After Ernest Murphy Got
260 Months in SDNY Maurice Curtis Is Probed
For Fraud in EDNY
By Matthew
Russell Lee, @SDNYLIVE
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Dec 30 -- A jury returned
guilty verdicts on drugs and
gun charges on August 20, 2019
against Ernest Murphy, one of
15 defendants in a
Brooklyn-based narcotics
conspiracy case brought by the
U.S. Attorney for the Southern
District of New York. Now a
co-defendants sentencing is
asked to be delayed two months
due to Coronavirus and the
Bureau of Prisons' response,
see below.
It
came after some electronic and
laboratory evidence was
suppressed by Circuit Judge
Richard J. Sullivan, who
rather than re-assigning has
kept many of his criminal
cases in the SDNY.
On
November 16, something new: a
co-defendant who had
cooperator came in to plead
guilty to an after arising
charge for which the US
Attorney would not give a 5K
letter. Maurice Curtis was
charged withing falsely
telling an Eastern District of
New York judge that he had two
asthma attacks in April 2020
in the GEO cooperators'
lock-up in Queens.
Judge
Sullivan asked him if he had
lied. Yes, he said, but I did
have troubling breathing.
Judge
Sullivan asked, Didn't you do
exercise to feign an asthma
attack? Yes, was the answer.
Tough crowd. The sentencing
was adjourned.
Now on
December 31 the US Attorney's
Office has written to Judge
Sullivan, working even on New
Year's Eve, that "on December
16, 2020 this Office learned
that Maurice Curtis is the
subject of an online criminal
fraud investigation by the US
Attorney for the EDNY...
whether he engaged in a scheme
to fraudulently apply for
government financial
assistance." So now the SDNY,
cooperating or not with EDNY,
is proposing a protective
order. Inner City Press will
have more on this in 2021.
And that has in
fact now been previews, with a
request for Brady material
denied. Attorneys for Tyshawn
Burgess wrote to Judge
Sullivan seeking an order for
"video surveillance from GEO
of Mr. Curtis in April 2020,
pertaining to the charges and
of him attempting to induce
asthmatic symptoms, and
medical records. I
respectfully submit that, all
of this material, which
corroborates Mr. Curtis’
criminal dishonesty and casts
doubt on his credibility,
falls within Brady. As the
Court and government are
aware, several defendants will
be sentenced after the Court
conducts the Fatico hearing.
Maurice Curtis will be the
star witness at that hearing
and will provide testimony on
highly contested sentencing
issues that will not only
affect the defendants at that
hearing, but also those
sentenced after the hearing.
The Brady disclosure
obligation does not end
because the defendants have
pled guilty, as the Brady
disclosure rule applies to
impeachment material that
relates to evidence presented
at sentencing."
Judge Sullivan
denied it: "Defendant's
request is DENIED. As
indicated in its prior order
(Doc. No. 747), the Court is
confident that the government
is aware of its production
obligations and will comply
with them without a reminder
from the Court. SO ORDERED."
On
September 8 Judge Sullivan was
to sentence co-defendant
Devontae Newton, using the
CourtCall platform. Inner City
Press called in. But first
there was a lot of echoing on
the line. It was recommended
that Judge Sullivan mute
himself, and raise his hand to
be given the floor. He gamely
endeavored, but finally the
screen froze up and he said
the sentencing would be
postponed, probably to next
week. He apologized to Newton.
Strangely, Judge Swain's
simultaneous (re-) sentencing
on CourtCall worked fine.
Inner City Press later learned
there is a difference in
capabilities in the computers
of District Judges and Circuit
Judges.
On
September 25, the Newton
sentencing resumed and was
consummated. Newton spoke
movingly, and Judge Sullivan
agreed that he had been young
at the time of the crime.
Judge Sullivan recounted a
termination of supervised
release proceeding earlier in
the week, how well that
defendant had been doing.
Inner City Press covered that
as well, but has yet to report
on it because at the end,
Judge Sullivan said the
transcript would be sealed
because of discussion of
cooperation and where the
cooperator now works.
In this
case, Judge Sullivan said he
hoped Newton would in the
future similarly return for a
termination of (five years) of
supervised release. Judge
Sullivan said in Fort Dix, he
can take college classes even
in Princeton, "which I
couldn't get into," he said.
He
sentenced Newton to 72 months
- above the 60 month mandatory
minimum, but below the 87
month guideline. Judge
Sullivan pointed out he could
have faced 15 years if the US
Attorney's Office had not
dropped the gun charge. He
wished Newton well.
Earlier in
September 2020, this was sent
to Judge Sullivan: "Re: USA v.
Burgess et al., (Tyshawn
Burgess) 18 Cr. 373(RJS) Dear
Judge Sullivan: I am appointed
counsel for Tyshawn Burgess,
and Sam Coe is appointed
co-counsel, pursuant to the
Criminal Justice Act (CJA).
Currently, Mr. Burgess is
scheduled for a Fatico hearing
on October 15, 2020. As the
Court is aware, this is a
complex matter with voluminous
discovery relevant to the
upcoming hearing. My
understanding is that Mr.
Burgess is only permitted to
view discovery for one hour at
a time at the Westchester
County Jail, which makes his
participation in his own
defense difficult as the
hearing approaches. We are
requesting that the Court
direct the Westchester County
Department of Correction to
allow Mr. Burgess to review
the discovery in his case for
at least two-hour blocks of
time, to the extent
practicable, between now and
the date of the hearing. Mr.
Coe has contacted two of the
assistant wardens of the jail
regarding this issue, as
directed by a jail supervisor,
and has not yet received a
response."
On
September 8, Judge Sullivan
denied the request without
prejudicing, urging that if it
is renewed more detail be
provided: "MEMO ENDORSED
denying [715] LETTER MOTION
Additional Time in the Library
at the Jail as to Tyshawn
Burgess (1) ENDORSEMENT: IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT
Defendant's motion is denied
without prejudice to renewal.
Should Defendant seek to renew
his motion, IT IS FURTHERED
ORDERED THAT he provide the
Court with specifics about
when and to whom his requests
were made at the Westchester
County Jail, and what
response, if any, he has
received as of the date of his
renewed motion. SO ORDERED.
(Signed by Judge Richard J.
Sullivan on 9/6/2020)." Watch
this site.
On March 3
Burgess came up for sentencing
and Inner City Press which
alone covered the trial went
to cover it. But the
sentencing was postponed for
this Fatico hearing. Before he
adjourned it, Judge Sullivan
told Burgess in his orange
WCDOC shirt that others in the
case, he says given serious
time: Bayer 108 months, Felix
160 months, Robinson 126
months, Murphy himself 260
months (see below), Wilson 180
months.
But now
there will be a Fatico
hearing, and Inner City Press
hopes to be there. Judge
Sullivan is right that
transparency is important, and
it is appreciated. Here's the
Minute Entry: "proceedings
held before Judge Richard J.
Sullivan: Status
conference/Sentencing held on
3/3/2020. Defendant, in
custody, present with
attorneys Lorraine Gauli-Rufo
and Samuel Coe. AUSA Karin
Portlock present with Brittany
Raffa (ATF) and James Miles
(NYPD Det.) Court reporter
present. The Court adjourned
the sentencing and ordered the
parties to appear for a Fatico
hearing. The Court ordered the
government to submit a letter
no later than Wednesday, March
10, 2020, advising the Court
of counsel's availability for
such hearing, the government's
expected witnesses and
exhibits, and whether any of
Defendant's co-defendants
require the Court to resolve
similar disputes. The Court
will set a date for the Fatico
hearing by separate order. "
Watch this site.
Back on
February 13, 2020, Judge
Sullivan sentenced Ernest
Murphy. In the gallery of his
mobile courtroom now 11B were
six Murphy supporters, and
independent Inner City Press.
Judge Sullivan was rigorous,
demanding that Assistant US
Attorney Matthew Hellman
justify his count of weight of
heroin and of crack.
In a two
hour proceeding, Sullivan
sentenced Ernest Murphy to 260
in prison: 200 months on Count
1 (lower than the government
requested), and 60 more months
to run consecutive on Count 2.
Judge Sullivan urged Murphy to
get R-DAP drug rehab and job
training and warned his "iPad
and laptop" may be searched --
all this in more than 20 years
when he gets out. What will be
the technology then? Inner
City Press will stay on this.
Murphy's
two Criminal Justice Act
lawyers, Patrick Joyce and
Robert Moore, present again on
February 13, had complained to
Judge Sullivan on the eve of
trial that they had only then
been given 16 gigabytes of
audio and video recordings and
lab tests on crack cocaine.
Rather
than delay the trial, Judge
Sullivan ordered much of it
suppressed. During the five
day trial the government still
had a number of NYPD lab
technicians testimony, and
played wiretaps of cell phone
calls and calls from Riker's
Island, whose location in The
Bronx was cited as a basis for
venue in the SDNY.
In the
intercepted calls, there was
discussion of cooking,
packaging and selling crack
cocaine. Several times
reference was made to bringing
firearms to protect turf. A
government slang expert
witness said that "Shaquille"
jersey meant .32 caliber
pistol.
After the
jury got the case, they asked
to examine the drugs. Judge
Sullivan declined to send the
crack and ecstacy pills into
the jury room. Instead the
juror came out and passed them
hand to hand, in evidence
bags, in the jury box.
On the
second day of deliberations
the jury through the Court
Security Officer passed a note
that they wanted all audio
recordings and transcripts.
Judge Sullivan sent them in a
thumb drive and three binders,
as well as a menu to order
lunch.
But barely
an hour later, the jury
returned with its guilty
verdicts. The case is US
v. Ernest Murphy,
18-cr-373 (Sullivan).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold
Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|