In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT,  Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon here Thread

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Dec 9 – Arizona based crypto-currency maven Reginald Fowler, with multiple accounts with the HSBC, appeared ready to plead guilty on January 15 to a single count, "operation of an unlicensed money transmittal business."

  After that fell through on financial issues, Fowler was hit with a five count Superseding Indictment, adding as a fifth count the catch-all, Wire Fraud. On March 5, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Andrew L. Carter emphasized this fifth count to Fowler, see below.

On November 13, Fowler's lawyers asked to make a secret filing to withdraw. Inner City Press believe these is a public right to all or part of these filings, as recently advocated for and obtained regarding the financial filings of David Correia to Judge Oetken.

 On November 23, Judge Carter set in motion of processing of partial unsealing between Fowler's exiting lawyers and the US Attorney's Office.

And now on December 9, the US Attorney's Office has not opposed withdrawal, but does oppose any adjournment of the April 2021 trial: "Re: United States v. Reginald Fowler, S3 19 Cr. 254 (ALC) Dear Judge Carter: The Government writes in response to the Motions to Withdraw as Counsel (the “Motions to Withdraw,” Dkt. Nos. 69, 72, and 76) filed by the two firms currently representing defendant Reginald Fowler. Based on the facts set forth in the Motions, the Government agrees that defense counsel has a conflict that permits them to withdraw from the current representation.1 However, the Government opposes any adjournment of the current trial date resulting from the evident false representations by Fowler to his counsel necessitating the need for substitution of counsel. The defendant’s failure to pay his legal fees after making a series of increasingly incredible assertions regarding the availability and source of his funds is a problem of this defendant’s own creation. Indeed, Fowler has been on notice since at least in or about February 2020 that his counsel was contemplating withdrawing from this representation based on his nonpayment of legal fees. Rather than address that problem candidly, Fowler engaged in the conduct described in counsel’s prior filings. As the Court is well aware, in January 2020 this matter was set for a jury trial beginning April 28, 2020. Following the defendant’s arraignment on a superseding indictment in March 2020, the trial was adjourned to January 11, 2021. In October 2020, the defense, without noting for the Court the then already well-developed fee dispute, moved to adjourn the trial date over the Government’s objection, and an adjournment was granted to April 12, 2021." Watch this site.

We'll have more on this - for now, here's the November 13 thread:

AUSA Greenwood says Fowler's lawyers should have to say more about why they want to withdraw. But US has said it is ok to make the filing secretly.  [Inner City Press disagrees]

 AUSA Greenwood: Let them file ex parte, then given the government access to all that is non privileged.  [Inner City Press: and what about the public?]

 AUSA Greenwood: These lawyers could then be employed as CJA [Criminal Justice Act]  Judge Carter: I give permission for ex parte filing on this conflict. I understand there is a public right, but in the first instance it's outweighed here. [But not filed yet]

 Judge Carter: Once I receive the documents I'll make a determination. [transitions to new Rule 5(g), but doesn't read script since these lawyers may withdraw] AUSA Greenwood: A potential withdrawal would impact trial date. Adjourned.

  Judge Carter proposed October 28 and Fowler's lawyers agreed. But the Assistant US Attorney said the lead counsel on the case has a trial near that time before Judge Denise Cote. She proposed August. Judge Carter said it is hard to get jurors in August "for a trial not as straight forward as a CBS Fall drama." Inner City Press was there; live tweeted thread here.

  Finally the parties agreed to start the trial on Monday January 11, 2021. Afterward Inner City Press waited by the elevators and, to see if Fowler was able to talk about Bitfinex, asking for his views of the XFL. He smiled, but on the advice of counsel... In the proceeding reference was made to defrauding the now defunct American Alliance of Football. Inner City Press asked, Will the XFL fare better? No.

 On October 15, Judge Carter held another proceeding and Inner City Press live tweeted it here and below.

 Now on October 23, Fowler's lawyers have put in more about how they want money unfrozen to fund his defense (that is, themselves). They write: "We are counsel to Mr. Reginald Fowler in the above-referenced action, and we submit this letter jointly with the government to request a bail hearing during the week of October 26, 2020. At the October 15, 2020 status conference, we advised the Court that we had informed the government of our intention to request a modification of the defendant’s current bail conditions to allow him to fund his defense. The Court instructed the parties to file a joint status report on the bail application today. Unfortunately, the parties have been unable to reach an agreement. By way of summary, the defense seeks an adjustment of the May 8, 2019 letter (the “Letter”)(attached), endorsed by the Court, which served as the basis of Mr. Fowler’s release on bond with conditions. Among other elements, the Letter includes, as the fifth bail condition, that “[n]o new lines of credit without [Pretrial Services] approval” shall be issued to the defendant. The Letter also references the five properties that the government required the defendant to post as security for the $5 million personal recognizance bond. The defense requests modification of both of these items." Full letter on Patreon here.

From Oct 15: Fowler's lawyer wants a delay of January 2021 trial date. Cites Portugal, saying the COVID situation there is "worse that in the US."

Judge Carter: I think it makes sense to postpone the trial. We need one of the bigger rooms, my courtroom is not one. Let's make the January 11 trial date now just another telephone conference. "At once point there was almost a resolution..."

Judge Carter: It seemed that forfeiture was the sticking point at the time. Has there been any progress? The Court could deal with forfeiture without a jury trial. Any discussions?

Fowler's counsel: They superseded the indictment. All discussions stopped.

AUSA Seb Swett: It's true, since we superseded, no talks.

Judge Carter: Mr Fowler could plead to the indictment, without a deal with the government, and we deal with forfeiture separately. Any thoughts?

Fowler's lawyer: There was always a looming wire fraud count
AUSA Swett: We would request a new trial date be set, maybe three months out from January 11.  Fowler's lawyer: We'd like the discovery for the wire fraud count. I don't see why since there's not threat of violence they are holding back all the 302s

Judge Carter: I'm not going to order US to provide that information, at least at this time. Let's pick an April trial date. Monday, April 12. We'll see what happens.

Fowler's lawyer: We'd like the security for his bond to be released. He's had $258 million frozen

Fowler's lawyer: We'd like a hearing on that next week.

Judge Carter: Let's set a date next week for a filing of a joint status report. Oct 23. And then a hearing if we need one. I exclude time to April 12, 2021. Adjourned.

 Watch this site. More on Patreon here.

 Previously, at what was billed as a change of plea proceeding, Fowler acknowledged the section of the law to which he was pleading guilty to violating: 18 US Code Section 1960. Yes, he said.

  Judge Carter said, We are here for a change of plea, and there was no objection. Judge Carter read from a plea agreement that Fowler had signed. All was going according to plan, until the issue of $371 million in forfeiture came up.

  Now on February 14, it would seem the plea is entirely and and pre-TRIAL schedule set: "Re: United States v. Reginald Fowler, S1 19 Cr. 254 (ALC) Dear Judge Carter: The parties respectfully write to request that the Court enter a schedule for pretrial motions in the above-captioned matter. The parties propose that pretrial motions be filed by February 28, 2020, with oppositions due on March 13, 2020, and any replies due on March 20, 2020." Inner City Press will continue on this case, and all things crypto in the SDNY.

    This is a case Inner City Press will continue to follow. It is US v. Fowler, 19-cr-00254 (Carter).