US
Says South Sudan Shot First In Abyei, UN
Still Silent, Who Else'll Speak?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
May 21 -- As the conflict in Abyei escalates, what does the
US know that the UN doesn't? Saturday night US spokesman Jay Carney
issued a threat to Sudan, while noting that “the United States
deplored the May 19 attack by Southern forces on a United Nations
convoy that was transporting a Sudan Armed Forces company.”
But
the UN, which
was present during the attack, has yet to assign blame. At the UN's
May
20 noon briefing, Inner City Press asked UN spokesman Martin
Nesirky who was responsible for starting the May 19 fighting: “what
was the UN’s own observation, being there present at the time of
the shooting, of who started it?”
Rather
than saying
what the UN, which was there, has seen, Nesirky again called for the
combatants to investigate it themselves, saying “isn’t that what
an investigation is supposed to ascertain?”
But
in short
order, Khartoum dissolved the Abyei administration, and tanks were
rolling. The Security Council confirmed what was already known -- due
to the threat of International Criminal Court indictee Ahmed Haroun
showing up on the tarmac in Kadulgi: they would not visit.
But
can they
accomplish in Khartoum and Juba, even armed with Jay Carney's
statement? And will any other country other than the US speak out on
it, unilaterally or bilaterally as the case may be?
UN air craft near Abyei, UN ascribing blame, UNSC and Haroun not shown
From
the UN's
May
20 noon briefing transcript:
Inner
City
Press: first I wanted to ask you about, in Sudan, this incident,
this shooting incident in Dokura, yesterday. The SPLM [Sudan
People’s Liberation Movement] have denied reports that they were
the ones that fired; in fact, they are saying that the North, that
Northern soldiers who were retreating fired first. So I just wonder,
since the UN was there, and was… you are calling for an
investigation by the parties, but the parties have already said, each
has a totally different story. So what can the UN do to find… if
they were there, who fired first and what are they taking to…?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
Well, isn’t that the point? If we are asking for an
investigation by the parties, that’s what needs to happen, that
there should be an immediate investigation into the incident and then
appropriate action taken against the perpetrators. We’ve strongly
condemned, and the Mission has strongly condemned, this attack. We’ve
said this is a serious breach of previous agreements and also
it was an attack, a criminal attack, against the United Nations.
Inner
City
Press: My question is, if they were present, maybe there is a
mechanism that needs to investigate it, but what was the UN’s own
observation, being there present at the time of the shooting, of who
started it?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
Well, isn’t that what an investigation is supposed to
ascertain? And that’s why there should be an immediate
investigation into the incident.
Too
late. Watch
this site.
* * *
As
UN
Won't Blame for Abyei Violence, Council Visit in Doubt, Haroun
Looms
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
May 20 -- As the UN Security Council mission approaches
Sudan, its long planned stopover in Abyei is in doubt.
A
Council
Permanent Representative predicted to Inner City Press on Friday that
Abyei “will be canceled,” leaving only Khartoum and Juba in
Sudan. Darfur was already left out of the trip.
As
Inner City
Press exclusively reported, Sudan and some Council
members pointed to
the claimed electoral win as South Kordofan government of Ahmed
Haroun as a militating against the Council refusing to meet with
Haroun, indicted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes
in Darfur.
French
Permanent
Representative Gerard Araud told Inner City Press, “We will not
meet with him.”
But
another
Permanent Representative, pointing to Haroun's win and “the UN
welcoming” it, asked on what basis other Council memberswould avoid
the governor of a state they sought to visit.
Now
despite
earlier claims that UN Peacekeeping could safety get the ambassadors
to Abyei via the Wau or Kadugli airports, the talk is of canceling
the Abyei leg of the trip.
Also being
cited is recent fighting in
Abyei -- fighting which even those the UN peacekeepers were right
there to witness they are declining to assign any blame for.
* * *
As
Sudan
Asks
Why Haroun Shouldn't Meet UN Council,
Journalists Detained
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
May
19 -- With the UN Security
Council en route to Africa,
their possible encounter in Sudan with Ahmed Haroun, indicted by
the
International Criminal Court for war cimres in Darfur, remains a wild
card.
On
May 18 French
Ambassador Gerard Araud told Inner City Press, when asked about
Haroun, that “we will not meet with him.”
But
a Sudanese
diplomat on May 19 asked Inner City Press, “Why not? He was just
legitimately elected.” The diplomat pointed at the statement by UN
Mission in Sudan chief Haile Menkerios welcoming the election on
South Kordofan.
At
the UN's noon
briefing on May 19 Inner City Press asked
UN
spokesman Martin
Nesirky:
Inner
City
Press:
on this trip, there are conflicting reports in Sudan
about whether the trip includes a stop in Kadugli and Abyei, and
whether they will meet with Ahmed Haroun, who is indicted by the ICC
[International Criminal Court]. So I wanted to know, you’d said
there is more information, I’d try to pass through and see it, but
it has… what is the status of, even just the logistics, is the
Council in fact going to Abyei via Kadugli and is… will Mr. Haroun
be present?
Spokesperson:
I
think that’s a good idea; pass by and we can give you more
details. But to my knowledge, there is no meeting planned with Mr.
Haroun, to my knowledge.
Planning
is
one
thing, and the presence at the airport of the Governor of South
Kordofan, declared winner of an election praised by the UN, is
another.
The
UN belated
provided Inner City Press with this response about journalists
detained for covering the election:
From:
UN
Spokesperson
- Do Not Reply [at] un.org
Date: Thu, May 19, 2011
at 4:21 PM
Subject: Your question on journalists in Sudan
To:
Matthew.Lee [at] InnerCityPress.com
Regarding
your
question
about the arrests of two journalists in Sudan (Mohamed
El Fateh Himma and Rushan Aoushi) on 14 May 2011 in Jebel Awlia
(Khartoum State): The UN Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) has followed up on
that matter with its sources on the ground.
The
Mission
learned
that the two journalists were reportedly returning
from Southern Kordofan State when they were stopped on the road by
Sudanese Armed Forces Military Intelligence at around 08:00 on 14
May. The journalists were then transferred to the custody of the
National Security Service (NSS), which reportedly interrogated them.
The two journalists were released by the National Security Service
without charge after approximately ten hours.
And
that was the
entire response. The UN apparently has no comment on this. Watch this
site.
* * *
UN
Admits
2d
Flight
of
ICC
Darfur
Indictee
Haroun
to
Abyei
in Sudan, Impunity
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March
4,
updated -- The UN
has for a second time offered a free UN
flight in Sudan to Ahmed Haroun, under indictment by the
International Criminal Court for war crimes in Darfur, the UN
admitted Friday in response to questions from Inner City Press.
On
March 3 the UN
Security Council met about renewed fighting in the disputed Abyei
region. Back in January, Inner City Press got the UN to acknowledge
they had flown ICC indictee Haroun from South Kordofan, where he
serves fellow ICC indictee Omar al Bashir as governor, to Abyei.
The
UN has defended
this controversial flight by saying that Haroun and Haroun alone
could stop violence in Abyei. The UN never explained why the
government of Sudan, which has an air force currently bombing civilians
in Jebel Marra in Darfur, couldn't itself fly Haroun.
The
UN said it was
a scheduled flight, then UN Mission in Sudan chief Haile Menkerios
admitted to
Inner City Press that it was a special flight. Inner City Press is
told such flights cost $40,000, and the UN has confirm no
reimbursement has been sought from the Bashir government.
But
now the
violence has continued, making the UN flight of ICC indictee Haroun
harder to justify even by the UN's own argument.
March
3
in
front
of
the
Security
Council,
Inner
City
Press
asked Council president for
March Li Baodong of China if the UN Peacekeeping official who briefed
the Council, Atul Khare, had mentioned if Haroun would again be flown
in a UN helicopter. Li Baodong did not directly answer.
At
the March 4 UN
noon briefing, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's
spokesman Martin Nesirky to confirm or deny that that the UN would
once again fly ICC indictee Haroun to Abyei, even now that his work in
connection with the first flight has proved ineffective.
Nesirky
said
he
would
check.
Ten
minutes
later,
Nesirky's
deputy
Farhan
Haq announced
by speaker to all UN correspondents that yes, Haroun attended today's
meeting in Abyei, and yes, “he was transported” by the UN.
This
UN
promotes
impunity,
even
for
one
of
the
few
people
indicted for war crimes by
the ICC. Meanwhile Ban Ki-moon brags about the Security Council's partial
referral of the situation in Libya to the ICC -- a referral that Ban
Ki-moon did not even call for until after the Council voted to make
the referral.
This
UN
is
promoting
and
enshrining
lawlessness,
with
no
transparency
or
accountability.
Watch this site.
Update
of 3:48 pm -- Human Rights Watch, via Richard Dicker, submitted
this
comment:
“This
is the second time in recent weeks the UN has transported Ahmed
Haroun who is charged by the ICC with war crimes in Darfur. We have
real concerns because the U.N. should not be in the business of
transporting Haroun. There needs to be an extremely high threshold of
urgency for such action by UNMIS.”
Responses
have
been
sought
from
the
Missions
to
the
UN
of
France, the UK and the US,
with the latter two asked if they knew in advance of the UN's new
flight of ICC indictee Haroun. Given her
statements
this
year
about
social
media, & after hours of non-response by the US Mission
to the UN,@AmbassadorRice
has been asked directly as well. Watch
this site.
Update
of
4:30
pm
--
Then
this,
from
UK
Mission
to
the UN spokesman Daniel
Shepherd:
“As
spokesperson, I would only reiterate the message that my two
Ambassadors have both said on the record (and published by Inner City
Press) first time around: that we aren’t going to second guess how
UNMIS fulfills its mandate to provide good offices to the
Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) parties in efforts to resolve
differences through dialogue and negotiations. I’d only add that
this work is particularly important at this sensitive time, to
contain any potential escalation after the recent Abyei violence.”
We could
note
again that violence has persisted despite the UN flying ICC indictee
Ahmed Haroun in the first time, and that it is the role of UN member
states to oversee the UN Secretariat, not to defer in this case to
what some see as its promotion of impunity - but at least the UK
would put its position on the record.
Update
of
4:43
pm
--
this
too
has
come
in,
perhaps
in response:
Date:
Fri,
Mar
4,
201
Subject: Haroun and Abyei
To: Matthew.Lee [at]
innercitypress.com
You
guys
ask
great
questions!
Have
you
noticed
perhaps
that
the
United
Nations seems to be unaware of who is causing the violence in Abyei.
And yet "diplomatic sources" report seeing the burial of 33
bodies - all southerners.
The
Arab
nomads
say
the
violence
started
when
SPLM
police
shot
at them
(Hitler used a similar ploy to invade Poland) - and today thousands
of civilians fled Abyei fearing another crisis like in June 2008. The
Dinka Ngok villages north of Abyei, such as Maker, have been
burnt to the ground. The end explains the means. There is a
creeping ethnic cleansing going on in the Abyei region despite the
agreements of 2005 and the Court of Arbitration ruling in 2010.
Why
fly
Haroun
to
Abyei
-
what
is
his
cv?
It
is, as you correctly point
out, that of arming arab militias to burn villages. I hope to see
more of your questions pinning the UN to the responsibility to
protect.
Click
for Mar 1, '11
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate
on
Sri
Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A,
UN,
NY
10017
USA
Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner
City
Press
are
listed
here,
and
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner
City
Press,
Inc.
To
request
reprint
or
other
permission,
e-contact
Editorial
[at]
innercitypress.com
-
|