On UN
CAR Rapes
Report, ICP
Asked
Eliasson, Who
Says Mulet By
End of Month
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
January 19 --
The UN report
on rapes
in the Central
African
Republic,
released on
December 17,
found that UN
Peacekeeping's
Under
Secretary
General Herve
Ladsous
“illustrate[s]
the UN's
failure to
respond to
allegations of
serious human
rights
violations in
the meaningful
way.”
Ladsous
has yet to
take any
questions
about the
report. On
January 5, his
mission in CAR
issued a press
release about
yet more
allegation of
sexual abuse
of minors by
its
peacekeepers,
below.
On
January 18,
Inner City
Press managed
to ask UN
Deputy
Secretary
General Jan
Eliasson about
the report --
the UN Deputy
Spokesperson
appeared
intent on not
allowing the
question, but
Eliasson to
his credit
took it. Video
here, UN
transcript
here:
Inner City
Press: The UK
Ambassador
mentioned
sexual abuse.
DSG: Yes.
Inner City
Press: He did.
And so I
wanted to
know…
DSG: I did
also.
Inner City
Press: So,
since that
report came
out about the
Central
African
Republic, what
has the
Secretariat or
the 38th floor
done to ensure
that in the
future if a UN
staffer
becomes aware
of child rape,
that it goes
to the right
people?
DSG Eliasson:
This is very
serious. As
you know, the
Special
Representative
in Central
African
Republic
resigned, was
asked to
resign. One of
the others who
were named by
the Deschamps
group, panel,
was considered
to have abused
authority has
left the
United
Nations,
retired.
And we have a
group set up
right now, led
by the Chef de
Cabinet -
Edmond Mulet -
that is going
to work very,
very quickly
on following
up the
recommendations
of the panel.
Mr. Mulet and
his group will
report to the
Secretary-General
by the end of
this month.
We will look
into both
issues of
individual
responsibility,
but also
primarily on
the systemic
problems. This
reminded me of
my reaction to
the Sri Lanka
tragedy back
in 2009. The
panel came to
the conclusion
that it was
systemic
failure, so we
drew the
[conclusion]
to that – we
need to have a
systemic
response. That
was the origin
of Human
Rights Up
Front.
This time also
the Deschamps
report talks
about, almost
in the same
language –
systemic
reactions. I
also expect,
or we also
expect, Member
States again
to draw the
conclusions
from
this. In
so many cases
we have passed
on to the
Member States
very damning
reports, but
very little
sometimes has
been done by
Troop
Contributing
or Police
Contributing
countries. So
we need to
have nation
states
following up
these
[inaudible].
We will
have more,
too, on DSG
Eliasson's
reference to
the UN's
failure in Sri
Lanka. At the
January 19 UN
noon briefing,
Inner City
Press asked
Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq if
Mulet's report
at the end of
January will
be made
public. Video
here.
We'll see.
Earlier in the
month,
Inner City
Press asked
the Permanent
Representative
of New Zealand
and of
Uruguay,
President of
the Security
Council for
January, about
the report(s).
Video
here.
Ambassador
Gerard van
Bohemen of New
Zealand
expressed
concern.
Ambassador
Rosselli of
Uruguay said
in his
national
capacity that
allegations
should be
dealt with has
his country
had,
apparently a
reference to
Haiti. It
appears the
Security
Council will
take up this
matter.
Earlier
at the January
5 UN noon
briefing,
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric if
now Ladsous,
in the
Security
Council right
then on CAR,
would
belatedly
answer
questions,
since the
firing /
scapegoating
of former
mission chief
Babacar Gaye
clearly didn't
end the rapes.
From the
transcript:
I wanted
to ask but
CAR, since you
have this new
report.
One, I guess
I’d like to…
since Mr.
[Hervé]
Ladsous is
briefing the
Security
Council today
about CAR and
has yet to
answer any
questions on
the CAR sexual
abuse
allegations
report… I
guess it’s a
timely
request… can
he do a
stakeout, take
questions on
it?
Because it
seems like
Babacar Gaye
was fired, but
the problems
go on.
So this is a
request.
It seems like
a reasonable
one
But as
noted (and Vined, here), Ladsous did not
answer.
Back on
December 18,
Inner City
Press asked
the UN:
Inner City
Press: I
wanted to ask
you again
about
yesterday’s
released
Central
African
Republic
report.
What I wanted
to ask, in
reading it
more closely,
that given the
finding about
the now left
the UN head of
OIOS (Office
of Internal
Oversight
Services)…
first of all,
can you say…
you answered
yesterday that
Mr. [Anders]
Kompass is
still under
investigation.
Given how
pretty
definitive the
report is, is
he under
investigation
in connection
with the
release of the
CAR report or
with the
Western Sahara
allegations
or…
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric:
I have no… I
don’t have
those details.
Inner City
Press:
Given that
Miss [Carman]
Lapointe’s
deputy, Mr.
[Michael]
Stefanovic,
recused
himself and
spoke out
basically
against what
she was doing
and that a Mr.
Finness
continued, is
there any… of
Mr. Finness is
the third one
down…
Spokesman:
I don’t think
Mr. Stefanovic
is her
deputy.
He’s the
investigator
chief.
Inner City
Press:
Exactly.
I guess what
I’m saying is
the finding… I
mean, for
example, they
looked at this
chief of staff
of Ban Ki-Moon
and not Ban
Ki-Moon.
They looked at
her activities
at the meeting
in Turin, in
setting up the
meeting,
whether if it
was
appropriate or
not. In
the case of
OIOS, is it…
the things
that OIOS did,
is it entirely
contributable
to Ms.
Lapointe or
are they the
continuing?
Is the
continuing of
the
investigation
of Mr. Kompass
consistent
with the
directive of
the report?
Spokesman:
The
investigation,
as far as I
know, is
continuing.
And I’m not
going to
analyse the
rest of your
question.
Once the
report came
out from under
embargo at the
noon briefing
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric what
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon will
do about the
findings
against
Ladsous, and
that he
escaped the
“abuse of
authority”
moniker only
because “the
mandate of the
Panel is to
assess whether
an abuse of
authority has
occurred in
connection
with the
Allegations.”
Since
the abusers
Ladsous let
into MINUSCA
were not the
French troops
who are
accused of
rape -- these
troops are not
in MINUSCA --
Ladsous'
malfeasance is
not “in
connection”
with the
Allegations.
But is it
acceptable?
Dujarric seems
unfamiliar
with the
report; he
implied that
the third
person found
to have abused
authority was
the Ethics
Officer, when
it was a lower
level official
in CAR. Inner
City Press
asked what
this all says
about Ban
Ki-moon's
management,
along with the
John Ashe / Ng
Lap Seng and
Bernardino
Leon scandal,
a question
Dujarric did
not allow
Inner City
Press to asked
Ban himself on
December 16.
“Those are
your words,”
Dujarric
replied. Yes,
they are.
When
the Panel's
three members
held their
press
conference,
Inner City
Press asked
about Ladsous'
failure to vet
and his
linking of
rapes to
“R&R.” Video here. Marie
Deschamps said
pointedly she
wouldn't
comment on
Ladsous'
remarks;
Yasmin Sooka
said these are
crimes for
punishment,
not
recreation.
As the
last question,
Inner City
Press asked
what it had
wanted to ask
Ban, and tried
to ask
Dujarric: what
does this say
about Ban's
management? Video of Q&A here. Didn't
Ban's chief of
staff
Malcorra,
criticized in
the report, do
it for Ban?
Didn't the
“senior
official” who
ostensibly let
the rape
information
die on the
vine in the
38th floor
work in an
atmosphere
created by
Ban's nine
years? We will
pursue this.
And this: if
OIOS' Lapointe
was wrong,
isn't James
Finness, who
continues the
OIOS campaign?
While the UK
has spoken,
where is
France, given
Sangaris and
Ladsous?
As to
Ladsous, the
finding was
made even
though the
three authors
of the report
do not
mention, and
apparently
have not yet
seen, the
notes from
Ladsous'
October 1,
2015 meeting
about the CAR
mission with Burundi's
Vice President,
in which
Ladsous said
he is
“pragmatic” on
human rights,
in Burundi and
by extension
elsewhere, nor
Ladsous'
September 11,
2015 on-camera
comments
linking the
rapes to
“R&R,” video here.
But
Ladsous still
as of December
17 holds the
senior UN
position into
which France,
which has
chosen the
last four
heads of UN
Peacekeeping,
put him in
September
2011. How much
longer?
By contrast,
the former
head of OIOS
Carman
Lapointe, of
whom the panel
finds an abuse
of authority,
is
conveniently
gone, as is
Babacar Gaye,
who worked for
Ladsous at the
CAR mission.
Perhaps
it was easier
for the panel
to make the
formal finding
against people
who had
already left
the UN by the
time the
report was
released.
One
wonders: if
responses like
Ladsous'
legalistic
(and largely
false)
November 2
letter were
received so
long ago
by the panel,
why did they
withhold the
report all the
way until
December 17,
the day AFTER
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's rare
(and last of
the year) press
conference?
High
Commission
Zeid, of whom
it is said he
was slammed in
the report, in
fact gets the
same treatment
-- critical,
but no formal
abuse of
authority --
as Ladsous,
who is
airbrushed out
and conditions
access to
information
and answers
about
Peacekeeping
on positive /
false
coverage.
The same
finding is
made with
regard to
former Chief
of Staff
Susana
Malcorra. Will
the critical
language hurt
what chance
she has, as a
non Eastern
European, to
try to follow
Ban Ki-moon as
Secretary
General?
More
generally, how
does all this
criticism
reflect on the
tenure of Ban
Ki-moon? The
report does
not mention
the concurrent
scandals
regarding UN
Secretariat
documents
purchased by
now indicted
Ng Lap Seng
through former
President of
the General
Assembly John
Ashe, nor Ban
Libya envoy
taking
instruction
and a cushy
job with the
UAE while
representing
Ban on and in
Libya.
In
December 2015,
Ban allowed
those who
cover him, at
least the UN
Correspondents
Association,
to sell
seats with him
for $6,000.
And it is
these same who
have
airbrushed out
Ladsous and
others.
The
Panelists --
Marie
Deschamps,
Hassan Jallow
and Yasmin
Sooka -- leave
unnamed a
senior officer
in Ban
Ki-moon's
office
(finding that
he misspoke
when he said
he had
informed
Deputy Jan
Eliasson),
without saying
if the officer
remains in the
same position.
We'll have
more on this. Follow @innercitypressFollow @FUNCA_info
, 
