Ghislaine Maxwell Wants Release to
General Population in MDC But US Opposes
By Matthew
Russell Lee Patreon Periscope Song
BBC
- Decrypt
- LightRead - Honduras
-
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Aug 13 – Ghislaine Maxwell
used the United Nations, as
reported by Inner City Press
whose questions about it UN
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres refuses.
First
Inner City Press showed that
on the board of Maxwell's
Terramar Project Inc. was
Guterres chief Partnerships
official, Amir Dossal, below.
Now while
UNEP official Lisa Svensson
appears in the documents
unsealed July 30 in the U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York
which Inner City Press covers
since ousted
from the UN by Guterres for is
reporting, Inner City Press is
continuing its exclusive 2018
reporting in Svensson's "Volvo
Boating" and other scams at
UNEP, here,
where we published
in full, on Scribd and Patreon, the agreement
with Volvo Ocean
Races signed by
Erik Solheim, here,
and the EUR
500,000
agreement signed
by UNEP's Lisa
Emilia Svensson, here and here.
[Aug 1, 2020
song here.]
On
August 10 in Maxwell's
criminal case,
her
lawyers asked
SDNY Judge
Alison Nathan, full
letter on
Patreon here:
"we request
that the Court
enter an order
directing the
government to
disclose to
defense
counsel the
identities of
the three
alleged
victims
referenced in
the indictment
(“Victims
1-3”), subject
to the
restrictions
of the
protective
order entered
by the Court,
so that Ms.
Maxwell and
defense
counsel can
meaningfully
investigate
the alleged
conduct, which
is now over 25
years old.
Second, we
request that
the Court
enter an order
directing the
Bureau of
Prisons
(“BOP”) to
release Ms.
Maxwell into
the general
population and
provide Ms.
Maxwell with
increased
access to the
discovery
materials
while she is
detained so
that she can
meaningfully
participate in
the
preparation of
her defense."
Now
on August 13
the US
Attorney's
Office has
said it's too
early
to name
victims or
witnesses, and
opposes
release to
general
population:
"The
defendant’s
requests with
respect to the
conditions of
her
confinement at
the
Metropolitan
Detention
Center (“MDC”)
are similarly
premature and
unavailing,
and her
request that
the Court
dictate the
terms of her
confinement to
the Bureau of
Prisons
(“BOP”) should
also be
denied.4 As an
initial
matter, the
defendant’s
argument that
she is being
treated
“worse” than
other inmates
is incorrect.
There is no
merit to her
complaints
about being
monitored by
staff, as it
is entirely
appropriate
for BOP to
carefully
monitor any
inmate,
particularly a
new inmate who
has never
before been
incarcerated
and who faces
the strong
likelihood of
serving many
years in
prison.
Additionally,
like all
inmates, the
defendant may
be subject to
observation or
searches of
her person or
space as
appropriate.5
It is
otherwise
entirely
unclear what
specific
“privileges
given to other
pretrial
detainees” the
defendant
believes she
is being
denied. More
generally, the
defendant,
like all
pretrial
inmates, is
subject to an
individualized
assessment by
the BOP with
respect to his
or her
placement in a
facility.
Here, for
reasons
including
safety,
security, and
the orderly
functioning of
the facility,
BOP has made
the
determination
that, at
present, the
defendant
should not be
fully
integrated
into the
dorm-style
accommodations
of the general
population.
The Government
understands
from BOP that
it will
4 Once
again, defense
counsel has
rushed to seek
Court
intervention
on issues they
have made
little or no
meaningful
effort to
address with
the Government
or, in this
case, the BOP.
The Government
learned of the
defendant’s
specific
objections to
her conditions
of
incarceration
for the first
time from the
Defense
Letter, and
has since
conferred with
BOP to
understand and
to address the
issues as
appropriate.
Moreover, as
noted below,
the defendant
filed the
instant
challenge to
the BOP’s plan
to permit her
time to review
discovery
before the BOP
had a chance
to implement
(and
ultimately
modify) that
plan. 5
Defense
counsel claims
that prison
staff
“constantly
observe” the
defendant
“including her
phone
conversations
with defense
counsel.” This
is misleading.
As with all
inmates, the
defendant is
able to speak
to her counsel
behind a
closed door,
in an area
that is
visible—but
not audible—to
MDC staff.
Among other
reasons, this
is so MDC
staff can
ensure that
inmates do not
complete calls
with their
counsel and
then call
other
individuals on
a non-recorded
line."
Watch this
site.
From
the March 1,
2018 UN
transcript, four
months before
Guterres has
Inner City Press
physically ousted
from the UN:
Inner City
Press: I also
wanted to ask
you about UNEP
(United Nations
Environment
Programme).
Whistleblowers
there have
alleged a number
of
irregularities,
but the one that
caught my eye
and I've
published has to
do with the
allegation is
that UNEP, which
claims under Mr.
[Erik] Solheim
to have a number
of corporate
partnerships is,
in fact, in some
cases paying the
corporation for
the
partnership.
I.e., it's not a
partnership
like, you know,
Barcelona
Football Club
with UNICEF,
where they
pay. In
this case,
they're alleged
that, under Mr.
Solheim, the UN
Environment, as
it's now called,
is paying
$500,000 to
Volvo Ocean
Races. And
I wanted to know
is it… one, I
don't know if
it's true, but
they work there
and they have a
lot of names and
a lot of
information.
Spokesman:
I think you can
ask those
questions
directly of
UNEP. I
have no doubt
that Mr. Solheim
is operating and
running the
agency in
accordance to
all relevant
rules and
regulations."
Right.
Here's
from the letter:
"Dear Mr.
Solheim...
a D1, Lisa
Svensson can
work from
Europe, because
for personal
reasons she does
not wish to work
in
Nairobi.
Her big office
in Nairobi
remains vacant
with her name
and
organisational
equipment while
the same has to
be provided
again by another
office in
Europe.
She leads the
marine team
remotely as the
rest of the
staff under her
responsibility
are in Nairobi.
As
Inner City Press first
reported, long time UN
operative Amir Dossal, UNSG
Antonio Guterres' chief
Partnerships official who was
also his link to UN bribers
like Ng Lap Seng and Patrick
Ho of CEFC China Energy, was
on the board of directors of
Maxwell's shadowy Terramar.
Inner City Press first made
this link & published the
990. And here
is Dossal introducing Maxwell
as one of her nine visits to
the UN, here.
After the death of Jeffrey
Epstein in the MCC prison, on
July 2 Acting US Attorney for
the SDNY Audrey Strauss
announced and unsealed in
indictment of Maxwell on
charges including sex
trafficking and perjury.
Inner City Press went to her
press conference at the US
Attorney's Office and asked,
Doesn't charging Maxwell with
perjury undercut any ability
to use testimony from her
against other, bigger
wrong-doers? Periscope here
at 23:07.
Strauss
replied that it is not
impossible to use a perjurer's
testimony. But how often does
it work?
At 3:30 pm
on July 2 Maxwell appeared in
the U.S. District Court for
the District of New Hampsire,
before Magistriate Judge Andrea
K. Johnstone.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted it
here.
(Also
live tweeted
bail denial of
July 14, here.)
In
the July 3 media coverage of
Maxwell, media all of the
world used a video and stills
from it of Maxwell speaking in
front of a blue curtain, like
here.
What they
did not mention is something
Inner City Press has been
asking the UN about, as under
UNSG Antonio Guterres with his
own sexual exploitation issues
(exclusive video
and audio)
it got roughed up and banned
from the UN: Ghislaine Maxwell
had a ghoulish United Nations
press conference, under the
banner of the "Terramar
Project," here.
On July 5,
after some crowd-sourcing,
Inner City Press reported on
another Ghislaine Maxwell use
of the United Nations,
facilitated by Italy's
Permanent Representative to
the UN, UN official Nikhil
Seth and Amir Dossal,
who also let into the UN and
in one case took money from
convicted UN briber Ng Lap
Seng, and Patrick Ho of CEFC
China Energy, also linked to
UN Secretary General Antonio
Guterres.
At the
Ghislaine Maxwell UN event,
the UN Deputy Secretary
General was directly involved.
List of (some of)
the participants on Patreon here.
Inner City
Press has published a phone of
Maxwell in the UN with Dossal,
here. But the connection runs
deeper: Dossal with "25 years
of UN involvement" was on
Terrarmar's board of
directors, one of only five
directors, only three not
related to Maxwell by blood
and name.
The directors:
Ghislaine Maxwell, Christine
Malina-Maxwell, Steven Haft,
Christine Dennison and... Amir
Dossal. Inner City Press is
publishing this full 990 on
Patreon here.
Dossal has
operated through the UN Office
of Partnership, with Antonio
Guterres and his deputy Amina
J. Mohammed, here.
And the links to
the world of UN bribery,
including Antonio Guterres
through the Gulbenkian
Foundation, runs deeper. More
to follow.
Antonio Guterres
claims he has zero tolerance
for sexual exploitation, but
covers it up and even
participate in it. He should
be forced to resign - and/or
have immunity waived.
Terramar
has been dissolved, even
though Maxwell's former
fundraiser / director of
development Brian Yurasits
still lists the URL on his
(protected) Twitter profile,
also here.
But now
Inner City Press has begun to
inquire into Ghislaine
Maxwell's other United Nations
connections, starting with
this photograph of another
day's (or at least another
outfit's) presentation in the
UN, here.
While co-conspirator Antonio
Guterres has had Inner City
Press banned from any entry
into the UN for two years and
a day, this appears to be in
the UN Economic and Social
Council (ECOSOC) chamber.
We'll have more on this, and
on Epstein and the UN. Watch
this site.
The case
is US v. Maxwell, 20-cr-330
(Nathan).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|