On
Darfur Rapes,
UK Rycroft
Tells ICP UN
Reviews May
Ensure
Follow-Up
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, June
29, more
here --
With UN
Peacekeeping
still
providing few
to no updates
on its UNAMID
mission's
under-reporting
of attacks in
Darfur,
including 200
reported rapes
in Tabit in
October 2014,
Inner City
Press on June
29 asked UK
Ambassador
Matthew
Rycroft about
Tabit and the
subsequently
reported cover
up of rapes in
the Central
African
Republic, and
about what can
be done. Video
here. UK
transcript:
Inner
City Press:
Ambassador
Rycroft, you
mentioned
Tabit and the
rapes that
took place
there last
November. I
wanted to know
what, if
anything, can
done at this
point to get
to the bottom
of that
situation. And
do you think
that this
Ramos-Horta
report or the
response to
the Central
African
Republic’s
seemingly
similar kind
of cover up or
underreporting,
can this be
solved, so
that going
forward so
that UNAMID
and other
missions don’t
cover up what
seems to be
sexual abuse
in conflict.
PR Rycroft:
Well there are
very serious
allegations of
sexual
exploitation
and abuse in
Darfur and
elsewhere
around the
world, as you
have
mentioned. It
is important
wherever there
are
allegations,
they must be
vigorously
followed up,
pursued,
investigated.
There is a
very important
role for UN
Peacekeeping
missions
around the
world to do
that and to
set the
highest
standards of
behaviour
amongst their
troops. And I
think there
are
opportunities
through the
Review of
Peace
Operations,
through the
review of the
Peacebuilding
architecture
and later this
year through
the review of
the whole
Women, Peace
and Security
Agenda to make
further
progress on
that issue.
Back
on March 17
Inner City
Press asked
that month's
Security
Council
president,
Francois
Delattre of
France, if the
issue came up
in closed door
consultation.
Inner City
Press
specifically
asked Delattre
about the
November 9
press release
by the
peacekeeping
mission UNAMID
which said
there was no
evidence of
rape and that
Tabit
residents get
along well
with Sudanese
security
forces --
essentially
covering up
the rapes.
Delattre to
his credit did
respond to the
question,
saying that
the issue came
up in
consultation
and mentioning
a November
Press
STATEMENT by
the Security
Council urging
access. But
the Press
RELEASE by the
UNAMID
mission, which
remains
online, has
yet to be
explained or
addressed, and
UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous
refused to
answer Press
questions on
it on March
17.
We'll have
more on this.
From
the French
Mission's
March 17, 2015
transcript:
Q : On
the mass rapes
allegations
that were made
in Tabit in
October, could
you give us
some sense in
the
consultations
of what
Council
members are
expecting DPKO
and Unamid to
do to get
access ? Also
how they
explained the
9 November
2014 press
release which
said the rapes
didn’t happen
and that
people were
happy with the
army. What is
it going to be
done about
that?
A:
First, as soon
as the news of
these horrible
rapes broke,
DPKO requested
Unamid to
launch an
investigation
which faced
considerable
restrictions
of access from
the Sudanese
Government.
Secondly,
as you said
the Security
Council in a
press
statement back
in November
called on the
Sudanese
authorities to
allow the full
and
unrestricted
freedom of
movement for
Unamid to be
able to
conduct its
investigation
without any
interference.
This
issue was
raised during
the
consultations
this morning
and Hervé
Ladsous
mentioned the
fact that
efforts are
ongoing to
continue the
investigation.
In other
words, we
don’t give up.
Back on
January 26
Inner City
Press asked
Security
Council
ambassadors
Mark Lyall
Grant of the
UK and
Raimonda
Murmokaite of
Lithuania,
"what happened
with UNAMID
going back for
real
investigation
of rapes in
Tabit?"
Lyall Grant replied,
"We continue
to press DPKO
to encourage
UNAMID to
revert on the
Tabit
allegations."
Murmokaite
added,
"have been
raising the
issue at
consultations,
will
continue."
And
so Inner City
Press at the
January 26 UN
noon briefing
asked
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric, video here:
Inner
City
Press: two of
the Security
Council
ambassadors
this morning
said they
continued to
ask DPKO to
ensure that
the Tabit site
of alleged
mass rapes is
revisited. I
want to know
has any action
been taken on
that? Has
there been any
move by
UNAMID?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
The request to
visit Tabit
stands.
There's
nothing to
report.
Nothing
to report?
Back on
January 8
Inner City
Press asked
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, video
here:
Inner
City Press:
what has the
UN system done
in order to
get access
again to
Thabit in
Darfur, where
there were
allegedly 200
rapes, and
then the
Government
didn’t allow
any
inspectors.
What have you
done since we
last spoke on
it?
SG
Ban: As for
the first part
of the
question, as
you know, we
tried to have
a thorough
investigation.
This report
might not have
been
sufficient
because of the
lack of full
cooperation of
the
authorities on
the ground.
That has
really
hampered our
authorities to
go into the
field and get
a thorough
investigation.
It is
important that
we have to
have a
thorough
investigation
and as a
matter of
principle,
there should
be a clear
accountability
process and
justice. I am
firm about
this matter.
And we will,
in the course
of time, have
better
information on
this matter.
While
appreciated,
it is widely
recognized
that the more
time goes by,
the more
difficult a
credible rape
investigation
becomes. So
why did UNAMID
issue a
cover-up
November 9
press release?
On December 12
in
International
Criminal Court
prosecutor
Fatou
Bensouda's six-month
report to the
Security
Council, she
said that the
reported rapes
in Tabit
should "shock
the Council
into action."
But will it?
To some, the
Council
appears to
have moved on.
Bensouda, who
like the
Security
Council
members was
given only the
Executive
Summary of Ban
Ki-moon's
cover up (of
cover up)
report on
Darfur,
thanked Ban
for the report
and hoped that
it would be
acted on.
Belatedly
ensuring that
UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous
answers
questions
about his and
his
Department's
performance
would be a
start.
Ten days after
after the UN
issued a
statement on
its internal
investigation
into charges
it covered-up
attacks in
Darfur, its
UNAMID mission
there on
November 9
issued a
statement that
"village
community
leaders
reiterated to
UNAMID that
they coexist
peacefully
with local
military
authorities in
the area" and
that no
evidence of
rape was
found.
On
December 4,
Inner City
Press asked
Ladsous, Why
did UNAMID not
say on
November 9
that it was
surrounded by
soldiers? Video here, and
embedded
below.
As is his
habit, Ladsous
did not answer
on December 4,
even with his
UN
Peacekeeping
under fire for
cover ups. It
is a pattern
with Ladsous.
He refused
Press
questions for
months about
rapes in
Eastern Congo
in Minova by
DRC Army units
his UN
Peacekeeping
supports: video compilation here;Vine
here.
On the morning
of December 4
Ladsous
claimed to the
Security
Council that
UNAMID's
findings were
"inconclusive"
due to army
presence. But
his UNAMID's
press release
whitewashed
the situation
in Tabit and
did not
mention the
army presence.
The
covering-up
continues,
with no
credibility,
as Ladsous did
on the Minova
raped by DR
Congo Army
units his UN
Peacekeeping
supports.
On
November 25, a
wide range of
groups in
Darfur
petitioned the
UN Security
Council about
UNAMID's
malfeasance.
Inner City
Press that
morning
obtained the
letter (h/t)
and put
it online in
full here.
While
UN
Spokesperson
Stephane
Dujarric, when
Inner City
Press asked at
noon, said he
had not seen
the letter, by
6 pm when
Inner City
Press asked
November's
Security
Council
president
about the
letter, he
confirmed
receipt.
Quinlan said
he had
circulated the
letter to the
other 14
Council
members -- as
of 3 pm, one
of them had
not yet
received it --
and that he
expects the
issues to be
considered
when the
Security
Council takes
up UNAMID
"next week,
under Chad's
presidency."
(On
November 26,
the UK Mission
to the UN"s
Arran Skinner
told Inner
City Press, "I
can confirm
that we
received the
letter
indirectly. In
terms of
contents, on
alleged rape
cases, the
Security
Council issued
a press
statement
calling for a
full
investigation.
The UK
initiated the
call for a
press
statement and
so agree that
this issue
needs to be
looked at.")
On Ban
Ki-moon's
report into
UNAMID
under-reporting
attacks on
civilians and
even
peacekeepers,
Inner City
Press asked
and Quinlan
repeated it
should be
taken up soon,
the question
is finding the
right,
credible (or
disinterested)
briefer. Watch
this site for
that.
Inner City
Press at the
November 17 UN
noon briefing
asked Ban's
deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq
about Sudanese
forces having
filmed
UNAMID's
interviews.
Who is going
to take
action, on
whom, about
that? Inner
City Press and
the new Free
UN Coalition
for Access are
asking.