| In We Build The Wall Case Kolfage
Lawyer Steinberg Wants More Time, Trial On
Nov 15
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- The
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
July 21–
The Southern District of New
York courthouse, which Inner
City Press has covered nearly
alone this summer amid the
COVID-19 pandemic, was jumping
on August 20. Video here.
In the afternoon, Steve Bannon
would appear in person before
a judge. After pleading not
guilty, he told the press as
he left the courthouse, "This
entire fiasco is to stop
people who want to build the
wall."
This came after
more than two hours of
chanting by three then six
people with flags, pro-Bannon:
"CCP violence, stop the
killing." Inner City Press
spoke with them, video here.
And see coverage
of Guo case here,
podcast here
On August
31, 2020 U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of
New York Judge Analisa Torres
held a proceeding, and Inner
City Press live tweeted it,
below.
On
December 17, Judge Torres held
another proceeding, and Inner
City Press live tweeted it,
below.
On December 27-28
in the case, We Built The Wall
and Kris
Kobach appealed:
"Notice is hereby given that
We Build the Wall, Inc., and
Kris Kobach, nonparty movants
in the above-captioned case,
hereby appeal to the United
States Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit from an
Order denying their Motion to
Modify a Post-Indictment
Restraining Order, entered in
this action on December 14,
2020."
On May 5, 2021
Judge Torres denied the
request without prejudice:
"ORDER - Defendant Brian
Kolfage moves for an order
modifying the post-indictment
restraining order issued on
August 24, 2020, which
prohibits the transfer of
certain funds involved in his
charged offenses (the
"Restraining Order"), ECF No.
64. Alternatively, he requests
a hearing to challenge the
Courts finding that there was
probable cause for the
issuance of the Restraining
Order, ECF No. 77. For the
reasons stated below,
Kolfage's motions are DENIED
without prejudice. By May 19,
2021, Kolfage may submit
evidence demonstrating that he
meets the threshold for a
Monsanto hearing, along with a
motion to seal the affidavit
from the public if desired....
By May 19, 2021, Kolfage may
submit evidence demonstrating
that he meets the threshold
for a Monsanto hearing, along
with a motion to seal the
affidavit from the public if
desired."
On May 6, "LETTER
by USA as to Brian Kolfage
addressed to Judge Analisa
Torres from Assistant United
States Attorney Robert B.
Sobelman dated May 6, 2021 re:
United States v. Brian G.
Kolfage, 21 Cr. 29 (MCR) (N.D.
Fla.) Document filed by USA.
(Sobelman, Robert)." The
charges are "tax related."
Now on July 21,
2021, Judge Torres held a
proceeding leading up to a
trial scheduled for November
15. Inner City Press live
tweeted it here:
Assistant US
Attorney reports on discovery
and says, "Let's set a motion
schedule." Judge Torres: Mr
Steinberg (represents
Kolfage), do you plan motions?
Steinberg: We ask
for 60 days after the last
drop of discovery. Judge
Torres: That's an awfully long
period of time.
AUSA Roos:
The government's view is that
the remaining materials should
not delay a motion schedule.
The defendants already have
the search warrants, and can
make suppression motions; they
have the indictment and can
make motions to dismiss.
AUSA Roos:
The proposal by counsel for
Mr. Kolfaaage would delay the
trial. Steinberg: How about 45
days from today for motions?
Judge Torres. No. That's
also just too long --
Steinberg: We are doing back
to back trials because so many
cases have been continued
Steinberg:
We're having trials every day,
I'm on trial 4 weeks in a row,
2 trials a week. Judge
Torres: When do you start?
Steinberg: I have
two next week. Judge Torres:
When do you expect to be
finished?
Steinberg: The
state hasn't had trials in a
year.
Steinberg:
Next week I have an NFL player
who hasn't been able to play
for a year, because of no
trial.
Judge
Torres: Aug 30 for motions...
Motions in limine and voir
dire by Oct 18... We have a
Nov 15 trial date but I am not
in control, it's now 100%
certain. Judge Torres:
We are adjourned
Watch this site.
The overall case
is US v. Kolfage et al.,
20-cr-412 (Torres).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|
,
