Exclusive:
New UN Rapes
In CAR
Revealed in
Feb 11 Emails,
Ladsous'
Congolese
Connections
By Matthew
Russell Lee,
Exclusive Must
Credit
UNITED
NATIONS,
February 12 --
Amid a litany
of rape
charges
against UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous, Inner
City Press has
exclusively
obtained UN
emails showing
another round
of sexual
abuse of
minors in
Ouaka
prefecture in
the Central
African
Republic by UN
Peacekeepers
from the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo. Click
here to view.
The
emails, dated
February 11,
2016, describe
at least four
underage
victims, two
of whom were
impregnated by
the rapist UN
peacekeepers.
Middle
management at
the UN,
further up the
email chain,
notes that the
majority of
sexual abuse
in CAR has
been committed
by the
battalions
from the DRC
and the
Republic of
Congo.
Well
placed sources
tell Inner
City Press
these two
countries'
soldiers have
been in the UN
MINUSCA
mission nearly
entirely due
to Ladsous
and, more
outrageously,
the / his
French
government due
to its
political
relations with
the Republic
of Congo and
DRC.
Ladsous, as
Inner City
Press has
reported, told
Burundi's Vice
President that
he is
"pragmatic"
about human
rights; even
on camera,
Ladsous linked
the rapes to
"R&R," click here for video.
While
Ladsous' DPKO
and Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
Office of the
Spokesperson
announced that
the DRC
contingent
would be
pulled out of
Bambari and
CAR in late
Janaury, Inner
City Press is
informed this
never
happened: they
are still
there.
Ladsous' DPKO,
and now the UN
Spokesperson's
Office, are
engaged in
misleading the
press and
public, and
doling out
what
information
they provide
to only the
friendliest
media.
For
recent
example, Inner
City Press for
weekly has
reported on
and asked
about the
repatriation
from CAR of
Burundian
troops charged
with abuse
during the
crackdown on
opponents of
Pierre
Nkurunziza's
third term.
Even after
Inner City
Press obtained
and published
on February 9
proof of
three
repatriations,
all UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric told
Inner City
Press is that
he
would seek an
update.
Simarily,
Ladsous' lead
spokesman Nick
Birnback told
Inner City
Press DPKO
would have
something to
say about the
particular
Burundian
officers in
CAR Inner City
Press asked
him about.
Then
Ladsous'
spokespeople
including
Ismini Palla
gave their
limited
confirmations
to Reuters
and Agence
France Presse,
who published
it without
credit or
context.
(Neither media
reported on
Ladsous
linking rape
to R&R).
In a
February email
by UN official
Anthony
Banbury, soon
to leave the
UN after some
heartfelt
tears of outrage
at
peacekeepers'
rapes, it is
said:
"We have a
pack of
predatory
criminals and
rapists,
preying on
young girls,
under the
banner of the
United
Nations. How
can we stand
by? In my view
that battalion
should be
ordered to
cease
operations
today, same
with the RoC
battalion, and
be confined to
camp and
guarded full
time so they
cannot
continue to
abuse
children.
While we would
pay a
short-term
price in terms
of operations,
we would gain
so much in
terms of the
integrity and
reputation of
the UN, in the
CAR and
internationally,
and we would
almost
certainly
prevent more
rapes of minor
girls. We
simply cannot
sustain the
argument that
the benefit
these troops
are bringing
to the UN and
PoC is greater
than the harm
they are
doing."
What
will the UN
do? What will
France, with
new foreign
minister Jean
Marc Ayrault,
do? How long
can Ladsous -
and the
Congolese
contingents -
remain in
place?
On
February 11,
Inner City
Press
exclusively
reported and
then asked the
UN about,
member states
went to the
UN's 38th
floor to ask
where Ban's
response to
the issues and
Deschamps
report is. It
was due by the
end of
January, as
Inner City
Press has
asked.
Now,
the sources
told Inner
City Press,
Ban is trying
to delay it
until March.
Ban in fact
wasn't there
to meet the
member states
on February 11
- he is in
Canada -- and
neither was
his Deputy Jan
Eliasson. The
task fell to
Chief of Staff
Edmond Mulet,
who replaced
Susana
Malcorra
before she
issued the
promised
response. So
it goes at the
UN.
At the
February 11
noon briefing
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
it, UN
transcript
here.
More
than a week
after Inner
City Press'
January 27
question, and
nearly two
weeks after
the UN learned
of the rape
charges, the
UN announced
them on
February 4.
Dujarric's
Deputy Farhan
Haq read them
out, and Inner
City Press
asked
questions, transcript here.
On January 29,
first High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights Zeid
then this same
UN spokesman
issues
statement
about (what
else), new
rape charges
in CAR. But
even these
lists do not
appear to be
complete,
omitting
alleged rapes
that UN
officials have
spoken about
involving UN
peacekeepers
from Burundi,
the Republic
of Congo and
Gabon.
Inner
City Press
asked now
departing
Assistant
Secretary
General
Anthony
Banbury about
these still
unreported
cases, and why
it was him and
not the head
of UN
Peacekeeping,
Herve Ladsous,
who was
answering for
the charges at
the UN's
January 29
briefing.
Video
here.
Banbury,
visibly upset,
shed tears
during the
briefing. But
again, why
isn't Ladsous
as the person
responsible,
named in the
Deschamps
report as
having failed
to vet
contingents
subsequently
charged with
rapes, the one
answering
questions?
In the
briefing, the
UN set aside
the first
question for a
representative
of the UN
Correspondents
Association,
and then two
UNCA board
members: none
of these
questions
involved the
head of
peacekeeping
Herve Ladsous.
We'll have
more on this.
Having been
told by
sources of
more rapes by
peacekeepers
in the Central
African
Republic,
Inner City
Press on
January 26 reported
them and on
January 27
asked the UN's
spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric to
confirm them -
but wouldn't.
UN
transcript
here. Video here.
So what
is the
protocol of UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous, who
linked the
rapes to
"R&R," here? How many more do
they know
about?
The UN report
on rapes
in the Central
African
Republic,
released on
December 17,
found that UN
Peacekeeping's
Under
Secretary
General Herve
Ladsous
“illustrate[s]
the UN's
failure to
respond to
allegations of
serious human
rights
violations in
the meaningful
way.”
Ladsous
has yet to
take any
questions
about the
report -- this
as Inner City
Press
exclusively
hears from
sources of yet
more sexual
abuse cases in
CAR, involving
DR Congo AND
Republic of
Congo, and
changes of
abuses will in
detention.
On
January 27,
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
these new
charges, transcript
here.
On January 5,
Ladsous
mission in CAR
issued a press
release about
yet more
allegation of
sexual abuse
of minors by
its
peacekeepers,
below.
On
January 18,
Inner City
Press managed
to ask UN
Deputy
Secretary
General Jan
Eliasson about
the report --
the UN Deputy
Spokesperson
appeared
intent on not
allowing the
question, but
Eliasson to
his credit
took it. Video
here.
Earlier in the
month,
Inner City
Press asked
the Permanent
Representative
of New Zealand
and of
Uruguay,
President of
the Security
Council for
January, about
the report(s).
Video
here.
Back in
December, once
the report
came out from
under embargo
at the noon
briefing Inner
City Press
asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric what
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon will
do about the
findings
against
Ladsous, and
that he
escaped the
“abuse of
authority”
moniker only
because “the
mandate of the
Panel is to
assess whether
an abuse of
authority has
occurred in
connection
with the
Allegations.”
Since
the abusers
Ladsous let
into MINUSCA
were not the
French troops
who are
accused of
rape -- these
troops are not
in MINUSCA --
Ladsous'
malfeasance is
not “in
connection”
with the
Allegations.
But is it
acceptable?
Dujarric seems
unfamiliar
with the
report; he
implied that
the third
person found
to have abused
authority was
the Ethics
Officer, when
it was a lower
level official
in CAR. Inner
City Press
asked what
this all says
about Ban
Ki-moon's
management,
along with the
John Ashe / Ng
Lap Seng and
Bernardino
Leon scandal,
a question
Dujarric did
not allow
Inner City
Press to asked
Ban himself on
December 16.
“Those are
your words,”
Dujarric
replied. Yes,
they are.
When
the Panel's
three members
held their
press
conference,
Inner City
Press asked
about Ladsous'
failure to vet
and his
linking of
rapes to
“R&R.” Video here. Marie
Deschamps said
pointedly she
wouldn't
comment on
Ladsous'
remarks;
Yasmin Sooka
said these are
crimes for
punishment,
not
recreation.
As the
last question,
Inner City
Press asked
what it had
wanted to ask
Ban, and tried
to ask
Dujarric: what
does this say
about Ban's
management? Video of Q&A here. Didn't
Ban's chief of
staff
Malcorra,
criticized in
the report, do
it for Ban?
Didn't the
“senior
official” who
ostensibly let
the rape
information
die on the
vine in the
38th floor
work in an
atmosphere
created by
Ban's nine
years? We will
pursue this.
And this: if
OIOS' Lapointe
was wrong,
isn't James
Finness, who
continues the
OIOS campaign?
While the UK
has spoken,
where is
France, given
Sangaris and
Ladsous?
As to
Ladsous, the
finding was
made even
though the
three authors
of the report
do not
mention, and
apparently
have not yet
seen, the
notes from
Ladsous'
October 1,
2015 meeting
about the CAR
mission with Burundi's
Vice President,
in which
Ladsous said
he is
“pragmatic” on
human rights,
in Burundi and
by extension
elsewhere, nor
Ladsous'
September 11,
2015 on-camera
comments
linking the
rapes to
“R&R,” video here.
But
Ladsous still
as of December
17 holds the
senior UN
position into
which France,
which has
chosen the
last four
heads of UN
Peacekeeping,
put him in
September
2011. How much
longer?
By contrast,
the former
head of OIOS
Carman
Lapointe, of
whom the panel
finds an abuse
of authority,
is
conveniently
gone, as is
Babacar Gaye,
who worked for
Ladsous at the
CAR mission.
Perhaps
it was easier
for the panel
to make the
formal finding
against people
who had
already left
the UN by the
time the
report was
released.
One
wonders: if
responses like
Ladsous'
legalistic
(and largely
false)
November 2
letter were
received so
long ago
by the panel,
why did they
withhold the
report all the
way until
December 17,
the day AFTER
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's rare
(and last of
the year) press
conference?
High
Commission
Zeid, of whom
it is said he
was slammed in
the report, in
fact gets the
same treatment
-- critical,
but no formal
abuse of
authority --
as Ladsous,
who is
airbrushed out
and conditions
access to
information
and answers
about
Peacekeeping
on positive /
false
coverage.
The same
finding is
made with
regard to
former Chief
of Staff
Susana
Malcorra. Will
the critical
language hurt
what chance
she has, as a
non Eastern
European, to
try to follow
Ban Ki-moon as
Secretary
General?
More
generally, how
does all this
criticism
reflect on the
tenure of Ban
Ki-moon? The
report does
not mention
the concurrent
scandals
regarding UN
Secretariat
documents
purchased by
now indicted
Ng Lap Seng
through former
President of
the General
Assembly John
Ashe, nor Ban
Libya envoy
taking
instruction
and a cushy
job with the
UAE while
representing
Ban on and in
Libya.
, 
