Uber Is Sued
For Using Criminal History To Drop Drivers
Now Discovery Stay Opposed
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
July 31 – Uber has been sued
for unlawfully using criminal
history to discriminate
against its drivers in NYC,
including by
race.
On June
30, U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New
York Judge Lewis J. Liman held
a proceeding. Inner City Press
covered it.
The
complaint describes Uber using
Checkr to dig up a Virginia
ticket that was characterized
as a misdemeanor - leading to
Mr. Golightly being
deactivated from the platform
without any notice or due
process.
Uber is
arguing that the drivers are
bound by agreements to
arbitrate, and to not be in
class actions.
Judge Liman split
the baby, as he put it,
allowing for now limited to
discovery to go forward while
the motion to compel
arbitration is considered.
On July 30, the drivers'
counsel filed a memo opposing
Uber's motion to stay
discovery. The drivers' argue
that their proposed discovery
is targeted to material
issues, citing at least two
Lyft cases.
This case is
Golightly v. Uber
Technologies, Inc. et al.,
21-cv-3005 (Liman)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2021 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|