City Press at
noon on July
31 asked
Guterres and
his spokespeople
and Deputy and
Smale (and
has asked the
Rapporteur
to obtain),
"Given
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric's quotes
to Columbia
Journalism
Review, and
the moribund
nature of the
supposed
“investigation,”
please
describe all
instructions
given to UN
Security, Lt
Dobbins and
others, after
June 19
regarding
Inner City
Press, and
also state
whether any
personnel of
Al Jazeera or
[ ] have
been
interviewed
for the
investigation"
- watch this
site.
Amazingly, the UN is pointing
to a vague language
it negotiated with its UN
Correspondents Association
which Inner City Press quit
after finding the organization
took money from now convicted
UN bribery Ng
Lap Seng and had a
president who rented one of
his apartments to a Sri
Lanka war crimes
suspect: "Where unexpected
circumstances arise, the
approach will be to avoid
confrontation, maintain
civility and find the fastest,
safest and most secure
acceptable solution. Those
Correspondents who violate the
ground rules governing access,
including the abovementioned
standards of ethical behavior
may have their accreditation
withdrawn or suspended by the
United Nations."
But it was
UN Security, Lt Dobbins on
July 3 with another still
unnamed, who initiated violent
confrontation, grabbing Inner
City Press' reporter's arm and
twisting it, and tearing his
shirt, as he sat typing up
interview notes outside a
Budget Committee meeting he
had every right to cover,
under the rules. Guterres' UN
has become a Kafkaesque place
of censorship where guards he
had already been warned (in
writing on June 25) were
targeting the Press can
physically assault a reporter
whose saying "I am a
journalist!" can then be used
as a lack of civility or
unacceptable comportment to
ban the journalist. This is
corrupt.
On July 20, with
Inner City Press still banned
from the UN after 17 days with
no end in sight, prohibited
from attending the day's US
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
and Ambassador Nikki Haley
press encounter because it was
in the UN, Inner City Press
waited and politely asked
Guterres and his chief of
staff Maria Luiza Viotti why
it is still banned after 17
days, for being roughed up
twice by Guterres' Security.
(After the first physical
ouster on June 22, Inner City
Press on June 25 notified
Guterres, his chief of staff,
Deputy SG Amina J. Mohammed
and Global Communications
chief Alison Smale that it was
being targeted by Lt. Dobbins;
they did nothing.) On July 20,
despite the quite audible
questions including about
related inaction on the
slaughter in Cameroon which
Inner City Press has asked
about, Guterres got in his
limousine and did not answer,
as did UK Ambassador Karen
Pierce. Video here.
The lack of
accountability for censorship
is growing: Guterres told his
lunch companions "bonne
vacances" and Smale has left
on a three week vacation,
bouncing back all e-mails
with: "I am out of the office
from 1.00 p.m. on Thursday, 19
July through Thursday, 9
August 2018. During my
absence, the Officer-in-Charge
of the Department of Public
Information will be as
follows: 19-25 July - Mr.
Janos Tisovszky.... 26 July
through 1 August - Mr. Ramu
Damodaran... 2-9 August - Ms.
Hua JIang" [sic]." We'll have
more on this. On July 18,
Guterres' deputy spokesman
Farhan Haq was asked by two
journalists about the status
of what he and lead spokesman
Stephane Dujarric called the
investigation of the
"incidents" of July 3, and
apparently not now of June 22.
Video here,
from the UN transcript:
a follow-up to one that’s been
asked here last week and the
week before, and that’s a
report on the current status
of the investigation into the
events on 3 July leading,
ultimately, to the ouster, at
least temporary ouster, of
Inner City Press. And
did the Secretary-General
receive any communications
from any non-governmental
organization (NGO) on… on this
subject? For example, I
think it’s called the Global
Accountability Project or
something like that.
Deputy Spokesman: The UN
has received a letter from the
Government Accountability
Project, and I believe we’ll
be responding to them in due
course.
Question: And… and the
status of the
investigation? Could
you…
Deputy Spokesman: It’s
ongoing... 2d Questioner:
regarding Inner City Press,
you said it’s ongoing.
Is there an idea of when… is
there a date… any idea of when
it’s actually going to come
out and have a result?
Deputy Spokesman:
No. I mean, once we’ve
come to a decision, he’ll be
informed of the decision." On
what - the excessive use of
force by UN Security? This is
Kafkaesque - or now,
Guterresian....
Tellingly,
six days after UN Security
roughed up Inner City Press
and four days after UNnamed
official(s) instituted without
any due process an ongoing ban
on Inner City Press for having
been roughed up, on July 9
Guterres' chief of Management,
Saunders supervisor Jan
Beagle, issued a self-serving
"Administrative Instruction"
which seeks to legitimate
Dobbins' police brutality
after the fact, and ensure it
goes on in the future. The
document is ST/AI/2018/8, here, and we will publish it
in full: "Administrative
instruction
Authority of United Nations
security officers in New York
Headquarters
The Under-Secretary-General
for Management, pursuant to
section 4.2 of
Secretary-General’s bulletin
ST/SGB/2009/4, hereby
promulgates the following:
1. United Nations security
officers function as agents of
the Secretary-General to
preserve order and to protect
persons and property within
the New York “headquarters
district,” as defined in the
Agreement between the United
Nations and the United States
of America regarding the
Headquarters of the United
Nations. All persons within
the headquarters district are
expected to comply with the
directions that may be issued
by the security officers in
the performance of their
functions. Security officers
are expected to exercise their
functions with courtesy and in
conformity with established
rules and regulations,
including applicable local
law.
2. Security officers are
authorized to search persons,
vehicles, handbags, briefcases
or packages in the performance
of their official duties. They
may also seize
property if they have a reason
to believe that a person is
carrying an unauthorized
weapon, explosives or other
dangerous substances or
narcotics, or that property of
the United Nations is being
removed from the premises
without authorization.
Vehicles entering the premises
will be subject to search by
security officers on duty at
entry/exit gates.
3. Refusal to comply with
directions issued by the
security officers within their
authority may result in
removal from or denial of
access to the premises.
4. Subject to the provisions
of the present administrative
instruction, security officers
are authorized, within the
limits permitted by local law,
to effect arrest, including
the use of force, where the
person to be arrested is
committing or attempting to
commit an offence or has, in
fact, committed an offence.
5. Compliance with and
application of the present
administrative instruction in
no way prejudices the duties,
obligations and privileges of
staff members.
6. The present administrative
instruction shall enter into
force on the date of issuance.
It supersedes administrative
instruction ST/AI/309/Rev.2 of
18 February 1997, which is
hereby abolished." Why now?
Again, watch the video.
Jan Beagle, while purporting
to stamp out sexual harassment
for Guterres, has herself been
formally accused of harassment
while at UNAIDS with Luiz
Loures and Michel Sidibe. Now
this. How is behind the
outrageous ban of Inner City
Press for *being* roughed up
by UN Security? Watch this
site.
Secretary General
Antonio Guterres' deputy
spokesman Farhan Haq told
Fox News that the ban of Inner
City Press is pending a “full
review of the incident," which
by July 9 Haq was calling an
altercation - except only UN
Security used force, before
even talking. In the first
visible step of the UN's
self-investigation of the July
3 assault on the Press, on
July 10 Inner City Press was
interviewed for more than an
hour by UN Security officer
Raughn Perry in a windowless
basement room of the UNITAR
building across from the UN on
47th Street. Perry and his
partner / witness Officer
Valentin Stancu refused to
include in what they typed and
edited either the June 22
ouster of Inner City Press by
Lt Dobbins and four Emergency
Response Unit officers who
refused to give their names,
or Inner City Press' June 25
formal notification to
Guterres, his deputy and chief
of staff and Global
Communicator Alison Smale that
Inner City Press was being
targeted by Dobbins based on
an investigative piece it
published about scam
promotions in UN Security,
including Dobbins' and
others'. They would not
include Inner City Press
allegation of retaliation or
vendetta, saying it was beyond
the scope of their interview.
They told Inner City Press not
to make any notation to this
effect on the statement they
printed out, complete with
mis-spelling of Cameroon, that
it could submit that
information later. But to
whom? Their boss Peter Drennan
has not acknowledged any of
Inner City Press' e-mails to
him, even those at the
suggestion of Guterres'
"Victims' Advocate" Jane
Connors who kindly spoke with
Inner City Press outside the
visitors entrance and promised
to appropriately forward what
Inner City Press sent her, so
far without effect. On June
11, after refusing to provide
Inner City Press with even a
summary of what Dobbins and
Saunder have said, Perry did
hand Inner City Press a copy
of "its" statement. It says at
the top, "This is a United
Nations document and may not
be disclosed or used outside
of the Organization without
first obtaining written
permission from the United
Nations." It seems absurd that
the UN could further retaliate
against Inner City Press
publishing the print out of
its statement about being
attacked by UN Security. But
when Inner City Press wrote to
Perry and USG Drennan
notifying them of its intent
to publish and asking their
confirm receipt, there was no
response. This is Guterres'
UN. So Inner City Press in an
abundance of caution has
transformed the hard-copy of
its statement handed to it by
UN Officer Perry into the
below, without any changes
other than to fix the UN's
telling mis-spelling of
Cameroon:
"My name is
Matthew Lee. I am a journalist
attached to Inner City
Press.... I would like to
state that on the evening of
the 03 July 2018, I remained
in the "Bull Pen" press area
on the fourth floor of the
Secretariat Building from
07:00PM to approximately
10:00PM writing articles and
waiting to check on the status
of the Fifth Committee Budget
meeting. I would like to state
that this area is reserved for
Non-Resident Correspondents to
perform their duties as they
are not provided with offices
or cubicles. At approximately
10:00PM, I proceeded to the
Viennese Cafe, located on the
first basement level of the UN
Conference Building, to cover
the Fifth Committee Budget
meeting. I was aware that the
meeting was closed so I
anticipated waiting in the
Viennese Cafe to speak with
any of the Committee members
about any news regarding the
budget. I recalled that Mr.
Tommo Monthe, Permanent
Representative of Cameroon to
the United Nations, and
Chairman of the Fifth
Committee, approached me in
the Viennese later that
evening and explained the
current state of the meeting/
discussions. I recorded our
conversation on my mobile
phone.
After Mr. Monthe and I ended
our conversation, I proceeded
to the dining area of the
Viennses Cafe where I sat down
to transcribe what Mr. Monthe
had shared with me. Less than
five minutes after sitting
down, I observed two UN
Security Officers approaching
me. I recognized one of the
Officers as Lieutenant
Dobbins; I did not know the
other Officer. Lieutenant
Dobbins immediately said to me
that I had to leave the
building, while he (Lieutenant
Dobbins) grabbed my computer
from the table and put it in
my backpack. The Officer I did
not know approached me and
grabbed at my chest. I did not
know if that officer was
attempting to reach for my UN
grounds pass (which was
hanging foom around my neck)
but he grabbed the shirt I was
wearing and he ripped it,
creating two holes. That
Officer then released my shirt
and then grabbed my right
forearm and begun twisting it
and pulling me towards the
front of the cafe towards the
garage. I observed that Mr.
Christian Saunders was in the
vicinity. I called out to him
and asked him if he could
intervene. Mr. Saunders came
over to where the Officers and
I were and told me, "If the
Officers are asking you to
leave, then you should leave."
I told Mr. Saunders that there
is a Media Accreditation
Liaison Unit rule that allows
me to remain in the building
beyond 07:00PM if there is a
meeting to be covered and one
hour after the meeting. The
Officers then continued to
physically pull me by my arms
towards the UN garage. I then
asked Mr. Saunders to
accompany me as the Officers
escorted me; to which he did.
Mr. Saunders accompanied me as
both Lieutenant Dobbins and
the other unknown Officer
escorted out of the UN
premises via the 43rd Street
and 1st Avenue exit. There was
no other physical altercation
through the UN garage or at
the exit to the UN compound.
Matthew Lee
This statement was recorded by
me at UNHQ on Tuesday 10 July,
2018 at 1100 hours, at room
GA-1B-052.
Raughn Perry
Witnessed by: Valentin Stancu"
Even
with the material Perry and
Stancu refused to include -
while including the wrong room
number for the "recording" of
the statement which took place
in a windowless basement room
of the UNITAR building which
is not the GA or General
Assembly, it is amazing that
the UN's response to this is
to ban Inner City Press from
entering the UN for nine days
about counting, including so
it misses and cannot ask
questions at Guterres' rare
July 12 press conference.
We'll have more on this. On
July 11 at noon, Guterres'
lead spokesman Stephane
Dujarric was asked about Inner
City Press by a sunny
correspondent, UN transcript here:
Question: Thank
you. Can you update us
on the status of the usual
occupant of this chair?
Spokesman: The usual
occupant of this chair?
Question: Of this chair.
Spokesman: His… there
was an incident, I think, last
week or a bit… I'm starting to
get lost in the weeks.
His status is being
reviewed. And I know… my
understanding is that he will
be having discussions with
various parts of this
administration, and then we'll
keep you updated, and I'm sure
he will keep you updated.
Question: And is he
currently suspended? Is
he barred entry to this…
Spokesman: Yes.
His credentials and pass have
been suspended, pending
review." What review? UN
Security investigating itself,
and covering up for Guterres
who was informed of Lt
Dobbins' vendetta on June 25
and did nothing? Officer Perry
declined to or could not
explain what the process or
timing is going forward, or
who unilaterally banned Inner
City Press pending and
apparently during this
"investigation." He said to
ask MALU and DPI - but DPI's
Alison Smale has refused to
answer or acknowledge a single
one of Inner City Press' seven
emails. We'll have more on
this. On July 9, Haq was asked
two questions, video here,
from the UN transcript:
Question: I was
wondering if you have any
update on Matthew Lee's
situation. What's going
on? And can you tell us
the story of what happened to
him exactly, because we know
from his side of the story,
but we don't know from the
UN's side. Thank you.
Deputy Spokesman: I've
provided details concerning
that situation. The
short answer is that there was
an altercation last 3 July,
and since this was the second
incident in recent times in
which your colleague had been
disruptive in dealing with
security after an earlier
incident on 22 June, there's a
review taking place that is
under the aegis of the
Department of Public
Information (DPI) and the
Department of Safety and
Security (DSS).
Question: Do you know
how long the review will going
to take? Is he going to
be away for a long time, or is
he going away for good?
Deputy Spokesman: As far
as the timeline, I don't know
how long it will take. I
know that the review is
currently ongoing....
Question: I just want to ask a
follow-up to the question
about the 3 July incident
involving Inner City
Press. Will the review
include an evaluation of the
actions by security itself
that were alleged looking into
whether, in fact, physical
force… any physical force was
used against Mr. Lee and the
circumstances surrounding that
as opposed to just his
conduct, which, of course, I
understand, but is… is the
security's actions itself… are
they going to be examined?
Deputy Spokesman: We are
looking into the matter
thoroughly, including the
actions taken by the security
forces. At the same
time, I would point out that
there is a concern whenever
anyone, whether media or
otherwise, has an altercation
with the security in the
build… inside the building."
The only use of force was by
Lt Dobbins and his
co-conspirators, four of whom
refused to give their names.
On July 6 Haq called Inner
City Press a "repeat
offender." This is false. By
the UN's own written rules
Inner City Press was
authorized to remain and cover
both the June 22 event in the
General Assembly lobby at
which Antonio Guterres gave a
speech and the July 3 Budget
Committee meeting, the
existence of which was
notified to Inner City Press
by a UN Spokesperson. That
Inner City Press can film and
stream Periscope video in UN
hallways, without a UN minder,
has been communicated to Inner
City Press by the UN itself,
which told it no minder was
required to film in the hall
outside of the clubhouse the
UN gives to the silent UN
Correspondents Association.
Inner City Press' work in the
fourth floor bullpen was
authorized by DPI; its
completing there its writing,
often eight to ten stories a
day, was open with nothing
said by UN Security when Inner
City Press left upon work's
complete, through the
Secretariat lobby and traffic
circle guard booth. Lieutenant
Dobbins on June 22 ignored the
written rules and left Inner
City Press without its laptop
for three days. Dobbins and
four officers who refused to
give their names pushed Inner
City Press right past multiple
other non-resident
correspondents. Their
presence, then and on all
other days, can be documented.
With his partner on July 3, he
grabbed Inner City Press
laptop and Inner City Press'
shirt was torn and arm twisted
before any discussion. It was
an abuse, and a set up. And
banning Inner City Press for a
review it has not even been
contacted for, involving
practices by Inner City Press
that the UN has repeatedly
authorized, is Kafka-esque or
worse. Haq refused to answer
Inner City Press questions
about the review, saying
contact the Department of
Public Information whose Under
Secretary General Alison Smale
refuses to answer e-mails or
petition, and the Department
of Safety and Security, whose
USG Peter Drennan also has a
conflict of interest. Inner
City Press published
a leaked DSS e-mail alleging
that Drennan “buried” a threat
against then-UNESCO chief
Irina Bokova, who ran against
Guterres for the position of
Secretary General. (She may
now be in line to replace
Prince Zeid as UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights,
call it musical chairs).
Drennan's response was to
initiate an invasive
investigation... of who leaked
the e-mail to Inner City
Press. He used public money to
try to triangulate where the
e-mail published by Inner City
Press had been printed out.
And now he has a role in
deciding to ban Inner City
Press from the UN compound
preventing it from asking
questions for two days and
counting? This is a conflict
of interest, the Kafka-esque
UN that has grown worse under
Guterres. Likewise, after
Inner City Press exposed
senior UN Security official
Matthew Sullivan linking up
with a group holding
for-profit events in large UN
meeting rooms, one ludicrously
involving “GPS sneakers,” what
happened next was Sullivan ousting
Inner City Press from the
photo booth over an open
meeting about the cholera
brought to Haiti by UN
Peacekeeping. There's more -
watch this site. On July 6,
when Inner City Press went to
the gate to ask politely if it
could as before enter to
attend the noon briefing and
ask questions, it was told
"No." Inner City Press
reiterated its concern about
censorship to Darrin Farrant,
a staff member of Alison Smale
of DPI who has not answered
Inner City Press' six emails
and petition; he said he would
pass the concern along. We are
waiting for an answer. At the
day's noon briefing, unlike
for most of his previous
briefing, there were no
questions at all for Brenden
Varma the spokesperson for the
President of the General
Assembly, Miroslav Lajcak.
But, in the morning, Inner
City Press had e-mailed Varma
"two questions since I am
banned from entering the UN:
Since the PGA is using the
term eSwatini, what is his
comment on this: 'A
pro-democracy activist in
Swaziland has challenged the
king's decision to change the
country's name. In April, King
Mswati III, one of the world's
last-remaining absolute
monarchs, unexpectedly
announced he was changing the
country's official name to the
Kingdom of eSwatini. The
activist, Thulani Maseko,
argued in papers submitted to
the High Court that the
decision was invalid because
there had been no prior public
consultation.' Also, what is
the PGA's comment on and
action on UN banning Inner
City Press from the UN on July
5, today and for the
foreseeable future, after it
was physically ousted from
covering the July 3 meetings
of the UNGA's 5th Committee?
The issue has been raised,
yesterday, to at least two
members of his staff." At 4:52
pm, Varma replied with this:
"As discussed before, none of
these matters (country names,
media accreditation, security
at UNHQ) are matters for the
PGA. I would have to refer to
you to the Secretariat." And
the Secretariat's spokesman
refers Inner City Press to the
Department of Public
Information, whose chief
Alison Smale has ignored six
emails and a 5000 signature
petition. Lajcak back in May
2017 told
Inner City Press which asked
about UN bribery, from Ashe
now to Kutesa, There will be
no secrets. That seemed to
imply he would not stand by as
an investigative journalist is
ousted and banned from
covering the GA. We'll see.
Also at the day's noon
briefing, the UN's deputy
spokesman Farhan Haq took
questions from France 24,
Moroccan state media, Reuters
and quickly turned over the
podium to the PGA's spokesman.
Inner City Press had asked
Haq: "Since Inner City Press'
six inquiries with the head of
DPI Alison Smale have gone
unanswered, and I am as you
know banned from entering the
building, who are you telling
me to contact in Security and
DPI? Aren't you the
spokesperson for the
Secretariat? Need answer
immediately. For now, for
noon, three questions:
In Tanzania, Julius Mtatiro
asenior leader of a Tanzanian
opposition party has been
arrested for insulting
President John Magufuli by
asking“Who is the President,
really?” Police detained him
“as they found this phrase
offensive to the president.
They went on to search Mr
Mtatiro’s home for the device
used to post on social media.”
What is the Secretary
General's comment - and his /
Country Team's action?
It is reported that Canada
will deploy up to 20 civilian
police officers to support
both the United Nations
peacekeeping mission and the
EU training mission in Mali.
So, will they be part of
MINUSMA? How many Canadian
personnel are currently part
of MINUSMA, and what is the
plan and timetable for
additional Canadian joining of
MINUSMA? Will Canadian troops
have different (and
significantly, better)
security equipment that other
countries' troops in MINUSMA?
On the deadly class between
DRC's and Uganda's militaries
on Lake Edward, what is the
SG's comment and what is
MONUSCO's action?" So far,
even after the briefing, only
this: "Regarding your question
on Lake Edward, there is no
comment or response from
MONUSCO." We'll have more on
this.
Haq told Fox News
"Matthew Lee [i]s a repeat
offender, having been
similarly removed from the
building on 22 June 2018,
Matthew Lee has been
temporarily barred from the
premises pending a full review
of this incident." There is no
offense by Inner City Press:
the rules permit Inner City
Press to cover meetings after
7 pm, on June 22 a speech by
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres and on July 3 a
meeting about Guterres' $6.7
billion budget. So since no
one from the UN contacted
Inner City Press on July 5
about any review, Inner City
Press wrote to Haq and his
boss Stephane Dujarric (out of
the office again). Haq
replied, "Receipt is
confirmed. For questions about
security issues, you will need
to be in touch with security
and with DPI." But neither
Department has a spokesperson
- Haq is the spokesperson for
the Secretariat -- and Inner
City Press has written six
times to the head of DPI
without a single response. The
head of DPI ordered an
investigation of him own staff
after Inner City Press
published a leaked email about
him "burying" a threat to
another UN system official,
Irina Bokova (who may, some
say, become High Commissioner
for Human Rights). So Haq's
"answer" is Orwellian. We will
have more on this. Guterres
was informed on June 25 by
Inner City Press of the
escalating targeting by his UN
Security Lieutenant Ronald E.
Dobbins. In fact, Guterres
deputy spokesman Farhan Haq on
July 3 essentially gave the
green light for that evening's
Security violence. On July 5,
Guterres' lead spokesman
Stephane Dujarric refused to
answer press questions about
the ouster before "his" noon
briefing. Afterward, when
Saunders sauntered out of the
UN in black sunglasses and was
informed that Inner City Press
was now banned, his response
was to complain about some of
the written coverage of him.
Video here.
So is that why he cheered on
the twisting of the Press'
arm? Will this obviously
biased official be witness in
the "full review of the
incident" pending which Inner
City Press is indefinitely
banned? Brenden Varma the
Spokesperson for the President
of the General Assembly
Miroslav Lajcak (whose chief
of staff and under-staffer
were also informed of the
Press ban) said, as his office
summarized, "This afternoon at
3:00, the General Assembly’s
Fifth Committee, which handles
administrative and budgetary
matters, will formally take
action on all outstanding
issues, including United
Nations peacekeeping budgets
and the Secretary-General’s
management reform and peace
and security architecture
reform proposals.
It will then close the second
part of its resumed session.
Following that, the General
Assembly plenary will meet to
consider the report of the
Fifth Committee." Inner City
Press was banned from this
meeting and vote. While the UN
has told Inner City Press
nothing, Guterres spokesman
Farhan Haq told FOX
News' Adam Shaw that
"security followed up, they
found Matthew Lee to be in the
building past 9 p.m., well
after the hours for a
non-resident correspondent,
and they informed him that he
was not allowed to roam around
the UN compound at that hour.
They informed him that he
would be required to leave the
premises. At that point, Mr.
Lee became loud and
belligerent, and resisted the
instructions of UN security
officers. He was then escorted
outside the building, along
with his laptop and backpack.
Based on his unacceptable
behavior, and the fact that he
was a repeat offender, having
been similarly removed from
the building on 22 June 2018,
Matthew Lee has been
temporarily barred from the
premises pending a full review
of this incident." But Inner
City Press has not been
contacted for any review,
which would have to include UN
Security twisting its
reporter's arm before any
volume, and the MALU rule
permitted coverage of meetings
after 7 pm, and for an hour
after then end. This was pure
targeting, and Guterres and
his team are
responsible. Eleven days
after UN Security officers led
by UN Lieutenant Ronald E.
Dobbin and four others who
refused to give their names
pushed Inner City Press'
reporter out
of the UN during a speech by
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres, on July 3 just after
Inner City Press interviewed
the chairman of the UN Budget
Committee, Dobbins and another
UN Security officer even more
physically removed Inner City
Press from the UN. Video
here,
tweeted here.
Hours later as diplomats and
Guterres officials who
witnessed it left the UN,
Inner City Press asked
Guterres' Under Secretary
General for Field Support Atul
Khare about the process. He
admitted, contrary to
Guterres' spokesman, that the
Support Account was still not
agreed. Shown the shirt that
UN Security officers Dobbins
and his thus far UNnamed
partner tore, he said, "I'll
talk to DPI." While
appreciated, Inner City Press
already six times wrote to
DPI's Alison Smale, and last
week spoke directly to her and
her piano playing husband
Sergei Dreznin at the End of
UNSC Presidency reception.
Inner City Press told Smale,
and an hour later emailed her,
that her continued disparate
treatment of active Inner City
Press as a non - resident
correspondent would allow
further targeting like that of
Lieutenant Dobbins and four
unnamed Emergency Response
Unit officers on June 22.
Smale didn't even confirm
receipt of the email as
requested. And on July 3 a new
officer got involved as Inner
City Press covered the UN
budget, breaking Inner City
Press' laptop, tearing its
shirt and twisting its arm.
Smale and Guterres are
responsible. This all happened
as Inner City Press was
actively writing about the
UN's murky $6.7 billion
peacekeeping budget and
questionable reforms by
Guterres. It happened directly
in front of, and ultimately at
the order of, a Guterres
Assistant Secretary General,
Christian Saunders. A number
of diplomats stood and took
pictures and videos. Here as
the interview, pre-ouster,
with the Budget Committee
chairman Tommo Monthe of
Cameroon, video here.
Guterres' spokesman Farhan on
both July 2 and July 3
insisted to Inner City Press
that the budget was agreed to
in a closed session on Sunay,
when clearly it has not been
approved. While we will have
more on the other UN Security
Officer, Inner City Press has
previously reported on issues
with Saunders, from education
to the cover up of sexual
harassment and abuse in the
UN. The fact that Antonio
Guterres allows this to go on
in his UN should disqualify
him. The UN had at least 11
days to deal with this - Inner
City Press repeatedly at the
noon briefing asked about the
rules, and the budget - and
this was their response.
Significantly, on July 3 the
Government Accountability
Project has criticized
the ouster and called for
Inner City Press to be
reinstated as a UN Resident
Correspondent. Inner City
Press asked Guterres' Deputy
Spokesman Farhan Haq, video here, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: I'd asked
you, a week ago, about the UN
policy of UN security ousting
the non-resident correspondent
during a meeting to be covered
and refusing to give their
names, and now the Government
Accountability Project has asked
the same question. So
I'm wondering, you didn't ask
me when I answered it [sic],
what is the policy of the UN
on something as fundamental as
security officers giving their
names, and also can they oust
journalists during a meeting
such as a budget meeting that
will be upcoming, I would
believe, in upcoming days?
Deputy Spokesman: As far
as I'm aware, the security
officers were enforcing the
appropriate rules. Any
problems that you have with
them are questions that you
need to address with our
colleagues in UN security and
with Media Accreditation." But
as GAP notes, the boss of
Media Accreditation Alison
Smale has refused to answer
anything in eight months. GAP
writes:
"as security expelled Mr. Lee
from the building, he
encountered Catherine Pollard,
the UN’s Under-Secretary
General (USG) for General
Assembly and Conference
Management, who pointedly
ignored his plight and simply
stayed her course, despite his
plea for her intervention.
Along the way, Mr. Lee also
asked the guards for their
names, which they refused to
provide. This most recent
incident is the latest in a
long history of harassment
directed at a journalist who
has been critical of UN
management and operations over
the years. Mr. Lee’s
investigative reporting has
broken stories concerning
sexual abuses committed by
peacekeepers in Africa, the
role of UN peacekeepers in
bringing cholera to Haiti, and
war crimes in Sri Lanka,
Burundi and Sudan [and
Cameroon]. Mr. Lee’s reporting
has also helped to expose
corruption at the Headquarters
of the United Nations,
including the current bribery
scandals surrounding former
General Assembly President
[Sam Kutesa and] John Ashe."
In the
eleven days since the ouster,
live-streamed on Periscope and
then put on YouTube,
the UN of Antonio Guterres has
not responded in any way.
Inner City Press was first
told to "Ask Security" then to
"Ask DPI" or as it now
absurdly wants to be known,
the UN Department of Global
Communications. But as GAP
continues, "Like USG Pollard,
the Under-Secretary for Global
Communications, Alison Smale,
seems deaf to Mr. Lee’s
distress; she has refused for
eight months to answer e-mails
or respond to a petition to
restore his credentials as a
resident correspondent." Inner
City Press since the ouster
has raised it to Smale not
only in writing (again) but
also in person - with no
response. Global
Communications, indeed. GAP
concludes: The Government
Accountability Project
therefore urges the Member
States of the United Nations
to combat the silencing of a
journalist by taking action at
the offices of the
self-appointed guardian of
free speech, itself: the
United Nations. Matthew Lee
should be: Reinstated as a
resident correspondent with
appropriate access to
facilities and events, and
Issued a public apology for
the improper expulsion that
occurred on June 22nd." To
Inner City Press, it is the
first of these, restoration to
its long time work space S-303
which sits empty every day,
assigned to an Egypt state
media Akhbar al Yom whose
Sanaa Youssef, while a former
president of the UN
Correspondents Association
(1984) has not asked the
UN a question in a
decade. As to apologies from
today's UN, the disingenuous
apology in Haiti for example
shows how much those are
worth. We'll have more on
this. Guterres' lead spokesman
Stephane Dujarric evaded Inner
City Press' questions then ran
off the podium. Video here.
Despite the fact that
Guterres' armed guards ousted
Inner City Press and that the
UN Department of Public
Information under Alison Smale
did nothing, Dujarric babbled
that Inner City Press should
"ask DPI" then ran off the
podium. Video here.
From the UN (controlled) transcript:
Inner City Press: Farhan
[Haq], on Monday, when I
informed him that on Friday I
had been, during an event in
which the Secretary-General
was giving a speech, made to
leave by UN Security while
other non-resident
correspondents, a distinction
you just cited, were still in
attendance, he said to talk to
security. And that seems
strange to me, because it
seems to me that the
Secretariat, like civilian…
Spokesman: I think if
there are any issues that you
have…
Inner
City Press: My
issue…
Spokesman: If you have
any issues with your access,
you should take them up with
DPI [Department of Public
Information] and the people
who actually issue the
accreditation.
Inner City Press: They
came… they came and they said
there was nothing they could
do…
Spokesman: "Thank you
very much. Brenden." The
UN transcript
omitted the audible question,
"So can Security just at will
bar journalists?" Video here.
The UN of Guterres, Dujarric
and Smale is a place of
corruption and censorship, and
self-serving erasure even of
the questions asked, with the
public's money. The day
before, after cutting off
Inner City Press' question
about protests of Guterres'
inaction on sexual harassment
cover-ups at UNAIDS, Dujarric
called on a correspondent for
a London-based Arabic daily.
Then he called on that same
correspondent again before
returning to Inner City Press.
Sensing this second round
might be cut off, Inner City
Press began asking about
Guterres inaction on Cameroon
then on his Security's ouster
of the Press which asks. But
Dujarric after evading the
Cameroon question turned to Al
Jazeera which asked what even
it called a light question
about the French label pin on
Dujarric's sear-sucker jacket.
Then Dujarric simply left the
room, so that Inner City
Press' question about
Guterres' use of his Security
to target the Press could not
be asked. On June 22 Inner
City Press was live-streaming
Periscope and preparing to
write about Secretary General
Antonio Guterres' claims about
his visit to Mali, where he
didn't even inquire into a
recent case child rape by a UN
Peacekeeper. With the event
still ongoing, Inner City
Press was approached by
Lieutenant Dobbins and told
that since it was just past 7
pm it had to leave the
building. Video here.
That is not
the rule, nor the practice.
But Inner City Press under
Guterres and his head of
Global Communications Alison
Smale has inexplicable been at
the "non-resident
correspondent" level lowered
from that of no-show state
media like Akbhar al Yom's
Sanaa Youssef, assigned Inner
City Press' long time office
despite rarely coming in and
not asking a question in ten
years.
While
Guterres and Smale have
created and encourage the
atmosphere for targeting the
Press, Dobbins had and has his
own reasons. Inner City Press
previously exclusively
reported on fraudulent
promotions in the UN
Department of Safety and
Security, beginning of series
here
with a leaked document
with Dobbins own name on it,
under the heading "Possible
Promotions... if Dobbins does
not want Canine / ERU."
Document here.
Since the publication, Dobbins
and a number of UN Security
officers have openly targeted
Inner City Press. This has
been raised in writing to
Smale (for eight months), for
almost 18 months to Guterres
and his deputy Amina J.
Mohammed, whose response has
been to evade questions on
Cameroon and now an ambiguous
smile while surrounded by UN
Security. On June 25 Inner
City Press asked Guterres'
Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq
about it, video here,
UN transcript here:
Inner City Press:
on Friday there was the Eid
event in which António
Guterres gave a speech, and I…
I want… I guess I want to put
this in a general way because
I don't understand it.
During the event, as the event
went on, I was required to
leave by a Lieutenant Dobbins
and the emergency response
unit. And it seemed
strange, because there were
many other non-resident
correspondents at the
event. So, I wanted to
know… to know, one, what are
the rules? Number two,
is it acceptable for a… a… UN
Security to… to single out and
target a specific
journalist? And I did…
and I ask this because I've
previously written a story
about promotions in DSS
[Department of Safety and
Security], including Mr.
Dobbins, and whatever that is,
what are the provisions in the
UN to make sure that security
cannot abuse its powers?
So those are… I… I… I'd like
you to answer that, and also
they didn't give their
names. The other
individuals refused to give
their names. Is that UN
policy?
Deputy Spokesman: UN
Security has their
policies. Your concerns
with them need to be addressed
to UN Security. I'm not
going to comment on your own
problems with UN
Security. Brenden, come
on up.
Inner
City Press: I
don't understand. This
happened at a speech by the
Secretary-General.
Deputy Spokesman: No,
I'm sorry, your security
issues are things you're going
to have to deal with.
Inner City Press: It's not a
security issue. It was
done in the name of the
Secretary-General. Is he
speaking tomorrow at 6 p.m.
somewhere? Can you say where
the Secretary-General is
speaking tomorrow at 6 p.m.?
Deputy Spokesman: I’m
not going to argue with you on
this." There was more - video
here.
Even if Lt
Dobbins and his team and
commanders wanted to interpret
and twist the existing rules
in a way they are not enforced
against any other non-resident
correspondent at the UN, the
Guterres Eid al -Fitr event
listed in the UN Department of
Public Information was still
ongoing, making it
unquestionable that Inner City
Press had a right to be in the
UN and cover it.
But
even as Inner City Press
dialed DPI's Media
Accreditation and Liaison
Unit, getting only voice mail,
Dobbins made a call and UN
“Emergency Response Unit”
officers arrived, with barely
concealed automatic weapons.
One of them repeatedly pushed
Inner City Press' reporter in
the back, forcing him through
the General Assembly lobby
toward the exit. Video here.
UN
Under Secretary General
Catherine Pollard was told the
ouster and did nothing, as was
a Moroccan diplomat. The
heavily armed UN Security
officers refused to give their
names when asked. Lieutenant
Dobbins, with no name plate on
his uniform, refused to spell
his name. He said, I have my
orders. From who - Guterres?
His Deputy SG or chief of
staff, both of whom were at
the event? DSS chief Drennan?
DPI chief Alison Smale?
Inner City Press repeatedly
asked to be able to get its
laptop computer, which was
upstairs - there was no way to
have known it would be ousted
during Guterres' event.
But
Dobbins and the others
refused, as did the UN
Security officers at the gate.
Inner City Press remained
there, with dwindling cell
phone battery, raising the
issue online to Smale, under
whose watch Inner City Press
has remained in the
non-resident correspondent
status it was reduced to for
pursuing the Ng Lp Seng UN
bribery case into the UN press
briefing room where Guterres'
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
ordered it out, then had it
evicted. A DPI representative,
whom Inner City Press asked to
call Smale, was unable or
unwilling to even let Inner
City Press go in escorted to
get its laptop.
Just
in the past week, when Inner
City Press complained of
Dujarric providing only to Al
Jazeera the response of
Antonio Guterres to the US
leaving the UN Human Rights
Council, Dujarric and the Al
Jazeera trio claimed
to MALU that the coverage was
“too aggressive.” Journalism
is not a crime? Next week,
Antonio Guterres is set to
give remarks, to which Inner
City Press has requested the
right to cover response, to
the UN Correspondents
Association, which not only
has not acted on this
censorship, but has fueled it.
Inside the
UN the Eid event continued,
alongside a liquor fueled
barbeque thrown by UN
Security. This DSS sold
tickets to non resident
correspondents, and allowed in
people who had nothing to do
with the UN, including some
seeming underage. When Inner
City Press audibly raised the
issue to UN Safety and
Security Service chief Mick
Brown, he did nothing.
The
Moroccan diplomat emerged and
chided Inner City Press for
even telling him of the
ouster, claiming that “25% of
what you write is about
Morocco.” Some Periscope video
here.
Pakistan's Permanent
Representative, who hosted the
Eid event, said she would look
into it. Sweden's spokesperson
asked whom to call in DPI and
when Inner City Press said,
Alison Smale, responded, Who
is Alison Smale? Indeed.
Smale has
refused to respond in any way,
in the eight months she has
been Guterres' “Global
Communications” chief, to a
5000 signature petition to
restore Inner City Press to
its unused office S-303 and to
adopt content neutral media
access rules going forward.
That, and appropriate action
on Lt. Dobbins and the others,
must be among the next steps.
Watch this site.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2018 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
,
