In
SDNY The Case Of The
Copyrighted Survey Has
Injunction of CEO Summit
Denied By Judge Abrams
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Scoop
Patreon,
thread
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Sept 12 – A
company which
claims its
employees left
en masse
taking with
them
confidential
and even
copyrighted
survey
information
sought an
injunction on
September 12
against the
use of the
contested
survey at the
"AECAL CEO
Summit" in
Manhattan
starting
September 17.
They
lost.
U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York Judge
Ronnie Abrams
asked the
plaintiffs,
EFCG, why they
had sat on
their hands
about the
survey until a
week before
the
conference.
After
reflecting on
the arguments
in her robing
room, Judge
Abrams emerged
to say that
she didn't
even have to
get to
likelihood of
success on the
merits. The
plaintiffs
having delayed
could not show
irreparable
harm. And
enjoining the
conference or
the discussion
there of the
already
collected
survey results
would harm the
defendants
more than the
plaintiff.
The
two sides have
been given a
week to
submitted a
joint letter
on how to
proceed. The
case is EFCG,
Inc. v. AEC
Advisors, LLC
et al.,
19-cv-08076
(RA).
Also on
September 12,
eight stories
below before
SDNY Judge
Paul G. Gardephe,
Inner City
Press entered
and stayed and
covered the
sentencing of
a rogue
government
cooperator,
who after
signing his
agreement with
the US
Attorney's
office
smuggled drugs
into prison
and sold them.
The government
did not rip up
the deal....
This Inner
City Press
story is here.
The week prior
before Judge
Abrams: a 28
year old man
who uploaded
hundreds of
pieces of
pornography of
children as
young as four
was sentenced
on September
5th to "time
served" and
the mandatory
five years of
supervised
release, to be
spent in a
group home.
This was the
sentence urged
by Federal
Defenders, and
barely opposed
by the U.S.
Attorney's
Office, which
made part of
its sentencing
submission
behind a
redaction.
Federal
Defenders'
submission
does not
appear to be
in the public
docket, even
three hours
after the
sentencing.
In fairness,
the case of
Phillip
Richardson is
a difficult
one. Federal
Defender
Martin Cohen
called him
autistic and
said he would
fare poorly in
prison. He
appeared to
say - the
withholding or
non-filing of
the sentencing
submission
makes it hard
to ascertain -
that Banana
Kelly was
seeking
housing for
Mr. Richardson
and that now a
group called
Tri-County
will.
U.S. District
Court for the
Southern
District of
New York Judge
Ronnie Abram,
whom Inner
City Press has
covered being
a mentor to
defendants
between the
ages of 18 and
25, took the
sentencing
seriously. She
stressed that
Richardson
never actually
violated a
child; he only
trafficked in
these
images.
But who makes
these films?
Who creates
the market in
which children
are abused to
make these
films?
While
Richardson was
portrayed as
almost
catatonic and
therefore not
really a
danger, the
only
sentencing
submission on
the docket,
signed by
Assistant US
Attorney Aline
R. Flodr for
Geoffrey S.
Berman, says
that "the
defendant has
obtained a
passport and
visa to work
in China...
defendant had
indeed flown
to China
shortly after
being
confronted by
law
enforcement
and had
obtained a job
teaching
English to
young
children. (PSR
Para 12)."
How
incapacitated
is someone who
can get a visa
to and job in
China? The
government
partially
redacted
sentencing
submission
refers to the
defendant's -
Federal
Defenders' --
August 27,
2019
sentencing
memorandum and
accompanying
exhibits.
There is
nothing in the
docket on that
date. Who
decides to
withhold the
whole
thing? On
what basis?
Again
in fairness to
Judge Abrams,
it would be a
burden to
sentence
Richardson,
who apparently
tried to hang
himself in the
Federal
Defenders'
office, to
jail and have
bad things
happen. But
what about
what may
happen with
him out? Or
what may have
happened in
China? Inner
City Press,
the only media
in the court
room for this
sentencing,
intends to
have more on
this.
As if in
another world,
just 14
stories down:
in reporting
on the
sometimes
depressing
litany of
young adults
jailed in the
U.S. Federal
courts, with
sentences
repeated
extended by
violations of
Supervised
Release, one
hears from
time to time
of the U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York's
Young Adult
Opportunity
Program. Inner
City Press
heard it
mentioned on
September 3 by
SDNY
Magistrate
Judge Sarah
Netburn, that
there was an
open meeting
later in the
day.
Nowhere
on the SDNY
website was
the location
of the meeting
given, but a
defense
attorney
pointed Inner
City Press in
the right
direction, in
40 Foley
Square.
There, Judge
Netburn and
District Judge
Ronnie Abrams,
fresh off
presiding over
what some
called the
homeless
beat-down
trial of
Sargeant
Cordell Fitts,
took on roles
strikingly
different than
at sentencings
and changes of
plea. A
baker's dozen
of program
participants
sat in a
circle
testifying, in
the manner of
group therapy,
about how
their month of
August had
gone.
For most it
was good: a
man had
apologized to
a woman for
his behavior,
another was
making money
from his
livery cab
even while
going home to
take care of
his daughter.
A woman had
gotten engaged
and nearly all
were in
school. One
had been and
perhaps will
again be a
Columbia
University
teacher's
aide, working
now at a
non-profit.
The judges
gave each of
them
encouragement,
extracting
life lessons
such as to not
hang out with
the same old
crowd, to not
get flumoxed
by the ups and
downs of
income.
To the two
graduating on
September 3,
good luck was
wished. Cases
reactivate and
it is up to
each
defendant's
lawyer to make
a pitch to the
Assistant US
Attorneys on
how to
proceed.
Of
course there
were
challenges: a
school too far
away from
home, a month
so bad its
experiencer
asked to speak
to the judges
in private
afteward.
(Inner City
Press left,
and is also
not
identifying
participants
in this
story). But it
was a welcome
relief to the
drum beat of
sentencings
and violations
of supervised
release. There
should be more
or it.
While
many even most
cases in the
Magistrates
Court of the U.S.
District Court
for the
Southern
District of
New York are
sealed or have
case numbers
given only
later, on September
3
Magistrate
Judge Sarah
Netburn
herself
expressed
concern about
unanswered
questions
about a defendant
whose name
appeared to be
Mr Foreman, a
citizen of
Guyana and
also perhaps
of the United
States, either
living with
his mother or
not. He is
charged with
wire fraud and
aggrevated
identity
theft.
Given
all these
uncertainties,
Judge Netburn
said no
release until
conditions
met. She also
suggested that
his appointed
lawyer look
into the Young
Adult
Opportunity
Program she
runs along
with SDNY
District Judge
Ronnie Abrams.
Later on
September 3,
Inner City
Press did look
into the
program, see
above.
Back on
August 30
Magistrate
Judge Parker was
reading out
the bond
conditions for
a defendant
called Soto
when suddenly
the government
and Federal
Defender
Christopher
Flood asked
for a
whispered
sidebar.
There
was no court
reporter, and
Inner City
Press the only
media in the
Mag court
could not
hear. Suddenly
the bail deal
was off, and
the bond
proceeding
continued
until
September 5 in
front of Judge
Parker. Soto
is charged
with selling
guns, and said
he planned to
work for
Amazon while
he said being
already
employed as a
teachers aid.
Was this what
the whispering
was about?
Murky mag
court indeed.
Even in
the Mag court,
case law
requires that
there be one
the record
findings about
the need to
defeat the
presumption of
press and
public access
to all facets
of such
proceedings.
Inner City
Press will
have more on
this.
Earlier
in the week
affable Judge
Parker
instructed a
defendant
named Mr.
Patterson who
was being released
to stay away
from the Gun
Hill Road area
in The Bronx.
The
scope of that
neighborhood
was not
defined; his
assigned CJA
lawyer as
we've noted
before is at
the same time
representing
the government
in a criminal
contempt case.
Inner City
Press will
have more on
this.
Inner City Press
will continue to cover this
and other SDNY and 2nd Circuit
cases - watch this site, and there is
more on
Patreon, here.
***
Feedback: Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
Box
20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY
NY 10017
Other, earlier Inner
City Press are listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner
City Press, Inc. To request reprint or
other permission, e-contact Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com for
|