Inner City Press





In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYTAzerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .



These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis
,



Share |   

Follow on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

(FP Twitterati 100, 2013)

ICP on YouTube

More: InnerCityPro

BloggingHeads.tv
Sept 24, 2013

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

FOIA Finds  

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Deliverymen Suing Matsu Sushi Under FSLA Get to Trial Now a Dispute on Squishy Memory

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC - Guardian UK - Honduras - ESPN

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Sept 24– Qiang Lu sued Matsu Sushi of 483 Columbus Avenue in Manhattan for failure to pay overtime and to provide required information "in Chinese, [his] native language." 

  On September 24, 2021 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker held a proceeding. Inner City Press covered it, here. Now in August 2022 it's come to trial, see below.

  On September 24, 2021, the Law Offices of Vincent S. Wong, for the defendants, asked for an extension of time for discovery, and got it.

Jump cut to August 22, 2022 when the civil trial began before Judge John P. Cronan, to whom the case was reassigned. Inner City Press went and covered it. The questioning was about when a half day was added - in 2015? There were only two other people in the gallery of Courtroom 12D.

On August 23, the redirect examination was doing long. Judge Cronan told plaintiffs' counsel to stay within the scope of the cross examination. On re-cross, the witness acknowledged he had in those days swapped shifts, and couldn't remember which day, no one could. The next witness dramatically identified the defendant, by point and saying, He is wearing black clothing.

On August 24, the defense was questioning a plaintiff why his name did not appear in a handwritten notebook of who got paid, in and before December, 2016. Judge Cronan said to move you, if they had already stipulated to this.

In the docket are dueling emails about stipulations, including an argument to exclude before "the jury will gain no additional clarity... given how squishy his memory of his employment at the 28th Street and 27th Street locations were." The trial will continue.

The case is Lu, et al. v. Purple Sushi, Inc. et al., 19-cv-5828 (Cronan)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com