In Telemarketing Case of
Jen Shah of RHOSLC Chad Allen
Pleads Guilty to Elder Targeting
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Patreon Order
BBC
The
Times (UK)
Honduras
- The
Source
SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Feb 3 – Five defendants
in a telemarketing scheme were
presented past 8 pm on
November 20, 2019 in the
Magistrates Court of the U.S.
District Court for the
Southern District of New York.
The government
proposed that while they could
be released on their own
signatures that night, but
asked that they get
pre-approval from Pre-Trial
Services for any expenditure
above $10,000.
On April 2,
2021 Jen Shah of Real
Housewifes Of Salt Lake City
was arraigned in the same case
- and a $1 million bond, with
$250,000 of it secured by case
or property, required. Inner
City Press live tweeted that,
below.
On February 3,
2022, Chad Allen came before
Judge Sidney H. Stein to plead
guilty. Inner City Press
covered it. Judge Stein called
the allocution essentially
legalistic and asked Allen if
he had targeted the elderly.
He said he knew that elderly
people were another the
targets.
On
December 1, 2021 Shah's lawyer
filed a letter, which Inner
City Press is publishing in
full on Patreon here,
demanding sanctions: "As the
Court is aware, we represent
Jennifer Shah in the
above-referenced matter. We
respectfully submit this
letter concerning the
Government’s flagrant
violation of Local Criminal
Rule 23.1 by members of the
prosecutorial team. In a
documentary which was released
yesterday by ABC News and is
available for streaming
worldwide, two supervisory
agents with Homeland Security
Investigations gave interviews
about Ms. Shah and opined on
her involvement with the
alleged scheme, her “lavish
lifestyle,” and her alleged
treatment of purported
victims. These violations of
Rule 23.1, as described
herein, are reprehensible and
severely jeopardize Ms. Shah’s
right to a fair trial." Full
letter on Patreon here.
On December
3 the US replied, claiming
that when it handed out
exhibits in US v. Owimrin, "in
accord with the Office's
standard practices in
responding to such requests
from the press or public, the
Office provided those
materials."
But that's not
true. When Inner City Press
asked for the exhibits in the
UN corruption case of US v. Ng
Lap Seng, it was denied and
had to FOIA. So too on Patrick
Ho. Watch this site.
Back on
November 19, Shah's
co-defendant Stuart Smith came
to plead guilty. Inner City
Press live tweeted it here:
now Jennifer
Shah's co-defendant Stuart
Smith is appearing at noon
before SDNY Judge Sidney
Stein - in order to plead
guilty.
Stuart Smith: I
am 43 and got a bachelors
degree in Sociology. Judge
Stein: Mental illness? Smith:
No. Judge Stein: Any pills?
Smith: Pills to sleep at
night.
Judge Stein: You
are charged in count 1 with
wire fraud in tele-marketing.
In count 2, money laundering.
In count 3, obstructing an
official proceeding.
Assistant
UN Attorney Fletcher: 1
correction - in count one he
is charged with conspiracy to
commit wire fraud
AUSA
Fletcher: Someone thinks I'm
not a participant and keeps
muting me. [Note: This change
of plea is being done with a
public call-in line, unlike
the upcoming US v.
#GhislaineMaxwell, for which
Inner City Press has requested
a line
Judge
Stein: Tell me what you did.
Defense lawyer: He'll read it,
he wrote it yesterday. Judge
Stein: Read slowly, though.
Stuart Smith: I knowingly
planned with others to obtain
money by offering many elderly
individuals to entities I was
involved in.
Stuart
Smith: I was involved in
fulfillment companies in Utah.
Also, Wyoming, which helps
hide the ownership of
corporations. I was aware it
was misleading. We sold
marketing that was of no
value.
AUSA:
Please confirm there were at
least 10 victims over the age
of 55.
Stuart Smith:
Yes. AUSA: The interstate
wires, we proffer that Mastery
Pro Group has offices in the
SDNY and contacted victims
outside of the District.
AUSA: And the
official proceeding he
obstructed was an FTC
investigation conducted in the
SDNY. We would prove this with
testimony of victims.
Accepted.
Back on August 5,
Shah and a co-defendant had a
slew of motions denied. Order.
SDNY Judge Sidney
Stein tried to do the
arraignment on March 31, but
the technology broke down. Now
there's an echo but it's going
forward. Judge Stein: Ms.
Shah, have you read the
indictment? Shah: Yes, I have.
And I waive the public
reading.
Judge Stein: How
do you plead to charges of
conspiracy to commit wire
fraud, and money laundering?
Shah: Not guilty. Judge Stein:
Let me turn to Mr. Smith.
Judge
Stein: Mr. Smith, how do you
plead? Smith: Not guilty.
Judge Stein: Let's talk about
bail conditions. Ms. Shah you
were released by a Magistrate
in Utah.
Assistant US
Attorney: We have a proposal
on conditions. There are some
on which there is a dispute.
AUSA: In Utah,
Ms. Shah posted no cash. We
propose a $1 million bond,
secured by $250,000 in cash or
property. On no contact with
witnesses and victims, we want
to specify that means those
who purchased services, or
sold them on sales floors. She
can travel to DC
Judge Stein: You
proposed no disbursements over
$10,000 without permission.
I'm going to lower it to
$5000. Defense: She is
on Real Housewives of Salt
Lake City but she doesn't take
any credit cards for that.
Judge: Does the
government have possession of
Ms. Shah's passport? AUSA: It
was expired, and we took it.
If she has another, she should
surrender it. Judge: What is
the risk of flight? Ms. Shah,
I've come to learn, is a
participant in a popular
television show.
Judge: She
is active on social media. It
is unlikely she could
disappear.
AUSA: We will
make a proffer.
[Meanwhile, it dawns on Inner
City Press these two are part
of the largest US v. Cheedie
case Inner City Press has
covered, here
AUSA: The
penalties for $5 million money
laundering, it is not clear
she would remain a public
persona. In any event the
persona is insufficient to
ensure her return to court.
So, a modest security. Judge:
Is $250,000 modest? AUSA: She
has access to it.
Judge
Stein: Let me here from the
defense. Defense: We do not
believe she has any active
passport. She had hired us to
defend her - she wants to
fight this. Cash bond in not
favored anyway around the
country.
Judge
Stein: Does she receive a
salary from any of her
businesses, including the Real
Housewives franchise? Defense:
I don't know, I haven't spoken
with my client about that.
2d Defense
lawyer: She is an
entrepreneur. She makes some
money from the show, yes.
Judge
Stein: There is a risk of
flight. It's not
insubstantial. I'm to have her
continued released, on
condition of a bond of $1
million, with $250,000 secured
by cash or property and 2
co-signers.
Judge Stein: She
is to continue with her
treatment. She can accept
credit card charges for other
businesses. No telemarketing.
Defense: Could we
have 2 weeks for $250,000,
since we're in Utah?
AUSA: Bonds can
be handled remotely. 1 week.
Judge Stein: I'll
do 2 weeks.
The case is US
v. Cheedie, et al,
19-cr-833 (Stein) - Dkt 409.
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|