| Pest Control
Dispute Has Starbucks Demand For Sanctions
Denied In SDNY
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon
BBC
- Guardian
UK - Honduras
- ESPN
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Nov 10 – Workers sued
Starbucks and asked for a
motion to compel provision of
information. Starbucks
responded by asking for
sanctions.
On
November 10 U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn
held a proceeding. Inner City
Press covered
it.
Plaintiff Rafael
Fox used to manage 11 stores
for Starbucks, including at
405 Broadway.
Paul
D'Auria was a pest control
technician. Fox says he was
fired for reporting "a
sighting of a product called
'Hot Shot No-Pest
2."
Judge
Netburn denied both the motion
to compel, and also Starbuck's
motion for sanctions.
The case
continues. It is Fox et al v.
Starbucks Corporation,
19-cv-4650 (Nathan / Netburn)
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
|
,
