In
SDNY Ari Teman Before Sentencing
Today Wanted Info on BofA US
Says No Role for Jury
By Matthew
Russell Lee,
Patreon
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Dec 1 – While
many even most
cases in the
Magistrates
Court of the U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York are
sealed or have
case numbers
given only
later, on September
6, 2019
Magistrate
Judge Sarah Netburn
arraigned four
defendants in
a case that
even long
after the fact
was still
listed as
sealed:
19-cr-627.
It has since
been unsealed.in
A case
back on on September
6 that wasn't
sealed
involved Ari
Teman who
allegedly
deposited
counterfeit
checks into a
bank account
in Florida,
then
transferred
and withdrew
$4000 of the
funds from the
same bank at a
branch in
Manhattan.
Back on June
20, 2019, by
coincidence
before the
same
Magistrate
Judge who
eight weeks
later released
Teman on a
$25,000 bond,
NYPD Detective
Daniel
Alessandrino
swore out that
Teman for the
scheme used
his company
GateGuard Inc,
based in New
York, NY..
Why
Teman thought
he could
deposit over
$200,000 in
funds from
companies
which exist
but had not
authorized the
payment is not
known. His
lawyer is
Joseph A.
DiRuzzo of
Fort
Lauderdale,
Florida, with
a notice of
appearance
first
digitally
signed, then
re-filed
upside down.
Inner City
Press will
continue to
follow this
case and has.
Now on
the eve of
sentencing,
the US
Attorney's
Office has
apparently
reduced the
amount of
money it is
seeking, while
Teman insists
he is ready to
pay
$259,988.17
while
demanding to
know more
about the US
Attorney's
Office's
communications
with Bank of
America. There
is a "Sealed
Document
placed in
vault" on
November 30,
the day before
virtual
sentencing is
scheduled.
And
later still on
November 30
the US replied
with a quote
from Judge
Robert W.
Sweet that
"Under Rule
32.2 of the
Federal Rules
of Criminal
Procedure, if
the Government
seeks to
forfeit
specific
property after
trial, the
defendant and
the Government
each have the
option of
requesting
that the jury
determine
whether the
specific
property is
subject to
forfeiture. If
the Government
seeks a
money
judgment,
however, the
Court alone
determines the
forfeiture
amount at
sentencing”.
So, the
US says, it
"provided both
Rule 16
discovery
material and §
3500 material
relating to
the loss
suffered by
Bank of
America in
connection
with the
offenses of
conviction.
The Government
provided
records to the
Probation
Office
substantiating
the need for
restitution
and forfeiture
in the amount
of
$259,988.17.
Today, the
Government
learned that
Bank of
America was
able to offset
certain losses
it suffered,
and the
Government
promptly
notified the
Court and the
defense that
it was seeking
a lower amount
of forfeiture
and
restitution....
$245,862.95."
oWatch
this site.cappar
No
The
sentencing of
Teman is set
for December 1
at 10:30 am.
The case is US
v. Teman,
19-cr-696
(Engelmayer)
***
Feedback: Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
Box
20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY
NY 10017
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner
City Press, Inc. To request reprint or
other permission, e-contact Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com for
|