On
Syria,
Russia & China Willing to Negotiate Press Statement,
Lebanon Blocked
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April 28 -- The morning after the UN Security Council failed
to agree on a press statement about Syria, triggering an open meeting
and subsequent media stakeouts, Council sources have described to
Inner City Press the counter-intuitive background to the failure to
agree.
In
a closed
meeting of the Permanent Five members of the Security Council, before
the full Council held consultations, both Russia and China expressed
a willingness to negotiate about the draft press statement.
During
that
meeting, a source quotes the Permanent Representative of the United
Kingdom, Mark Lyall Grant, as saying that the goal was to address
media pressure about Syria, and that the UK has or had no intention
to become substantively involved in Syria.
More
solidly, in
the consultations of the full Council that followed, the UK announced
that one member was opposed, that no consensus was possible and that
an open meeting would be held.
It
was known, even
at the time of the P-5 consultations, that at least one member --
Lebanon -- had instructions not to agree to any Security Council
press statement, which under Council rules requires unanimity.
In
the
consultations of the whole Council, there was no discussion of the
draft press statement.
Even
a Western
member has confirmed to Inner City Press that Russia and China on
April 27 expressed a willingness to negotiate around the press
statement on Syria, albeit with “substantial changes,” as the
Western member puts it, implying that Russia's and China's
willingness may have been made easier by their knowledge that Lebanon
would block any press statement.
Ban & Assad, no UN envoy (or UNSC press statement) shown
During
the open
meeting, both Russia and China described the situation in Syria as
sensitive, with China referring to the possibility of impacting the
global economic recovery. Lebanese Ambassador Nawaf Salam's speech
referred to the close historical ties between Syria and Lebanon.
Afterward
in
media stakeouts, after French Ambassador Gerard Araud described
France's “four prong” strategy, Inner City Press asked Syria's
Permanent Representative Bashar Ja'afari about Lebanon's position,
and what his vote count was.
Ja'afari
said, you
know the dynamics of the Council, if you have the P-5 you can move
forward, implying that Russia and China had opposed discussion of any
press statement. This is how many reported it. But this, and not
that, is true.
* * *
On
Syria,
Security Council Member Tells Lebanon That Open Meeting Wasn't a
Good
Idea, All Claim Victory
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee, Exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
27 -- During the public
session of the UN Security
Council on Syria Wednesday afternoon, a handwritten notes was
passed
to Lebanon's Ambassador Nawaf Salam which said, as recounted to Inner
City Press by its author, “Open meeting was not such a good idea
after all.”
Syria,
at
least
publicly, thinks differently. Its Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari told the
press after the meeting that a Western attempt to hijack the Security
Council's Middle East agenda item had failed.
Inner
City
Press
asked Ja'afari what he estimated the vote count to be in the Security
Council. You know the dynamics of the Council, Ja'afari told Inner
City Press, if you have the Permanent Five members you can do what
you want. He emphasized that Russia and China were with him.
Ja'afari
ignored
and
did not answer Inner City Press' question about Lebanon's
position.
But
sources in the
Council tell Inner City Press that Lebanese Ambassador Nawaf Salam,
who later received the above-quoted note, was opposed to the Council
issuing any press statement on Syria.
The struggle
in Beirut between
the Hariris' Future Movement, described by some as supporting the
demonstrators in Syria, and those aligned with Hezbollah plays itself
out in the positions that Salam takes in New York.
When
Inner
City
Press asked French Ambassador Gerard Araud, usually voluble on
Lebanon, what he made of Salam's speech and position during the
Council's open meeting, Araud said to “ask Lebanon.”
Communications
to
Lebanon,
as noted, were in writing. And in the UN Security Council
things get more surreal, or UNreal, every day.
Footnotes:
Araud
emphasized
to the press France's strategy to hold Assad to account in the UN
Human Rights Council -- on which Syria is seeking a seat. The US is
opposing Syria's bid, while Ja'afari on
Wednesday condemned the US for giving "six million dollars... to Barada
TV" based in London. (Ja'afari cited the
Washington Post, after saying "don't believe media accounts.")
Meanwhile Barada TV says it has an annual budget of only $1 million. We'll have
more on all this. Watch this site.
* * *
At
UN,
Open
Meeting on Syria after Statement Blocked- by Lebanon, Sources Say
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
27 -- On Syria, when diplomats emerged from the UN
Security Council Wednesday afternoon to say there was no consensus
that the Council should issue a press statement,
many
assumed it was
Russia, and perhaps China, which had inside blocked the statement.
Russia,
it
is
true, last week blocked a statement on Yemen. Inside the Council, the
Russians ultimately blamed it on the leak of the draft statement,
which Inner City Press exclusively published while Russia said it was
waiting for instructions.
But
in explanation
of the blockage Wednesday afternoon, which triggered an open meeting
of the Council, well placed sources tell Inner City Press it was
Lebanon which said in consultation it had instruction not to agree to
a press statement of any kind.
This,
a
source
said, is Syria's position. A Council Press Statement requires all 15
to agree, so without Lebanon it would not be possible. Watch this site
* * *
At
UN
on
Yemen,
Russia
Blocks Lebanese & German Security Council
Statement Supporting
GCC
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee,
Exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
19
--
When the UN Security Council got a briefing
on
Yemen on April 19, a statement was proposed by Germany and
Lebanon. But it was not agreed to.
Inner
City
Press
has
seen
the proposed statement, and it is very simple:
“The
members of the Security Council heard a briefing from... on the
situation in Yemen.
“They
expressed their concern at the political crisis in Yemen, and called
on the parties to exercise restraint and to enter into a
comprehensive dialogue to realize the legitimate aspirations of the
Yemeni people.
“They
also expressed their full support to the mediation role of the Gulf
Cooperation Council.”
A
Western
spokesperson told the Press pointedly that “the usual suspects”
had blocked this simple statement by saying that they needed
instructions from their capitals. Other sources in the Council,
however, reduce the suspects to a single one: Russia.
They
describe
a
standoff
between
the second and third highest diplomats in Russia's
Mission to the UN -- top ambassador Vitaly Churkin was not involved
-- and Lebanon's Permanent Representative Nawaf Salam.
The
Russians,
they say, asked Salam why Lebanon wasn't taking the anti-statement
position. Salam in turn raised his voice, saying that Russia should
be following the Arab countries' lead, and that Russia's Ambassador
in Beirut would to asked to explain why not.
Inner
City
Press
will
venture
this explanation: Russia sees the GCC as a pro-American
grouping and does not want to support it.
Ban & Saleh, previously, Russia and 2d term not shown
Another
Western
spokesman,
on
background,
said that the real purpose of the briefing
was to provide support to the Gulf Cooperation Council mediation in
Yemen. A well placed UN source told Inner City Press this was
wishful thinking, that the GCC process would need outside support or
“content.”
The
reason for the
Western countries deferring to the GCC, he said, was that “probably
only a GCC country would be willing to take Yemen's president” Ali
Abdullah Saleh if
he stepped down.
While
the
UN
Secretariat
seems
to feel positive about the Security Council session
and that it could do more in Yemen than the GCC can, others predict
that Russia will not get instructions for the rest of the shortened
week, and the statement will die. The questions is whether this is
another thing Russia will admonish Ban Ki-moon about during his
upcoming visit there. We'll see. Watch this site.
Footnote:
As
US
Ambassador
Susan
Rice left the meeting, she was asked if Syria
had also been discussed. “No,” he said. Why not? Because the
topic was Yemen, she said as she left. But Syria did come up in the
Security Council during Monday's “horizon” briefing by Lynn
Pascoe. Watch this site.
Click
for Mar 1, '11
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption
Click
here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate
on
Sri
Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A,
UN,
NY
10017
USA
Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner
City
Press
are
listed
here,
and
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner
City
Press,
Inc.
To
request
reprint
or
other
permission,
e-contact
Editorial
[at]
innercitypress.com
-
|