Inner City Press

Inner City Press -- Investigative Reporting From the United Nations to Wall Street to the Inner City

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

Google
  Search innercitypress.com Search WWW (censored?)

In Other Media-eg AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

,



Follow us on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

RSS

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



As Reuters Turns Routine Quotes into Breaking News, Why Is Dying Media Bitter?

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, February 6 – How mechanical and servile have the wire service correspondents at the UN gotten?

  On February 4 when incoming Security Council president Kim Sook held a press conference, he was constrained by “tradition” as he put it to call on the UN Correspondents Association first.

  But under the current leadership, the best UNCA could come up with was a question by the new president Pam Falk about how North Korea was going to perform a nuclear test “in the next few days or even sooner.”

  Kim Sook launched into an answer that most journalists at the UN – and elsewhere – did not find newsworthy. An understandable answer, from South Korea's Permanent Representative. But hardly breaking news.

  But UNCA's First Vice President Louis Charbonneau of Reuters, who'd plopped down next to Pam Falk before she asked her question, then rose and ran up the auditorium stairs and out. He filed this quote as a snap alert, and later filed a three paragraph story based only on the quote.

  Is this journalism or stenography? As in other recent Charbonneau re-types of Ban Ki-moon expressions of concern, and Reuters' use of blind quotes of the UN declaring war in DRC, where is the value added?


Reuters' Charbonneau reaches for Ban Ki-moon, snaps and sleazy anonymous tweets, continuing, not shown, (c) Luiz Rampelloto

  Never mind that some few others made even more of Kim Sook's quote, making it appear at least from those headlines as if they'd had a one on one interview with Kim Sook rather than just sat upstairs in a cubicle watching it on UN TV.

 (In fairness, Agence France Presse is doing so little actual journalism at the UN that if it weren't for stories spoon-fed by the French Mission or its dump-job in UN Peacekeeping Herve Ladsous, Tim Witcher and AFP at the UN might have nothing at all.)

  What's the point of being inside the UN if that's how you cover it? And spend your time anonymously tweeting against those who dare question this state of affairs, or dare actually ask questions? To be continued – watch this site.

Share |

* * *

These reports are usually also available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.

Click here for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City Press at UN

Click for  BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

UN Office: S-253, UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Google
  Search innercitypress.com  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

            Copyright 2006-2012 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com