ICP
Asks UN &
CAR Panel of
Ladsous
Failing to
Respond on
Rights, Ban's
UN
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 17 --
The UN report
on rapes
in the Central
African
Republic,
released
today, finds
that UN
Peacekeeping's
Under
Secretary
General Herve
Ladsous
“illustrate[s]
the UN's
failure to
respond to
allegations of
serious human
rights
violations in
the meaningful
way.”
Once the
report came
out from under
embargo at the
noon briefing
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric what
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon will
do about the
findings
against
Ladsous, and
that he
escaped the
“abuse of
authority”
moniker only
because “the
mandate of the
Panel is to
assess whether
an abuse of
authority has
occurred in
connection
with the
Allegations.”
Since
the abusers
Ladsous let
into MINUSCA
were not the
French troops
who are
accused of
rape -- these
troops are not
in MINUSCA --
Ladsous'
malfeasance is
not “in
connection”
with the
Allegations.
But is it
acceptable?
Dujarric seems
unfamiliar
with the
report; he
implied that
the third
person found
to have abused
authority was
the Ethics
Officer, when
it was a lower
level official
in CAR. Inner
City Press
asked what
this all says
about Ban
Ki-moon's
management,
along with the
John Ashe / Ng
Lap Seng and
Bernardino
Leon scandal,
a question
Dujarric did
not allow
Inner City
Press to asked
Ban himself on
December 16.
“Those are
your words,”
Dujarric
replied. Yes,
they are.
When
the Panel's
three members
held their
press
conference,
Inner City
Press asked
about Ladsous'
failure to vet
and his
linking of
rapes to
“R&R.” Video here. Marie
Deschamps said
pointedly she
wouldn't
comment on
Ladsous'
remarks;
Yasmin Sooka
said these are
crimes for
punishment,
not
recreation.
As the
last question,
Inner City
Press asked
what it had
wanted to ask
Ban, and tried
to ask
Dujarric: what
does this say
about Ban's
management? Video of Q&A here. Didn't
Ban's chief of
staff
Malcorra,
criticized in
the report, do
it for Ban?
Didn't the
“senior
official” who
ostensibly let
the rape
information
die on the
vine in the
38th floor
work in an
atmosphere
created by
Ban's nine
years? We will
pursue this.
And this: if
OIOS' Lapointe
was wrong,
isn't James
Finness, who
continues the
OIOS campaign?
While the UK
has spoken,
where is
France, given
Sangaris and
Ladsous?
As to
Ladsous, the
finding was
made even
though the
three authors
of the report
do not
mention, and
apparently
have not yet
seen, the
notes from
Ladsous'
October 1,
2015 meeting
about the CAR
mission with Burundi's
Vice President,
in which
Ladsous said
he is
“pragmatic” on
human rights,
in Burundi and
by extension
elsewhere, nor
Ladsous'
September 11,
2015 on-camera
comments
linking the
rapes to
“R&R,” video here.
But
Ladsous still
as of December
17 holds the
senior UN
position into
which France,
which has
chosen the
last four
heads of UN
Peacekeeping,
put him in
September
2011. How much
longer?
By contrast,
the former
head of OIOS
Carman
Lapointe, of
whom the panel
finds an abuse
of authority,
is
conveniently
gone, as is
Babacar Gaye,
who worked for
Ladsous at the
CAR mission.
Perhaps
it was easier
for the panel
to make the
formal finding
against people
who had
already left
the UN by the
time the
report was
released.
One
wonders: if
responses like
Ladsous'
legalistic
(and largely
false)
November 2
letter were
received so
long ago
by the panel,
why did they
withhold the
report all the
way until
December 17,
the day AFTER
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's rare
(and last of
the year) press
conference?
High
Commission
Zeid, of whom
it is said he
was slammed in
the report, in
fact gets the
same treatment
-- critical,
but no formal
abuse of
authority --
as Ladsous,
who is
airbrushed out
and conditions
access to
information
and answers
about
Peacekeeping
on positive /
false
coverage.
The same
finding is
made with
regard to
former Chief
of Staff
Susana
Malcorra. Will
the critical
language hurt
what chance
she has, as a
non Eastern
European, to
try to follow
Ban Ki-moon as
Secretary
General?
More
generally, how
does all this
criticism
reflect on the
tenure of Ban
Ki-moon? The
report does
not mention
the concurrent
scandals
regarding UN
Secretariat
documents
purchased by
now indicted
Ng Lap Seng
through former
President of
the General
Assembly John
Ashe, nor Ban
Libya envoy
taking
instruction
and a cushy
job with the
UAE while
representing
Ban on and in
Libya.
Only this
week, Ban
allowed those
who cover him,
at least the
UN
Correspondents
Association,
to sell
seats with him
for $6,000.
And it is
these same who
have
airbrushed out
Ladsous and
others.
The
Panelists --
Marie
Deschamps,
Hassan Jallow
and Yasmin
Sooka -- leave
unnamed a
senior officer
in Ban
Ki-moon's
office
(finding that
he misspoke
when he said
he had
informed
Deputy Jan
Eliasson),
without saying
if the officer
remains in the
same position.
We'll have
more on this. Follow @innercitypressFollow @FUNCA_info
, 
